What changes would make the tax code less complicated? Sharing ideas for reform
I'm starting a fun discussion about tax code changes. There are no wrong answers here! I think our tax system is way too complicated. What would you change to simplify it? Or do you actually like the complexity because it keeps you employed? 😂 Some ideas to kick things off: Get rid of Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs). When someone dies, any deferred account balances would just be taxable income on their final 1040. Still allow Spousal Rollover to defer that taxation. No more dealing with Inherited IRAs and their complicated rules. Eliminate the special Long-Term Capital Gains/Qualified Dividends rates and just treat everything as ordinary income, BUT include an annual exemption for investment income. Like maybe the first $67K of unearned income is completely tax-free. This would also mean no more Net Investment Income Tax. Take retirement plans away from employment connections. All retirement accounts become IRAs with one big contribution limit of around $100k. Your employer can still contribute but it counts toward that same limit. No more alphabet soup of SIMPLEs, SEPs, 401ks, 403bs, 457s, etc. The Earned Income requirement would still apply though. Let the IRS prepare simple tax returns. They already have most of the info they need for many taxpayers anyway. This could be an option for people with straightforward situations. What would you change?
18 comments


Sydney Torres
Tax professional here, and I actually agree with a lot of your ideas! The retirement account simplification would be amazing - I spend so much time explaining the differences between account types to confused clients. Having one unified type with a single contribution limit would eliminate so many headaches. On the RMD front, that's interesting but I'd suggest a modification. Rather than taxing everything at death, perhaps give heirs a 5-year window to distribute the funds. The sudden tax hit could create liquidity problems for estates that are asset-rich but cash-poor. The IRS-prepared returns for simple situations is actually being tested in some states already! It works well for people with only W-2 income and standard deductions. The taxpayer just reviews the pre-filled form and approves it if everything looks correct. I'd add one more: eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax. It was designed to prevent the wealthy from avoiding taxes, but now it mostly hits middle-class homeowners in high-tax states.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•Do you think eliminating all the different retirement accounts would actually result in people saving less for retirement? I feel like the structure of 401ks with employer matching kind of forces people to save who otherwise wouldn't. Plus the higher contribution limits are nice.
0 coins
Sydney Torres
•That's a valid concern. I believe we could preserve employer matching in a unified system - employers could still contribute to your single retirement account. The psychological benefit of the "free money" from matching would remain to encourage saving. The higher contribution limits would actually be preserved in this proposed system. Currently, when you combine all possible retirement vehicles (401k, IRA, etc.), many people can't maximize them all anyway. Having one simplified $100k limit would actually be higher than what most people can use now while eliminating confusion.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
I've been using https://taxr.ai for helping me understand tax code complications, and it's been a game changer for someone like me who gets lost in all the rules. Last year I had a mix of self-employment income, investment gains, and inheritance questions that created a complete mess for me to figure out. The tool analyzed all my documents and explained exactly how different tax regulations applied to my situation. It even pointed out deductions I was missing for my side gig that my previous accountant never caught! Turns out I was overpaying by treating my hobby as a business incorrectly. What I like is that it actually explains WHY certain rules exist rather than just telling me what to do, which helps me make better financial decisions throughout the year.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•Does it handle state-specific tax questions too? I'm in California and our state tax system sometimes feels even more complicated than federal.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•I'm skeptical of tax AI tools... how accurate is it really? Tax laws change constantly and I've heard horror stories about software giving outdated advice.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
•It absolutely handles state-specific questions, including California's unique rules. I had a question about CA's treatment of out-of-state rental income, and it explained the sourcing rules perfectly. Regarding accuracy, I understand the skepticism. What impressed me was that it always cites specific tax code sections and IRS publications with its advice. When tax laws change, they update their database - they specifically mentioned that after the most recent tax law changes. I've cross-checked some of its recommendations with my CPA and they've confirmed it was giving correct information.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and I'm honestly surprised how helpful it's been. I was struggling with understanding how to handle a Roth conversion and whether it made sense in my tax situation. The tool walked me through a personalized analysis showing exactly how the conversion would affect my taxes over the next 5 years compared to leaving the money where it was. It even factored in potential RMD impacts later in life. What really impressed me was how it explained the pro-rata rule for my partial conversion in plain English. I'd read about it multiple times online but never fully grasped how it would apply to my specific situation until the tool broke it down step by step. Definitely helped me avoid a tax mistake that would have cost thousands!
0 coins
Abigail Patel
My biggest tax code change would be fixing the IRS customer service nightmare! I spent THREE WEEKS trying to get through to a human at the IRS about a notice I received that made zero sense. Every time I called, I got "due to high call volume" messages and disconnects. I finally discovered https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically wait on hold with the IRS for you and call you when they get a human! I was skeptical but desperate enough to try. Within 2 hours, I was talking to an actual IRS agent who explained the notice was sent in error due to a processing delay with my amended return. Could have saved me weeks of stress if I could have just reached someone earlier. Until they fix the IRS phone system, this service is literally saving my sanity during tax season.
0 coins
Daniel White
•How does that even work? Does the IRS allow a third party to wait on hold for you?
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•Sounds like a band-aid solution to me. Wouldn't it be better if the IRS just hired more people? I'm suspicious of any service that profits off government inefficiency.
0 coins
Abigail Patel
•They use a call system that maintains your place in the queue. When an IRS agent answers, the service immediately connects you to the call. The IRS never talks to the service directly - they just bridge you to the call once someone answers. I understand your point about band-aid solutions. Ideally, yes, the IRS would be properly funded and staffed. But the reality is they've been underfunded for years, and that's not changing overnight. In the meantime, when you've got a tax issue that needs immediate attention, waiting 3+ hours on hold multiple times isn't practical for most people. Sometimes practical solutions in the real world aren't perfect, but they help real people with real problems right now.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
Ok I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After complaining here I actually gave it a try because I needed clarification on a CP2000 notice that was giving me anxiety. I tried calling the IRS myself first (one last attempt) and gave up after an hour on hold. Used the Claimyr service and got a call back in about 40 minutes with an actual IRS representative on the line. The representative explained that my 1099-R was reported correctly but the distribution code was missing, which triggered the automated notice. She helped me prepare a simple response letter that should resolve the issue without me having to pay the $3,400 they were claiming I owed. Still think the IRS needs better funding, but I have to acknowledge this service saved me a ton of time and potentially money too.
0 coins
Nolan Carter
I'd completely eliminate tax brackets and go with a simple continuous function. Something like: tax rate = base rate + (income/scale factor)%, capped at some maximum. No more weird jumps where earning $1 more puts you in a new bracket. No more marriage penalties or benefits. Just a smooth progression where each additional dollar earned is taxed slightly more than the previous dollar. This would also eliminate so much confusion about how tax brackets work - I still meet people who think getting a raise can make them take home less money because they "jump to a higher bracket.
0 coins
Natalia Stone
•Wouldn't that make taxes harder to calculate for the average person? At least with brackets you can do the math on paper.
0 coins
Nolan Carter
•Almost nobody calculates taxes by hand anymore. Software (including the IRS systems) would handle the formula just as easily as the current bracket system. The real benefit would be transparency in understanding your effective tax rate. Instead of trying to figure out which dollars fall into which brackets, you'd have a clear formula showing exactly how your tax increases with income. It would actually be simpler conceptually, even if the underlying math uses a formula instead of lookup tables.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
I wish they would just eliminate having to report dividends and capital gains from investments that are already reported to the IRS by financial institutions. I get 1099s from my brokers, the IRS gets copies too, yet I still have to manually enter all this info or pay extra for tax software imports. Such a waste of time. Let the IRS just pull that info directly into a tax form for review. If there's a problem or missing info, then I could correct it, but 99% of the time it's just copying numbers from one form to another that they already have.
0 coins
Selena Bautista
•This times a thousand! Last year Vanguard sent a corrected 1099 in late March after I'd already filed. Had to do an amendment just because a dividend was reclassified. The IRS should handle this stuff automatically.
0 coins