What are the tax implications of company-matched charity donations being split between coworkers?
My coworker wants to donate about $13k to a charity he really cares about. Our company has this benefit where they match charitable donations but only up to $6.5k per employee. He came up with this idea where he'd give me $6.5k, then we would each donate $6.5k to the charity. This way, both donations would get matched by the company, the charity gets more money, I get a tax deduction, and he gets to give the full amount he wanted. I'm wondering if this could potentially cause problems if the IRS audits me? Or is it just my company that would object since it would cost them more in matching funds? If it's only my company that would care (not the IRS), I might just go ahead with it since I don't think my company would ever investigate this arrangement.
18 comments


Yuki Ito
This arrangement raises several tax and ethical concerns. From a tax perspective, when your coworker gives you $6.5k, that's technically a gift to you. While gifts under $18,000 (2025 limit) don't require gift tax filing by the giver, the subsequent donation creates complications. If you donate money that was specifically given to you for that purpose, the IRS could view this as your coworker using you as a "conduit" to circumvent company policy. The IRS substance-over-form doctrine looks at the economic reality of transactions, not just their form. Since you're not donating your own funds but acting as an intermediary, you may not be entitled to the charitable deduction. Beyond potential tax issues, this arrangement deliberately circumvents your company's matching policy limits, which could violate your employment policies or code of conduct, potentially risking both your jobs if discovered.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•So what happens if the coworker just gifts the money with no strings attached, and then later I independently decide to donate to that charity? Would the IRS still consider that a problem? I'm just curious about where exactly the line is drawn.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•The timing and documentation matter significantly. If there's clear separation between receiving a gift with no conditions and your later independent decision to donate, that's more defensible. The IRS looks at intent and substance - a documented, unconditional gift followed by your separate decision months later looks very different from an orchestrated same-day transaction where the money never really becomes "yours." If you receive a gift, incorporate it into your finances for a reasonable period, then independently decide to donate, that's much harder to challenge. But contemporaneous evidence (emails, texts) showing a plan to circumvent company policy would be problematic regardless of timing.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
After struggling with a similar donation matching situation at my company, I found a really helpful tool at https://taxr.ai that analyzes these kinds of complex tax scenarios. I uploaded the details of my situation (no personal info needed) and it broke down exactly how the IRS would view the transaction. It saved me from making a mistake with my charitable donations that could have caused issues during an audit. The tool specifically addressed conduit donation arrangements and showed me legitimate alternatives to maximize my charitable impact without creating tax problems. It even provides documentation you can save if you ever need to explain your position to the IRS.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•How does this work with more complicated situations? I have a donor-advised fund and sometimes contribute appreciated stock instead of cash to avoid capital gains. Would this tool handle that level of complexity?
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Does it just give generic advice or does it actually look at your specific situation? And how accurate is it compared to talking with an actual tax professional?
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•The system handles complex scenarios including donor-advised funds and non-cash contributions like appreciated stock. It specifically addresses optimization strategies for avoiding capital gains while maximizing deductions across different asset types and donation methods. Regarding accuracy, it's built on tax code and case law, not just generic advice. It analyzes your specific inputs against IRS regulations and relevant tax court decisions. While it doesn't replace a tax professional for very specialized situations, many accountants actually use similar tools themselves. The platform clearly indicates when a situation requires professional consultation.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
I want to follow up about https://taxr.ai that I asked about earlier. I was skeptical but decided to try it with my own charitable giving situation involving donor-advised funds. The analysis it provided was surprisingly detailed and pointed out something I'd completely missed about carryforward limitations when bunching donations. It saved me from making a mistake that would have reduced my deduction by about $3k! Definitely worth checking out if you're doing anything beyond basic charitable giving. It caught nuances that honestly my previous tax preparer missed last year.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
If you're having trouble getting clear answers about this donation situation, I had a similar experience trying to reach the IRS directly about a charitable deduction question. I waited on hold for hours over multiple days with no luck. Then I found https://claimyr.com which got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with explained exactly how they view these types of arrangements and what documentation I needed to keep. It was incredibly helpful to get an official answer directly from them rather than wondering if I was doing something wrong.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Wait, how exactly does this work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. Are you saying this service somehow gets you through the phone tree faster? That sounds too good to be true.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Yeah right. I've been trying to reach the IRS for MONTHS about a missing refund. There's no way some service can magically get you through when millions of people can't get answers. Sounds like a scam to me.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•It works by using technology to navigate the IRS phone systems and wait on hold for you. When an actual agent comes on the line, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. No more sitting on hold for hours or calling back multiple times. The system isn't magic - it's just automating the painful waiting process. They have technology that keeps your place in line through the IRS phone system so you don't have to. I was skeptical too until I tried it and got connected to a real IRS agent who answered my specific questions about charitable deductions.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
I need to apologize for my skeptical comment earlier. After getting absolutely nowhere with the IRS for weeks about my missing refund, I was desperate enough to try that Claimyr service. I honestly expected it to be a waste of money, but within an hour I was talking to an actual IRS representative who located my return and identified the issue (verification problem). The representative explained exactly what documents I needed to submit and where to send them. My refund was processed two weeks later. After spending countless hours on hold myself with nothing to show for it, I'm still shocked this actually worked. Definitely changed my mind about this.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Just want to add another angle here - if your company discovers this arrangement, it could be considered a violation of your corporate ethics policy. Many companies have specific provisions against circumventing policy limitations. I used to work in corporate compliance, and we would consider this a clear policy violation that could result in disciplinary action. Companies take matching gift programs seriously as they're part of their charitable budget and tax planning. The risk to your professional reputation might not be worth it.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•Do you think there's any legitimate way my coworker and I could structure this that wouldn't violate policies? What if he just gave me the money as a birthday gift with no strings attached, and then months later I happen to donate to that charity?
0 coins
GalacticGuru
•Even with separation in time, the arrangement is still designed to circumvent company policy, which is problematic regardless of how it's structured. Most corporate ethics policies look at intent, not just technical compliance. A legitimate alternative would be for your coworker to donate their full intended amount directly to the charity, and you could separately donate to the same charity if you genuinely support their cause. This way, both donations would be legitimate, the company match would apply appropriately based on actual employee giving, and there would be no ethical concerns. The charity might receive slightly less overall, but without any risk to your employment or tax standing.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
Has anyone considered that the charity might have ways to handle this situation? Many larger charities have programs for corporate matching optimization and might have legitimate solutions. I would suggest your coworker contact the charity's development office directly. They deal with matching gift situations all the time and might have proper ways to maximize the donation without creating problems.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Great point! When I worked in nonprofit development, we had several approaches for donors in this exact situation. Some options included spreading the donation across multiple tax years, involving family members who could make legitimate donations, or exploring donor-advised funds which sometimes have their own matching programs.
0 coins