< Back to IRS

Ethan Taylor

Can I claim tax deductions for charitable donations using money gifted to me from relatives?

My family has been talking about this situation recently and I'm not sure if it crosses any IRS lines. My parents and sister support the same charity that I donate to regularly. The difference is that I itemize my deductions, but they all take the standard deduction. They recently suggested giving me about $300 (which is roughly 13% of what I normally donate to this organization each year) with the specific understanding that I would add it to my annual donation. This way, someone in the family could get a tax benefit from the charitable contribution since I itemize anyway. On the surface, it seems like it should work - they're giving me a gift (which isn't taxable to me), and then I'm choosing to donate that amount plus my regular contribution. But I'm concerned there might be some rule against this kind of arrangement where the explicit purpose is to get a tax benefit that they couldn't get directly. Does anyone know if this is completely fine, somewhat questionable, or actually forbidden by IRS regulations? I appreciate any insights before I proceed!

This question comes up more often than you might think! What you're describing exists in a somewhat gray area, but I can help clarify. When your relatives give you money as a gift (under the annual gift exclusion limit), that's perfectly legal and not taxable to you. Once that money becomes yours, you can do whatever you want with it - including donating it to charity. Technically, the money has changed ownership and you're making the donation, so claiming the deduction isn't explicitly forbidden. However, the IRS does look at the substance of transactions over their form. If there's clear documentation (like emails or texts) showing the money was given specifically to circumvent tax rules, you could potentially face issues if audited. The arrangement as you've described it - with the explicit purpose of obtaining a tax benefit that wouldn't otherwise exist - does create some risk. That said, many families do coordinate charitable giving this way, and the practical risk is fairly low for small amounts. Just know there is some technical risk involved.

0 coins

But couldn't the IRS argue this is basically tax fraud since the whole point is to get a deduction that otherwise wouldn't exist? Especially if there's like a paper trail of texts or emails spelling out the arrangement?

0 coins

You raise a valid concern. The IRS could potentially challenge this arrangement if they determined the primary purpose was to create a deduction that otherwise wouldn't exist. While not explicitly prohibited in the tax code, the "step transaction doctrine" allows the IRS to collapse related steps and view them as a single transaction. Under this view, it could be seen as your relatives indirectly claiming deductions they're not entitled to. The risk increases significantly if there's written communication explicitly stating tax avoidance as the purpose. If audited, the IRS would evaluate the entire circumstance and intent behind the transactions.

0 coins

I used to struggle with similar issues when coordinating charitable giving with my family. Last year, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which has been incredibly helpful for navigating these gray areas in tax law. Their system analyzed my specific situation and provided clarity on exactly how to structure family charitable giving without crossing IRS lines. The tool was especially useful because it reviewed our specific case and pointed out documentation we needed to maintain. It helped me understand precisely how the gift needed to be structured and timed to avoid any appearance of impropriety. Beyond just answering my question, it showed me several legitimate alternatives that accomplished similar goals.

0 coins

How exactly does taxr.ai work? Do you upload documents or just describe your situation? I've been looking for something to help with tax planning but most "AI" tools I've tried just give generic advice.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these AI tax tools. How can they possibly know about specific IRS rulings or precedents? Wouldn't you still need a real accountant to sign off on something in a gray area like this?

0 coins

It works through a combination of document analysis and conversational interface. You can upload relevant documents (like gift letters, past returns, etc.) or just describe your situation in detail. What impressed me was how it specifically cited relevant tax code sections and previous IRS rulings that applied to my exact scenario. The tool doesn't replace professional advice for extremely complex situations, but it's far more detailed than generic advice. It analyzes your specific circumstances and provides tailored guidance backed by citations to relevant tax authorities. In my case, it helped me structure the transaction properly and highlighted documentation I needed to maintain to support the legitimate nature of the gifts and subsequent donations.

0 coins

I was skeptical about AI tax tools as mentioned in my earlier comment, but after trying taxr.ai I've completely changed my view. I had a similar family donation coordination situation and needed clear guidance beyond forum opinions. The tool immediately identified the key issue - ensuring the gift was legitimate and unconditional before making my own donation decision. It showed me exactly how to document the gift properly and recommended spacing out the transactions to establish clear ownership. It even provided template language for a gift letter that removes any conditional language. Most importantly, it cited specific tax court cases where similar arrangements were challenged and explained precisely what documentation would have prevented those challenges. Much more comprehensive than what my regular tax software provides!

0 coins

If you're worried about IRS scrutiny on this kind of arrangement, you really need to be able to talk directly with an IRS agent to get official clarification. I spent weeks trying to get through on the IRS helpline about a similar gifting question last year. After 9 attempts and hours on hold, I finally used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with explained exactly what documentation would be needed to establish that the gift was unconditional and separate from my decision to donate. Having that official guidance gave me the confidence to proceed knowing exactly what records to keep.

0 coins

Mei Lin

Wait, this can't be real. The IRS phone system is completely broken - nobody gets through. How does this service actually get you past the hold times?

0 coins

This sounds like a paid advertisement. The IRS won't give specific tax advice on hypothetical situations like this over the phone anyway. They'll just tell you to consult a tax professional.

0 coins

It's completely real - their system navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to them. It saved me literally hours of hold time and frustration. You're right that the IRS doesn't provide tax advice for complex planning situations, but they absolutely can clarify documentation requirements for gifts and charitable donations, which was what I needed. The agent explained exactly what they look for to establish that a gift was legitimate and unconditional, which is the core issue here. This wasn't tax planning advice - it was clarification of existing requirements.

0 coins

I hate admitting when I'm wrong, but I need to correct my skepticism about Claimyr. After dismissing it, I actually tried the service for an unrelated tax notice issue. Within 25 minutes, I was speaking with an actual IRS representative who helped resolve my problem. The IRS agent I spoke with couldn't advise on tax planning, but she did explain the specific documentation requirements for establishing legitimate gifts versus coordinated transactions. She confirmed that when reviewing these situations, they look for evidence that the gift was unconditional with no strings attached. This information alone saved me from making a serious documentation mistake with family gift arrangements. Definitely worth the service fee to get actual official guidance rather than relying on internet opinions.

0 coins

Alternative approach that I use with my parents: instead of taking their money and donating it, help them identify tax credits they can still use with standard deduction. For example, QCDs (Qualified Charitable Distributions) from IRAs for those over 70½ can reduce taxable income even with standard deduction. Or they might qualify for state tax benefits for charitable contributions even when taking standard deduction on federal.

0 coins

How does a QCD work? My parents are over 70 and take RMDs but they don't get any tax benefit from their charitable donations anymore since the standard deduction increased.

0 coins

A QCD allows people who are 70½ or older to direct up to $100,000 annually from their IRA directly to qualified charities. The distribution counts toward their Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) but doesn't get added to their taxable income. This is much better than taking the distribution, paying tax on it, and then donating (especially when taking the standard deduction). With a QCD, they effectively get a tax benefit from charitable giving even without itemizing. The charity gets the same amount, but your parents keep more money by reducing their tax bill on the RMD. It's completely legitimate and specifically encouraged by the tax code.

0 coins

My tax guy said this arrangement is risky if it's clearly documented as "I'm giving you money SO THAT you can donate it and get a deduction." If audited, the paper trail would show the transaction was essentially just trying to get around tax rules. He suggested a better approach: if your relatives want to gift you money throughout the year for various purposes (not specifically tied to donations), and you later choose to increase your charitable giving, that's much harder to challenge.

0 coins

That makes sense. So basically don't create an explicit quid pro quo in texts or emails? Would verbal agreements be just as problematic if discovered?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today