Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
The whole cash proceeds ucc perfection thing is one of the most misunderstood areas of secured transactions. Lenders think they're automatically covered but don't realize the 20-day limitation. Equipment financing is especially tricky because restaurants constantly buy and sell equipment. Your description should definitely include comprehensive proceeds language.
The 20-day rule under 9-315(d) is uniform across all UCC states. But there can be variations in how different states handle specific types of proceeds or filing requirements.
Emma Davis
•This is why I always include standard proceeds language regardless of what the lender says. Better safe than sorry when it comes to perfection issues.
Bottom line - include the cash proceeds ucc language. Your counsel is giving you good advice and the SBA lender is prioritizing speed over proper security interest perfection. Restaurant equipment gets sold all the time and without proceeds coverage you're taking unnecessary risk. Standard language like 'and all proceeds and products thereof' should be sufficient and won't slow down the deal significantly.
Agreed. It's such basic language that any experienced lender should be fine with it. If they're pushing back this hard it makes me wonder what other corners they're trying to cut.
Sometimes lenders get set in their ways with template forms and resist any changes even when they're clearly necessary. Stand your ground on this one.
Join the conversation
Mia Alvarez
The UCC system is supposed to provide certainty but it's actually quite unforgiving. Small mistakes can have huge consequences. I always tell my clients that UCC filings are like brain surgery - precision is everything and there's no room for error. Every comma, every space, every character matters.
That's a good analogy. I think a lot of lenders don't realize how technical and precise UCC filings need to be. They treat them like routine paperwork when they're actually complex legal documents.
Sophia Long
•The complexity is why I always recommend getting professional help or using technology to verify everything. Too much at stake to rely on manual processes and human memory.
Reading this thread makes me realize how important it is to stay current on UCC requirements. The rules can vary by state and they do change over time. What was acceptable years ago might not be sufficient today. Regular training and staying informed is crucial for anyone handling UCC filings.
Good point about state variations. Some states are more forgiving than others when it comes to debtor name discrepancies, but you can't count on that in bankruptcy court.
That's why I always file as if I'm going to end up in the most strict jurisdiction. Better to be over-prepared than caught off guard.
Join the conversation
Javier Cruz
The authenticated security agreement requirement is actually pretty straightforward once you understand it. The security agreement needs to be 'authenticated' (signed) by the debtor, and it needs to adequately describe the collateral. Your UCC-1 then provides public notice of that security interest. The rejection probably means there's a disconnect between what you're claiming on the UCC-1 versus what's actually covered in the security agreement.
Miguel Diaz
•That makes sense. I think I need to go line by line through both documents to find the disconnect.
Javier Cruz
•Exactly. Pay special attention to how the collateral is described in each document. Even small differences in language can cause problems.
Update: I went back and compared the security agreement with our UCC-1 filing and found the issue. The security agreement covers 'manufacturing equipment located at 123 Main Street' but our UCC-1 said 'all equipment'. Apparently that was too broad since it could include equipment at other locations not covered by the security agreement. Resubmitted with the specific location language and it was accepted. Thanks for all the help!
Perfect example of why the document verification is so important. Congrats on getting it resolved!
Great outcome! This thread will be helpful for others dealing with the same issue.
Join the conversation
Maya Jackson
Pro tip: if you're doing multiple continuations for the same debtor across states, prepare all your UCC-3 forms at the same time using identical information. Then go through each one carefully to match the exact debtor name format from each state's original filing. Saves time and reduces errors.
That's smart. I usually do them one at a time but batching makes more sense for consistency.
Amaya Watson
•I tried that approach but still managed to mess up a debtor name on one of them. Now I use a document checker to verify everything matches before filing. Much more reliable than trusting my tired eyes after looking at multiple forms.
Grant Vikers
Bottom line - budget around $15-20 per state for continuation fees, file at least 3-4 months before your lapse dates, and triple-check debtor names match your originals exactly. It's not complicated but requires attention to detail and good organization. The alternative is lapsed liens and very unhappy lenders.
Perfect summary, thanks. I think I was overcomplicating it in my head. Just need to get organized and methodical about the process.
Exactly. The UCC system has its quirks but if you follow the basics and don't rush, it's manageable. Just don't underestimate the time investment for multiple states.
Grace Durand
The fact that you're finding multiple UCC-1s under different name variations is actually helpful - it confirms there are active filings out there and validates your concern about being thorough. Better to find too many potential matches and investigate each one than miss something critical.
0 coins
Steven Adams
•Good point. At least finding multiple filings means the search is working, just need to be systematic about all the name variations.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
•That's actually reassuring. I was worried I was being too paranoid but sounds like thoroughness is the right approach for Hawaii UCC searches.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
I did a deal in Hawaii last month and used every trick mentioned here plus one more - I searched for the street address of their registered office. Sometimes if the debtor name was entered wrong on the UCC-1, the address might still be right and you can catch filings that way.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
•Does Hawaii's UCC search allow searching by address? I thought most states only did debtor name searches.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
•Hawaii has an advanced search option that includes address fields. It's not foolproof but can help catch filings where the name was mangled but address is correct.
0 coins