IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

160,000+ people connected since 2021

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Tax implications of early withdrawal from UTMA/UGMA for education expenses?

So I've been looking into using some of the money from my nephew's UTMA account to help with his upcoming college expenses. He's 16 now and will be starting college in about a year and a half. I'm the custodian of his account which has about $27,000 in it from various family contributions over the years. I know UTMA/UGMA accounts are technically the child's property, but I'm confused about the tax situation if we need to use some of these funds before he reaches the age of majority (which is 21 in our state). The money would only be used for his education expenses like tuition, books, housing, etc. Does anyone know how taxes work when withdrawing from a UTMA/UGMA early for educational purposes? Are there different rules depending on the state we live in? I've heard conflicting things about who pays the taxes - the custodian or the minor - and what rates apply. Any insights would be really appreciated!

One thing to remember with UTMAs - once the kid reaches the age of majority (either 18 or 21 depending on your state), that money is 100% theirs. They can use it for education or buy a sports car... it's legally their decision! This is different from 529s where you maintain control.

0 coins

This is why I ended up avoiding UTMAs entirely and just went with a 529. Too risky to hand an 18-year-old a chunk of money with no strings attached. My nephew got his UTMA at 18 and lets just say very little of it went to education ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

0 coins

As someone who's been through this exact situation with my daughter's UTMA account, I can share some practical insights. The tax implications really aren't as scary as they initially seem once you understand the mechanics. One key point that often gets overlooked - you should keep detailed records of all withdrawals and what they were used for. While there's no additional tax penalty for using UTMA funds for education, having documentation helps if there are ever questions about whether the custodian used the funds appropriately for the minor's benefit. Also, timing can matter for tax planning. If your nephew has other income (like a part-time job), you might want to coordinate UTMA withdrawals with his overall tax situation to stay within favorable tax brackets. Since he's 16, he likely has minimal other income, so the standard deduction and lower tax rates could work in your favor. The financial aid impact mentioned by others is real - UTMA assets hit the Expected Family Contribution calculation hard. If you're planning to apply for need-based aid, consider using UTMA funds for expenses in the years before filing FAFSA rather than letting them sit in the account where they'll reduce aid eligibility.

0 coins

Can there be 2 Head of Households filing from the same address? Need advice ASAP!

So here's our situation - my boyfriend and I aren't married and we live together in the same house. We have two children together, our daughter who's 4 years old and our son who just turned 9 months old. We're trying to figure out the best way to file our 2024 taxes for the upcoming tax season. We were thinking I could claim our daughter as my dependent and file as Head of Household, while he claims our son and also files as Head of Household. But now I'm wondering if the IRS allows two people with the same address to both claim Head of Household status? Or does one of us need to file as single instead? I've heard Head of Household gives better tax benefits, so ideally we'd both use that filing status if possible. We contribute equally to household expenses, and each take care of both kids, though I'm the primary caregiver for our daughter and he handles more of our son's needs. Does anyone know the rules about two Head of Households at the same address? Thanks for any advice!

Does anyone know what software is best for filing two HOH returns from the same address? I tried TurboTax last year and it kept giving me warnings about potential conflicts.

0 coins

I used FreeTaxUSA last year for this exact situation and had no problems. The software doesn't freak out about the same address being used for two HOH filers like some others do. Plus it's way cheaper than TurboTax!

0 coins

I'm in a very similar situation and have been researching this extensively! Just wanted to confirm what others have said - yes, you can absolutely both file as Head of Household from the same address. The IRS doesn't have any rule limiting HOH status by address. The key is that you each need to independently meet the three main requirements: 1. Be unmarried (or considered unmarried) at the end of the tax year โœ“ 2. Pay more than half the cost of keeping up a home โœ“ 3. Have a qualifying person (your children) live with you for more than half the year โœ“ Since you're splitting household expenses and each claiming a different child, you should be fine. Just make sure to keep good records of how you divide expenses in case you ever need to justify your filing status. One tip: consider documenting your expense split in writing (even just a simple spreadsheet) showing who pays what percentage of rent, utilities, groceries, etc. This way if there are ever questions, you can clearly show that you each pay more than 50% of the household maintenance costs. Good luck with your filing! The HOH status will definitely save you both money compared to filing as single.

0 coins

Can I write off a laptop for my 1099 business if I also use it for personal stuff?

I recently switched to a new full-time W-2 position, but I'm also running a 1099 side business. At my previous job, they were cool with me using my work laptop for both my side gig and personal stuff. Unfortunately, my new employer has stricter policies and doesn't allow that. I'm planning to purchase a new laptop and monitor setup since I need something for both my 1099 work and personal use. The thing is, I'll probably be using it 60% for my business and 40% for watching Netflix, social media, and other personal stuff. So my question is: Can I still write off the cost of the laptop and monitor on my taxes for my 1099 business even though I'll be using them for personal stuff too? If so, would I just deduct a percentage based on business use? The laptop I'm looking at costs around $1200 and the monitor is about $300. Any advice would be great!

Don't forget about the de minimis safe harbor election! If each item costs less than $2,500, you can potentially deduct the business portion immediately without having to deal with depreciation. You just need to have an accounting policy in place at the beginning of the year and attach a statement to your tax return. I do photography as a side hustle, and this has saved me so much headache with tracking depreciation on smaller equipment purchases. Just make sure you're only deducting the business-use percentage of each item.

0 coins

This is super helpful! If I go this route, do I still need to track the business vs. personal use percentage? And would I still get the same total deduction amount compared to depreciating it?

0 coins

Yes, you absolutely still need to track the business vs. personal use percentage. The de minimis election just changes HOW you deduct it (immediate vs. over time), not WHAT you can deduct. So you'd still only claim 60% of the cost if that's your actual business use. You'd get the same total deduction amount either way, but with de minimis you get it all in year one rather than spread over several years with depreciation. This is usually better for most people, but if your business is just starting and not making much profit yet, depreciation might actually be preferable to spread the deductions over years when you might be earning more.

0 coins

I know everyone's focused on the deduction itself, but PLEASE keep good records of your business usage! I claimed 70% business use on my laptop last year and got audited. The IRS wanted a usage log showing how I came up with that percentage. Thankfully I had a spreadsheet where I tracked hours, but it was still super stressful. If I could do it again, I'd take pictures of my setup being used for business, save business-related files in clearly labeled folders, and keep a simple log of hours used for business vs personal. Just my 2 cents from someone who learned the hard way!

0 coins

What kind of usage log did you have that satisfied them? Like did you literally track hours every day or just estimate? This is making me nervous about my own deductions lol.

0 coins

I kept a simple Excel sheet with columns for date, start time, end time, and activity description. I didn't track every single day religiously, but I did sample weeks throughout the year - like one full week each month where I logged everything. Then I used those sample weeks to calculate my average business vs personal usage ratio. The IRS auditor said this was reasonable since it showed a consistent pattern over time rather than just a wild guess. I also kept screenshots of business emails, invoices, and client work that were timestamped, which helped back up my claims. The key was showing I had some systematic approach rather than just pulling a number out of thin air. For what it's worth, they accepted my 70% claim after reviewing everything. Just make sure whatever method you use, you can explain how you arrived at your percentage!

0 coins

International Bank Transfers from Husband to Wife - Tax Implications

I'm a foreign citizen (not American) looking to send money to my American wife who lives in the US. I'm planning to transfer around 25K USD total to her US bank account, probably in 3 separate transfers of about 8K each. My wife is concerned that these transfers might raise questions from her bank or that she'll need to deal with additional tax filing requirements because of the money coming in. From what I've researched online, it seems like this should be a straightforward process without any special tax implications, but I wanted to check with people who might have experience with this situation. Does my wife need to report these transfers on her taxes? Will this create any issues for her? Thanks for any advice you can provide!

One thing nobody has mentioned yet - your wife should check with her bank about their specific policies on international wire transfers. Some banks charge ridiculous fees (my bank takes $45 per incoming international wire), and some may have additional documentation requirements. My husband is Canadian and when he first started sending me money, my bank froze the first transfer for 5 days while they "verified" it, which was super annoying. Might be worth her calling her bank in advance just to understand their specific process.

0 coins

This is so true! My credit union only charges $15 for international wires while my previous bank was charging $50+. Shopping around can save you a lot if these will be regular transfers.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I'm a US citizen married to a German citizen, and we've been dealing with these international transfers for years. One thing I learned is that your wife should keep documentation not just of the transfers themselves, but also proof of your marriage relationship. We keep copies of our marriage certificate and my husband's ID readily available because banks sometimes ask for this during larger transfers to verify the spousal relationship. Also, if your wife uses online banking, she should expect to see the transfers show up with codes like "OBI" (Originator Beneficiary Information) that might look confusing but are just standard international wire identifiers. The most important thing is that this really is routine - international spousal transfers happen thousands of times daily and the banks are well equipped to handle them properly.

0 coins

Are 1099-K forms being issued for cash back sites like Rakuten? How should I report this?

So I just found out something frustrating with this whole 1099-K mess. Apparently PayPal is sending out 1099-K forms for cash back I received from sites like Rakuten and TopCashback! I wasn't expecting this at all. I've been using these cash back portals for a couple years to save a little money on online purchases (mostly household stuff and some gifts), and now I'm confused about the tax implications. Does anyone know if cash back from these shopping portals counts as taxable income? I earned about $240 from Rakuten and maybe $175 from TopCashback last year. If it is taxable, do I have to report it as capital gains using Schedule D and Form 8949? Or is it considered some other type of income? I don't want to mess up my taxes, but this seems ridiculous to be taxed on what's essentially a discount on purchases. Any advice would be super helpful!

Does anyone know how you're supposed to show on your tax return that a 1099-K isn't for taxable income? Like if I got a 1099-K from PayPal for $900 in cash back from Rakuten but I don't put it on my return anywhere, won't that trigger a mismatch that could get me audited?

0 coins

You don't need to "show" it anywhere on your return if it's truly not taxable income. The IRS computer systems might flag a mismatch, but that doesn't automatically trigger an audit. If you get a notice, you can respond with an explanation and documentation. Some tax software has a place for "1099-K received but not taxable" notes. Keep good records of your purchases to show the cash back was tied to actual shopping transactions!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year and can confirm what others have said. The key thing to understand is that the 1099-K is just a reporting mechanism - it doesn't determine what's actually taxable. For your Rakuten and TopCashback earnings, since these were cash back on personal purchases, they're considered purchase rebates/discounts, not taxable income. Think of it like getting a coupon discount - you wouldn't pay taxes on money you saved with a coupon, and cash back works the same way. I kept a simple spreadsheet showing my original purchase amounts and the corresponding cash back received to demonstrate the connection between the two. My tax preparer said this was good documentation in case of any IRS questions. The frustrating part is that PayPal has to issue these forms because they're just reporting money that flowed through their platform - they can't determine the tax nature of each transaction. So you'll get a 1099-K even for non-taxable rebates. Bottom line: Don't stress about it. Your $240 + $175 in cash back from shopping portals on personal purchases isn't taxable income, regardless of the 1099-K forms you received.

0 coins

Prev1...37163717371837193720...5645Next