< Back to IRS

Yuki Kobayashi

How do charitable donations actually save the wealthy on taxes? Wouldn't they lose more money than they save?

I've been hearing a lot about how rich people donate to charities or put money into their foundations as a tax avoidance strategy, and I'm confused about how this actually benefits them financially. Everyone keeps saying it's to "keep their taxes low" or "stay in a lower bracket," but the math isn't making sense to me. For example, if someone donates $135,000 to charity and they're in the 37% tax bracket, they would save about $50,000 in taxes (37% of $135,000). But they still gave away $135,000, so they're still down $85,000 compared to if they had just paid the taxes, right? I understand that donations are tax-deductible, but you're still giving away more than you would have paid in taxes. If wealthy people are supposedly so greedy, wouldn't they just pay the tax and keep more money overall? I feel like I'm missing something about how these charitable deductions actually work from a tax strategy perspective.

Carmen Vega

•

You're asking a great question that many people misunderstand about tax deductions for charitable giving! You're absolutely right in your basic math. If someone donates $135,000 and they're in the 37% bracket, they save about $50,000 in taxes but are still "out" $85,000 compared to just paying the taxes. From a pure numbers standpoint, you never come out ahead by making charitable donations - you'll always have less money than if you had just paid the taxes. What actually happens is more complex. Wealthy individuals often create private foundations or donor-advised funds where they maintain some control over the money while getting immediate tax benefits. These structures let them direct charitable spending over time while getting tax advantages now. In some cases, they can employ family members at the foundation or use it to enhance their social standing and business connections. With appreciated assets like stocks, there's another advantage - if you donate stock that's gone up in value, you avoid capital gains tax AND get the charitable deduction for the full market value. This creates a double tax benefit that regular cash donations don't provide.

0 coins

Wait, so if I have stock worth $200k that I originally bought for $50k, I could donate it and deduct the full $200k without ever paying taxes on that $150k gain? That seems like a huge loophole! Do normal people ever use this strategy or is it just for the super rich?

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

Yes, that's exactly right! If you donate stock you've held for more than a year that's worth $200k with a $50k cost basis, you can deduct the full $200k fair market value AND never pay capital gains tax on that $150k appreciation. It's completely legal and one of the most tax-efficient ways to give. This strategy isn't just for the super wealthy - anyone who itemizes deductions and has appreciated investments can use it. Many middle-class people with long-term investments donate appreciated stock to their church or alma mater. The minimum to make this worthwhile is just having enough deductions to itemize rather than taking the standard deduction.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Just wanted to add my experience using https://taxr.ai for understanding these charitable deduction strategies. I was in a similar situation trying to figure out if my company stock donations were actually saving me money or if I was missing something. I uploaded my tax documents and investment statements, and the AI analysis showed me exactly how the charitable deduction worked with my appreciated stock. It broke down both the saved capital gains tax and the income tax deduction in real numbers for my specific situation. What surprised me was seeing the specific percentage I was actually "saving" when considering both tax benefits together. The tool also flagged that I was approaching the AGI limit for cash donations (60% of AGI) and suggested I restructure some giving to stay within limits. Totally changed my donation strategy for next year.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

How accurate is this tool with complicated tax situations? I've got a small family foundation and some donor-advised funds, plus I'm considering donating some cryptocurrency that's appreciated. Would it handle all those different elements or is it more for basic tax stuff?

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

I've seen ads for these AI tax tools, but I'm skeptical. How does it compare to just talking to a CPA? I feel like a human would understand my specific situation better than an AI would. Did you compare the results with what a tax professional told you?

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

The tool handles pretty complex situations including family foundations and cryptocurrency donations. It actually has specific modules for both - the crypto donation analysis was particularly helpful with the fair market value determination documentation the IRS wants. It even flagged that different types of crypto have different holding period requirements. Compared to my CPA, I found it gave me more detailed scenario planning. My accountant is great for filing correctly, but when I showed him the analysis from taxr.ai, he actually said it provided more detailed modeling than he typically does for clients. The difference is you can run unlimited scenarios yourself instead of paying hourly for each tax planning variation. I still use my CPA for the actual filing, but now I go in much more prepared.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

I was definitely skeptical about using an AI tax tool like taxr.ai, but I decided to try it after seeing it mentioned here. I'm genuinely impressed with the results. I uploaded my last three years of returns and investment statements, and it immediately identified that I'd been missing out on the appreciated stock donation strategy. I had been selling stock and then donating cash (paying capital gains tax unnecessarily). The analysis showed I'd paid nearly $18,000 in avoidable taxes over the past three years! The tool created a complete report showing exactly how much I would save by changing my approach, with side-by-side comparisons between different donation strategies. What really sold me was the documentation it generated for my tax records - it created IRS-compliant substantiation for everything, which my accountant said was better than what most of his clients provide. This thing seriously paid for itself within 5 minutes of using it.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

If you're struggling to get answers from the IRS about charitable deduction limits or strategies, I highly recommend using https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. I spent WEEKS trying to get clarity on some donation documentation requirements for a large stock gift, constantly getting disconnected or waiting for hours. Tried Claimyr after my third failed attempt and had an IRS rep on the line in about 20 minutes. They confirmed exactly what documentation I needed for my specific situation and cleared up confusion about the 30% AGI limit for appreciated property donations vs. the 60% limit for cash. You can see a demo of how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent also helped me understand how the 5-year carryforward works for excess charitable contributions, which was something I couldn't find a clear answer on anywhere online.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

How does this actually work? Does it just call the IRS for you? I'm confused about what service you're actually getting. Couldn't you just call yourself and wait on hold?

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

This sounds like snake oil. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They're chronically understaffed and everyone has to wait. If this actually worked, everyone would use it and the system would collapse. I've never heard of any legitimate service that can get you through to the IRS faster.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

It doesn't just call for you - it uses an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold in your place. When it actually reaches a human IRS agent, it calls your phone and connects you directly to that agent. So you don't have to sit through the hours of waiting and "your call is important to us" messages. You absolutely could just call yourself and wait on hold - that's what I did for weeks before finding this. But I was waiting 2-3 hours each time before getting disconnected or having to hang up for work meetings. This service basically waits in the virtual line for you, then brings you in only when there's an actual human ready to talk.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

I need to eat my words about Claimyr being "snake oil." After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it because I've been struggling to get clarification about a charitable remainder trust question for months. I've literally called the IRS 8 times over the past 10 weeks, never getting through to anyone who could help with my specific situation. Each time I waited at least 90+ minutes before either getting disconnected or having to hang up. Using Claimyr, I had an IRS tax law specialist on the phone in 35 minutes. Not only did they answer my questions about the trust, but they also walked me through the proper reporting on my Form 8283 for a substantial non-cash donation. They even emailed me the specific IRS publications I needed. I'm still shocked it actually worked. Saved me countless hours and probably some penalties too, since I was about to file incorrectly based on my misunderstanding of the rules.

0 coins

Another reason rich people use foundations is for CONTROL. When they donate directly to charity, the money is gone. But with a private foundation, they only have to distribute 5% of assets per year while the rest continues growing tax-free. Plus their family can draw salaries from the foundation for "managing" it. Look at any big foundation and you'll see family members on the payroll. They also use foundation money to throw galas and events that boost their social status. The whole "philanthropy" thing is mostly a tax shelter wrapped in good PR. If they really cared about causes they would just pay their fair share in taxes so the government could properly fund services for everyone, not just their pet projects.

0 coins

This is pretty cynical. Many wealthy people are genuinely charitable and care about causes. Bill Gates has literally saved millions of lives through his foundation's work on malaria and other diseases. Would the government have allocated tax dollars specifically to those global health initiatives? Probably not. Private foundations can focus on specific problems in ways governments often can't due to politics and bureaucracy. I agree there are some who abuse the system, but painting all philanthropists as tax-dodgers seems unfair.

0 coins

I hear what you're saying, but follow the money. The Gates Foundation has billions invested in the same pharmaceutical companies it works with. That's not charity - it's strategic investment with a tax advantage. And he's still one of the richest people on earth despite all his "giving." Yes, some good comes from these foundations, but it's a side effect, not the primary purpose. The primary benefit is maintaining wealth within the family while looking generous. If pure charity was the goal, they'd structure their giving differently. Most of these foundations spend more on administrative costs and investments than actual grants.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

One thing nobody's mentioned is that charitable deductions are subject to income limits - you can't just donate your entire income and pay zero tax. For cash donations, you can deduct up to 60% of your AGI. For appreciated assets (stocks, etc.), it's limited to 30% of AGI. Also, the phase-out of itemized deductions can reduce the benefit for very high earners. And if you're subject to AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax), the deduction value can be different than your normal tax rate. The tax code around charitable giving is SUPER complicated and most people (including many tax preparers) don't fully understand all the strategies and limitations.

0 coins

Thanks for bringing up the AGI limits! I got hit with this last year when I made a larger-than-usual donation to my alma mater. I didn't realize there were different limits for cash vs. property donations. Do unused charitable deductions just disappear, or can you use them in future years?

0 coins

You can carry forward unused charitable deductions for up to 5 years! So if you exceed the AGI limits in one year, you don't lose those deductions completely. They carry over to future tax years subject to the same percentage limits. For example, if you donate $100k in cash but can only deduct $60k this year due to the 60% AGI limit, that remaining $40k can be used in years 2-6 as long as you have sufficient AGI in those years. The carryforward deductions are used after you've maximized your current year donations within the limits. This is actually a key part of tax planning for larger charitable gifts - you can bunch several years' worth of donations into one year, get the immediate tax benefit spread over multiple years, and potentially stay in lower tax brackets by smoothing out the deductions.

0 coins

Daniela Rossi

•

The key insight you're missing is that wealthy people often aren't just trying to minimize their current tax bill - they're playing a much longer game with wealth preservation and transfer. Here's what really happens: When someone creates a charitable remainder trust (CRT), they can donate appreciated assets, get an immediate charitable deduction, avoid capital gains tax, AND still receive income from those assets for life. Then whatever's left goes to charity. So they're not really "giving away" the full amount - they're restructuring how they access that wealth while getting tax benefits. For family foundations, the ultra-wealthy can donate assets, get the deduction, maintain control through board positions, employ family members, and the foundation only needs to give away 5% annually while the other 95% grows tax-free. Over generations, this can actually preserve more wealth than paying taxes would have. The real strategy isn't about being "less poor" than paying taxes - it's about maintaining control and influence over capital while getting tax advantages. They're essentially converting taxable wealth into tax-advantaged wealth that still benefits them and their families, just in different ways.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today