Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just went through this same nightmare in PA actually. The comma thing is universal - every state I've dealt with requires exact matches. Pro tip: always do a UCC search first to see exactly how the name was indexed, then copy it character for character.
Evelyn Xu
•Yeah I'm definitely learning that lesson now. Going to be way more careful about name formatting going forward.
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar issue in NY and curious if the approach works.
Evelyn Xu
•Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow using the exact name from the original (no comma). Fingers crossed it goes through this time.
It should work fine. Just make sure you're copying the name exactly as it appears in the search results.
Join the conversation
One more tip - if you're really unsure about the debtor name, you can always file a protective UCC-1 under the corrected name while you sort out the amendment. That way you maintain continuous perfection even if there's a name issue with the original filing.
True, but it's better than having a gap in perfection. You can always clean it up later with terminations once you figure out the correct approach.
This seems overly complicated. Why not just call the filing office and ask them directly about the name formatting?
Chloe Davis
Thanks everyone for all the advice! I think I'm going to go with the exact match approach - use the name exactly as it appears on the original UCC-1 for the amendment. And I'm definitely going to check out that document verification tool to make sure I don't have any other inconsistencies. This thread has been incredibly helpful.
Dylan Wright
•Smart choice. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings. Good luck with your amendment!
NebulaKnight
•Let us know how it goes! Always interested to hear about successful filings after all this troubleshooting.
Join the conversation
This thread is making me rethink our Oregon expansion plans. Are the filing fees at least reasonable compared to other states, or is it expensive AND unreliable?
GamerGirl99
•Don't let the portal issues scare you off completely. Just build in extra time for filings and have backup plans. The legal framework is solid.
Good to know it's just a tech issue and not a systemic problem. Extra time and backup plans - noted.
Anyone know if they're planning to upgrade their system anytime soon? This can't be sustainable long-term.
I heard rumors about a modernization project but nothing concrete. State IT projects move at glacial speed anyway.
Emma Johnson
•probably be another 10 years before they get around to it. government efficiency at its finest.
Join the conversation
Ava Williams
Just to add another perspective - I've seen situations where relying on the Article 9 comments backfired in bankruptcy court. The trustee successfully argued that a name change made the original filing seriously misleading, even though it seemed like a minor change. The comments didn't provide the protection the secured creditor thought they would.
Ava Williams
•This was in the Fifth Circuit but I've seen similar rulings elsewhere. Bankruptcy trustees are aggressive about challenging imperfect filings.
Okay, that settles it. I'm filing the amendment. Not worth the risk based on vague commentary.
Smart decision. I learned early in my career not to rely on Article 9 comments for anything critical. They're useful for understanding the theory behind the rules but when money's on the line, err on the side of over-filing rather than under-filing. A UCC-3 amendment is cheap insurance against perfection challenges.
PixelWarrior
•This is why document verification tools like Certana are so valuable - they help you spot these issues before they become problems in court.
Absolutely. The comments create more confusion than clarity most of the time.
Dmitry Volkov
For anyone else reading this thread - Article 9 also covers agricultural liens, deposit accounts, and some other specialized collateral types. It's broader than just equipment and inventory, though those are the most common.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Don't forget about chattel paper and instruments. Article 9 covers those too, though the perfection rules can be different.
0 coins
CyberSiren
•And electronic chattel paper has its own special rules under Article 9. The law has really evolved to keep up with technology.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
Since you're dealing with multi-state filings, also remember that Article 9 has specific rules about which state's law governs and where to file. Usually it's where the debtor is located, but there are exceptions for certain types of collateral.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
•I had a case where we filed in the wrong state initially because we didn't properly analyze the debtor's location under Article 9. Had to refile everything and pay additional fees.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•That's exactly why I started double-checking everything with verification tools. One small mistake in interpreting Article 9 location rules and you can void your entire security interest.
0 coins