< Back to IRS

Nina Fitzgerald

Is my CPA's Engagement Letter Liability Waiver Normal? Need Help Understanding

So I just got an engagement letter from my tax preparer and I'm a bit concerned about some of the language in it. I totally get the parts where they say they're not liable for any mistakes in the information I provide them, or if there's fraud, or how I manage my business operations. That makes sense - it's on me to give them accurate info and run my business properly. But there are sections that seem to completely release them from ANY responsibility even if THEY make serious errors. Like they could totally mess up my taxes and I'd have no recourse? I've listed the concerning clauses below. Can someone help me understand if this is standard practice for CPAs? I'm trying to figure out why these clauses exist and how accounting firms can ask clients to basically sign away their rights even if the professional screws up majorly. I'd be fine with the whole letter if they just added some language acknowledging responsibility for their own work. This is my first time working with a CPA (previously used TurboTax) so I'm not sure if I'm overreacting or if this is a legit concern. I don't want to start our relationship on a bad foot, but also don't want to sign something that leaves me completely exposed.

Jason Brewer

•

Tax professional here. What you're describing is pretty standard in engagement letters. Most CPAs use template letters recommended by their professional liability insurance providers or professional associations. The clauses about limiting liability serve several purposes. First, they help define the scope of the engagement - what the CPA is responsible for versus what you're responsible for. Second, they protect the CPA from disproportionate liability (like being held responsible for the entire financial impact of a mistake rather than just the cost of fixing the error). That said, these clauses don't actually give CPAs a free pass to be negligent. Professional standards of care still apply, and truly negligent behavior can't be completely waived away by an engagement letter. Many states have laws that limit how much liability a professional can contract away. What you might consider is asking for clarification about what these clauses mean in practice. For example, if they make a calculation error that results in penalties, will they cover the penalties? Many CPAs will do this even if the engagement letter limits their theoretical liability.

0 coins

Thanks for this explanation. What if the CPA makes a mistake that costs me thousands in penalties? Does the engagement letter mean I just have to eat that cost? And is there any way to negotiate these terms or are they basically take-it-or-leave-it?

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

If the CPA makes a calculation error that directly causes penalties, most reputable firms will cover those penalties even if the engagement letter doesn't explicitly say so. It's generally considered good business practice and many firms have policies about this that go beyond what's in the engagement letter. As for negotiating terms, many CPAs use standardized engagement letters and aren't very flexible about changing the language. However, you can certainly ask for clarification in writing about how they handle situations where their error causes you financial harm. Some firms might be willing to add an addendum that addresses specific concerns without changing their standard letter.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

I've been using the tax document analysis tool at https://taxr.ai and it's been super helpful for reviewing documents like engagement letters. I was in a similar situation last year - my CPA sent me this intimidating legal document that I didn't fully understand. I uploaded it to taxr.ai and it broke down exactly what each clause meant in plain English and highlighted the parts that weren't standard industry practice. The tool explained that while most CPAs do limit liability, there are typically reasonable bounds. It helped me have a much more informed conversation with my accountant about what specific clauses meant and which ones were negotiable. Saved me from signing something that wasn't in my interest.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

That sounds interesting. Does it actually explain what's normal in the industry vs what's excessive? My CPA has a clause saying they have zero liability even for "gross negligence" which seems extreme.

0 coins

Mason Stone

•

I'm skeptical about these kinds of tools. Wouldn't it be better to just have another CPA review it? How can software understand all the nuances of tax professional agreements and liability law?

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

It absolutely does explain what's standard vs excessive in the industry. The tool is actually built on analyzing thousands of real CPA engagement letters, so it knows when something falls outside normal practices. For example, clauses that waive liability for "gross negligence" are actually quite unusual and potentially unenforceable in many states - the tool would flag that immediately. The software uses specialized tax knowledge combined with legal analysis. While getting a second CPA opinion is great, most won't review another professional's engagement letter for free. This gives you immediate feedback without that awkwardness or cost. It's like having a tax professional and contract attorney in your pocket to give you a quick assessment before you decide if you need more specialized help.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

Just wanted to follow up - I tried the taxr.ai tool mentioned above and it was really eye-opening. I uploaded my CPA's engagement letter and it highlighted three clauses that were way outside industry norms. One was trying to waive liability even for intentional misrepresentation (which apparently isn't even legally enforceable in my state). The analysis explained that while limitation of liability clauses are standard, my CPA's version was unusually broad. Armed with this info, I had a conversation with my accountant and they agreed to modify the most problematic language. They actually seemed impressed that I understood the issues instead of just signing blindly. For anyone facing a similar situation, having that objective analysis made all the difference in having a productive conversation instead of an awkward confrontation.

0 coins

After struggling to get clarity from my CPA about their engagement letter last year, I finally found the solution with Claimyr. I was getting nowhere trying to reach the IRS to understand which parts of engagement letters are actually enforceable according to their standards. Just endless hold times and disconnections. I used https://claimyr.com and they got me connected to a real IRS representative in about 20 minutes instead of the 3+ hours I was facing before. You can see how it works in their demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent explained that while they don't regulate CPA engagement letters directly, there are certain liability waivers that don't align with professional standards. They pointed me to resources about what's reasonable versus excessive in tax preparation agreements. This let me go back to my CPA with official information rather than just my concerns.

0 coins

Wait, I don't understand. How does this service get you through to the IRS faster? Doesn't everyone have to wait in the same queue?

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

This sounds like BS. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They're chronically understaffed and everyone has to wait. And why would an IRS agent advise on CPA contracts anyway? That's not their job.

0 coins

They use a specialized system that continuously dials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it gets through to a representative. Once there's a connection, they call you and connect you to the live agent. So you're not skipping the line - the service is essentially waiting in line for you so you don't have to sit with a phone to your ear for hours. The IRS agents don't provide legal advice about contracts specifically, but they can and do provide information about professional standards and resources for taxpayers. In my case, the agent directed me to IRS publications that outline taxpayer rights and CPA responsibilities, which gave me context for evaluating my engagement letter. They also pointed me to the Office of Professional Responsibility which oversees tax practitioners and provides guidelines on professional conduct.

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

I have to eat my words from my previous comment. After a particularly frustrating three-hour wait trying to reach the IRS about a related tax prep issue, I broke down and tried Claimyr. I was EXTREMELY skeptical that anything could improve the IRS contact experience. I'm still shocked, but it actually worked. The system called me back in about 30 minutes with an IRS agent already on the line. The agent walked me through which parts of tax preparation agreements are considered reasonable limitations of liability versus what crosses the line into potential violations of professional standards. For anyone dealing with questionable engagement letter terms, getting this direct information from the IRS was invaluable. Saved me from signing an overly restrictive agreement while also helping me understand which parts were actually standard industry practice.

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

Former tax office manager here. One thing to consider is that you can always propose changes to the engagement letter. It's just a contract. I've seen many clients who successfully negotiated modifications to liability clauses. A reasonable compromise might be asking them to add language that acknowledges they're responsible for errors resulting from their negligence, up to the amount of fees you've paid them. Many firms will accept this limitation since it's fair and doesn't expose them to unlimited liability. Remember that CPAs want your business. Unless you're a very small client for a very in-demand firm, you have some leverage. Just approach it as a business discussion rather than an accusation.

0 coins

Sophie Duck

•

Would requesting changes to the engagement letter potentially sour the relationship with a new CPA? I'm worried they'll see me as a "difficult client" from day one.

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

In my experience, requesting reasonable changes doesn't damage the relationship if you approach it professionally. Good CPAs respect clients who take their financial affairs seriously enough to read and understand what they're signing. The key is how you frame it. Don't accuse them of trying to take advantage of you. Instead, say something like, "I'm comfortable with most of the engagement letter, but I'd like to discuss a couple of points to make sure we're on the same page about our responsibilities." Then propose specific, reasonable modifications. Most CPAs will appreciate clarity upfront rather than misunderstandings later.

0 coins

Just to offer a different perspective - I've signed these kinds of engagement letters with my CPA for years without issues. While the language sounds harsh, in practice, good CPAs stand behind their work regardless. When my CPA made an error calculating my home office deduction that led to an IRS notice, they immediately took responsibility, corrected the return, and paid both the penalty and interest - even though their engagement letter technically limited their liability. Their reputation and relationship with me was worth more than the few hundred dollars at stake. The engagement letter is partly about legal protection, but how they actually handle mistakes tells you more about their professionalism than what's written in the contract.

0 coins

Anita George

•

That's been my experience too. My CPA's engagement letter has all kinds of limitations, but when they messed up my S-corp filing last year, they handled everything with the IRS and covered all penalties even though the letter said they weren't required to. Good firms care about their reputation.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now. My CPA sent me an engagement letter that basically says they're not responsible for anything - even their own calculation errors. Reading through everyone's experiences here, it sounds like I need to push back on some of the more extreme clauses. @Lucas Lindsey your suggestion about proposing specific language around negligence liability up to the fee amount seems really reasonable. And @Austin Leonard and @Anita George, it's reassuring to hear that good CPAs often do the right thing regardless of what the contract says. I think I'm going to ask my CPA for clarification on a few specific scenarios - like what happens if they make a computational error that leads to penalties, or if they miss a major deduction I'm entitled to. If they can't give me satisfactory answers, I might need to find someone else. The engagement letter should protect both parties, not just give one side a complete free pass. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this has been really educational for someone new to working with tax professionals!

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

@Samantha Howard You re'absolutely taking the right approach! As someone who just went through this process myself, I d'recommend being very specific about scenarios when you talk to your CPA. Don t'just ask general questions - give them concrete examples like If "you miscalculate my quarterly estimated taxes and I face underpayment penalties, how would that be handled? I" found that asking about specific situations really helped me understand whether my CPA was someone I could trust long-term. The good ones will give you straight answers about their policies for handling their own errors, while the ones you want to avoid will just keep pointing back to the engagement letter language. Also, don t'be afraid to get their responses in writing via email. If they say they ll'cover penalties for their calculation errors, ask them to confirm that in an email so you have it documented. A reputable professional won t'have any problem with this request.

0 coins

As someone who recently switched from TurboTax to working with a CPA, I completely understand your concerns about those engagement letter clauses. They can be pretty intimidating when you're not used to seeing that kind of legal language! One thing that helped me was asking my CPA to walk through the letter during our initial consultation. I said something like "I want to make sure I understand what we're both responsible for" and asked about specific scenarios. For example, what happens if they miss a deadline, make a calculation error, or overlook a deduction I'm entitled to? Their willingness to have that conversation openly and give concrete examples of how they handle mistakes told me a lot about their professionalism. A good CPA should be able to explain their policies clearly and shouldn't get defensive about reasonable questions. Also, don't forget that you can always get a second opinion from another CPA about whether the terms seem reasonable. Many will do a brief consultation to review an engagement letter, especially if you're considering switching to their services. Sometimes having that outside perspective can help you decide if your concerns are valid or if you're overthinking it. The fact that you're taking the time to read and understand the agreement before signing puts you way ahead of most people!

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

@AstroAdventurer This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was looking for! I love the idea of asking them to walk through specific scenarios during our consultation. That's a much more comfortable way to address my concerns than feeling like I'm challenging their contract terms. Your point about getting a second opinion from another CPA is really smart too. I hadn't thought about that approach, but you're right that many would probably be willing to do a brief review, especially if I'm potentially bringing them business. It's reassuring to hear from someone else who made the same transition from TurboTax to a CPA. Did you find the engagement letter discussion helped you feel more confident about your choice of accountant? I'm hoping that how they handle these questions will give me a good sense of whether we'll work well together long-term. Thanks for the encouragement - sometimes it's hard to know if you're being appropriately cautious or just overthinking everything!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today