


Ask the community...
Make sure your loan has a reasonable interest rate too! If the IRS thinks the rate is too low, they might consider it a "below-market loan" and apply something called "imputed interest" rules. This could potentially create taxable interest even if no interest was actually paid.
Can you explain more about these imputed interest rules? Our loan is at 3.5% - is that considered reasonable? I don't want to get caught in some complicated tax situation.
Sure thing! The IRS has what's called the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR), which is the minimum interest rate they consider legitimate for loans. If your rate is below the AFR, the IRS might "impute" interest, meaning they treat the loan as if it charged the minimum rate, even if it didn't. A 3.5% rate is likely fine for 2024-2025. The AFR changes monthly, but has generally been in the 2-4% range for mid-term loans recently. As long as your rate is at or above the AFR that was in effect when your loan was made, you should be safe from imputed interest complications.
Has anyone used TurboTax to generate a 1099-INT for family loans? Does it handle these situations well? We've always used it for our regular taxes but never had to deal with issuing forms before.
TurboTax isn't great for generating 1099-INTs. For issuing forms, I've found it easier to just order the official forms from the IRS website or use their online system. Much simpler than trying to make TurboTax do something it wasn't really designed for.
Your CPA is definitely dropping the ball. I switched accountants last year after similar issues and it was the best decision I made. Few suggestions based on my experience: 1) Look for a CPA who specializes in your specific industry. My new accountant works primarily with other software consultants like me and understands the unique issues we face. 2) Ask about their communication system and client load. My previous CPA was handling 300+ clients. My current one caps at 75 and has a dedicated client portal where everything is organized. 3) Request a written service agreement that specifies exactly what they're responsible for monitoring and what requires your notification. Don't settle for this level of service - there are excellent CPAs out there who would never let these issues slide!
Thanks for these specific suggestions. How did you find your new CPA? Did you get referrals or just search online? I'm worried about ending up with someone with similar problems.
I got referrals from others in my industry - specifically asked business owners with similar revenue and complexity to mine. Industry-specific Facebook groups and Slack communities were goldmines for recommendations. Avoid general business networking groups for this - you want targeted recommendations from people facing your exact tax situation. When interviewing potential CPAs, I asked how many clients they have with my specific business structure and revenue model. The ones who could immediately discuss the particular tax nuances of my situation rose to the top of my list.
Make sure ur looking at the whole picture before switching. Some CPAs are bad but sometimes we clients contribute to problems too. My first accountant seemed disorganized but looking back I was sending info all different ways (email, text, random portal uploads) and not always labeling things clearly. My new CPA gave me a structured checklist and specific deadlines for everything. Way easier for both of us! They also do quarterly reviews not just year end so less surprises. Maybe try giving super clear feedback on exactly what you need and see if they improve before switching? Just a thought bc sometimes the devil u know is better than the one u dont.
This is actually solid advice. I was ready to dump my CPA after some mistakes but we had a direct conversation about expectations. She implemented a much better system and things improved dramatically. Been smooth for 3 years now.
That's a fair point about communication. I've been pretty consistent with emails and using the systems he set up, but maybe I need to be even more structured. I'll definitely have a direct conversation before making any decisions.
Another possibility worth checking: make sure you're answering the questions correctly in both software programs. In TurboTax, there's a specific question about whether you itemized or took the standard deduction last year. If you accidentally say you itemized when you actually took the standard deduction, it would explain why it's treating your state refund as taxable. Also, double-check your 1099-G amount against what TurboTax is showing. Sometimes the numbers can be off if there were adjustments to your state refund or if you received multiple refunds.
That's a really good point! I just double-checked and I definitely selected that I took the standard deduction last year. When I look deeper into the calculation details in TurboTax, it does show the state refund on line 1 of the income section, but then somewhere in the calculations, it's showing $0 as the taxable amount. I think the confusion came from seeing it listed in the income section at all. I'm going to stick with FreeTaxUSA this year since the interface seems clearer for my situation. Thanks everyone for helping me understand what's happening!
FYI - this is reported on Form 1040, line 1h (State and local income tax refund) and calculated on the "State and Local Income Tax Refund Worksheet" in the 1040 instructions. The worksheet specifically asks if you itemized deductions the previous year. If you answer "no" (meaning you took standard deduction), the taxable amount is $0. Both software should get this right but they present it differently in the interface.
One tip that helped speed up our Form 7200 processing - make sure you're using the EXACT same business name and EIN format across all your forms. Our first submission was delayed because we used "ABC Company LLC" on Form 7200 but our payroll tax forms had "ABC Company, LLC" (note the comma). Seems ridiculous, but these small inconsistencies can flag your submission for manual review, adding weeks to processing time. Also double-check that your EIN is formatted consistently with how it appears on your 941 forms.
Does this apply to other tax forms too? We're about to submit for the Restaurant Revitalization Fund and I'm worried about similar delays.
Absolutely! This consistency rule applies to pretty much all tax forms and federal relief programs. For the Restaurant Revitalization Fund specifically, make sure your business name matches exactly what's on your business license, EIN documentation, and tax returns. I've seen applications get stuck in processing because the business applied as "Joe's Pizza" but their tax returns show "Joseph's Pizza LLC." The systems are often matching these entries automatically, and even minor differences can kick it out for manual review, which means significant delays.
How do you know if you even qualify for Form 7200? My accountant isn't sure if our situation meets the requirements and I don't want to submit if we're just going to get rejected. We had reduced hours but didn't fully shut down during the qualifying periods.
You don't need to have fully shut down to qualify. There are two main ways to be eligible: 1) Your business operations were fully/partially suspended due to government orders limiting commerce, travel, or group meetings due to COVID-19, OR 2) You experienced a significant decline in gross receipts during a calendar quarter compared to 2019 (specific percentage requirements depend on which quarter you're claiming). Reduced hours can definitely qualify under the first test if they were the result of government restrictions. Document everything showing how the restrictions affected your operations!
Thank you for explaining! We definitely had reduced capacity requirements from our county health department that forced us to operate at 50% for several months. I'll gather all the official orders and our schedule changes to document this properly. I appreciate the clear explanation - our accountant was being super cautious about this claim since the IRS has been scrutinizing them closely.
Reginald Blackwell
Have you checked if there were any return of capital distributions in your Webull account? Sometimes these can cause weird reporting issues where Box 5 and Box 1a don't match up. Return of capital reduces your cost basis but isn't taxable as a dividend, which could explain the discrepancy.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
ā¢That's an interesting idea! I'm not sure if I had any return of capital distributions. Is there a way to check that on the Webull platform? I'm still pretty new to investing and all these tax forms are confusing.
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
ā¢You can check by logging into your Webull account and going to the "Account" tab, then selecting "History" and filtering for "Dividends." Look for any entries labeled as "Return of Capital" or "ROC." If you see any of these, that's likely your culprit. Return of capital distributions are not technically dividends, but sometimes brokers report them incorrectly. If you find this is the case, you could try explaining this to TurboTax support as the reason for the discrepancy. Alternatively, you might need to manually override TurboTax's error check, though some tax software doesn't allow this without a paid upgrade to a premium version that allows manual entries.
0 coins
Aria Khan
I had this exact problem with Webull last year! It's definitely a Webull error. I called their tax support line (took forever to get through) and they admitted it was a known issue with their reporting system. They eventually sent me a corrected 1099-DIV but it took like 3 weeks. If you're trying to file now and don't want to wait, I'd do what others suggested and just make Box 5 equal to Box 1a. It's the technically correct way anyway since 199A dividends can't exceed total ordinary dividends.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
ā¢Did Webull send the corrected form to the IRS too? I'm worried about making changes on my end but then having the IRS records show something different.
0 coins