< Back to UCC Document Community

Zara Malik

Which Article of the UCC Covers Secured Transactions - Need This for Filing Requirements

I'm preparing documentation for a commercial loan package and my attorney mentioned I need to understand which article of the UCC governs secured transactions before we file our UCC-1. The borrower has equipment collateral worth about $850K and we're dealing with multiple state filings. I know there are different articles for different types of commercial law but I'm getting confused about which specific article covers our secured transaction work. Is it Article 7? Article 9? I need to make sure I'm referencing the right legal framework when I prepare our continuation filings next year. The loan officer said understanding the governing article is crucial for proper collateral descriptions and debtor name requirements. Can someone clarify which article of the UCC covers secured transactions so I don't mess up these filings?

Luca Greco

•

Article 9 of the UCC is what covers secured transactions. That's the section that governs UCC-1 filings, continuations, amendments, and terminations. Article 7 deals with warehouse receipts and bills of lading, completely different area. For your equipment collateral situation, everything you're doing falls under Article 9 provisions.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Thanks for the clarification! So when I'm doing my UCC-1 filing for equipment, all the debtor name requirements and collateral description rules come from Article 9?

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

Exactly right. Article 9 sets the standards for how you describe collateral, what constitutes a proper debtor name, continuation timing requirements, all of it. The individual states may have some variations in their filing procedures but the underlying law is Article 9.

0 coins

Article 9 for sure, but don't forget that each state has adopted their own version of Article 9 with some modifications. The core principles are the same but filing requirements can vary by state. Since you mentioned multiple state filings, make sure you check each state's specific Article 9 implementation.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

Good point about state variations. We're filing in Texas, Colorado, and Nevada so I'll need to check if there are any state-specific Article 9 differences that affect our UCC-1 filings.

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

•

Nevada has some quirky debtor name requirements under their Article 9 adoption. Texas is pretty straightforward. Haven't dealt with Colorado recently but they used to be strict about collateral descriptions.

0 coins

I ran into a similar situation last year with multi-state equipment financing. Article 9 governs everything but I kept making mistakes with debtor name consistency across different state filings. Finally started using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you just upload your charter docs and UCC-1 and it instantly flags any name mismatches before you file. Saved me from several rejected filings.

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

That sounds useful. Did it help with the collateral description consistency too or just debtor names?

0 coins

It checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, document consistency. Really helpful for multi-state situations where you need all your UCC documents to align perfectly.

0 coins

Yuki Yamamoto

•

How accurate is it compared to manual checking? I've been burned by automated tools before that missed important details.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Just to add some context - Article 9 was completely revised in 2001 and most states adopted the revised version. But some older references might still point to pre-2001 Article 9 provisions, so make sure you're looking at current Article 9 when you research filing requirements.

0 coins

Good reminder about the 2001 revision. The debtor name rules especially changed significantly with revised Article 9.

0 coins

Zoe Dimitriou

•

Yeah the old Article 9 was much more flexible about names. Now it's very strict about matching registered organization names exactly.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Article 9 covers secured transactions but remember it only applies to personal property. If you have any fixtures or real estate related collateral, you might need to look at real estate filing requirements too, not just UCC filings.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

All our collateral is equipment so we should be fine with just Article 9 UCC filings. No real estate or fixtures involved.

0 coins

Equipment is definitely Article 9 territory. Just make sure your collateral description is specific enough to identify the equipment but not so specific that it becomes outdated if equipment gets replaced.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

I always get confused between the different UCC articles. Article 2 is sales, Article 3 is negotiable instruments, Article 9 is secured transactions. Is there a good resource that breaks down all the articles?

0 coins

Liam McGuire

•

The American Law Institute website has good summaries of each UCC article. Most law libraries also have UCC practice guides that explain the different articles.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

Don't forget Article 4A for wire transfers and Article 5 for letters of credit. But yeah, for secured transactions it's definitely Article 9.

0 coins

One thing that trips people up - Article 9 covers the creation and perfection of security interests, but collection and enforcement might involve other laws too. For your UCC-1 filing purposes though, Article 9 is what you need to understand.

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

That's a good distinction. The filing and continuation requirements are pure Article 9, but if you ever need to foreclose or collect, other state laws come into play.

0 coins

Right, and bankruptcy law can override some Article 9 provisions too, but that's getting pretty deep into the weeds for basic UCC filing questions.

0 coins

Just had a thought - with your $850K equipment collateral, make sure you understand the Article 9 rules about purchase money security interests if any of that equipment was recently acquired. PMSI status can affect your filing strategy.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

The equipment has been in operation for about 3 years so no PMSI issues. But good point about checking those rules for future acquisitions.

0 coins

PMSI rules under Article 9 can be tricky, especially the timing requirements for filing to maintain super-priority status.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

For anyone else reading this thread - Article 9 also covers agricultural liens, deposit accounts, and some other specialized collateral types. It's broader than just equipment and inventory, though those are the most common.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Don't forget about chattel paper and instruments. Article 9 covers those too, though the perfection rules can be different.

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

And electronic chattel paper has its own special rules under Article 9. The law has really evolved to keep up with technology.

0 coins

Since you're dealing with multi-state filings, also remember that Article 9 has specific rules about which state's law governs and where to file. Usually it's where the debtor is located, but there are exceptions for certain types of collateral.

0 coins

Zainab Yusuf

•

The choice of law rules in Article 9 can get complex, especially for registered organizations with operations in multiple states.

0 coins

I had a case where we filed in the wrong state initially because we didn't properly analyze the debtor's location under Article 9. Had to refile everything and pay additional fees.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

That's exactly why I started double-checking everything with verification tools. One small mistake in interpreting Article 9 location rules and you can void your entire security interest.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today