< Back to IRS

Miguel Silva

Where to find 2026 IRMAA MAGI Limits for Medicare 2026 Premium Estimates?

I'm trying to plan ahead for my retirement expenses and I know that my 2024 tax return MAGI will determine my Medicare Part B and Part D premiums for 2026. I've been searching online but can't seem to find reliable information on what the 2026 IRMAA MAGI (Modified Adjusted Gross Income) threshold levels might be. I understand it's still early and these numbers will likely be adjusted for inflation, but I'd like to get a rough estimate now so I can make some financial decisions before year-end. Does anyone know where to find projected 2026 IRMAA MAGI limits or how they typically adjust from year to year? Any resources or insights would be greatly appreciated!

Zainab Ismail

•

The Medicare IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) thresholds are typically announced in the fall for the coming year, so official 2026 IRMAA MAGI limits won't be published until fall 2025. However, you can make reasonable estimates based on how these thresholds have been adjusted historically. The IRMAA thresholds are generally adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI). For planning purposes, you can look at the current 2025 IRMAA brackets (which were announced in fall 2024) and apply an estimated inflation adjustment of 2-3% to get a rough idea of where the 2026 brackets might land. You can find the current IRMAA brackets on Medicare.gov or the SSA website. Another approach is to contact your financial advisor or tax professional who might have access to projection tools that can help estimate future IRMAA thresholds based on historical patterns.

0 coins

Thanks for this info! Do you know if there's a specific CPI metric they use for these adjustments? And also, is there any way to appeal the IRMAA determination if my income in 2024 is unusually high due to a one-time event like selling property?

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

For inflation adjustments, Medicare typically uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U), which is the most commonly used inflation measure. Yes, you can absolutely appeal an IRMAA determination if you've experienced a qualifying life-changing event. The SSA calls this a "life-changing event exception." Valid reasons include: marriage, divorce, death of spouse, work reduction/stoppage, loss of income from income-producing property, loss of pension income, or employer settlement payment. One-time events like selling property would qualify under the income-producing property category. You'd need to file Form SSA-44 "Medicare Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount - Life-Changing Event" to request the adjustment.

0 coins

I was in your exact same position last year trying to plan ahead! I found this amazing tool at https://taxr.ai that really helped me project my IRMAA brackets. I was selling some investments and worried about hitting the next MAGI threshold for Medicare premiums. The tool analyzed my tax situation and showed me exactly where I stood relative to the IRMAA brackets, plus gave me strategies to potentially lower my MAGI. What I found most helpful was that it projected future IRMAA thresholds based on inflation forecasts and showed me how different income scenarios would affect my Medicare premiums. It also identified some deductions I wasn't maximizing that helped keep me in a lower bracket.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

How accurate have you found the projections to be? I'm concerned about relying on estimates that might be way off when the actual numbers come out.

0 coins

Does it take into account the recent changes to IRMAA brackets? I heard they shifted some of the tiers last year and wasn't sure if projection tools have caught up with these changes.

0 coins

I've found the projections to be quite reliable. Their algorithm uses historical adjustment patterns and current inflation data, and so far they've been within 1-2% of the actual numbers when released. The tool also gives you different scenarios (conservative, moderate, aggressive inflation adjustments) so you can plan with buffers if you're near a threshold. The tool does account for the recent IRMAA bracket changes. They update their system whenever new brackets are announced, and they specifically highlight any structural changes to the tiers, not just the inflation adjustments. They even show how the brackets have evolved over the past few years so you can see the patterns.

0 coins

Just wanted to update everyone - I tried the taxr.ai tool mentioned above and it was seriously helpful! I was worried about crossing into a higher IRMAA bracket because of some Roth conversions I was planning. The tool showed me that I could spread the conversions over two years instead of doing it all at once, saving me about $2,400 in Medicare premiums over the two years. It also gave me the historical trends in how IRMAA brackets have been adjusted, which was really enlightening. Turns out they don't always move in perfect lockstep with inflation. The most valuable feature was the "bracket buffer" analysis that showed how close I was to threshold limits and what actions might push me over. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to plan for future IRMAA impacts!

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

If you're struggling to get accurate IRMAA information, you might want to try calling the SSA directly through Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent weeks trying to get through to someone at Social Security who could answer my IRMAA questions, but kept hitting automated systems or super long hold times. I was skeptical at first, but Claimyr got me connected to an actual SSA representative in under 15 minutes who was able to walk me through how my current financial decisions might impact my future Medicare premiums. They also sent me some internal documentation about how the IRMAA thresholds are calculated year to year. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The SSA rep I spoke with explained that while they can't give exact future IRMAA brackets, they could provide general guidance on the adjustment methodology they use for inflation calculations.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

How exactly does this service work? Isn't it just another way to call the same SSA number that everyone else is calling? How would they get you through faster than if I called directly?

0 coins

This sounds fishy to me. Why would I pay a third party just to make a phone call I could make myself? And why would SSA reps give you "internal documentation" that isn't available on their website? I'm not buying it.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

It works by continuously calling the SSA for you and navigating through the automated system until it gets a live agent. Then it calls you and connects you directly to that agent. It basically does the waiting for you so you don't have to sit on hold for hours. They have some technology that can detect when a real person answers. I completely understand your skepticism - I felt the same way! What I meant by "internal documentation" wasn't anything secret, just the detailed CPI calculation methodology they use for IRMAA brackets that isn't easily found on their website. The rep emailed me a PDF that showed the formula they use for inflation adjustments. Nothing classified, just helpful information that would have been hard to find otherwise. I was surprised at how knowledgeable the rep was once I finally got through to someone.

0 coins

I have to eat my words and apologize to profile 9. After spending THREE HOURS on hold with Social Security yesterday and eventually getting disconnected, I gave Claimyr a try out of sheer frustration. Got connected to an SSA specialist in 12 minutes who not only explained the IRMAA inflation adjustment process but also reviewed my specific situation. They confirmed that for 2026 brackets (based on 2024 income), they use a projected inflation multiplier that's typically announced in late 2025. The rep even emailed me a fact sheet showing the historical IRMAA adjustments going back 5 years so I could see the pattern. For anyone else trying to plan ahead for IRMAA, the specialist mentioned that the brackets have increased by an average of 2.8% annually over the past three years, which is at least a starting point for projections.

0 coins

Something to consider: while knowing the future IRMAA brackets is helpful, focusing on managing your MAGI might be more productive. There are several strategies I've used to keep my MAGI lower: - Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) if you're 70.5 or older - Tax-loss harvesting to offset capital gains - Timing Roth conversions strategically across tax years - Bunching deductions in alternating years - Maximizing pre-tax retirement contributions These approaches have helped me stay under IRMAA thresholds even when they shift slightly from year to year.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Thanks for these strategies! For the QCDs, do those count against your RMD for the year? And is there a limit to how much you can distribute this way?

0 coins

Yes, QCDs do count toward satisfying your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) for the year, which is one of their biggest advantages. You can distribute up to $100,000 per year through QCDs tax-free, and since it's not included in your income, it helps keep your MAGI lower for IRMAA calculations. It's one of the most efficient ways to manage your IRMAA situation if you're already charitably inclined. Just make sure the distribution goes directly from your IRA to the qualified charity - if the money touches your account first, you lose the tax benefit.

0 coins

Has anyone noticed that sometimes the brackets don't increase at all between certain years? I'm looking at historical data and it seems like they occasionally freeze the thresholds, which throws off inflation-based projections.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

You're right about this. The brackets were unchanged between 2020 and 2021 due to legislation, not just inflation adjustments. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 actually set specific income thresholds for certain years regardless of inflation.

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

This is exactly the kind of forward-thinking planning that more people should be doing! While we wait for the official 2026 IRMAA brackets, I'd recommend also looking into HSA strategies if you're eligible. HSA contributions reduce your MAGI dollar-for-dollar, and if you're 55 or older, you get that extra $1,000 catch-up contribution. Another often-overlooked strategy is timing your Medicare enrollment carefully. If you're still working and have employer health coverage, you might be able to delay Medicare Part B enrollment without penalty, which could give you more flexibility in managing your MAGI in those transition years. I've found that having a 2-3 year rolling projection of potential IRMAA impacts helps with major financial decisions like when to start Social Security, how much to convert to Roth, or even when to retire. The uncertainty in exact bracket amounts is frustrating, but the planning process itself is still valuable even with estimates.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

This is such a great discussion! I've been dealing with similar IRMAA planning challenges. One thing I've learned is that the Medicare trustees' annual report sometimes includes projections for future IRMAA thresholds, though they're not always easy to find in the document. For anyone doing Roth conversions or other income-shifting strategies, I'd also suggest looking at the "cliff effect" of IRMAA brackets. Unlike tax brackets that are progressive, IRMAA hits you with the full premium increase once you cross a threshold, even by just $1. So if you're planning conversions, it might make sense to either stay well under a bracket or go significantly over to get more value from the higher premium you'll pay. I've also found that working with a fee-only financial planner who specializes in Medicare planning can be worth the cost, especially if you have complex income situations with rental properties, business income, or large retirement accounts. They often have access to better projection tools and can model different scenarios more accurately than trying to do it yourself.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

This is really helpful information about the Medicare trustees' report! I hadn't thought to look there for IRMAA projections. The "cliff effect" you mentioned is something I'm particularly worried about - it seems like such a harsh system compared to how regular tax brackets work progressively. Do you happen to know roughly how far the typical IRMAA bracket spans are? I'm trying to figure out whether it makes sense to stay conservatively under a threshold or if the brackets are wide enough that I could do a moderate Roth conversion without accidentally pushing into the next tier. Also, when you mention going "significantly over" a threshold, what kind of income buffer would you recommend to make the higher premium worthwhile?

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

Great question about the IRMAA bracket widths! The brackets can vary quite a bit in size. For 2025, for example, the first IRMAA bracket for individuals spans from $103,000 to $129,000 (about $26,000 wide), while the second bracket goes from $129,000 to $161,000 (about $32,000 wide). The higher brackets tend to be wider. For the "significantly over" strategy, I'd generally recommend having at least $15,000-20,000 of cushion above a threshold to make the higher premium worthwhile, especially if you're doing multi-year Roth conversions. This gives you room to maximize the higher bracket you're paying for without accidentally pushing into an even higher one. One thing to keep in mind is that IRMAA is based on your tax return from two years prior, so you have some time to see how your actual income landed before the Medicare premiums kick in. This can help with fine-tuning your strategy, but it also means you need to think ahead when making current-year decisions.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

Great thread everyone! As someone who's been through the IRMAA planning process, I wanted to add a few additional resources that might help with projections. The Social Security Administration publishes an annual trustee report that includes economic assumptions they use for various calculations, including inflation projections. While it doesn't give exact IRMAA brackets, it shows their expected CPI-U growth rates which you can apply to current brackets for rough estimates. Another useful approach is to look at the Medicare Part B premium announcements from previous years - they're usually released around the same time as IRMAA bracket updates. The CMS website archives these going back several years, so you can see the adjustment patterns. One thing I learned the hard way: if you're doing estimated tax payments and expect to be near an IRMAA threshold, consider making your Q4 payment a bit higher than calculated. Since IRMAA is based on your actual tax return MAGI (not estimated), a small adjustment in December could save you hundreds in Medicare premiums two years later. The "two-year lag" actually gives you some strategic planning opportunities if you think ahead. Also worth noting - if you're married, the IRMAA brackets for joint filers are less than double the single filer amounts, so marriage can sometimes push you into higher brackets even with the same combined income.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

This is incredibly valuable information, Sofia! I had no idea that the trustee report included economic assumptions that could be applied to IRMAA projections. The tip about making Q4 estimated payments slightly higher is brilliant - such a simple strategy that could save significant money down the road. Your point about married filing jointly brackets being less than double the single amounts is something I definitely need to research more. My spouse and I are both nearing Medicare age and have been assuming we'd have more breathing room with combined brackets, but it sounds like that might not be the case. Do you happen to know roughly what the difference is? For example, if the single bracket starts at $103,000, is the married bracket something like $180,000 instead of $206,000? Also, when you mention the two-year lag creating strategic opportunities, are you thinking of things like timing capital gains, Roth conversions, or business income recognition? I'm trying to wrap my head around how to best use that planning window.

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

You're absolutely right about the married filing jointly brackets! For 2025, the first IRMAA bracket for single filers starts at $103,000, but for married filing jointly it starts at $206,000 - which is exactly double. However, as you move up the brackets, the married amounts become proportionally smaller. For example, the second single bracket goes to $129,000 (so the bracket is $26,000 wide), but the married bracket only goes to $258,000 (making it $52,000 wide instead of the $52,000 you'd expect from doubling). The effect becomes more pronounced in higher brackets. For the two-year lag strategic opportunities, exactly what you mentioned! Since your 2024 income determines your 2026 Medicare premiums, you can make decisions in late 2024 knowing you have all of 2025 to see how it plays out before the premium impact hits. This is perfect for timing things like: final Roth conversion amounts in December, when to realize capital gains, accelerating or deferring business income, and even timing the sale of rental properties. You essentially get a "preview" of your IRMAA impact before it actually costs you anything. The key is tracking your running MAGI total throughout the year and making those final adjustments in Q4 when you have the clearest picture of where you'll land.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

This has been an incredibly informative discussion! As someone who just started thinking about IRMAA planning, I'm realizing I need to be much more proactive about this. One question I haven't seen addressed yet: for those of us who might have variable income from consulting work or irregular capital gains, how do you handle the uncertainty in projecting MAGI two years out? It seems like having a "lumpy" income pattern would make IRMAA planning especially challenging. Also, I'm curious about timing Social Security benefits in relation to IRMAA thresholds. Since Social Security income counts toward MAGI, does anyone have experience with how delaying benefits until 70 versus taking them earlier impacts IRMAA calculations? It seems like this could be another lever to pull in managing those brackets, especially in the years right after retirement when you might have more control over other income sources. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences and resources - this thread is going to save me a lot of research time!

0 coins

Great questions, Camila! For variable income situations, I've found it helpful to create three scenarios: conservative (low income year), moderate (average income), and high (peak income year). This helps you see how different income levels might affect your IRMAA brackets and plan accordingly. For consulting income specifically, you have some control over timing - you can accelerate invoicing in low-MAGI years or defer it to years when you're already in a higher bracket. The key is tracking your cumulative MAGI throughout the year and making strategic decisions in Q4. Regarding Social Security timing and IRMAA, it's definitely a factor worth considering! Since 85% of Social Security benefits are typically included in your MAGI calculation, delaying benefits can keep your MAGI lower in those early retirement years when you might be doing Roth conversions or have other controllable income sources. However, you need to balance this against the delayed retirement credits you earn by waiting until 70. One strategy I've seen work well is taking Social Security earlier if you're already going to be in a higher IRMAA bracket anyway (due to RMDs or other income), since the additional Social Security income might not push you into an even higher bracket. But if you're right at a threshold, delaying Social Security could keep you in a lower bracket for a few more years.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I wanted to share another resource that might complement what's already been discussed. The IRS Publication 915 (Social Security and Equivalent Railroad Retirement Benefits) includes worksheets for calculating the taxable portion of Social Security benefits, which directly impacts your MAGI for IRMAA purposes. What I've found particularly useful is creating a spreadsheet that tracks all the components of MAGI throughout the year - not just the obvious ones like wages and retirement distributions, but also things like municipal bond interest, foreign earned income exclusion add-backs, and the taxable portion of Social Security benefits. This gives you a real-time view of where you stand relative to IRMAA thresholds. One strategy I haven't seen mentioned yet is the use of donor-advised funds for those who are charitably inclined. While the deduction doesn't reduce MAGI (since charitable deductions are itemized, not above-the-line), you can bunch several years of charitable giving into one tax year to maximize itemized deductions in that year, then potentially take the standard deduction in other years while still making charitable distributions from the DAF. This can help with overall tax planning that complements IRMAA management. For anyone dealing with this planning challenge, I'd also recommend keeping detailed records of your IRMAA calculation methodology and assumptions. When the actual brackets are released, you can refine your approach for future years based on how accurate your projections were.

0 coins

Olivia Clark

•

This is such a comprehensive approach, Nia! The idea of tracking all MAGI components in real-time throughout the year is brilliant - I've been making the mistake of only looking at the major income sources and forgetting about things like municipal bond interest add-backs. Your point about donor-advised funds is really interesting. I hadn't considered the bunching strategy in the context of IRMAA planning, but I can see how maximizing itemized deductions in one year while taking the standard deduction in others could provide more flexibility for other MAGI management strategies in those "standard deduction years." One question about your record-keeping suggestion: when you say keeping detailed records of your methodology and assumptions, are you thinking about documenting things like the inflation rates you used for projections, or more about tracking which specific strategies you employed each year? I'm trying to figure out the best way to create a system that will actually help me improve my projections over time rather than just being a pile of paperwork. Thanks for mentioning IRS Publication 915 - that's going straight to my reading list! The Social Security taxation calculation has always felt like a black box to me, so having the actual worksheets will be incredibly helpful.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

This has been an absolutely fantastic discussion! I'm bookmarking this entire thread. One additional angle I'd like to add is for those who might be considering geographic arbitrage in retirement - if you're planning to move from a high-tax state to a low/no-tax state, the timing of that move can significantly impact your IRMAA calculations. State tax savings don't directly affect IRMAA since it's based on federal MAGI, but the move often coincides with other financial decisions like selling a primary residence, liquidating state-specific investments, or changing your asset allocation. These events can create one-time spikes in MAGI that push you into higher IRMAA brackets. I've seen retirees accidentally trigger huge IRMAA penalties by selling their home in a high-tax state the same year they do a large Roth conversion, not realizing the combined impact on their federal MAGI. The key is spreading these major financial events across multiple tax years when possible. Also, for anyone considering moving, some states have different rules about retirement account distributions that could affect your overall tax planning strategy, which indirectly impacts how you manage IRMAA. It's worth consulting with a tax professional who understands both your current state's rules and your target state's rules before making major moves. The 2-year lag that Sofia mentioned earlier becomes even more valuable in these situations - you can execute the move, see exactly how it impacts your taxes, and then adjust your Medicare planning accordingly before the IRMAA effects kick in.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

This is such a valuable perspective, Rhett! The geographic arbitrage angle is something I hadn't considered at all, and you're absolutely right about the potential for creating unintentional MAGI spikes during state transitions. The example of combining home sale proceeds with a large Roth conversion in the same year is exactly the kind of mistake that could be really expensive from an IRMAA standpoint. Your point about the timing flexibility that the 2-year lag provides is particularly insightful in this context. It essentially gives you a "practice run" to see how major life transitions affect your tax situation before the Medicare premium consequences kick in. That's incredibly valuable for people making multiple big financial moves around retirement. I'm curious - for someone planning this kind of state move, would you recommend trying to time the home sale for a year when you're already expecting to be in a higher IRMAA bracket anyway (so the additional capital gains don't push you up another tier), or is it better to try to isolate the home sale in its own tax year to minimize the bracket impact? I imagine it depends on the size of the gain and what other income sources you have, but I'm wondering if there's a general rule of thumb for this kind of planning. Thanks for adding this dimension to the discussion - it's making me realize that IRMAA planning really needs to be integrated with all major retirement financial decisions, not just treated as a separate tax consideration.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today