< Back to Social Security Administration

Ryan Kim

Getting retroactive Social Security payments after reaching FRA - will my delayed retirement credits apply immediately?

Hello everyone! I'm a bit confused about how retroactive benefits work. I hit my full retirement age (FRA) back in December 2024, but I haven't applied for my Social Security retirement benefits yet. Two questions I'm hoping someone here can help with: 1. If I apply now (May 2025), can I choose to get backpay to December when I reached FRA? I've heard mixed things about whether this is automatic or if I need to specifically request it. 2. I'm also considering waiting until June 2025 to apply. If I do that, will the delayed retirement credits I've earned since December be included in my very first payment? Or will the 2025 credits not kick in until January 2026? I'm trying to maximize my benefit while also planning for some upcoming expenses. Any insights would be greatly appreciated!

Yes, you can get retroactive benefits going back to your FRA! The SSA allows retroactive payments for up to 6 months from when you apply (except for disability, which is 12 months). Since you're only 5 months past FRA, you can get all those months. You DO need to specifically request it though when you apply - they won't automatically do it. As for the delayed retirement credits (DRCs), it's a bit complicated. The credits you earned from December 2024-May 2025 would be included in your initial benefit calculation if you apply now. However, if you wait until June, any DRCs earned in 2025 won't be fully applied until January 2026. SSA only does the final DRC calculations once per year.

0 coins

Thank you! That's very helpful. So it sounds like if I want those credits calculated immediately, I should apply now and request retroactive benefits to my FRA date? I wasn't sure if requesting retroactive benefits would somehow cancel out the delayed credits I've earned since FRA.

0 coins

my sister had something like this happen. she waited 8 months after her FRA to apply and got all the back pay right away. but i think she had to ask for it specifically when she applied.

0 coins

This is PARTIALLY correct. You can get retroactive benefits back to your FRA, but ONLY if you specifically request it when you apply! And there's a HUGE catch that many people miss - if you take retroactive benefits, you GIVE UP all those months of delayed retirement credits you would have earned! The SSA treats it as if you filed at your FRA, NOT 5 months later. So your monthly benefit will be LOWER than if you just applied from this point forward. This is why it's so frustrating dealing with SSA - these details make a BIG difference financially!

0 coins

I waited 14 months after my FRA to apply. Got a nice lump sum for 6 months back from when I applied, but that's the max they'll go back. Anything beyond 6 months is just money you leave on the table. The whole system is designed to keep you from getting what you deserve.

0 coins

Not quite accurate. The 6-month retroactive limit applies to retirement benefits for people who file AFTER their Full Retirement Age. It's different for disability claims (12 months retroactive possible) and for people filing before FRA (no retroactive benefits at all). The important thing OP needs to understand is that retroactive benefits and delayed retirement credits are a trade-off. You can't get both for the same months. Taking 5 months of retroactive benefits means losing those 5 months of DRCs (which would be worth approximately 3.33% more on your monthly benefit for life if you're born 1943-1954). I recommend doing the math based on your specific benefit amount and life expectancy. For most people with average or better health, taking the DRCs instead of retroactive benefits is usually the better financial choice.

0 coins

Have you tried calling SSA directly to discuss your specific situation? I spent 3 days trying to get through to them about my delayed retirement credits last month - kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours. Finally I found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in about 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with explained that retroactive benefits and delayed credits are mutually exclusive for the same months. If you take retroactive benefits to your FRA in December, your benefit will be calculated as if you filed in December - no DRCs for those 5 months. If you file now without retroactive benefits, you get the DRCs for those 5 months permanently added to your monthly amount. Definitely worth talking to SSA directly about your specific situation.

0 coins

Thanks for the suggestion! I've tried calling a few times but gave up after being on hold forever. I'll check out that service - getting a definitive answer about my specific situation would really help me make a decision.

0 coins

ok i think people are making this more complicated than it needs to be. here's the simple version: - if u apply now and DON'T ask for retroactive: u get 5 months of DRCs added to ur monthly benefit forever - if u apply now and DO ask for retroactive: u get 5 months of payments in a lump sum but NO extra DRCs - if u wait till june to apply: u get 6 months of DRCs but the 2025 ones won't be fully calculated until jan 2026 (u'll get an adjustment then) it's basically a choice between cash now vs slightly higher monthly checks forever. depends on if u need money now or want more later

0 coins

Thank you for breaking it down so clearly! I think I understand the tradeoff better now. Since I'm expecting to live at least another 20 years (based on family history), it sounds like taking the DRCs instead of the retroactive benefits would be better in the long run, even if I have to wait for the final calculation in January 2026.

0 coins

To your second question about applying in June - you'll get provisional credit for the DRCs you've earned when you apply, but the final recalculation happens the following January. It's usually a small adjustment. If your FRA monthly benefit would have been $2,500, and you've earned 6 months of DRCs (4% annually = 0.33% per month, so 2% total for 6 months), your initial payment would be about $2,550. If any minor adjustments are needed, they'll happen in January. For what it's worth, with today's longer lifespans, the math usually favors taking the DRCs over retroactive benefits unless you have serious health concerns or an immediate need for the lump sum.

0 coins

so what happens if someone applies in december? do they still have to wait a whole year for the final calculation or is it done the next month?

0 coins

The DRC annual recomputation ALWAYS happens in January, no matter when you apply during the year. That's just how their system works. It's one of the MANY confusing aspects of Social Security that they don't explain clearly! One more IMPORTANT point: when you apply, make ABSOLUTELY SURE the SSA representative understands what you want. Some reps automatically process retroactive benefits without fully explaining the DRC trade-off. Be VERY clear about whether you want retroactive benefits OR you want to preserve your DRCs. Get it in writing if possible!

0 coins

I really appreciate everyone's advice! I think I'm going to apply now but turn DOWN the retroactive benefits to keep my DRCs. Sounds like that's the best long-term financial decision for my situation. I'll make sure to be very clear about that when I apply.

0 coins

Just wanted to add one more consideration that might help with your decision - you can also use the SSA's online retirement estimator to see the actual dollar difference between taking retroactive benefits vs. keeping the DRCs. It's at ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/estimator.html The calculator will show you what your monthly benefit would be if you filed at FRA (which is essentially what you'd get with retroactive benefits) versus filing now with the DRCs included. For most people, the breakeven point is around 12-15 years, meaning if you expect to live that long past when you start benefits, the DRCs are usually worth more. Also, don't forget that your spouse's survivor benefits (if applicable) are based on your benefit amount including any DRCs, so that's another factor to consider in your decision.

0 coins

That's a great point about the survivor benefits! I hadn't thought about how the DRCs would affect my spouse's potential benefits down the road. That definitely makes keeping the DRCs even more valuable. I'll check out that online estimator too - having the actual numbers will help me feel more confident about my decision. Thanks for mentioning that resource!

0 coins

That's really helpful about the survivor benefits angle - I hadn't considered that at all! My wife is 3 years younger than me, so those DRCs could potentially make a significant difference for her down the line. I'll definitely use that online estimator to run the numbers. It sounds like between the longer-term financial benefit and the survivor benefit implications, keeping the DRCs is probably the smarter choice for our situation. Thanks for pointing out that calculator!

0 coins

As someone who just went through this process last year, I can confirm what others have said about the retroactive vs DRC tradeoff. I waited 8 months past my FRA before applying and chose to keep my DRCs rather than take retroactive benefits. One thing I wish I had known earlier - when you apply online through my Social Security account, there's a specific question about whether you want to receive retroactive benefits. Make sure you read that section carefully and select "No" if you want to preserve your DRCs. The default seemed to be set to "Yes" when I applied. Also, I'd suggest printing out or saving screenshots of your application responses, especially the retroactive benefits section. I had some confusion later and having that documentation helped clear things up quickly. The monthly payment difference from those DRCs really adds up over time. In my case, waiting those 8 months increased my monthly benefit by about $160 permanently. Much better than the one-time lump sum I would have gotten with retroactive benefits.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was hoping to hear about! Thank you for sharing the details about the online application process - I had no idea the default might be set to "Yes" for retroactive benefits. That's such an important detail that could easily trip someone up if they're not paying close attention. $160 per month extra for life is huge - that's nearly $2,000 more per year! It really drives home how much those DRCs are worth compared to a one-time lump sum. I'm definitely going to follow your advice about taking screenshots of my application responses too. Better to have that documentation just in case there are any questions later. Thanks for the practical tips on navigating the actual application process!

0 coins

I'm in a very similar situation - reached my FRA in January 2025 and haven't applied yet. This thread has been incredibly helpful in understanding the tradeoff between retroactive benefits and DRCs. One question I have after reading all the responses: if I apply today (March 27th) and choose NOT to take retroactive benefits, will my first payment include the DRCs I've earned for January, February, and March? Or do I have to wait until the January 2026 recalculation for those to be included? Also, has anyone here used the SSA's online benefit estimator that Omar mentioned? I'd love to hear if it's accurate and easy to use before I dive into running my own numbers. The survivor benefit angle is something I definitely need to factor in too - my husband is 5 years younger, so maximizing the benefit amount could make a real difference for him eventually.

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Great question about the timing of DRC calculations. From what I understand based on the discussion here, if you apply today without retroactive benefits, you should get provisional credit for your January-March 2025 DRCs in your first payment. The SSA includes earned DRCs when they calculate your initial benefit amount, but then does a final recalculation in January 2026 to make sure everything is accurate. Regarding the online estimator Omar mentioned - I haven't used it personally yet, but it sounds like a really valuable tool for comparing scenarios. Given that you and your husband have a 5-year age gap like some others mentioned, the survivor benefit consideration definitely seems worth factoring into your decision. It sounds like most people in this thread who've done the math have found that keeping the DRCs rather than taking retroactive benefits works out better financially in the long run, especially when you factor in the survivor benefit implications. The real-world example Aisha shared about gaining $160/month permanently really puts it in perspective!

0 coins

I just wanted to chime in as someone who works in retirement planning - this has been a really excellent discussion with a lot of accurate information! A couple of additional points that might help Ryan and others in similar situations: 1. **Tax implications**: Don't forget that retroactive benefits are all taxable in the year you receive them, which could potentially push you into a higher tax bracket for that year. With DRCs, the higher monthly payments are spread out over time, which might be more tax-efficient. 2. **Medicare considerations**: If you're not already enrolled in Medicare, delaying your Social Security application doesn't affect your Medicare eligibility timeline. You still need to enroll during your Initial Enrollment Period (3 months before through 3 months after turning 65) to avoid late penalties. 3. **COLA adjustments**: Your DRCs will also benefit from future Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs), since they become part of your base benefit amount. So that extra monthly amount from DRCs will grow with inflation over time. The consensus here seems spot-on - for most people in good health with normal life expectancy, preserving those DRCs is usually the better long-term financial strategy. The breakeven analysis mentioned earlier is key, but don't forget to factor in taxes and the compounding effect of COLAs on those higher monthly payments.

0 coins

Thanks Sofia for bringing up those additional considerations! The tax angle is something I completely overlooked - getting 5 months of retroactive benefits all at once could definitely create a tax headache, especially if it pushes me into a higher bracket for 2025. Spreading that income out over time with higher monthly payments seems much more manageable from a tax planning perspective. The point about COLAs is huge too! I hadn't thought about how those DRCs would compound with future cost-of-living adjustments. So not only do I get a higher base amount, but that higher amount grows with inflation every year. That makes the long-term value of choosing DRCs over retroactive benefits even more compelling. I'm already enrolled in Medicare (turned 65 last year), so that's one less thing to worry about. Based on everything I've learned from this discussion, I'm feeling very confident about applying without requesting retroactive benefits to preserve those valuable DRCs. This community has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experiences!

0 coins

I'm in a similar boat - reached my FRA in November 2024 and still haven't applied yet. This discussion has been a goldmine of information! One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned yet: does anyone know if there are any differences in how DRCs are calculated based on your birth year? I was born in 1959, so my FRA is 66 and 10 months. I've heard that the DRC percentage might vary slightly depending on when you were born, but I'm not sure if that's accurate. Also, for those who have already gone through this process - how long did it typically take to receive your first payment after applying? I'm trying to plan my finances accordingly if I decide to apply in the next month or two. The tax implications Sofia mentioned are really important too. Getting a large lump sum in retroactive benefits could definitely complicate my 2025 tax situation, especially since I'm still working part-time and have some other retirement income coming in.

0 coins

Hi Eleanor! Great question about DRCs and birth year differences. For people born in 1943 or later (which includes you since you were born in 1959), the DRC rate is 8% per year or 2/3 of 1% per month (about 0.67% per month). This rate has been consistent for your birth year cohort, so you don't need to worry about variations there. Regarding timing for first payments, most people I know who applied online received their first payment within 2-3 months of applying. The SSA processes retirement applications much faster than disability claims. Since you'd be applying for benefits starting from when you apply (not retroactively), the process is usually pretty straightforward. You're absolutely right about the tax implications being important, especially if you're still working part-time. A lump sum of retroactive benefits on top of your work income and other retirement income could definitely push you into a higher bracket. The higher monthly payments from keeping your DRCs would likely be much more tax-efficient spread out over time. Given that you've already accumulated about 4 months of DRCs since November, you're looking at potentially 2.67% higher monthly benefits for life if you preserve those credits. That's substantial!

0 coins

This has been such an informative thread! As someone who's been helping friends and family navigate Social Security decisions, I wanted to add a few practical tips based on what I've learned: **Documentation is key**: When you apply (whether online or in person), make sure you get written confirmation of your choices, especially regarding retroactive benefits. I've seen cases where there was confusion later about what was requested. **Consider your health realistically**: While the math usually favors DRCs for people with average life expectancy, if you have serious health concerns that might shorten your lifespan, the immediate lump sum from retroactive benefits could make more sense. **Don't forget about working spouses**: If your spouse is still working and you're considering the survivor benefit angle, remember that your higher DRC-enhanced benefit could be really valuable to them later, especially if they have lower lifetime earnings. **State tax considerations**: Depending on which state you live in, Social Security benefits may or may not be taxable at the state level. This could influence whether you want a lump sum (retroactive) or higher monthly payments (DRCs) from a tax planning perspective. The consensus here seems very solid - for most healthy individuals, preserving those DRCs is the smarter long-term financial choice. Just make sure you're clear about your decision when you apply!

0 coins

This is such valuable advice, Giovanni! The point about getting written confirmation is so important - I can definitely see how miscommunication about retroactive benefits could cause major headaches later on. The health consideration is something I've been thinking about too. While I'm generally healthy now, my family doesn't have the greatest longevity history. But even with that in mind, the math still seems to favor the DRCs for me since the breakeven point mentioned earlier was around 12-15 years. Even if I'm being conservative about my lifespan, I'm likely to live at least that long past when I start benefits. The state tax angle is interesting - I'm in Florida, so no state income tax to worry about there. But for folks in states that do tax Social Security benefits, that could definitely tip the scales one way or another. Thanks for emphasizing the documentation point - I'm definitely going to make sure I have everything in writing when I apply. This whole discussion has really helped me feel confident about choosing to preserve my DRCs rather than taking the retroactive benefits. The long-term financial benefits just seem too good to pass up!

0 coins

As someone who recently went through this decision process myself, I wanted to share my experience and reinforce some of the excellent advice already given here. I reached my FRA in October 2024 and applied in February 2025. Like many others have mentioned, I chose to forgo retroactive benefits to preserve my delayed retirement credits. Here's what I learned from the process: **The online application was straightforward**, but you really do need to pay attention to the retroactive benefits question. It's buried in there and could easily be missed if you're rushing through. I took screenshots of every page as others suggested - definitely recommend that! **My first payment came exactly 3 months after applying**, and it did include the provisional DRCs I'd earned from October through February. The amount was higher than my estimated FRA benefit, so the system does seem to calculate and include those earned DRCs right away. **One thing I wish I'd considered earlier**: the impact on my Medicare premiums. Since Social Security benefits are used to calculate Medicare Part B premiums (IRMAA), having higher monthly benefits from DRCs could potentially affect those premiums down the line. It wasn't a game-changer for my decision, but it's worth factoring in if you're close to any of the IRMAA thresholds. For Ryan and others in similar situations - the math really does favor preserving those DRCs in most cases. The peace of mind from having higher guaranteed monthly income for life (that also grows with COLAs) outweighs the appeal of a one-time lump sum, at least in my experience. Good luck with whatever you decide!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your real experience, Nia! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who just went through this exact process. The fact that your first payment included the provisional DRCs right away is great to know - that was one of my main concerns about the timing. The Medicare IRMAA consideration is something I hadn't thought about at all! That's a really good point. I'll need to look into whether my projected benefit amount with DRCs would push me into a higher IRMAA bracket. Even if it does, the long-term value of the higher monthly benefits would probably still outweigh the increased Medicare premiums, but it's definitely worth factoring into the calculation. I'm feeling more confident than ever about applying soon and preserving my DRCs rather than taking retroactive benefits. This whole discussion has been incredibly helpful - it's so valuable to hear from people who have actually been through the process recently rather than just relying on official SSA publications that can be confusing or incomplete. Thanks again for sharing your experience and the practical tips about taking screenshots and watching for that retroactive benefits question!

0 coins

I've been following this discussion closely as someone who will be facing this same decision in about 18 months when I reach my FRA. The insights shared here have been incredibly valuable! One question I haven't seen addressed yet: for those of you who chose to preserve your DRCs, did you have any concerns about potential changes to Social Security policy during the delay period? I know it's probably unlikely, but I sometimes worry about applying later only to find that benefits have been reduced or the rules have changed. Also, I'm curious about the practical side - when you applied and chose not to take retroactive benefits, did the SSA representatives try to talk you into taking the lump sum? I've heard that some government agencies sometimes push people toward options that might not be in their best interest, and I want to be prepared if I encounter any pressure to take the retroactive benefits when my time comes. The breakdown everyone has provided about the long-term financial benefits of DRCs versus the short-term appeal of retroactive benefits has really opened my eyes. It sounds like for most people in decent health, those delayed credits are worth significantly more over a lifetime than a one-time payment. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experiences and knowledge!

0 coins

Great questions, Jamal! Regarding policy changes, while Social Security reform is always a possibility, the delayed retirement credit structure has been pretty stable since 1983. Any major changes would likely have grandfather clauses for people already close to or past their FRA. I wouldn't let fear of policy changes drive the decision - the current rules are what we have to work with. As for SSA representatives pushing retroactive benefits, I didn't experience that personally, but I've heard mixed reports from others. Some reps do seem to default to offering the lump sum, maybe because they think people prefer immediate cash. That's why it's so important to go in knowing exactly what you want and being clear about preserving your DRCs. Don't be afraid to politely but firmly decline retroactive benefits if that's your decision. One tip: if you apply online through your my Social Security account, you have more control over the process and don't have to worry about a rep's influence. You can take your time reading each question carefully. Just remember to save/screenshot everything as others have suggested! The 18 months you have to plan is actually a great advantage - you can run the numbers, consider your health and family situation, and maybe even talk to a fee-only financial advisor if you want a professional perspective on your specific situation.

0 coins

Social Security Administration AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today