< Back to IRS

Logan Greenburg

Understanding ISO spread calculation - FMV vs strike price for pre-IPO stock options

I just got offered a bunch of ISOs at my pre-IPO company that has an early exercise option. When I asked about the FMV of the stock, HR told me it's exactly the same as my strike price. But I've heard through the grapevine that there's actually a higher number floating around. When I pressed HR about this, they said the higher number is from the latest VC funding round (I'm guessing that's total raise divided by outstanding shares). Here's what I need to know for AMT purposes if I decide to exercise: What number is actually used to calculate the spread? Is it the FMV that HR gave me (which would mean zero spread) or is it that higher funding round valuation? Also, I definitely can't afford to exercise all these options right now. If I exercise later, is the spread calculated based on the FMV/valuation at the time I exercise, or is it locked in at the time of the original grant?

You've got an interesting situation with potential tax implications. Let's break this down: For AMT purposes when exercising ISOs, the "spread" is the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) and your strike price. The FMV should be based on a 409A valuation, which companies typically get done by independent firms. This valuation is what the IRS looks at - not necessarily the price from the latest funding round. If HR is telling you the FMV equals your strike price, that might be correct if they just completed a 409A valuation. Companies often try to keep the strike price equal to FMV to avoid immediate tax consequences for employees. As for when you exercise later, the spread is calculated based on the FMV at the time of exercise, not at grant. This means if your company continues to grow, your potential AMT hit grows too as the spread widens.

0 coins

Wait, I'm confused. My company also has ISOs and they told us the latest funding round price is what matters for taxes. Is that wrong? Also, what's the difference between 409A valuation and the VC round valuation? Aren't they the same thing?

0 coins

The 409A valuation is specifically designed to determine the fair market value of common stock for tax purposes, and it's typically lower than the VC round price. VC investments usually purchase preferred stock with special rights and privileges, making it more valuable than common stock. Your company should be using the 409A valuation for setting strike prices and determining the spread for tax purposes. The latest funding round valuation is different - it reflects what investors paid for preferred shares with liquidation preferences and other rights that regular employees don't get with their stock options.

0 coins

I ran into this exact problem last year and ended up using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to figure it out. They specialize in equity compensation and AMT issues. My situation was almost identical - HR said one thing, but rumors about valuation were much higher. The spread between FMV and strike price ended up being significant, and exercising early saved me a ton in taxes. The platform analyzed my grant documents and explained exactly how the AMT calculation would work based on different exercise scenarios and the proper FMV numbers. Their system helped me compare exercising now vs. later and figure out the optimal tax strategy. It was honestly way clearer than what our finance team could explain.

0 coins

How exactly does taxr.ai work? I'm in a super similar situation but with NSOs not ISOs. Would it still help me? I've tried talking to my company's stock admin people but they keep giving vague answers about valuation.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these kinds of services. My company has a very complex cap table with multiple classes of shares. Can it really handle something that specific? Our last funding round had all kinds of weird terms.

0 coins

Their system works by analyzing your specific grant documents and company valuation information. You just upload the paperwork and it pulls out all the relevant data automatically. They handle both ISOs and NSOs, so it would definitely work for your situation - the tax treatment is different but they cover both types. For complex cap tables, that's actually where it shines. My company had three different share classes and convertible notes. The platform accounts for all those factors when determining the true FMV and tax implications. It specifically looks at the details of your latest funding round terms to understand how they affect common stock valuation for tax purposes.

0 coins

I used taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here, and I'm actually glad I listened. Turns out I was about to make a huge mistake with my stock options. My company also claimed the FMV was equal to strike price, but the analysis showed that wasn't accurate for tax purposes. The 409A valuation was actually 30% higher than what HR told me, which would have created a substantial AMT surprise. The tool generated a complete breakdown of my potential tax liability under different exercise scenarios. Saved me from a potential $18,000 tax bill I wasn't expecting!

0 coins

If you're struggling to get straight answers from your company about valuations, you might need to talk directly to someone at the IRS who specializes in equity compensation. I spent months trying to figure this out myself until I used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to get through to an actual IRS tax specialist. There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They got me connected to someone who handles AMT questions in about 20 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. The agent explained exactly how the ISO spread should be calculated for AMT purposes and what documentation I needed from my company to support the FMV they were claiming. Made a huge difference in my confidence about exercising my options.

0 coins

How does this actually work? I've called the IRS like 15 times about my stock options and never get through. Do they actually connect you with someone who understands ISOs and AMT stuff? Those topics are super specialized.

0 coins

Yeah right. No way this gets you through to the IRS faster than waiting. I've spent literally hours on hold with the IRS and eventually just gave up and paid an accountant $500 to figure out my options situation. Sounds like a scam to me.

0 coins

It works by holding your place in the IRS phone queue so you don't have to stay on hold yourself. When an IRS agent picks up, you get a call back immediately so you can talk to them. The average wait time for IRS calls is over 90 minutes, but with this I was connected in about 20 minutes. And yes, they can transfer you to specialized departments once you're connected. I specifically asked for someone who handles AMT and equity compensation questions, and after a brief hold I was transferred to an agent who dealt with those issues regularly. They answered my questions about how the ISO spread should be calculated and what documentation would satisfy the IRS if I were audited later.

0 coins

OK I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. I tried it after posting that skeptical comment and it actually worked perfectly. Got connected to an IRS tax specialist in about 15 minutes who explained exactly how ISO spread calculations work for AMT purposes. The agent confirmed that companies must use the 409A valuation for determining FMV, not the VC round price. She also explained that my company is legally required to provide me with this information for tax purposes. I've been fighting with our finance department for weeks before this, and now I have official IRS guidance backing me up. Definitely worth it.

0 coins

From my experience as a startup employee with ISOs, here's the real deal: companies often try to keep the 409A valuation (FMV) as low as possible while still being defensible to the IRS. This helps employees avoid immediate tax hits. The VC valuation is almost always higher because they're buying preferred shares with liquidation preferences and other rights. Your company should have documentation about the most recent 409A valuation they had done. Ask specifically for that. For AMT purposes, that's the number that matters - not the VC round price. If the 409A valuation truly equals your strike price, you'd have zero spread and no AMT impact when exercising, which would be ideal.

0 coins

Thanks for this explanation! Just to be super clear - even if the strike price equals the 409A valuation when I was granted the options, if I wait to exercise, I'd need to use whatever the 409A value is at the time of exercise for calculating the spread, right? So there's potentially a tax advantage to exercising earlier rather than later?

0 coins

That's exactly right. The AMT spread calculation uses the FMV (from the 409A valuation) at the time you exercise, not when the options were granted. This is why many people choose to exercise early when the spread is smaller or zero. As your company grows and approaches IPO, that 409A valuation will likely increase significantly, creating a much larger spread and potentially a substantial AMT liability. Early exercise, if you can afford it, can be a smart tax strategy as long as you're confident in the company's future. Just remember to file an 83(b) election within 30 days if you exercise unvested options!

0 coins

Has anyone here actually calculated what happens to your AMT if you exercise a bunch of ISOs? I'm in a similar situation and trying to figure out if I should exercise now or wait.

0 coins

I exercised about $50k worth of ISOs last year with a spread of around $75k. It pushed me into AMT territory and I had to pay about $15k in additional taxes. But I'm hoping for a 5-10x return when we exit, so I figured it was worth the hit. Just make sure you have the cash set aside for those taxes - that caught me by surprise!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing the numbers! That's really helpful. Did you do a partial exercise or all at once? I'm wondering if I should do a little each year to spread out the tax impact.

0 coins

I did it all at once because I was worried about the valuation increasing quickly - we were in late Series B and I could see IPO on the horizon. In retrospect, spreading it out over a few years might have been smarter from a tax perspective, but I was concerned about missing the window when the spread was still manageable. One thing to consider is the AMT credit - you can carry forward unused AMT credits to offset regular tax in future years. So even though I paid that $15k hit, I'll get some of it back when I eventually sell the shares. The key is making sure you have enough cash flow to handle the immediate tax bill without creating financial stress.

0 coins

Based on what everyone's sharing here, it sounds like you definitely need to get clarity on the actual 409A valuation from your company. The fact that HR is being evasive when you ask about the higher valuation number is a red flag - they should be transparent about this since it directly affects your tax liability. I'd recommend requesting the most recent 409A valuation report directly. As an employee with stock options, you have a legitimate need for this information to make informed decisions about exercising. If they won't provide it, that's concerning and might indicate the FMV is actually higher than your strike price. The timing question is crucial too. If your company is pre-IPO and growing quickly, waiting could mean a much larger AMT hit later. I've seen people get stuck with massive tax bills because they waited too long to exercise. The 83(b) election mentioned earlier is also critical if you're doing early exercise on unvested shares - missing that 30-day window can cost you thousands in additional taxes. One more thing to consider: even if the current 409A valuation equals your strike price, companies typically update these valuations every 12 months or after major funding events. So that spread could open up quickly.

0 coins

This is really solid advice. I'm actually dealing with a similar transparency issue at my company right now. When I asked for the 409A valuation report, HR said they'd "look into it" but it's been three weeks with no follow-up. One thing I learned from talking to other employees is that some companies are reluctant to share the full 409A report because it contains sensitive information about the company's financial projections and assumptions. But they should at least be able to give you the per-share fair market value that's relevant for your options. @GalacticGladiator - you mentioned the 12-month update cycle, but I've heard some companies do them more frequently if they're raising money or expecting significant valuation changes. Do you know if there's a way to find out when the next 409A update is scheduled? That could help with timing the exercise decision.

0 coins

You're absolutely right to push for transparency on this. As someone who's been through multiple equity compensation scenarios, I can tell you that companies are legally required to provide the FMV information used for tax purposes - it's not optional. Here's what I'd recommend: Send a formal email to both HR and your finance team requesting the specific per-share fair market value from your most recent 409A valuation, along with the date of that valuation. Reference that you need this information to properly calculate your AMT liability for tax planning purposes. If they continue to stonewall, escalate to your manager or even the CFO - this is a legitimate business need. Regarding timing, most companies do 409A valuations annually or within 12 months of a material event (like a funding round). If your company just raised money, they likely have a fresh valuation that reflects the new funding environment. The fact that there's a "higher number floating around" suggests the 409A was probably updated recently and may indeed be higher than your strike price. Don't let them keep you in the dark on something that directly affects your personal tax liability. You have every right to this information, and any reputable company should provide it without hesitation.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of guidance I needed! I'm definitely going to send that formal email you suggested. It's frustrating that they're making this so complicated when it should be straightforward information. One follow-up question - if they do provide the 409A valuation and it turns out to be significantly higher than my strike price, is there any way to negotiate or challenge it? Or am I basically stuck with whatever number they give me for tax purposes? I'm worried about ending up with a huge AMT bill if I exercise, but I also don't want to miss out on potential gains if we go public soon. Also, has anyone here ever had their company refuse to provide this information? What are the actual consequences if they keep stonewalling?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today