< Back to IRS

Anna Xian

How does AMT work when exercising ISOs and holding shares for less than 365 days?

I'm trying to understand the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) implications for my situation. My company granted me some Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) about 18 months ago, and I'm planning to exercise them soon. I've been reading that if I hold the shares for less than 365 days after exercise, there are different AMT consequences compared to holding them longer. From what I understand, when you exercise ISOs, the difference between the exercise price and fair market value gets added to your AMT income calculation. But I'm confused about what happens specifically if I sell within a year of exercising. Does the AMT adjustment still apply? Do I get any AMT credit? How exactly does the timing impact my tax situation? My total ISO grant is for 2,500 shares with an exercise price of $8.50 per share. Current FMV is around $32 per share. Given my other income and deductions, I'm trying to figure out if exercising now and potentially selling in 8-10 months would trigger AMT for me, and how to plan for it. Any insights would be really helpful!

The AMT treatment for ISOs can definitely be confusing! Here's what happens in your situation: When you exercise ISOs, the difference between your exercise price ($8.50) and the fair market value ($32) is considered a "preference item" for AMT purposes. This means that while this spread ($23.50 per share) isn't taxed for regular income tax purposes upon exercise, it IS included in your AMT income calculation. If you sell the shares within 365 days of exercise (a "disqualifying disposition"), you actually simplify your tax situation somewhat. The sale means you don't get the special ISO tax treatment (potential long-term capital gains), but it also means you typically won't have to pay AMT on those shares because the regular income tax and AMT systems essentially align once you've made a disqualifying disposition. The tricky part is timing - if you exercise in 2025 but don't sell until 2026 (but still within 365 days), you could trigger AMT in 2025 and then have regular income in 2026. This creates a potential AMT credit situation, but it's not always a perfect wash.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation. So if I understand correctly: If I exercise and sell in the same tax year (both in 2025), even if less than a year apart, I wouldn't really have an AMT issue? But if I exercise in December 2025 and sell in January 2026, that's when things get messy with AMT? Also, in terms of actual dollars, with 2,500 shares at a $23.50 spread, that's around $58,750 of potential AMT income. Does all of that get added to my AMT calculation, or is there some reduction?

0 coins

If you exercise and sell in the same tax year, you'll generally just pay ordinary income tax on the gain - the AMT issue becomes mostly irrelevant since the income is captured in your regular tax. So yes, exercising and selling in 2025 simplifies things significantly from an AMT perspective. The December/January scenario is exactly when things get complicated. You would potentially pay AMT in 2025 because of the $58,750 preference item, and then in 2026 you'd have ordinary income from the disqualifying disposition. You'd likely get an AMT credit to use in future years, but it might not fully offset your 2025 AMT payment immediately.

0 coins

I went through this exact same confusion with my ISOs last year! After struggling to make sense of all the AMT calculations and timing considerations, I stumbled across https://taxr.ai which literally saved me thousands in potential tax mistakes. Their tool analyzed my ISO exercise scenarios and showed me exactly how the AMT would impact me in different exercise-and-sell timelines. The best part was it clearly showed the tax implications for holding periods under 365 days versus qualifying dispositions. I was able to run multiple scenarios with my specific numbers to find the optimal strategy. What I really appreciated was that it explained exactly which portion of my potential ISO exercise would trigger AMT and how much tax I'd actually owe rather than just giving generic advice. Much clearer than the confusing spreadsheets I was trying to build myself!

0 coins

Did it actually help you determine if you should do a same-year sale or if you should hold longer? My tax guy keeps telling me conflicting things about AMT credits and I'm not sure if he really understands ISO treatment.

0 coins

Ev Luca

I'm curious about this - did their analysis factor in state taxes too? I'm in California and heard the state AMT calculations can be different from federal. Does the tool handle these state-specific AMT rules?

0 coins

Yes, it actually showed me side-by-side comparisons of different scenarios including same-year sales vs. holding for qualification. In my case, it turned out that exercising a portion each year rather than all at once was optimal for my situation. The clarity on AMT credits was particularly helpful since those can carry forward. For state taxes, yes - the tool does handle state-specific calculations. I'm also in California, and it separately calculated the CA AMT impact which was important since California's AMT rules don't perfectly mirror the federal ones. It showed both the federal and state tax implications for each scenario.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up after trying https://taxr.ai for my ISO situation. I was skeptical at first but decided to give it a shot after the conflicting advice from my tax guy. The analysis was eye-opening! It showed me that in my specific situation, exercising and selling within the same tax year would actually be more beneficial than holding for the long-term capital gains treatment. The AMT hit would have been significant if I had exercised and held across tax years. The tool gave me a detailed breakdown of exactly how much AMT I would owe under different scenarios, including the "exercise now, sell in 8 months" approach I was considering. The specific AMT credit calculations were what my tax advisor was missing. Definitely saved me from making a costly timing mistake with my ISOs!

0 coins

After spending WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS about AMT treatment for my ISOs last year (their published guidance is so confusing!), I finally used https://claimyr.com to actually speak with someone at the IRS. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I had specific questions about Form 6251 calculations for ISOs with different holding periods, and needed clarification directly from the IRS. Claimyr got me through to an actual IRS representative in about 20 minutes when I had previously been hanging on hold for hours only to get disconnected. The IRS agent I spoke with provided the exact guidance I needed on how the AMT adjustment works for ISOs held less than 365 days and how to properly document everything on my return. Completely worth it instead of guessing or relying on possibly outdated information online.

0 coins

How exactly does this service work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I'm confused why I would need a service to make a phone call.

0 coins

Sounds like BS honestly. I've called the IRS plenty of times and while yes, the wait times can be long, you can just put your phone on speaker and do other stuff. Why pay for something you can do yourself? And the IRS agents often give different answers to the same question anyway.

0 coins

They don't call for you - they navigate the IRS phone tree and hold in the queue until an agent is about to answer, then they transfer the call to you. It's basically a service that does the waiting for you so you don't have to sit on hold for hours. I totally get the skepticism - I felt the same way initially. But after trying three times to call the IRS myself and spending over 5 hours total on hold (once getting disconnected after 2+ hours), the value became clear. The time saved was worth it to me, especially because I needed answers before making my ISO exercise decision. And yes, IRS agents can sometimes give different information, but I was able to get the specific Form 6251 instructions I needed.

0 coins

I want to follow up on my skeptical comment about Claimyr. I decided to try it because I needed specific clarification about AMT credits after a disqualifying disposition of ISOs. I'm honestly surprised to report it actually worked exactly as advertised. I got connected to an IRS tax law specialist in about 25 minutes without having to sit on hold myself. The agent walked me through exactly how to calculate my AMT adjustment for my specific ISO situation and how the credits work if I sell within a year. What was most valuable was getting confirmation about how to document everything on Form 8949 and Form 6251 for a disqualifying disposition. Saved me a ton of confusion and probably an amendment later. Didn't think I'd be saying this, but it was definitely worthwhile.

0 coins

Don't forget about the state tax implications too! Depending on your state, you might have different AMT rules. For example, California has its own AMT system that doesn't perfectly match the federal one. In my experience with ISOs, the best approach for shares held less than 365 days was to coordinate the exercise and sale in the same tax year when possible. This eliminated most AMT complications. The worst situation is exercising in December and selling in January - that's where you can get hit with AMT without the offsetting income until the following year.

0 coins

How do state-specific AMT calculations work? Does every state with income tax have their own AMT rules, or just certain states like California?

0 coins

Not every state has an AMT system. California definitely does, and a few others like Minnesota and New York have some form of AMT or minimum tax calculations, but many states don't have an AMT equivalent at all. For states that do have AMT, the calculations are often similar to federal but with state-specific rates and sometimes different exemption amounts. California's system is particularly noteworthy because it has its own AMT rate (7% currently) and its own set of preference items that doesn't exactly match the federal list. This means you could potentially trigger CA AMT even if you don't trigger federal AMT, or vice versa.

0 coins

Has anyone actually disputed the AMT forms with the IRS? I exercised ISOs last year, held for 8 months, then sold. I didn't report any AMT adjustment on Form 6251 since I figured the disqualifying disposition meant I just pay ordinary income tax on the gain. My accountant agreed with this approach. The IRS hasn't questioned it so far but I'm still nervous about it.

0 coins

That approach sounds correct to me. If you exercised and sold in the same tax year, there shouldn't be an AMT issue regardless of the holding period. The AMT problem happens when you exercise in one year and sell in another. You essentially handled it the right way by just reporting the ordinary income.

0 coins

Just want to add some clarity on the AMT credit situation since it seems like there's some confusion in the thread. When you exercise ISOs and trigger AMT, you do get AMT credits that can be used in future years - but these credits can only offset regular tax liability, not AMT liability in future years. The key thing to understand is that AMT credits are essentially a way to recover the "prepayment" you made through AMT. However, you can only use these credits when your regular tax exceeds your AMT in future years, and only up to the difference between the two. For Anna's situation with $58,750 of potential AMT income ($23.50 spread × 2,500 shares), the actual AMT impact depends on her total income, deductions, and other AMT adjustments. The AMT exemption for 2025 is $85,700 for single filers, so if this ISO exercise is her only major AMT adjustment, she might not even trigger AMT. My recommendation would be to model this out with actual numbers including your other income sources. The exercise-and-sell-same-year strategy that others have mentioned really is the cleanest approach if you don't need to hold for the long-term capital gains treatment.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today