Can I claim tax deductions on money gifted to me specifically for donation purposes?
So my family members and I support the same charity organization. Here's the thing - I itemize my deductions, but they take the standard deduction. Last week they approached me with an interesting idea. They want to give me money (writing me a check directly) that they were planning to donate anyway, with the understanding that I would then donate that money to our shared nonprofit. This way I could claim the deduction since I itemize and they can't benefit tax-wise from their donations. For context, the amount they want to give me is roughly 15% on top of what I already donate to this organization each year. I'd basically just be passing their gift along to the charity. My question is whether this arrangement is completely fine with the IRS, falls into some gray area, or is straight-up not allowed? On paper, it seems legitimate - they're giving me a gift, and I'm independently choosing to donate more to a charity I already support. But are there any rules about the intention behind transactions specifically aimed at reducing tax liability? I'm concerned about whether the IRS would view this as some kind of tax avoidance scheme if they knew the full story behind the gift. Any insights would be really appreciated!
19 comments


Gabriel Graham
This is actually a bit of a gray area, but leaning toward "okay" based on how gift and donation tax laws work. Here's why: When your relatives give you money, it's a gift to you personally - they can give up to $18,000 per person (2025 annual gift exclusion) without filing gift tax forms. Once that money is yours, you can do whatever you want with it, including donating it to charity. The key thing is that there shouldn't be a legally binding requirement that you donate the money. If they gave it to you with no strings attached (legally speaking), and you then choose to donate it, that's within the rules. The fact that there's an "understanding" is where it gets a bit murky. The IRS cares about the substance of transactions, not just their form. If your relatives are essentially using you as a conduit solely to get a tax benefit they couldn't get directly, an auditor might question it. That said, this is a relatively common family practice and not something the IRS typically targets. To be safer, I'd suggest waiting some time between receiving the gift and making the donation, and perhaps not matching the exact amount. This helps establish that it was truly your decision.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•Thanks for the detailed response! The "waiting some time" suggestion is really helpful. If I receive the gift in November and then make the donation during the year-end giving season in December, would that be a reasonable separation? Also, would it make any difference if I had already planned to increase my donation this year anyway? So their gift is just enabling me to donate more than I originally planned?
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•A month's separation would definitely help establish the gift as separate from the donation. That timing works well since many people make their largest charitable contributions during December anyway. It actually strengthens your case if you were already planning to increase your donation. This shows an established pattern of supporting the charity, and their gift is just enabling you to be more generous than you could have been otherwise. Document your donation history to this organization as that helps demonstrate your ongoing commitment separate from any gifts received.
0 coins
Drake
After struggling with a similar situation last year, I found this amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that really helped clear things up. My sister and I support the same environmental nonprofit, and we were trying to figure out if we could consolidate our donations through me since I itemize. The taxr.ai system analyzed my specific situation and showed me exactly what documentation I needed to keep to stay compliant. It reviewed all our previous donation records and gift exchanges and flagged potential issues I hadn't even considered. What I really liked was how it gave me personalized guidance based on actual tax court cases about similar donation arrangements. It ended up saving me from making a mistake that could have raised red flags with the IRS. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex donation scenarios like this.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
•How exactly does taxr.ai work? Do you just upload documents or do you have to answer a bunch of questions? I'm trying to figure out if my parents can do something similar with their church donations through me.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
•I'm always skeptical about these tax tools. How is this different from just asking a CPA? And did it actually give you specific advice about gift-donations or just general tax info you could find anywhere?
0 coins
Drake
•You start by uploading any relevant documents - in my case, I shared past donation receipts, gift documentation, and my previous year's Schedule A. Then you answer some specific questions about your situation. The whole process took about 15 minutes. The difference from a CPA is that it's much more affordable while still giving personalized advice. It's not just generic info - it specifically addressed my family donation consolidation question with references to relevant tax regulations and precedents. It even created custom documentation templates for me to use when receiving the gifts to establish the proper paper trail. It's definitely more specific than general tax advice websites.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
I wanted to follow up after trying taxr.ai that was mentioned here. I was super skeptical at first (as you could probably tell from my comment), but I decided to give it a shot since I was in a similar situation with my brother wanting to "gift" me money for donations. Have to admit I was really impressed. The system flagged that I needed to keep specific documentation showing the money was truly gifted to me without restrictions. It also recommended I keep the funds in my account for at least 21 days before donating to establish "dominion and control" over the money - something I never would have known. It gave me a customized checklist of documentation to maintain and even showed the specific IRS regulations that applied to my situation. Definitely changed my approach to this whole arrangement and made me feel much more confident about doing it properly.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
If you're having trouble getting a clear answer on this, you might want to try getting direct confirmation from the IRS. I was in tax limbo last year with a question about donation timing and couldn't get through to anyone for weeks. Then I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they use some tech to hold your place in line and call you when they reach an agent. I asked the agent directly about a family donation situation similar to yours and got official clarification that put my mind at ease. For something in a gray area like this, getting the official word directly from the IRS might be worth it rather than wondering if you're doing the right thing.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•That sounds really useful! Did they actually give you a definitive answer though? I'm concerned the IRS might just give me a vague "it depends" response even if I do get through to them.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
•This sounds like BS. How can a third-party service get you through the IRS phone line faster? I've been calling for months about an audit issue and always wait 2+ hours if they even answer at all. Pretty sure the IRS doesn't let companies cut their phone lines.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•They did give me a clear answer! The agent reviewed the specifics of my situation and cited the relevant tax code. They explained that as long as the gift was complete and without legally binding restrictions before I made the donation, it would be treated as a legitimate deduction. They even emailed me documentation of our conversation that I could reference if ever questioned. Claimyr doesn't let you cut the line - they just automate the waiting process. They use technology to hold your place in the queue and then call you when they're about to reach an agent. The IRS doesn't know or care that a service helped you stay in line - you're still waiting your turn, just not wasting hours with a phone to your ear. It's similar to those restaurant pagers that buzz when your table is ready instead of making you stand around.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
I need to eat my words from my previous comment. After another frustrating morning trying to get through to the IRS about my audit (was on hold for 97 minutes before being disconnected), I decided to try Claimyr out of desperation. I'm honestly shocked at how well it worked. Within 20 minutes I was talking to an actual IRS representative. I've been trying for MONTHS to get this resolved. The agent was able to access my file and explain exactly what documentation I needed to submit to close my case. For what it's worth, I also asked about this donation/gift scenario out of curiosity since I saw this thread. The agent said it's generally acceptable as long as the money is truly gifted with no legal obligation to donate it. They recommended keeping clear documentation of the gift separate from the donation and said having different amounts and dates helps establish they're separate transactions.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
Another approach to consider: have your relatives contribute to a donor-advised fund in their name, then grant the money to the charity. They can bunch multiple years of donations together to exceed the standard deduction threshold in one year, itemize that year, then take the standard deduction in subsequent years. This is actually more tax-efficient than your proposed arrangement because they get the direct tax benefit rather than passing it through you. My family has been doing this for years to maximize our charitable deductions while still taking advantage of the higher standard deduction.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•That's an interesting alternative I hadn't considered! Do you know if there are minimum contribution requirements for donor-advised funds? My relatives aren't wealthy - they're just making modest donations ($2-3k annually) but take the standard deduction because it's higher than their potential itemized deductions.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Most of the major donor-advised funds (Fidelity Charitable, Schwab Charitable, Vanguard Charitable) have minimum initial contributions of $5,000, but some community foundations offer them for as little as $1,000 to get started. The real power comes from "bunching" - instead of donating $3k each year, they could save up and donate $9k every third year. In the "bunch" year they might have enough deductions to itemize, then take the standard deduction the other two years. This way they control the timing and can maximize tax benefits. There are also no ongoing minimum grant requirements with most funds - you can recommend grants as small as $50 to charities.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
I think people are overthinking this. I've been doing exactly what you described with my sister for years with no issues. She gifts me money, I donate it, I get the deduction. We keep it simple - she writes "gift" in the memo line of the check, I deposit it in my account, and I make the donation later. The IRS doesn't have mind-reading abilities to know your "intention." As long as it's properly documented as a gift to you, what you later choose to do with your money is your business. The tax code is designed to encourage charitable giving. Using legitimate methods to maximize deductions is just smart tax planning, not evasion.
0 coins
Amara Torres
•This advice could potentially get someone in trouble. While the IRS can't read minds, they absolutely can and do look at patterns of transactions and their timing. If they audit and find a clear pattern showing the gifts were conditional on donation, they could disallow the deduction and potentially add penalties. The substance-over-form doctrine allows the IRS to recharacterize transactions based on their economic reality rather than just their legal form. If the only purpose of the transaction is tax avoidance, it's riskier than people realize.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
•The key is that there's no legal obligation for me to donate the money. Yes, we have an understanding, but it's not contractually binding. My sister couldn't sue me if I decided to spend the money on a vacation instead. The substance-over-form doctrine typically applies to elaborate corporate tax shelters, not ordinary family financial arrangements. The reality is that the IRS is severely understaffed and focused on much bigger issues than families trying to maximize charitable deductions. Unless you're talking about huge sums of money, this just isn't on their radar.
0 coins