Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As someone new to this community, I wanted to jump in and say how incredibly helpful this entire discussion has been! I'm actually in a very similar situation - my husband worked for the postal service for most of his career and I'm trying to understand how GPO might affect my potential spousal benefits when I'm eligible. Reading through everyone's experiences has been eye-opening. The key takeaway for me is that the actual calculations are much more nuanced than the simple "GPO eliminates everything" narrative you often hear. @Freya Thomsen's real-world example of still receiving $83/month despite a substantial teacher pension really drives home the point that it's worth applying regardless of what the rough calculations suggest. I'm also bookmarking the advice about gathering all pension documentation upfront and considering in-person appointments over the phone system. The MySocialSecurity account tip for checking old work credits is something I hadn't considered either. @MidnightRider - your wife's situation with 32 years of teaching plus that department store experience actually sounds quite promising based on what others have shared here. I hope you'll keep us posted on how the application goes! This community's combination of technical knowledge and personal experiences is exactly what people need when navigating these complex rules. Thank you all for creating such a supportive environment for those of us trying to figure out these complicated systems!

0 coins

@Sofia Morales Welcome to the community! Your postal service situation is actually quite interesting because federal employees have a different set of rules than state/local government workers like teachers. If your husband worked for USPS, he likely WAS paying into Social Security unlike (teachers who typically don t',)so your situation might be different from what we ve'been discussing here. Federal employees hired after 1983 generally pay into both their pension system FERS (AND) Social Security, which means GPO might not apply to you at all when claiming spousal benefits. But if he was hired before 1984 and was under the old CSRS system, then GPO could be a factor. It s'definitely worth checking with SSA about your specific situation since postal workers have unique rules. The advice about gathering documentation and applying anyway still holds true though! This thread really has been a goldmine of information for anyone dealing with these government pension offset issues. The real-world examples make such a difference in understanding what s'actually possible versus what people assume will happen.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by how thorough and helpful this discussion has been! I'm in a similar boat - my spouse worked as a firefighter for the city and we've been confused about GPO rules for years. What really stands out to me is how many misconceptions there are about these provisions. Like others have mentioned, I always assumed GPO meant automatic disqualification from any spousal benefits, but seeing the real examples here (@Freya Thomsen's $83/month, @Amara Adebayo's aunt getting $117/month) shows that's not necessarily true. The advice about checking MySocialSecurity for any previous work credits is something I never considered either. My spouse worked construction for several years before joining the fire department, so we should definitely look into that. @MidnightRider - your situation actually sounds quite promising given all the insights shared here. With your wife's department store experience plus the detailed roadmap everyone has provided, I'd definitely encourage moving forward with the application. Even if the monthly amount turns out to be modest, it could really add up over time. Thanks to everyone for sharing both the technical knowledge and personal experiences - this is exactly the kind of community support that makes navigating these complex government systems so much more manageable!

0 coins

@Eloise Kendrick Welcome to the community! Your firefighter situation is really interesting because municipal firefighters often have similar pension arrangements to teachers - they typically don t'pay into Social Security during their careers, which is exactly what triggers GPO issues. I m'glad this discussion has been helpful for you too! It s'been eye-opening for me as a newcomer to see how many people are dealing with these same challenges. The construction work your spouse did before joining the fire department could definitely be significant - those early years of paying into Social Security might make a real difference in your overall strategy. What I find most valuable about this community is how people share both the technical details AND their real-world outcomes. It s'one thing to read about GPO formulas in government publications, but hearing from @Freya Thomsen about actually receiving benefits despite GPO, or learning about the application process timelines, makes it all much more concrete and actionable. @MidnightRider - I hope you re'feeling more confident about moving forward with your wife s'application after all this great advice! This thread has become such a comprehensive resource for anyone dealing with GPO issues. Thanks everyone for being so welcoming to newcomers and generous with sharing your knowledge and experiences!

0 coins

You're welcome! Just one more thing to consider - make sure to check if your wife might be eligible for any delayed retirement credits on her own benefit if she hasn't reached 70 yet. Even though she's already collecting, sometimes people don't realize they could have waited longer for a higher benefit. Also, you might want to use the SSA's online benefit calculators or consider meeting with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security optimization. The timing decision can have a huge impact on your lifetime benefits, especially when you factor in both of your life expectancies and potential survivor benefits.

0 coins

Great point about the delayed retirement credits! I didn't realize that was still an option once someone starts collecting. This whole Social Security system has so many nuances that it's easy to miss important details. The idea of meeting with a specialist makes a lot of sense given how much money is at stake over the long term. Thanks for mentioning the lifetime benefit perspective - that's definitely something we need to factor in beyond just our immediate cash flow needs.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation with my husband last year! One thing that really helped us was creating a spreadsheet to compare different scenarios - like what our total household income would look like if he filed at 66 vs waiting until 67 or even 70. Don't forget to factor in taxes too - Social Security benefits can be taxable depending on your other income sources. We ended up deciding it made sense for him to file early because we needed the cash flow, even though it meant leaving some money on the table long-term. Sometimes the bird in the hand is worth more than waiting for the potential bird in the bush, especially if you have health concerns or other financial pressures.

0 coins

everyones ignoring the obvious - 20 yr olds change jobs like they change clothes. my kids had like 5 diff jobs by age 25. she prob wont even be there next yr so why stress about it

0 coins

You make a fair point! She is definitely not planning to stay in this job long-term - it's just convenient while she's in school. I was just worried about potential long-term impacts of even a short stint in this system.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with similar decisions, I'd say don't overthink this one. At 20 with a part-time job making $12k/year, the PARS contributions are minimal and unlikely to significantly impact her Social Security benefits decades from now. The WEP reduction is proportional to your non-covered pension amount - a small pension from 2-3 years of part-time work would result in a very small WEP reduction, if any. Plus, if she ends up with 30+ years of substantial Social Security earnings (which is likely given her age), WEP won't apply at all. I'd focus on her building good work experience and figuring out her career path rather than worrying about retirement systems at this stage. The financial impact of this decision is probably much smaller than you think.

0 coins

This is exactly the perspective I needed to hear! As a parent, I think I was getting caught up in trying to optimize every financial decision for her future, but you're absolutely right - at her age and income level, this is such a small piece of her overall financial picture. The math really puts it in perspective when you think about decades of future earnings versus a couple years of minimal PARS contributions. I should probably focus more on helping her explore career options and build skills rather than stressing about retirement calculations for someone who's barely started working!

0 coins

You actually only need 40 quarters (10 years) to qualify for your own retirement benefit. With 15 years of even part-time work, you might qualify! Definitely check your my Social Security account online. If you do have your own benefit, you'll receive the higher of: 1) your own reduced retirement benefit, or 2) your reduced spousal benefit. They don't stack - you get the larger of the two.

0 coins

this happened to my cousin! she thought shed get spousal but turns out her own benefit was actually higher so that's what they gave her. definately check ur record!!

0 coins

Just wanted to add my experience here - I went through this exact same situation two years ago! My husband filed at 62 and I was worried my spousal benefits would be tiny. But like everyone else confirmed, it's based on his full retirement age amount (PIA), not what he's actually getting. The SSA representative I finally got through to was really helpful and calculated it out for me on the spot. She explained that his early filing penalty stays with him - it doesn't get passed down to affect my spousal benefit base calculation. The only reduction I get is for MY early filing. I ended up getting about $920/month at age 62, which was way better than I expected! Definitely create your my Social Security account online first - it'll show you estimates and your earnings record so you know exactly what to expect before you apply.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your real experience Diego! That's really encouraging to hear. $920/month sounds pretty good for filing at 62. I'm definitely going to set up my online account this week to check my earnings record and see if I might qualify for my own benefit too. It's so helpful to hear from people who have actually been through this process rather than just trying to decode the SSA website!

0 coins

I went through a very similar situation with my disabled daughter a few years ago. One thing that might be worth considering is the timing of when your husband applies versus when you apply. Since you're the higher earner, your son's potential CDB benefit on your record will likely be significantly higher than on your husband's record. Here's what we learned: If your husband files first at 62, your son can immediately switch from SSI to CDB on his record. Then later when you file for retirement (whenever that is), your son can potentially switch again to the higher benefit on your record if it's more advantageous. The key is that once someone is receiving CDB, they can usually switch to a higher-paying parent's record when that parent becomes eligible. Also, don't forget that when your son switches from SSI to CDB, he'll no longer be subject to those strict SSI asset and income limits, which can be a huge relief for the whole family's financial planning. We were finally able to help our daughter save some money and have a small inheritance without it affecting her benefits. Definitely get those calculations from SSA - the difference in potential benefits between your record and your husband's could be substantial given the earnings gap you mentioned.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information! I hadn't realized that our son could potentially switch between records to get the higher benefit. The part about no longer being subject to SSI asset limits is huge for us - we've been so worried about accidentally affecting his eligibility by helping him financially. It sounds like CDB could really open up more options for our family's long-term planning. Thank you for sharing your experience - it's exactly the kind of real-world insight I was hoping to find here!

0 coins

I work as a benefits counselor and see families in your exact situation regularly. A few additional points that might help: First, regarding the timing strategy - since you mentioned your husband just turned 62, you have some flexibility here. One approach to consider: your husband could file for his retirement benefits now (even with the reduction) to get your son immediately onto CDB benefits and off the restrictive SSI program. This gives your son 5 extra years of the higher CDB payments and eliminates the SSI asset/income restrictions right away. When you reach 62 in 7 years, you can evaluate whether your son should switch to CDB on your higher-earning record. The math might work out favorably even with your husband's reduced benefit, especially considering your son gets those extra years of higher payments. Also, make sure to ask SSA about retroactive benefits when your son switches from SSI to CDB - sometimes there can be back payments involved if the application process takes time. One last thing - if your son is currently receiving Medicaid through his SSI eligibility, switching to CDB shouldn't affect his Medicaid in most states, but definitely confirm this with your local Medicaid office as healthcare coverage is crucial. The system is complex, but you're asking all the right questions. Good luck!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping for! The strategy of having my husband file now to get our son onto CDB immediately makes a lot of sense when you put it that way - those 5 extra years of higher payments plus freedom from SSI restrictions could really add up. I hadn't thought about the retroactive benefits possibility either. One question about the Medicaid piece - our son's healthcare needs are pretty significant, so maintaining coverage is absolutely critical. When you say "most states," are there some states where switching from SSI to CDB could jeopardize Medicaid eligibility? We're in California if that helps. I definitely don't want to make a move that improves his monthly income but costs him his healthcare coverage. Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed professional guidance - it's invaluable to hear from someone who works with these situations regularly!

0 coins

Prev1...512513514515516...837Next