


Ask the community...
This thread is making me nervous about my own filings! I had no idea the debtor name had to be so exact. I've been using the business names from loan applications without verifying against state records. Time to go back and double-check everything...
For your general security agreement template, I'd recommend including cross-default provisions if this borrower has other debt. Also make sure you have adequate insurance requirements and the right to inspect the collateral. The LLC name change issue is exactly why I always require borrowers to update me immediately on any corporate changes - saves headaches later when you need to file continuations or amendments.
Whatever you do, don't miss that continuation deadline. Better to file a continuation that might not be perfect than to let your lien lapse entirely. You can always file an amendment later to correct any issues.
That's my biggest fear right now. The deadline is coming up fast and I'm still trying to sort out which filing to continue.
If you're really pressed for time, consider using an automated verification tool. I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC document checker - you upload your original UCC-1 and continuation form and it instantly shows if the debtor names match properly. Takes the guesswork out of it.
Update us on what you find when you pull those filing copies! This kind of name variation issue is so common, would be helpful to know how it resolves.
This is exactly why I keep a master spreadsheet with debtor names, file numbers, lapse dates, and collateral descriptions for every UCC filing. Takes 5 minutes to update after each filing but saves hours of detective work later.
Just wanted to follow up and say I've been in similar situations before. The key is catching it early like you did. Once you file the corrected continuation, make sure to update your loan servicing system with the right file number so this doesn't happen again at the next renewal.
Already updated our loan system and created a checklist for future UCC work. Thanks everyone for the help - crisis averted!
Glad it worked out! The Certana.ai verification tool is great for these double-checks if you want an extra safety net for future filings.
Does anyone know if there's a grace period for correcting rejected UCC-1 filings? Like can you refile within a certain timeframe and maintain the original priority date?
I'm new to handling UCC filings for our financial services company. This thread is making me nervous about all the ways things can go wrong! Any other common rejection reasons I should watch out for?
Pedro Sawyer
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai's document verification tool for exactly these kinds of disputes. You can upload your loan docs and UCC-1 filing and it will instantly cross-check all the dates, debtor names, and collateral descriptions to verify everything matches perfectly. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a clean report you can send to opposing counsel to shut down these kinds of challenges.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•That sounds perfect for this situation. Having an independent verification report would definitely help push back against their claims. I'll check it out.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
•I was skeptical about automated tools for UCC verification but Certana.ai actually caught a debtor name mismatch in one of my filings that I totally missed. Saved me from a potential perfection issue down the road. The document cross-checking feature is surprisingly thorough.
0 coins
Beatrice Marshall
This whole situation is ridiculous. SOS processing delays are completely normal and don't affect your priority date. I've had UCC-1s take up to a week to process during busy periods. Your security interest was perfected when you filed on March 13th, period. The debtor's attorney is either incompetent or being deliberately misleading. Either way, don't let them push you around.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
•Exactly. And even if there WAS a brief gap (which there wasn't), they'd need to prove actual harm - like another creditor filing during that window. Since no one else filed, there's no damages even under their bogus theory.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•You're all giving me the confidence I need to push back hard on this. I was second-guessing myself but it's clear their argument has no merit. Time to call their bluff.
0 coins