Which federal tax loophole makes you angry enough to want it gone?
I've been thinking about this a lot lately after watching some documentary about how the ultra-wealthy avoid paying their fair share. If you could get rid of one federal tax loophole, which one would it be? For me, it's definitely the unlimited charitable estate tax deduction. It basically lets billionaires dodge estate taxes entirely by "donating" to their own family foundations that their kids often control. I think it should be capped at $35 million max. That's still incredibly generous but would prevent the most egregious abuses. What loopholes drive you crazy?
18 comments


Hiroshi Nakamura
The charitable estate tax deduction definitely needs reform, but it's more complex than just capping it. The purpose is to encourage philanthropy, which does provide societal benefits, but you're right that it can be manipulated. The real issue is how these "charitable" foundations operate after receiving the assets. Many wealthy families maintain effective control over the assets through family foundations while avoiding estate taxes. Better reform would involve stricter regulations on how these foundations must distribute funds, requirements for independent board members, and limitations on administrative expenses paid to family members. That said, there are more problematic loopholes that affect everyday tax collection, like carried interest allowing investment managers to classify income as capital gains instead of ordinary income, or like-kind exchanges that indefinitely defer taxation on real estate gains.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•So what you're saying is that the charitable deduction itself isn't bad, but the way people can create fake charities to dodge taxes is the problem? I've heard about private foundations but don't really understand how they work. Couldn't we just make rules against family members running these foundations?
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•The charitable deduction itself is valuable for society - it encourages genuine philanthropy. The problem isn't family members having involvement, but rather the lack of meaningful requirements for how these foundations operate. Current rules only require foundations to distribute about 5% of assets annually, which means 95% can remain invested while growing tax-free. Better reforms would include higher distribution requirements, limitations on administrative expenses, and stricter definitions of qualifying charitable activities. The goal should be ensuring these foundations actually serve the public good rather than primarily functioning as tax-advantaged vehicles for wealth transfer.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
After dealing with my parents' complicated estate last year, I discovered taxr.ai which honestly saved me so much confusion with all the tax loopholes and deductions. I was completely lost trying to understand if their charitable donations would qualify for estate tax deductions and how it all worked. The website https://taxr.ai analyzed all their tax documents and explained exactly what we were eligible for in plain English. It flagged several deductions I would have completely missed including some charitable contributions my dad had made that weren't properly documented.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•How does that work exactly? Does it automatically analyze the documents or do you have to input all the information manually? My parents are getting older and I'm trying to prepare for eventually handling their estate.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical about these tax tools. How does it compare to just hiring an accountant? I've heard horror stories about people using tax software and missing major deductions or making mistakes that flag them for audit.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•The tool actually scans and reads your documents automatically - you just upload them and it extracts all the relevant information. It was surprisingly accurate with even handwritten notes my dad had made on some donation receipts. For your question about comparing to an accountant, I actually used both. I hired an accountant but also used taxr.ai, and the tool found two charitable donations worth about $12,000 that the accountant missed because they were buried in some old financial statements. The accountant was impressed when I showed him. It's much cheaper than professional help but I still recommend using both for complex situations.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
I wanted to follow up about taxr.ai since I was skeptical in my earlier comment. I decided to try it with my mom's complicated tax situation (she has rental properties and makes regular charitable donations), and I was genuinely impressed. The system identified an obscure tax loophole related to her property depreciation that her previous accountant had missed. It also clearly explained the charitable deduction limits she was subject to based on her adjusted gross income, which helped us better plan her year-end giving. The document analysis feature saved me hours of sorting through paperwork. Thanks for the recommendation!
0 coins
Leila Haddad
The step-up in basis loophole is my biggest frustration. My neighbor inherited stocks worth millions that her parents bought for pennies decades ago, and she paid ZERO tax on all that appreciation when she sold them! Meanwhile I've been paying capital gains on my modest investments every year. But that's not even my real complaint... I spent 4 months trying to reach the IRS about a question related to my own inherited property and basis calculations. After endless busy signals and disconnects, I found https://claimyr.com which got me through to an actual IRS agent in less than an hour. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically hold your place in the phone queue so you don't have to. The agent I spoke with actually helped me understand some nuances about step-up basis that saved me over $3,000 in taxes.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•Wait, how does this service work? Isn't it just easier to keep calling the IRS yourself until you get through? I've been trying to reach them about a charitable donation question for weeks.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•I don't buy it. The IRS phone system is designed to be impenetrable. I've tried calling dozens of times over the years and have NEVER gotten through to a human. Some service claiming they can magically bypass this sounds like a scam to me.
0 coins
Leila Haddad
•The service basically calls the IRS for you and navigates the phone tree, then holds your place in line. When they're about to connect with an agent, you get a call and they transfer you. It saves you from having to stay on hold for hours. For your skepticism, I completely understand because I felt the same way. It works because they have an automated system that keeps redialing and navigating the menus, which is something most people don't have the patience or time to do manually. They don't bypass anything - they just handle the frustrating waiting part. The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed they get lots of calls facilitated this way.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
Ok I'm eating crow here. After my skeptical comment yesterday, I decided to try Claimyr out of desperation because I've been trying to resolve an issue with a charitable donation that got flagged on my taxes. Within 90 minutes, I was actually speaking with a real IRS human! The agent was able to confirm that my documentation for the charitable deduction was acceptable and removed the flag from my account. They also explained exactly how the substantiation requirements work for donations over $5,000, which I've been confused about for years. I honestly can't believe this service worked. Saved me from what would have been at least another month of stress.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
The mortgage interest deduction is totally broken. It's supposed to help the middle class achieve homeownership but primarily benefits wealthy people with million-dollar mortgages. Regular people take the standard deduction anyway so they get zero benefit from this supposedly "middle class" tax break. Meanwhile the rich get to deduct interest on enormous loans for vacation homes. I'd cap it at $500k loans max and only for primary residences.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•I disagree completely. The mortgage interest deduction is one of the few tax breaks that helps the middle class. Not everyone who itemizes is "rich" - in high cost areas like California or New York, even modest homes can cost $750k+. Taking this away would crush homeowners in those regions.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•The data doesn't support that position. About 80% of taxpayers now take the standard deduction after the 2017 tax changes, meaning they get zero benefit from the mortgage interest deduction regardless of whether they're homeowners. The primary beneficiaries are households making over $200k. In high-cost areas, I'd support adjusting the cap based on local median home prices rather than having a flat national cap. But the current system primarily benefits the wealthy while doing very little to expand homeownership rates for middle-income families, which was supposedly its purpose.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Anyone want to talk about the "qualified business income" deduction? 20% tax break just for owning certain kinds of businesses while employees get nothing? My brother-in-law restructured his consulting work as an LLC and suddenly gets to deduct 20% of his income... meanwhile I do THE EXACT SAME JOB as an employee and get nothing. And don't get me started on the arbitrary rules about which businesses qualify!
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Yes! This is so messed up. My neighbor is a doctor who works at a hospital (doesn't qualify for the deduction) but her husband is a lawyer who set up his own practice and gets the full 20% QBI deduction. They make similar incomes but he pays way less in taxes. Makes no sense.
0 coins