< Back to IRS

Mary Bates

Which federal tax loophole do you think should be eliminated in 2025?

I've been thinking about this a lot lately, especially with all the talk about tax code changes. The one tax loophole I'd really like to see gone is the unlimited charitable estate tax deduction. It just seems ridiculous that it has no upper limit. In my opinion, it should be capped at something reasonable like $25 million. That's more than generous enough for legitimate charitable giving while preventing the ultra-wealthy from completely avoiding estate taxes. I mean, what normal person is even giving away more than $25 million anyway? The current system just lets billionaires set up foundations that their families often control, while paying zero estate tax. Seems like an obvious fix. What loopholes would you all want to see closed?

Tax professional here. The unlimited charitable estate tax deduction does create some interesting planning opportunities, but it's more nuanced than most people realize. This deduction allows estates to reduce their taxable value by donating to qualified charitable organizations. While it can be used strategically by wealthy estates, it also incentivizes significant charitable giving that benefits many nonprofit organizations. The key issue isn't necessarily the deduction itself, but how family foundations are structured and operated. The IRS does have rules governing private foundations, including restrictions on self-dealing, minimum distribution requirements, and prohibitions against excessive business holdings. However, enforcement can be challenging. Rather than capping the deduction at an arbitrary amount like $25 million, a better approach might be strengthening oversight of family foundations and ensuring they truly operate for charitable purposes rather than primarily benefiting the donor's family.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

But don't most of these "charitable foundations" just end up being tax shelters where family members get paid huge salaries to run them? I heard the money just sits there while the kids get director positions. How is that actually charitable?

0 coins

While there are certainly cases of abuse, most foundations are legitimately engaged in charitable work. The IRS requires private foundations to distribute at least 5% of their assets annually for charitable purposes, and there are limitations on compensation. Excessive compensation to family members can trigger penalties. Foundation assets don't just "sit there" - they must be actively used for charitable purposes or distributed to other charities. The real issue is enforcement of existing rules. With better oversight and stricter monitoring of how foundations fulfill their charitable purpose, the system could work as intended without eliminating the charitable deduction that incentivizes significant giving to important causes.

0 coins

I tried using taxr.ai when I was confused about tax loopholes vs. deductions for my small business last year. My accountant was talking about all these deductions I should be taking, but I wasn't sure if they were legitimate or if I was exploiting loopholes. Found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) after googling about business deductions, and it analyzed my situation completely. It was super helpful because it clearly explained the difference between illegal tax evasion, questionable loopholes, and legitimate deductions my business qualified for. I uploaded some docs and got explanations about which deductions were totally legit vs. which might raise flags. Helped me feel confident I wasn't doing anything sketchy while still minimizing my tax burden legally.

0 coins

How exactly does taxr.ai work? Like do I need to provide my SSN or other personal info? I'm always skeptical about giving financial info to websites.

0 coins

Kai Santiago

•

I'm wondering if it's worth the cost though? There are so many "tax helper" services that charge a ton and then just give generic advice you could find on Google.

0 coins

You don't need to provide your SSN or any super sensitive info like that. You can upload tax documents with personal info redacted if you're concerned. It just needs the relevant sections to analyze your situation and provide guidance. It's definitely worth it compared to what I was paying my accountant for hourly consultations. I was spending hundreds just asking basic questions about deductions, whereas taxr.ai gave me clear, specific guidance for my situation. It's not generic advice - it analyzes your specific documents and circumstances to give personalized recommendations.

0 coins

Kai Santiago

•

Just wanted to update everyone - I decided to try taxr.ai after commenting here and I'm actually impressed. I was really skeptical (as you could probably tell from my comment), but it helped me understand whether I was pushing the envelope too far with some rental property deductions I was taking. I uploaded my previous year's Schedule E and some expense documentation, and it flagged a couple deductions that were in a gray area that could potentially trigger an audit. Saved me from some headaches for sure. I was definitely being too aggressive with some home office allocations for my rental management activities. Not generic advice at all - it was specifically tailored to my situation.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

If we're talking about tax loopholes, my personal frustration is trying to get someone at the IRS to actually answer questions about them! Spent HOURS on hold trying to get clarification about a potential audit related to deductions I took that might be considered "loopholes." Finally found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the 2+ hours I was spending on hold. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically navigate the IRS phone tree and wait on hold for you, then call you when they have an agent on the line. When I finally got through to someone, I was able to get a straight answer about my specific situation instead of just guessing whether I was using a legitimate deduction or an exploitative loophole.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

Wait, how does that even work? The IRS actually takes calls from some third-party service? Sounds sketchy.

0 coins

Yeah right. Nobody gets through to the IRS these days. I've tried literally everything and waited on hold for 3+ hours multiple times. There's no way this actually works.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

It's not that they take calls from a third-party service. Claimyr uses an automated system that waits on hold for you. When they reach an agent, they call you and connect you directly. You're the one talking to the IRS agent, not some intermediary. I was super skeptical too. I had tried calling the IRS six different times and never got through. But with Claimyr, I got connected to an actual agent in about 20 minutes (while I was just going about my day instead of sitting by the phone). The agent answered my questions about some deductions I was taking that were in a gray area and helped me understand what documentation I needed to keep.

0 coins

I have to eat my words. After posting that skeptical comment, I was desperate enough to try Claimyr because I needed to resolve an issue about some potentially questionable deductions before filing season. Not gonna lie, I was 100% sure it was gonna be a waste of money. But damn, it actually worked! Got connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes. For comparison, my previous attempt had me on hold for 2.5 hours before I gave up. The agent was able to clarify exactly which parts of my home renovation qualified for energy credits vs. which would be considered loopholes. Cleared up a $4,500 question that my tax preparer and I had been going back and forth on. Sure beats waiting on hold for hours only to have the call drop when you finally get through.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

The loophole I want eliminated is the carried interest loophole. It's insane that hedge fund managers get to classify their income as capital gains instead of ordinary income. They're just doing their jobs managing other people's money, but they pay way lower tax rates than regular working people.

0 coins

Fidel Carson

•

What exactly is the carried interest loophole? I hear about it but don't really understand how it works or why it's such a big deal.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

Carried interest is basically the share of profits that hedge fund and private equity managers get as compensation for managing investments. Instead of being taxed as ordinary income (which can be up to 37%), it's taxed at the capital gains rate (usually 20%). So imagine a fund manager who makes $10 million from managing other people's money. Instead of paying $3.7 million in taxes like other high-earning professionals would, they might only pay $2 million. That's a $1.7 million tax break just because of how their compensation is classified! Meanwhile teachers, doctors, and engineers all pay the higher ordinary income rates on their earnings.

0 coins

The mortgage interest deduction needs major reform. It mostly benefits wealthy people with expensive homes. The deduction should be capped at houses worth $500k or less. Why should taxpayers subsidize mansions?

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

That would totally screw over people in high cost of living areas though. $500k won't even buy you a 1 bedroom condo in San Francisco or NYC. Not everyone with a mortgage over $500k is wealthy - many are middle class families in expensive metro areas.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today