


Ask the community...
Has anyone compared the returns between stable value funds and treasury bills for cash parking in retirement accounts? I'm currently using my 401k's stable value option (yielding about 3.1%) but wondering if treasuries would be better since rates have gone up.
In my 401k I've been using a treasury fund for cash parking and it's currently yielding about 3.8% which beats most stable value funds I've seen. The advantage of treasuries in the current environment is they respond faster to rate changes. The downside is there can be some minor NAV fluctuation vs stable value funds which maintain stable principal.
Thanks for that insight! Do you see much day-to-day fluctuation in the NAV with your treasury fund? I'm pretty conservative with this portion of my savings so stability is important, but that extra 0.7% yield is pretty significant too. I'm guessing the stable value fund will eventually catch up to current rates, but seems like they lag quite a bit based on what you're saying.
I'm curious what everyone thinks about just using a traditional money market fund inside a 401k for cash parking. My plan offers one yielding about 4.2% right now which seems pretty competitive. Is there any reason NOT to use this approach?
Money market funds are solid for cash parking in retirement accounts. The 4.2% yield is quite good actually. The main thing to check is the expense ratio - some 401k plans offer money market funds with ridiculous fees that eat into that headline yield. Also, if you don't mind sharing, which fund is offering 4.2%? Most I've seen are in the 3.5-3.8% range.
Have you considered just switching to FreeTaxUSA? They include Schedule D in their basic package which is way cheaper than TurboTax Premier. I switched last year after getting tired of TT's constant upselling and haven't looked back. Their import features aren't as fancy but if you have your forms ready it's super easy.
I've heard of FreeTaxUSA but was worried about switching since I've used TurboTax for years. Does it handle importing 1099-B forms from Wealthfront or would I have to enter all those transactions manually? And is it actually reliable/secure? TurboTax's upselling is driving me nuts but I'm nervous about trying something new.
FreeTaxUSA doesn't have direct import from brokerages like Wealthfront, so you'd need to enter the transactions manually. However, if you don't have tons of transactions, it's not too bad - just time-consuming. The software is completely legitimate and secure - I've used it for three years now with no issues. It's actually owned by TaxHawk, which has been around for 20+ years. The interface isn't as pretty as TurboTax, but it's much more straightforward and has all the same features without the constant upselling. For Schedule D specifically, it's included in their base price (around $15 for federal filing) instead of requiring an expensive upgrade.
I'm confused about something - if all the values on the 1099-B are zero, why does TurboTax insist you need Schedule D? What exactly are they seeing that triggers this?
TurboTax is looking at the detailed transaction section, not just the summary fields. Even if the summary shows zeros, each individual buy/sell transaction needs to be reported on Schedule D. The summary fields OP mentioned (lines 8-11) are actually for futures/derivatives contracts, not regular stock transactions.
In my experience, whether to hire a CPA comes down to: time, complexity, and potential savings. I did my own taxes for years until I started a small consulting business alongside my W-2 job. First year on my own, I missed several deductions and overpaid by nearly $2,400 (discovered this when I finally hired a CPA the next year who looked at my previous returns). My CPA charges $475 which felt expensive until I realized the ROI. She's saved me between $3,200-5,700 each year through proper planning, deductions I wouldn't have known about, and structuring my business correctly. Crypto adds another layer of complexity that most tax software still handles poorly. If your time is valuable and your situation is complicated, a good CPA usually pays for themselves.
Do you meet with your CPA throughout the year or just at tax time? I'm wondering if there's value in quarterly check-ins or something.
I do both - a main consultation during tax prep season but also a mid-year check-in around June/July to make sure I'm on track with estimated payments and to discuss any new business developments or investments. The mid-year meeting is actually incredibly valuable because it gives me time to implement tax-saving strategies BEFORE year-end when many opportunities disappear. For example, last July we identified that I could purchase some needed business equipment before December and fully deduct it, saving me about $1,400 in taxes. Waiting until tax season in April would have been too late.
I'm pretty sure the people who think they're saving money doing complicated taxes themselves are actually LOSING money most of the time lol. I thought I was so smart using TurboTax for my crypto stuff last year until my friend (who used a CPA) pointed out I'd missed like three major deductions. The way I think about it now: if your tax situation can be handled with a 1040EZ or is super basic, DIY all day. But when you've got crypto, investments, business income, rental properties or whatever? You're playing yourself if you think reading some reddit posts makes you as knowledgeable as someone who does this professionally all day. My CPA costs $600 but found over $3k in deductions my first year. Do the math...
What kinds of deductions did you miss? I'm curious because I'm in a similar situation and wondering if I'm leaving money on the table.
An important detail that nobody has mentioned yet is that if you filed jointly with your spouse, you might qualify for "injured spouse" relief if the tax debt from 2020 was solely yours from before marriage. Form 8379 (Injured Spouse Allocation) could potentially get your spouse's portion of the refund released to you. This is different from the offset bypass refund others have mentioned, and the IRS might be more likely to approve it since it's a standard procedure rather than an exception.
That's really helpful! The 2020 debt was actually from when we were already married and filing jointly, so I'm not sure if this would apply to us. But is there any similar form for requesting the bypass refund that others mentioned?
Unfortunately, there isn't a standard form for requesting an offset bypass refund. That's handled through direct communication with the IRS, usually by phone. Since you were already married and filing jointly for the 2020 debt, the injured spouse relief wouldn't apply in your situation. In your case, focusing on documenting your financial hardship is your best bet. Gather evidence of your essential expenses (mortgage/rent, utilities, medical bills, etc.) and how the loss of your expected refund creates a significant burden. I'd recommend trying both approaches others have suggested: use a service to help you get through to the IRS by phone, and consider using an analysis tool to strengthen your case with specific references to IRS procedures and regulations. The combination of these approaches gives you the best chance at getting at least a partial release of your refund.
One thing that worked for me with a CP49 situation was contacting my local Taxpayer Advocate Service office. They're an independent organization within the IRS designed to help taxpayers with problems that haven't been resolved through normal IRS channels. I explained my hardship situation to them, and they were able to help facilitate communication with the IRS and get part of my refund released. They're especially helpful if you can demonstrate that the offset is causing significant financial hardship.
Nia Davis
Just want to emphasize that if you can pay the full amount within 180 days, definitely go with the short-term payment plan! No setup fee and you can do it all online at IRS.gov. I did this last year and it was surprisingly easy. Also, don't forget that if you're getting a state refund, you might want to wait and see how much that is before deciding how much to pay upfront. My state refund covered about 1/3 of what I owed to the feds.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
ā¢Thanks for the tip about the state refund! I didn't even think about that. I'm expecting about $700 back from my state, so that would definitely help reduce what I need to finance. Based on everyone's advice, I think I'll make a payment now of whatever I can afford and then set up a short-term payment plan. Seems like the consensus is not to wait until April 15th!
0 coins
Nia Davis
ā¢You're welcome! Yes, using your state refund toward your federal tax debt is a smart move. And definitely don't wait until April - not only will the phone lines be jammed, but you'll be accruing interest on the full amount in the meantime. One more tip: if you set up a payment plan but then find you can pay it off faster than expected, there's no penalty for paying early. I ended up getting a small bonus at work and was able to clear my tax debt in 3 months instead of the 6 I had planned for.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
Has anyone here had experience with requesting a reduced amount through an Offer in Compromise? I've heard the IRS will sometimes accept less than the full amount if you can prove financial hardship.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
ā¢Offers in Compromise are pretty hard to get approved. The IRS only accepts them if they genuinely believe they cannot collect the full amount from you either now or in the foreseeable future. You have to provide extensive documentation of your assets, income, expenses, etc. For a tax debt of $7,420 like the OP has, it's unlikely to be worth pursuing unless they're facing severe financial hardship. The application fee alone is $205 (though it can be waived for low-income taxpayers), and you have to submit a significant payment with your offer.
0 coins