Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Quick tip - when you search by filing number 2019-12345678, it should show you the complete chain of all UCC-3 filings. Look at the filing dates carefully. The continuation should be dated within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary of the original UCC-1.
The original was filed March 2019 and the continuation shows February 2024, so that should be within the window, right?
Yes, that timing works. The continuation would be effective and the lien stays active until 2029 now.
Jay Lincoln
One more thing to check - make sure the secured party information on the UCC-1 matches who you think the lender is. Sometimes there are assignments or the original lender sold the loan to someone else. You want to contact the current secured party, not necessarily who's listed on the original filing.
I ran into this exact issue and the Certana.ai verification picked up an assignment that I missed in my manual review. Saved me from contacting the wrong lender.
Thanks everyone. Sounds like I need to be much more thorough with my search and probably get professional help to interpret the results correctly.
Join the conversation
Since you found the existing filings, make sure to check their continuation dates too. You don't want to perfect your lien only to have a senior lien lapse and mess up your priority position.
KhalilStar
•Yeah definitely check those dates. I've seen deals go sideways because someone missed a lapsed continuation.
This is where that Certana tool might be useful again - it can probably flag any continuation issues automatically.
Kaiya Rivera
Just to add one more tip - some states have separate databases for different types of UCC filings. Make sure you're not just searching UCC-1s but also amendments, continuations, and terminations. Sometimes the full picture isn't visible if you're only looking at one filing type.
That's true. Our state has tabs for different filing types and I always forget to check the amendments section.
Noah Irving
•Amendments are crucial! I've seen cases where the original UCC-1 looked fine but an amendment changed everything.
Join the conversation
Ella Knight
Quick follow-up on the Certana.ai suggestion - I just remembered they also have a feature where you can upload your rejected UCC filing along with your security agreement and it'll suggest specific language changes that might fix the rejection. Might be worth trying since you're already dealing with multiple rejections.
Noah Irving
•That sounds really helpful actually. Better than just guessing at what they want.
I've used similar document checking tools and they're definitely worth it when you're stuck in rejection cycles.
Jayden Reed
UPDATE: Tried the detailed asset category language suggested above and it finally went through! Thanks everyone. The key was definitely being specific about the types of collateral while still keeping it broad enough to cover everything in the security agreement. Lesson learned about not using overly generic descriptions even though they're technically allowed under the UCC.
Great outcome. That detailed asset category approach is really the way to go these days.
Noah Irving
•Thanks everyone for the help. This forum is way more useful than the SOS help desk!
Join the conversation
Sophia Long
Have you tried searching by secured party name instead of debtor name? Sometimes that can turn up filings that don't show up in debtor searches, especially if there were data entry errors when the original UCC-1 was filed.
That's a really good idea. I have the secured party name from the original filing so I'll try that approach. Might catch any filings where the debtor name got entered incorrectly.
Secured party searches are underutilized but really effective. I've found filings that way that were basically invisible in debtor name searches due to typos.
For a $2.8M transaction I'd definitely recommend getting certified copies of anything you find rather than just relying on the portal printouts. WV's certification process is pretty straightforward and gives you better legal protection if there are any questions later.
Smart approach. Their certified copy fees aren't too bad and turnaround is usually under a week if you order online.
This is another area where having your documents pre-verified with something like Certana.ai helps - you know exactly what to request for certification instead of ordering everything and hoping you got it right.
Miguel Ortiz
Just make sure you get a confirmation from the Nebraska SOS system after filing. Sometimes there can be delays in processing, and you want to make sure it actually went through within your deadline window.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
•Usually within a few business days for online filings, but I'd plan for up to a week just to be safe.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•In my experience, Nebraska is pretty quick with online filings. Usually same day or next day processing.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
Bottom line - file your UCC-3 continuation within 6 months before your UCC-1 expires, use the exact debtor name and filing number from the original, and file online to save money and time. You've got this!
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•You're welcome! These UCC timing rules can be tricky but once you understand them, it's pretty straightforward.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Good luck with your filing. Always nice to see someone taking the time to get it right rather than just winging it.
0 coins