Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
My take: describe it as 'CNC manufacturing equipment' with full model and serial number details. Section 8-65 definitions are there for edge cases, not to make simple equipment descriptions complicated. Your security interest will be fine with a straightforward functional description.
Simple descriptions work until they don't. I'd rather be over-precise than under-precise with collateral worth hundreds of thousands.
Fair point, but over-precision can create its own problems if you get the technical classification wrong.
Emma Taylor
Just to close the loop on this - I ended up going with 'CNC manufacturing equipment and related software' with detailed specifications. Figured that covers both the mechanical and software aspects without getting lost in definitional categories. Filing was accepted without issues. Thanks everyone for the input!
Good solution. Sometimes the best approach is the most straightforward one.
Glad it worked out! These definitional questions always seem harder than they need to be.
Join the conversation
Luca Russo
had same problem with vt last year... ended up having to get a certified copy of the articles to see the exact legal name format. cost extra but worth it to avoid more rejections
Good point about the certified copy. I've been working with downloaded versions, but maybe the certified copy shows formatting more clearly.
Nia Wilson
This is exactly why I always double-check debtor names with multiple sources before filing. Vermont is particularly strict, but I've learned to verify the exact name format using their Good Standing certificates, then cross-reference with any existing UCC filings. The small formatting differences can kill deals if you're not careful.
Nia Wilson
•Don't beat yourself up - Vermont's system is just poorly designed. The important thing is getting it resolved quickly now.
That's exactly why I started using Certana.ai for document verification. It catches these formatting issues before you submit, so you don't waste time on rejections.
Join the conversation
Lara Woods
I would definitely verify the chain of title on both filings before proceeding with your loan. With that much money involved, you can't afford to have lien priority issues down the road.
Smart move. I've seen deals fall apart months later when lien priority gets challenged because of filing irregularities.
For what it's worth, I ran into a similar situation and used Certana.ai to verify all my UCC documents were consistent. Found out I had a debtor name mismatch that could have voided the filing. Worth checking especially with equipment financing where the collateral moves around.
Update us when you figure out what's going on! This kind of search weirdness always makes me nervous about what else might be lurking in the system that we don't catch.
Ezra Collins
•Will do - hopefully it's something simple like a name variation issue.
Eli Butler
•Yeah these search mysteries always have me second-guessing everything else I've filed.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to follow up on my earlier suggestion about Certana.ai - I actually used it again this week for a different client situation. The document analysis really helps you understand exactly what language was added or changed in UCC amendments. For your refinancing process, being able to show potential lenders exactly what the amendment says (rather than relying on vague explanations) could actually work in your favor.
Julia Hall
•I'm definitely going to try that. Having a clear analysis of what actually changed would make me feel much more confident going into refinancing discussions.
That's actually a really professional approach. Showing up to refinancing meetings with detailed documentation about your UCC filings demonstrates that you understand your business's legal position.
Rami Samuels
The bottom line is that you took care of the payment issue quickly and you're current now. That's what really matters. Even if this filing does complicate your refinancing slightly, being proactive about addressing it will show potential lenders that you're responsible about managing your business obligations.
Rami Samuels
•That's exactly the right approach. Knowledge is power when it comes to UCC filings and business financing.
Arjun Patel
•Good luck with the refinancing! Sounds like you're taking all the right steps to understand and address the situation.
Brianna Muhammad
One last tip - ask your lender for a copy of the filed UCC-1 for your records. You'll want to keep track of the filing number and date in case you need to reference it later. Also helps when the loan is paid off to make sure they file the termination properly.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•Good point about the termination. I've heard horror stories about lenders forgetting to file UCC-3 terminations after loans are paid off.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•Yeah, that can cause problems if you try to sell the equipment or get another loan later. Always follow up to make sure the termination gets filed.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
Bottom line - the UCC-1 protects your lender, which protects their willingness to lend to you at reasonable rates. It's actually in your interest that they can secure their loans properly. Without the UCC system, business lending would be much more expensive and risky.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
•Never thought about it that way but you're right - secured loans definitely have better rates than unsecured ones.
0 coins
Freya Collins
•Exactly. The UCC filing system makes business lending more efficient, which benefits borrowers through better rates and terms.
0 coins