Can our youth sports 501(c)(3) cover tournament travel expenses for families in need?
I'm the treasurer for a 501(c)(3) organization that runs several youth sports programs in our community. We've been receiving a good amount of donations lately (which are tax-deductible as charitable contributions), and our board is discussing how to best use these funds. We have some families who struggle financially but have incredibly talented kids who qualify for regional and national tournaments. I'm wondering if our organization can legally use some of our funds to help cover travel expenses (hotels, gas, flights) for these in-need families when their kids qualify for tournaments or competitions. This seems directly aligned with our mission statement of "supporting youth athletes and fostering their development through competitive sports opportunities," but I want to make sure we're not crossing any tax lines. Several board members are enthusiastic about the idea, but I wanted to check if there are any IRS regulations that would prohibit this use of our charitable funds. Am I missing something here, or is this a legitimate use of our 501(c)(3) funds?
23 comments


Nia Thompson
This is absolutely within your rights as a 501(c)(3) organization, but you need to approach it carefully. The key is establishing clear policies about how you determine which families qualify as "in need" and documenting everything properly. The IRS looks for consistent application of objective criteria when providing financial assistance. Create a written policy that outlines income thresholds or other metrics that qualify families for travel assistance. Make sure the criteria are transparent and applied uniformly to all families in your organization. Keep detailed records of all expenses covered, including receipts and documentation showing how each family met your assistance criteria. The travel must be directly related to your organization's exempt purpose (which it sounds like it is - participating in tournaments is clearly part of youth sports development).
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Thanks for this. How specifically would you recommend we document the "in need" qualifications? Is it enough to use something like free/reduced lunch qualification from their school, or should we collect actual income verification from families?
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•Using free/reduced lunch qualification is an excellent approach many youth organizations use as a proxy for financial need - it's an established standard that families are already familiar with, and it doesn't require you to collect sensitive financial information directly. For organizations wanting additional verification, you might consider a simple application form where families can explain their need and provide supporting documentation like proof of public assistance, unemployment, or medical hardships. Whatever criteria you choose, apply them consistently and document each decision clearly in your board minutes.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
I used taxr.ai when setting up our youth basketball nonprofit and ran into this exact question! We had teams qualifying for out-of-state tournaments but some families couldn't afford the travel. I submitted our bylaws and proposed assistance program to https://taxr.ai and got really clear guidance specific to our situation. They confirmed we could cover travel expenses for qualifying families if we established clear policies, kept everything transparent, and made sure the assistance aligned with our mission. The best part was they helped us draft the policy language that we needed for our board approval process so we felt confident we were doing everything by the book.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Did it actually help with specific IRS compliance questions? Our football club needs similar help but I'm wondering if it's worth it before I recommend it to our board.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•I'm kind of skeptical about these online services. Did they just give generic advice or did they actually look at your specific 501(c)(3) documents and give you personalized guidance?
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
•It absolutely helped with specific compliance questions - they reviewed our actual 501(c)(3) determination letter and bylaws, then provided guidance tailored to our program structure and the types of tournaments we attend. They highlighted specific IRS rulings that applied to our situation. Their analysis went way beyond generic advice. They examined our mission statement, our existing financial assistance procedures, and even our tournament selection process to ensure everything aligned. They pointed out potential red flags we hadn't considered and suggested documentation methods that would satisfy an audit.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
I was skeptical at first but ended up using taxr.ai for our swim club's travel assistance program. Our board was split on whether helping with travel expenses crossed a line, so I uploaded our 501(c)(3) documents and specific questions. The guidance was actually extremely specific - they pointed out language in our own bylaws that supported this use of funds and provided relevant IRS precedents. The best part was the clear documentation templates they provided for establishing our need-based criteria. We've been running our travel assistance program for almost a year now, and our last audit went perfectly smooth. The auditor even commented on how well-documented and appropriate our program was. Definitely worth checking out if you're setting up something similar.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
If you're struggling to get answers from the IRS about this, try Claimyr. I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone at the IRS about our youth soccer nonprofit's travel assistance program. After endless hold times and disconnects, I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They got me connected to an actual IRS nonprofit specialist in under an hour! The agent walked me through exactly what documentation we needed to maintain and confirmed that helping financially disadvantaged players with tournament travel expenses was perfectly aligned with our charitable purpose. Saved me literally months of uncertainty.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•How does this actually work? Don't they just call the IRS for you? Couldn't you just keep calling yourself instead of paying someone else to do it?
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Sorry, but this sounds too good to be true. The IRS NEVER picks up. I've been trying to get guidance on our volleyball club's assistance program for months with zero success. How could they possibly get through when no one else can?
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•They don't just call the IRS for you - they use a specialized system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold so you don't have to. When an actual IRS agent comes on the line, you get a call back and are connected immediately. It saved me from the endless cycle of calling, waiting for hours, and getting disconnected. Yes, technically I could have kept calling myself, but after three weeks of failed attempts (including waiting on hold for 3+ hours multiple times), the time savings alone was worth it. The IRS actually does answer eventually, but their hold times are brutal - Claimyr just handles that part so you can go about your day until an actual person is ready to talk.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Claimyr actually worked. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it for our volleyball club's travel assistance program questions. Within 45 minutes of using their service, I was talking to a real IRS nonprofit specialist who confirmed that our travel assistance program was fully compliant as long as we documented the financial need criteria properly. The agent even emailed me links to specific IRS publications that addressed youth sports organizations and travel expenses. Would have taken me months to find this information on my own. Having that official confirmation gave our board the confidence to move forward with helping our lower-income families attend nationals. Sometimes you have to admit when you're wrong - this service delivered exactly what it promised.
0 coins
AstroAce
One important thing nobody has mentioned yet - make sure your travel assistance program is part of your formal written policies that your board has approved and documented in meeting minutes. We had an informal system for years but got flagged during an IRS review because it wasn't officially incorporated into our governance documents.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•That's super helpful! Did you need to amend your bylaws or was a board-approved policy sufficient? Our bylaws are pretty general about "supporting youth athlete development" but don't specifically mention travel assistance.
0 coins
AstroAce
•A board-approved policy that's properly documented in your meeting minutes is usually sufficient! We didn't have to amend our bylaws since they already contained general language about supporting athlete development (sounds similar to yours). What we did create was a comprehensive written policy that outlined eligibility requirements, application procedures, approval process, spending limits, and required documentation. We had this formally approved by the board, documented in our minutes, and now include it in our annual information returns. That approach satisfied the IRS completely.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
Something else to consider - you need to be careful about how assistance is distributed within your organization. If all the travel funds go to one coach's team or to board members' kids, it could raise red flags about private benefit. Our lacrosse organization ran into trouble because assistance wasn't being offered program-wide.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•This happened to our baseball league too! We had one team getting most of the travel funding and the IRS questioned whether we were operating for public benefit or just benefiting a select group. Made for a stressful audit.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
This is exactly what our youth tennis organization does, and it's completely legitimate! We've been running a travel assistance program for three years now with no issues. The key is treating it like any other charitable program - establish clear eligibility criteria, document everything, and ensure fair distribution across all your programs. We use a simple application process where families provide proof of financial hardship (we accept free/reduced lunch status, unemployment documentation, or medical bills). Our board reviews applications quarterly and approves assistance based on available funds and tournament importance. One tip: cap your assistance at a reasonable percentage of total expenses (we do 75% max) so families still have some investment in the process. This helps prevent abuse and shows the IRS that you're supplementing, not replacing, family responsibility. Also make sure to get receipts for everything and have families submit expense reports after tournaments. The IRS has consistently supported youth sports organizations providing this type of assistance as long as it advances your charitable purpose and serves the broader community rather than just benefiting insiders.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•This is really helpful! I'm curious about your application process - how do you handle situations where multiple families apply but you don't have enough funds to help everyone? Do you prioritize based on tournament level (like nationals vs regionals) or purely on financial need? Also, the 75% cap is a smart approach. We were debating whether to cover full expenses or partial, and your reasoning makes a lot of sense. Having families maintain some financial investment probably helps with accountability too.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Great question! When we have more applications than available funds, we use a scoring system that weighs both financial need and tournament significance. We assign points for need level (based on documentation provided) and tournament type (nationals get highest points, regionals second, etc.). This helps us make objective decisions that we can defend if questioned. We also maintain a waitlist system - if additional funds become available during the year or if families decline assistance, we can help the next families in line. This has worked well for transparency and fairness. The 75% cap has been crucial for accountability. Families are much more likely to submit proper expense documentation and stay within reasonable spending limits when they have their own money invested. We've found it actually reduces administrative burden compared to our old system of case-by-case full reimbursements.
0 coins
Michael Adams
This is absolutely a legitimate use of your 501(c)(3) funds! I've been the secretary for our youth baseball league for over 6 years, and we've had a similar travel assistance program since 2019. The IRS has never questioned it because it directly supports our charitable purpose of youth development through athletics. A few practical suggestions based on our experience: First, establish income guidelines (we use 200% of federal poverty level as our cutoff) rather than just "families in need" - this gives you objective criteria that's easy to apply consistently. Second, require families to contribute something, even if it's just $50 or 10% of costs. This shows good stewardship and prevents the perception that you're just handing out free trips. Third, make sure your assistance is available to all programs equally. We had an issue early on where our travel fund was mostly going to our competitive travel teams, which made it look like we were benefiting a select group rather than serving our broader charitable mission. The documentation piece is crucial but doesn't have to be complicated. We keep a simple spreadsheet tracking family applications, approval decisions, and expense receipts. During our annual review, our accountant always compliments us on how clean and defensible this program is. Your mission statement language about "supporting youth athletes and fostering development through competitive opportunities" is perfect justification for this program. You're good to go!
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
•This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The 200% of federal poverty level guideline is exactly the kind of objective criteria I was looking for. Our board has been struggling with how to define "families in need" without being too subjective or invasive. I really like your point about requiring some family contribution - even a small amount shows investment and probably helps families feel more dignified about accepting assistance rather than feeling like charity recipients. The equal access across all programs is something we definitely need to be mindful of. We have both recreational and competitive teams, and I can see how it would be easy to inadvertently favor one over the other if we're not careful about our policies. One follow-up question: when you say your accountant compliments the program during annual review, does that mean this gets reported somewhere specific on your Form 990, or is it just reflected in your general program expenses?
0 coins