< Back to IRS

Zoe Gonzalez

What would you change about the tax code? Asking for some creative ideas for simplification!

I'm curious what folks would change about our overly complicated tax system. This is just a fun discussion - no wrong answers here! Taxes seem way too complex these days. What changes would you make to simplify things? Or do you actually like the complexity because it keeps you employed? 😂 I'll throw out some ideas to get us started: Get rid of Required Minimum Distributions entirely. When someone passes away, any deferred account balances would just be taxable income on their final 1040. Still allow Spousal Rollover to defer taxation. No more dealing with Inherited IRAs. Eliminate the separate Long-Term Capital Gains / Qualified Dividends rates. Just treat investment income as ordinary income, but include an annual exemption. Like maybe the first $65K of unearned income is completely tax-free. Also dump the Net Investment Income Tax. Stop tying retirement plans to employers. Just make everything IRAs with one big contribution limit of $85k annually. Your employer can still contribute, but it counts toward that limit. No more alphabet soup of SIMPLE IRAs, SEPs, 401ks, 403bs, 457s, etc. Keep the Earned Income requirement though. Let the IRS prepare returns for simple situations. They already have all the info for many taxpayers anyway. This could be a starting point that people can adjust if needed. What would you change?

Ashley Adams

•

Tax professional here. I see so many people confused by our system every day. Some good ideas in your post that would definitely simplify things! I'd add eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax completely. It was originally designed to ensure wealthy taxpayers couldn't escape taxation through excessive deductions, but now it just adds complexity without serving its original purpose effectively. I'd also standardize all the different phase-out thresholds. Currently, different tax benefits phase out at different income levels, which is incredibly confusing. Having a single, consistent definition of "income" for determining eligibility for tax benefits would make planning so much easier. Another big one: eliminate the separate calculation for self-employment taxes. Just treat all income the same way whether it comes from a W-2 job or self-employment. The current system basically punishes entrepreneurs with extra complexity and paperwork.

0 coins

What about student loan interest deduction? That phase-out seems really low to me and it's above-the-line which is different from other deductions. Would your standardized phase-outs apply there too? Also what income definition would you use – AGI, MAGI, or something new?

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

Great question about student loan interest. Yes, I'd include that in the standardized phase-outs. The current threshold is ridiculously low considering today's education costs and salary levels. It phases out so quickly that many graduates lose it right when they start making decent money. I'd use a modified AGI but with fewer adjustments than the current system. Something closer to total income minus only the most essential adjustments. The problem with having multiple definitions (AGI, MAGI, etc.) is that each tax benefit uses a slightly different calculation, which is exactly the complexity we need to eliminate.

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

Struggling with tax issues made me try taxr.ai after my accountant gave me conflicting advice about retirement account contributions. I was trying to figure out if I could still contribute to both my employer 401k and a separate IRA, and getting different answers everywhere. Their document analysis actually showed me that I was eligible for catch-up contributions I didn't know about! The site https://taxr.ai literally saved me hours of research and potentially thousands in tax benefits I would have missed.

0 coins

How exactly does it work? Do you just upload your tax documents and it tells you things you might have missed? I'm self-employed with rental properties and feel like I'm always missing deductions.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Sounds too good to be true honestly. Can it really find things that professional tax software misses? What makes it better than TurboTax or whatever?

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

It works by analyzing your tax documents and identifying optimization opportunities based on your specific situation. You upload your relevant tax documents, and it scans them for potential deductions, credits, and strategies you might have missed. It's especially helpful for complex situations like yours with self-employment and rental properties. What makes it different from regular tax software is that it doesn't just process what you input – it actively looks for optimization opportunities based on your documents and suggests strategies you might not know about. Unlike TurboTax which basically just fills out forms based on what you tell it, this actually reviews your documents to find things you didn't know to look for.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

I was skeptical about taxr.ai but tried it anyway after posting here. Holy crap, it actually found a home office deduction strategy I qualified for that neither I nor my accountant had considered! The system showed me exactly which tax code sections applied to my situation, and I ended up saving over $3,200. It basically paid for itself in the first 10 minutes of using it. Still can't believe I almost didn't try it.

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

Speaking of tax issues, I was pulling my hair out trying to reach the IRS about a notice I received claiming I owed an additional $7,300. Called for WEEKS with no luck - constant busy signals or disconnects after waiting forever. Someone suggested Claimyr https://claimyr.com and shared this video https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. I was desperate enough to try it, and no joke, I had a real IRS person on the phone in under 25 minutes. Turns out the notice was completely wrong - they had double-counted some of my income! Got it resolved in one call instead of months of letters.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

Wait what? How does this actually get you through to the IRS faster? Isn't the whole problem that their phone lines are completely jammed?

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

Sounds scammy. The IRS phone system is the same for everyone. How could a third party possibly get you through faster? And why would anyone pay for that?

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

It uses technology to navigate the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. When it reaches a live person, it calls you and connects you directly to that IRS agent. So instead of you personally waiting on hold for hours, their system does it for you. The IRS phone system is jammed, but the service basically automates the process of calling repeatedly, navigating the menus, and waiting on hold so you don't have to tie up your phone and waste your day. It's not skipping the line - it's just handling the frustrating waiting process for you.

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

I'm eating crow right now. After being super skeptical about Claimyr, I tried it because I've been getting nowhere with the IRS for 3 months about a refund issue. Not only did it work exactly as described, but the IRS agent I spoke with actually told me several other people had reached them through the same service that day! We got my $4,700 refund issue resolved in a 17-minute call after I spent literally dozens of hours trying to reach them on my own. Apparently lots of IRS employees know about the service now.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Getting back to the original question about tax code changes - I'd eliminate the married filing separately status entirely. It's almost always worse than filing jointly, and in the rare cases where it's beneficial, it creates massive complexity. Just have single, married, and head of household. Also, can we PLEASE standardize the definition of "child" across all tax provisions? The different age requirements for dependents vs. child tax credit vs. EIC vs. head of household status make my brain hurt.

0 coins

Zoe Gonzalez

•

The married filing separately thing is interesting! I've rarely seen cases where it's beneficial. But what about separated couples who aren't legally divorced yet? Would you have some exception for them?

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Good point about separated couples! I'd create a simple "legally separated" status that would essentially treat them as single filers. The current system with MFS is just too punitive with all its limitations and phase-outs. The problem is that MFS was designed to prevent gaming the system, but it's become so restrictive that it actually creates unfair outcomes for people in difficult situations, like those separating or dealing with a spouse who won't cooperate on taxes. A better-designed single status for separated individuals would be much more straightforward.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

What about simplifying capital gains? I have to track basis for every stock purchase separately and it's a nightmare. Why not just let me use average cost basis for everything? And why do we have to track wash sales manually? The brokerages already report everything to the IRS anyway!

0 coins

Average cost basis would be amazing! Also why are crypto transactions so complicated tax-wise? I bought and sold some Bitcoin last year and the tax calculations were insane. Each transaction created a taxable event and I had hundreds.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today