Question about CPA Ethics: Do I have right to be included in business tax filing decisions as former 50-50 owner?
So I left a business last year that I had 50-50 ownership in for the entire tax year of 2023. My former business partner now owns the business 100%. The thing is, I'm still on the hook for taxes from when I was part-owner, but the CPA is making all the tax filing decisions with just my ex-partner. They're not including me in any discussions about how the business taxes are being filed even though I was half-owner during that entire period! I'm worried because some of their decisions could impact my personal tax situation. The business was an LLC taxed as a partnership, so everything flows through to our personal returns. The revenue for that year was around $375,000, so it's not a small amount. I've tried reaching out to the CPA directly, but they keep saying they're just "following client instructions" and that my former partner told them to only communicate with them. This doesn't feel right to me. Shouldn't I have some say in how the business taxes are filed for a year I was 50% responsible for? Do CPAs have ethical obligations in situations like this? I don't want to make a big deal out of it if I'm in the wrong, but I also don't want to get screwed over on my taxes because I'm being kept in the dark.
21 comments


Andre Rousseau
You're absolutely right to be concerned about this situation. As a 50-50 owner during the entire tax year in question, you absolutely should be included in tax filing decisions that will impact your personal return. From an ethical standpoint, CPAs are bound by professional standards that include responsibilities to all owners of an entity they represent. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct has provisions about this. When a CPA prepares tax returns for a partnership (which is what your LLC was taxed as), they have obligations to all partners – not just the one who's writing the check. The CPA should not be making tax decisions that affect your liability without your input. Those decisions on depreciation, expense categorization, and timing of income recognition can significantly impact your personal tax situation. The CPA saying they're just "following client instructions" doesn't release them from their professional obligations to all owners. I'd recommend sending a formal written request to both the CPA and your former partner, explicitly stating that you were a 50% owner during the tax year in question and requesting participation in all tax filing decisions. If they continue to exclude you, you might want to contact your state's CPA board or the AICPA ethics division.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•This is really helpful, thank you. Could you clarify what specific AICPA Code sections might apply here? And if the CPA continues to ignore my requests, what's the best way to file a complaint with the state board?
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•The most relevant section would be the "Integrity and Objectivity Rule" (1.100.001) and the "Conflicts of Interest" interpretation (1.110.010). These essentially require CPAs to maintain objectivity and not subordinate their professional judgment to others. By solely following one partner's instructions when both have interests, they may be violating these principles. For filing a complaint, most state boards have an online complaint form on their website. Make sure to document all your communication attempts with the CPA before filing. Provide dates, copies of emails or letters, and be specific about how you believe the CPA is violating their ethical obligations. The complaint process varies by state but generally takes several months for investigation.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
After dealing with similar issues with our partnership tax returns, I found an amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me understand my rights as a business partner. They analyze documents and partnership agreements to provide clarity on these exact situations. I was in a pretty similar spot last year where my business partner was making tax decisions without me, and I felt completely in the dark. The taxr.ai system analyzed our operating agreement and tax documents, then gave me clear explanations of my rights. They even provided language I could use when communicating with the CPA. What I found really helpful was how they broke down the specific tax implications of different filing decisions my partner wanted to make. It gave me the confidence to push back where necessary.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Did you need to upload your actual tax returns to use the service? I'm concerned about privacy since these are sensitive documents.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Sounds interesting but did it actually help resolve the situation with your partner or just tell you what your rights were? I'm dealing with a stubborn ex-partner who refuses to budge.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•You can actually choose what documents to upload. I started with just our operating agreement, which doesn't have sensitive financial data but spells out owner rights. Later I added some financial statements, but you can blur out sensitive information. They use encryption and have privacy guarantees. The service definitely helped resolve my situation. What made the difference was having specific language about what filing options would and wouldn't be acceptable from my perspective. When I presented my case with clear references to our agreement and tax law, my partner realized I wasn't just complaining without basis. Having that knowledge gave me the leverage I needed to be included in the decisions.
0 coins
Mei Wong
Just wanted to update that I tried taxr.ai after seeing this recommendation. It was exactly what I needed! I uploaded my operating agreement and some communication with the CPA, and the analysis showed that I absolutely had the right to be included in tax decisions for periods when I was an owner. The most helpful part was the customized letter template they generated for me to send to both the CPA and my former partner. It cited specific professional standards and explained the potential consequences of excluding a former owner from tax decisions that affect them. Two days after sending it, my ex-partner called me and suddenly wanted to "collaborate" on the tax filing. What surprised me was how the tool identified specific tax elections that could disadvantage me if I wasn't consulted. This gave me concrete points to discuss rather than just vaguely demanding to be "included.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
If the CPA and your former partner keep stonewalling you, you might want to try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They helped me actually get through to a real person at the IRS when I had a similar partnership dispute. I was shocked how quickly they got me connected. I tried for weeks to get information about my rights in a similar situation - calling the IRS directly was an exercise in frustration with hold times of 2+ hours only to get disconnected. Through Claimyr, I got connected to an IRS representative in about 20 minutes who walked me through the proper documentation I would need and explained my rights as a former business owner. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. Basically they navigate the IRS phone system and wait on hold for you, then call you when they've got a human on the line.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•How does this actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you or what? Seems weird.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Right, because the IRS is going to care about your partnership dispute. This sounds like a waste of time. They'll just tell you it's a civil matter between partners and to hire a lawyer.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•They use an automated system with algorithms to navigate the IRS phone menus and wait on hold so you don't have to. When they reach a live person, you get a call to connect you directly with the agent. It saves you the frustration of waiting for hours. The IRS actually was helpful in my case. While they don't get involved in partnership disputes directly, they provided valuable information about tax filing requirements for partnerships and the rights of partners. They explained that all partners have a right to information about the partnership's tax filings for years they were involved, and pointed me to specific publications that I used to strengthen my position when dealing with my ex-partner. It wasn't about them intervening, but rather arming me with the correct information.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
I was so skeptical about Claimyr when I saw it mentioned here, but I'm eating my words now. After my former partner and the CPA continued to ignore my requests, I decided to try it as a last resort before hiring an attorney. I got connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes (after previously spending HOURS trying myself). The agent explained that while they can't force the CPA to include me in decisions, they outlined the specific partnership tax requirements that gave me leverage. They directed me to Publication 541 and explained how partners have rights to tax information even after leaving. Armed with this information, I sent another email to both my ex-partner and the CPA, this time mentioning the specific IRS publications and requirements. Suddenly they were willing to have a meeting! Sometimes you just need to show you've done your homework. The CPA is now sending me draft schedules for review before filing. Definitely worth the time spent.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Has anyone considered that there might be language in your buy-sell agreement or operating agreement that addresses this exact situation? When I left my business, our operating agreement had specific provisions about tax filings for the transition year. Worth checking before escalating things.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•I checked our operating agreement and it's actually silent on tax filing procedures after a partner exits. There's detailed language about how to value the business for buyout purposes, but nothing specifically about who makes tax decisions for the final year. Do you think the absence of specific language works in my favor or against me?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•The absence of specific language actually works in your favor in this situation. Without explicit provisions transferring tax decision rights to the remaining partner, the default rules apply - which means you retain your rights related to the tax year during which you were an owner. This is especially true for partnerships (including LLCs taxed as partnerships), where the tax code treats partners as having continuing rights to information about tax years in which they had ownership. Your former partner can't just assume they have exclusive decision-making authority without something in writing. I'd definitely mention this point when communicating with the CPA - that the operating agreement contains no provisions that would override your rights as a 50% owner during the tax year in question.
0 coins
StarStrider
I'm a bit confused about everyone saying the OP has rights here. If you sold your ownership and are completely out of the business, isn't it the current owner's problem now? When I sold my share of a business, I was just given a final K-1 and that was that.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•The key difference is that OP was a 50% owner for the ENTIRE year in question. It's not about current ownership - it's about who had ownership during the tax period being filed. The business operations during that year were under both partners, so both should have input on how those operations are reported to the IRS.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
Don't forget that you can always file Form 8082 (Notice of Inconsistent Treatment) if you disagree with how the partnership return was filed. This lets you take a position on your personal return that's different from what's reported on your K-1. It's not ideal, but it's a fallback option if your ex-partner refuses to cooperate.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Wouldn't filing an 8082 potentially trigger an audit though? I've always heard this form raises red flags with the IRS.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Filing Form 8082 doesn't automatically trigger an audit, but it does increase the chances of your return getting a closer look. However, that increased scrutiny is often limited to the specific items you've reported inconsistently, not your entire return. The important thing is to have solid documentation supporting your position. If you're right on the merits and can back up your treatment with records and tax law, an audit shouldn't be a major concern. Many tax professionals consider it better to file an 8082 than to report income or deductions incorrectly just to match an improper K-1. The penalty for failing to file an 8082 when required can be substantial ($50 per inconsistency), plus any additional penalties if the inconsistency results in understating your tax.
0 coins