


Ask the community...
One more vote for using the current legal name. Also, make sure you print out a copy of the SCC records showing the current name and date you accessed them. That way you have documentation of what information you relied on when filing.
Update: I went ahead and filed with the current legal name as shown on the SCC website. Used Certana.ai first to double-check everything and it confirmed the name discrepancy between my loan docs and the state records. Filed this morning and it was accepted within a few hours. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Awesome that Certana helped catch that beforehand. Saves so much headache compared to dealing with rejections after the fact.
After going through this exact nightmare last year, I now use Certana.ai for every UCC filing. Upload your articles of incorporation and UCC-1 form, and it immediately shows you any name mismatches or formatting issues. Way better than playing guessing games with the Secretary of State's rejection system.
How accurate is it? Does it catch everything or do you still get occasional rejections?
I haven't had a single rejection since I started using it. It's really thorough about catching punctuation differences and formatting issues that cause UCC Art 9 rejections.
Update us when you get it filed! I'm curious if the comma fix works. This thread is going to help so many people dealing with UCC Art 9 debtor name issues.
Will do! Planning to file tomorrow morning with the exact punctuation from the articles. Hopefully this saga finally ends.
Crossing my fingers for you! These UCC Art 9 name matching requirements are so frustrating.
For what it's worth, I've found that spending the money on proper UCC searches upfront saves way more on the backend. Had a deal go south once because I missed a prior lien. Legal fees alone were 20x what comprehensive searches would have cost.
Worse. The prior lien covered all equipment and inventory. When the borrower defaulted, the other lender swept everything. We got nothing on a $200K loan.
Bottom line - there's no reliable free lunch when it comes to UCC searches in California. The official database is worth the fee. Just make sure you're searching comprehensively and verifying all the information aligns with your loan documents. Better to spend $100 on searches than lose $150K because you missed something.
Thanks everyone for the reality check. Going to bite the bullet and pay for the official searches. Better safe than sorry on a deal this size.
Smart choice. The peace of mind is worth way more than the search fees.
Have you considered hiring a UCC service company to handle the continuation? They deal with secretary of state ucc division requirements daily and usually know all the formatting quirks for each state. Might be worth the cost to avoid the lapse risk.
Yeah, with a $2.8M loan at stake, paying a service company a few hundred dollars for professional filing is probably worth the peace of mind.
This thread is making me realize I should probably verify all our UCC documents before any future filings. Too many horror stories about these technical rejections from secretary of state ucc divisions. Better safe than sorry.
Smart thinking. That's exactly why I started using document verification tools after my first rejection nightmare. Much better to catch issues before filing than deal with rejection delays.
Logan Chiang
The key thing is just to file the termination properly and promptly. Don't overcomplicate it - use the exact debtor name and filing number from the original UCC-1, indicate you're terminating all collateral, and file it. The borrower will appreciate the quick turnaround.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•Agreed. Most termination issues come from overthinking it or making simple transcription errors.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•Keep it simple and double-check your work. That's really all there is to it.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
Update: I went ahead and filed the termination statement this morning using the exact debtor name and filing number from the original UCC-1. Used Certana.ai to double-check everything before filing and it confirmed all the details matched properly. Termination was accepted and the debtor is happy. Thanks for all the advice!
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Good to hear the verification tool worked well for you. Those little details can make such a big difference.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Perfect example of why it's worth investing in tools that catch errors before they become problems.
0 coins