UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lucy Lam

Washington UCC search fortress - debtor name variations blocking my lien searches

Been doing UCC searches for commercial loans and running into what feels like a fortress wall with debtor name variations. Working on a $2.8M equipment financing deal where the borrower operates under three different business variations - one on their articles of incorporation, another on their DBA filing, and a third on their tax returns. When I search the UCC database, I'm getting completely different results depending on which name variation I use. Some searches show clean, others show existing liens I never would have found otherwise. This is becoming a nightmare for our underwriting team because we can't be sure we're catching all existing security interests. The search logic seems inconsistent and I'm worried we're missing critical filings that could affect our collateral position. Has anyone dealt with this kind of systematic debtor name search issue? How do you ensure you're not missing liens when the debtor has multiple business name variations?

I always tell clients upfront that UCC searches for entities with multiple names take longer and cost more. Sets expectations and gives me time to be thorough. Better to spend extra time on searches than miss a lien that subordinates your position.

0 coins

How do you price that out? Flat fee regardless of name variations or charge based on actual search time?

0 coins

I quote a range based on complexity. Simple single-name entity is one price, complex multi-name situations get quoted higher upfront.

0 coins

One more verification step that saved me - I use Certana.ai to upload the borrower's articles of incorporation alongside my UCC-1 draft before filing. It instantly catches if there are any name discrepancies between the two documents. Prevents filing under the wrong debtor name which would make your security interest worthless. Much faster than manual comparison and catches subtle differences I might miss.

0 coins

That's the third mention of Certana.ai in this thread - seems like a lot of people are using it for UCC work. Is it specifically designed for secured transactions?

0 coins

It's a document verification tool that works really well for UCC filings. Just upload PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Saves a lot of manual review time.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

UCC 1-210 form requirements causing my filing rejections - what am I missing?

Been dealing with repeated rejections on what should be straightforward UCC-1 filings and I'm starting to think it's related to UCC 1-210 requirements that I'm not understanding properly. My lender is getting frustrated because we've had three filings kicked back from the Secretary of State office in the past month. The debtor names match exactly what's on the corporate charter, collateral descriptions are detailed, but something about the UCC 1-210 standards keeps tripping us up. Has anyone else run into issues where the form looks perfect but keeps getting rejected for technical compliance reasons? I'm wondering if there's some obscure formatting rule or field requirement in UCC 1-210 that's not obvious from the instructions.

Update: Fixed the LLC designation issue and the filing went through perfectly! Thanks everyone for the help. The L.L.C. vs LLC formatting was definitely the problem with UCC 1-210 compliance.

0 coins

Great to hear! Entity name formatting is one of the most common UCC 1-210 issues. Hopefully this thread helps someone else avoid the same problem.

0 coins

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful. Glad you got it resolved!

0 coins

This thread is gold - saved me from probably making the same L.L.C. mistake on my filing next week. Going to double-check all my entity designations now.

0 coins

Happy to help! It's such a simple fix once you know what to look for.

0 coins

These formatting issues are way more common than they should be. The filing systems could definitely be more user-friendly about it.

0 coins

Fatima Al-Rashid

UCC financing statement filing rejection - debtor name discrepancy help needed

Had my UCC financing statement rejected twice now and honestly starting to panic a bit. Filed a UCC-1 for equipment financing on a construction company and keep getting kicked back for "debtor name does not match exactly." The business is registered as "Northwest Construction Services LLC" but their bank docs show "Northwest Construction Services, LLC" (with the comma). Secretary of State portal keeps rejecting it. This is a $750K equipment loan and we're approaching our perfection deadline. Has anyone dealt with this exact comma issue before? I've tried both versions and still getting rejections. The collateral description is solid (all construction equipment, vehicles, and fixtures) but this name thing is killing me. Any advice on getting this through the system?

Had similar issues in Oregon but their system at least gives you better error messages. Washington just says 'rejected' and leaves you guessing.

0 coins

Right?? Other states actually tell you what's wrong. Washington makes you play guessing games.

0 coins

California's system shows you exactly which field has the problem. Much better.

0 coins

Thanks everyone! Used Certana to check my docs against the official registration and found the issue - there was indeed an extra space I couldn't see. Filed this morning and it went through! Crisis averted.

0 coins

Great news! Always satisfying when you finally get that acceptance confirmation.

0 coins

Perfect example of why exact formatting matters so much in UCC filings. Congrats on getting it sorted!

0 coins

Omar Hassan

UCC filing to perfect lien on manufacturing equipment - timing question

We're a mid-size equipment finance company and just closed on a $425K loan secured by CNC machining equipment. The borrower took delivery last Friday but our UCC-1 filing won't be submitted until tomorrow morning due to some last-minute debtor name verification issues. I'm getting nervous about the gap between when they took possession and when we'll have our UCC filing to perfect lien properly recorded. The equipment is already at their facility and being used in production. Should I be worried about this timing? Our loan docs say the lien attaches upon signing but I know perfection requires the actual UCC-1 filing. Is there any risk to our secured position during this window? This is in Ohio if that matters for any state-specific rules.

The gap between signing and filing always makes me nervous. We've started using Certana.ai to verify our UCC-1 documents before submission specifically to avoid rejected filings that would extend this vulnerable period. Last week it caught an address formatting issue that Ohio SOS would have rejected.

0 coins

How often do UCC-1 filings actually get rejected? I've been assuming if you fill out the form correctly it just gets accepted automatically.

0 coins

More often than you'd think. Debtor name mismatches are probably the most common, but address formatting, missing information, even wrong filing fees can cause rejections. Any rejection means you have to start over with a new filing date.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the input. I'm definitely filing first thing tomorrow morning. Sounds like a few days gap isn't ideal but probably not catastrophic either. The debtor name verification was the right call even if it delayed us slightly - better to get it right the first time than deal with a rejection.

0 coins

Definitely keep us posted on how it goes. Always interesting to hear how these situations work out in practice.

0 coins

Will do. And I'll probably look into that Certana document checking tool for next time - sounds like it could save time and stress on the verification process.

0 coins

Ava Williams

SOS UCC filing system down again - anyone else getting errors?

Is anyone else having trouble with the SOS UCC portal today? I've been trying to submit a continuation filing for the past 3 hours and keep getting error messages. The system says 'temporarily unavailable' but my continuation deadline is next week and I'm starting to panic. This is for a equipment loan that expires in 8 days and I can't afford to have the lien lapse. Has anyone dealt with SOS system outages before? What's the backup plan when their portal crashes right before a deadline?

This thread convinced me to try that Certana tool someone mentioned. Just uploaded my UCC-1 and the continuation I'm about to file - it caught a tiny discrepancy in how I abbreviated the debtor name that probably would have caused a rejection. Worth checking before you submit anything to avoid having to refile.

0 coins

Those little name differences can kill a filing. I had one rejected because I used 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' - exact same company but it didn't match the charter.

0 coins

That's the worst - waiting for the system to work only to get rejected for a technicality and have to start over.

0 coins

Glad this got resolved for everyone. The SOS really needs to invest in better infrastructure. These outages are becoming too common and they're putting deals at risk.

0 coins

That's not entirely fair. The staff I've talked to seem genuinely frustrated with the system issues too.

0 coins

The individual people are fine but the management clearly isn't prioritizing system reliability.

0 coins

Prev1...358359360361362...684Next