Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

My husband faced the same question last year. Just want to add that when you apply online they actually help walk you through picking the right start date. The system asks when you want your benefits to begin and has information explaining how benefits are paid for each month. Super straightforward process once you get there!

0 coins

Just went through this exact situation last year! The key thing to remember is that Social Security benefits are calculated and paid by full months, not by specific dates. Since you reached FRA on July 18, 2024, if you want to work exactly one additional year, you should apply for benefits to start on August 1, 2025. This ensures you get full delayed retirement credit for July 2025. The application process is actually pretty user-friendly online - they walk you through selecting the right start date. I'd recommend applying about 3 months ahead of time (around May 2025) to avoid any processing delays. You'll get that nice 8% annual boost for each year you delay past FRA!

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who just went through it! Quick question - when you applied 3 months ahead, did you notice any issues with the timing or processing? I'm worried about applying too early and having something go wrong with the start date.

0 coins

I'm 68 and went through all this Medicare enrollment chaos two years ago - this thread brings back so many memories! What's really troubling is how much more sophisticated these scams have gotten since then. I remember getting maybe one or two suspicious emails, but it sounds like you folks are getting bombarded with them now. One thing I learned the hard way: even if you think you're being careful, these scammers are getting incredibly good at psychological manipulation. They sent me a fake "Medicare card replacement" email right after I had legitimately lost my card, and I almost fell for it because the timing seemed too coincidental to be fake. Thankfully I called my local SSA office first (after waiting 90 minutes!) and they confirmed it was a scam. Here's something nobody mentioned yet - keep a written log of ALL your legitimate government interactions: dates you called, reference numbers, what you discussed, etc. When I get suspicious emails now, I can quickly check my log to see if there's any legitimate reason I'd be getting that communication. It's saved me multiple times from second-guessing myself. Also, tell your adult children about these scams! My daughter now helps me review any government-related emails before I respond to anything. Having an extra set of eyes really helps, especially when you're stressed or dealing with health issues that might affect your judgment. Stay vigilant everyone - unfortunately these scams are only going to get worse as more of us age into Medicare eligibility.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice from someone who's been through the whole process! The written log idea is brilliant - I never would have thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. When you're dealing with multiple government agencies and legitimate appointments, having a record to reference would definitely help distinguish real communications from fake ones. Your point about involving adult children is really important too. I'm 64 and sometimes my kids are more skeptical of suspicious emails than I am, especially when I'm stressed about deadlines or worried I might have forgotten something important. Having that second opinion can be invaluable. The timing manipulation you described with the "Medicare card replacement" email is particularly scary - these scammers are clearly monitoring for vulnerable moments when we're most likely to let our guard down. It shows how sophisticated their targeting has become. I'm definitely going to start keeping a written log of all my government interactions starting now. Thanks for sharing your hard-learned wisdom - it's going to help so many of us avoid these increasingly clever scams!

0 coins

I'm 56 and this discussion has been absolutely crucial for me to read! While I still have several years before Medicare, I'm already seeing how important it is to get educated about these scams early. What really alarms me is how these criminals are specifically targeting people during one of the most stressful and confusing periods of our lives - when we're trying to navigate Medicare enrollment and Social Security for the first time. The fake domain example "ssa-services.gov" is terrifying because I probably would have missed that subtle difference too, especially if I was already overwhelmed with legitimate paperwork. I'm implementing several strategies from this thread immediately: setting up a dedicated government email account, enabling two-factor authentication on my future SSA account, and starting that written log of government interactions that Freya mentioned. What gives me hope is seeing how this community is actively sharing knowledge to protect each other. By the time I reach Medicare age, I'll be much better prepared thanks to everyone's experiences shared here. I'm also going to make sure my parents (who are in their 80s) know about these specific scam tactics - they might be getting targeted too but not recognizing the signs. Thank you Lucas for posting this important warning, and thanks to everyone who shared such detailed advice. This thread is going to help protect so many people from these increasingly sophisticated scammers!

0 coins

You're so wise to start preparing early! I'm 54 and feeling the same way after reading everyone's experiences. What really strikes me is how these scammers are essentially weaponizing our legitimate concerns about properly managing our benefits and healthcare. They know we're anxious about doing everything correctly during these major transitions, and they exploit that anxiety perfectly. The community knowledge sharing here has been incredible - I've learned more about protecting myself from these scams in this one thread than from any official government resource. I'm also going to have conversations with my older relatives about these tactics. My aunt is 72 and very trusting of official-looking communications, so I want to make sure she knows what to watch for. One thing I'm adding to my preparation checklist: bookmarking the legitimate SSA and Medicare websites now so I can type them in directly rather than ever clicking email links. It seems like such a simple thing, but when you're stressed or dealing with deadlines, it's easy to take shortcuts that could lead to trouble. Thanks for emphasizing how this knowledge will help protect our parents too - they're often even more vulnerable to these scams, especially if they're not as comfortable with technology. This thread really shows the power of intergenerational knowledge sharing in fighting these criminals!

0 coins

Confusion with spousal benefits - received my SS benefit letter but no spousal excess mentioned despite deemed filing rule

I'm totally confused about this spousal benefit situation and hoping someone can explain what's happening. My husband started collecting his Social Security at 70 in March 2025 ($3,950/month). I just filed for my own benefits last month (I'm 66, born in 1959) so I'm taking them before my FRA which I know means a reduction. I got my Benefits Verification letter yesterday showing $1,450/month, which matches what my SS account showed for early filing. But here's what's confusing me - there's absolutely NO mention of any spousal benefits in the letter! My husband's FRA benefit (not his age 70 amount) is around $3,200, which is WAY more than double my benefit. So I should qualify for some spousal excess, right? Even with the reduction for filing early. I called SSA yesterday and the person said there was no record of me applying for spousal benefits at all, so they scheduled me for a phone appointment on January 16th. I got the confirmation email right away. But this morning my husband got an email from SSA about a phone appointment on January 17th that HE never requested! What's going on? We've been married for 42 years! I thought the whole 'deemed filing' rule meant SSA would automatically look at all benefits I might qualify for. I even specifically wrote in the 'Notes' section of my application that I was applying for spousal excess! I haven't worked since 2007, so my own benefit is pretty small. We both paid into Social Security our whole careers. Can anyone explain why they scheduled my husband for an appointment too? And I thought deemed filing was automatic - isn't that how it works?

I'm currently dealing with this exact same frustrating situation! Filed for my benefits at 65 three weeks ago, my husband has been collecting since he turned 70 last year ($3,750/month), and I got my award letter showing only my reduced retirement benefit of $1,295/month with absolutely no mention of spousal benefits despite clearly qualifying under deemed filing. Called SSA twice and got that same maddening "no record of spousal benefits application" response both times, even though I specifically noted it in my application and assumed deemed filing made it automatic! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - I was really starting to panic that I had somehow screwed up my application, but it's obvious this is a widespread systemic processing issue. What's been most helpful from all these stories is understanding that the separate appointments are normal procedure and that backpay will go back to the original filing date once everything gets processed. I have my appointment scheduled for this Thursday and now I know to expect my husband to get one too. It's honestly unbelievable that something called "deemed filing" - which is literally supposed to be AUTOMATIC - consistently requires multiple phone calls, appointments, and months of follow-up to actually function. But this community sharing real experiences has been more valuable than hours spent trying to navigate SSA's confusing website! I'll definitely update after our appointments to help others going through this same bureaucratic nightmare.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this too, but honestly it's somewhat comforting to know I'm not alone in this mess! I just started the application process last week and after reading all these stories, I'm already preparing myself for the same "no record" runaround. It's absolutely mind-boggling that so many people are experiencing identical failures with what SSA calls "automatic" deemed filing. The consistency of these processing problems really highlights how broken their system is. I'm really grateful for everyone sharing their real experiences here because it's helping all of us understand what to expect from this bureaucratic nightmare. Good luck with your appointment Thursday - I'll be watching for your update to see how it goes! This thread has been more helpful than anything I could find on SSA's website.

0 coins

I'm currently going through this exact same issue and it's incredibly frustrating! Filed for my benefits at 66 last month (born in 1959), my husband has been collecting since he turned 70 ($3,875/month), and I received my award letter showing only my reduced retirement benefit of $1,380/month with zero mention of spousal benefits despite clearly qualifying under deemed filing rules. When I called SSA last week, I got that same infuriating "no record of spousal benefits application" response that so many others here have described. I was starting to think I had somehow messed up my application, but reading through all these experiences has been such a relief - it's clearly a widespread systemic processing problem, not something we did wrong individually. What's been most reassuring from everyone's stories is learning that the separate appointments are actually normal procedure and that backpay will go back to the original filing date once everything gets processed. I have my appointment scheduled for next Tuesday and now I expect my husband will get one too. It's honestly shocking that something called "deemed filing" - which is supposed to be AUTOMATIC - consistently requires multiple phone calls and appointments to actually work properly. But this community sharing real experiences has been more valuable than anything I could find on SSA's website. I'll definitely update after our appointments to help others navigate this same bureaucratic mess!

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! Just filed for my benefits at 64 last week and after reading through everyone's experiences here, I'm already mentally preparing for the same "no record" response from SSA. My husband has been collecting since he turned 70 ($4,200/month) and I made absolutely sure to mention spousal benefits in my application notes multiple times. It's honestly incredible how many people are experiencing identical processing failures with what's supposed to be "automatic" deemed filing. This thread has been such a lifesaver for understanding what to expect - I was worried I was the only one who might run into these issues! Your timeline sounds very similar to what I'm anticipating, so I'm really hoping to hear how your appointment goes next Tuesday. Good luck getting it all sorted out, and thank you for planning to update us afterward!

0 coins

Wow, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm not even close to retirement age yet, but reading through all these detailed explanations about the earnings test and benefit timing has really opened my eyes to how complex Social Security planning can be. The consensus here is so clear - waiting until January 2026 is absolutely the smart move in your situation. The difference between potentially losing over $16,000 in benefits versus only about $340-680 is just massive! It's amazing how one month can make such a huge financial difference. What really struck me is how many people mentioned they almost made the same mistake of filing in December without realizing the impact. It seems like this is a really common trap that people fall into. The fact that SSA applies the annual earnings test to your entire year's income, even if you're only collecting benefits for one month, seems particularly harsh but good to know about in advance. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this is exactly the kind of practical advice that makes this community so valuable. Even though I won't need this information for years, I'm definitely bookmarking this thread for future reference!

0 coins

You're absolutely right about this being a common trap! I think the issue is that Social Security's rules around the earnings test aren't very intuitive - most people assume that if you're only collecting benefits for one month, they'd only look at that month's earnings. The reality that they examine your entire year's income even for partial-year benefits is definitely not obvious. What's really valuable about threads like this is seeing how many people have personal experience with these exact scenarios. It's one thing to read the official SSA publications, but hearing from real people who've navigated these decisions (and sometimes learned the hard way) provides such practical insight you can't get anywhere else. I'm glad you're bookmarking this for the future! Even though retirement might seem far away, understanding these nuances early gives you such an advantage when it comes time to make these decisions. The more you know about how the system works, the better you can plan to maximize your benefits when the time comes.

0 coins

This has been such a comprehensive discussion! As someone who's helped many clients navigate Social Security timing decisions, I want to emphasize one additional consideration that hasn't been fully addressed yet: the psychological aspect of this choice. Many people feel anxious about "leaving money on the table" by not starting benefits as soon as they're eligible, especially when they see that first month of December 2025 as a "lost" benefit payment. But as everyone here has clearly demonstrated with the math, that perceived "lost" month would actually cost you thousands in withheld benefits due to the earnings test. The other thing worth noting is that once you make this timing decision, it sets the foundation for your entire Social Security strategy going forward. Starting in January 2026 with minimal benefit withholding gives you a clean slate and predictable monthly payments, which makes financial planning much easier in early retirement. Also, don't forget to factor in Medicare timing if that's relevant to your situation. While Medicare eligibility starts at 65 regardless of when you claim Social Security, having a clear Social Security benefit timeline can help with overall healthcare and retirement planning. You're making a very well-informed decision based on excellent community advice. January 2026 is definitely the way to go!

0 coins

I'm really sorry you're facing this difficult situation. As others have confirmed, unfortunately your daughter's survivor benefit won't increase when your benefits stop - each person gets their own calculated amount and when one becomes ineligible, that portion just ends. One thing I wanted to add that might help with planning: since you mentioned your daughter previously qualified for SSI but lost it when survivor benefits increased, you should definitely keep that SSI case information handy. If her survivor benefits ever decrease in the future (like if there are changes to the calculation), she might become eligible for SSI again to make up the difference. SSI acts as a safety net when other benefits aren't enough to meet basic needs. Also, for the DAC application, make sure you're emphasizing how her autism and cognitive delays will prevent her from being able to work and support herself as an adult. SSA looks at whether someone can do "substantial gainful activity" - so document things like her inability to handle workplace social interactions, follow complex instructions, manage time/schedules independently, or cope with workplace stress and changes in routine. I know this is incredibly stressful, but you're doing all the right things by planning ahead and fighting for her benefits. The DAC benefits could provide lifelong financial security for her, so it's definitely worth persisting through the application process even if it takes multiple attempts.

0 coins

This is really helpful information about potentially reestablishing SSI eligibility in the future! I hadn't thought about keeping those old SSI case records, but you're absolutely right that we might need them if circumstances change. I'm going to dig out all that paperwork and create a file specifically for future reference. Your advice about emphasizing workplace limitations for the DAC application is spot on. I've been thinking too much about her medical conditions and not enough about the practical reality that she could never function in a work environment. She has major issues with changes in routine, gets overwhelmed by social interactions, and needs step-by-step guidance for even basic tasks. The idea of her trying to navigate workplace expectations and deadlines is honestly unimaginable. Thank you for the reminder that DAC benefits could provide lifelong security - that's exactly what keeps me motivated to keep fighting through this process even when it feels overwhelming. Knowing that approval could mean she's financially protected for life makes all these bureaucratic battles worth it. I really appreciate you taking the time to share this guidance. Having concrete next steps like documenting workplace limitations and keeping SSI records gives me something productive to focus on instead of just worrying about the unknown.

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this incredibly stressful situation. As a parent of a child with disabilities myself, I completely understand the anxiety about financial security and navigating SSA's complex system. From what I've learned through my own experience and from reading the excellent advice here, you're unfortunately correct that your daughter's survivor benefit won't increase when your benefits stop at her age 16. The benefits are calculated individually, and losing one beneficiary doesn't redistribute that amount to others. One thing I'd suggest that hasn't been mentioned yet is to start documenting your daughter's daily support needs in a journal format. Write down specific examples of assistance she needs with tasks like personal hygiene, meal preparation, money management, safety awareness, etc. This creates a clear picture of her functional limitations that goes beyond medical reports. I found this really helpful when we were going through our own disability determination process. Also, when you do get that job, consider asking HR about any employee assistance programs or disability-related benefits they might offer. Some employers have resources for employees caring for family members with disabilities that could provide additional support during this transition. You're clearly an amazing advocate for your daughter, and your proactive planning shows incredible dedication. The system is frustrating and confusing, but don't give up on the DAC benefits - they could provide that crucial long-term security she'll need. Wishing you strength and success in this process.

0 coins

Prev1...219220221222223...836Next