Optimal tax strategies for C Corp payments to foreign owner with no US work permit
I've got a Delaware C corporation that's 100% owned by someone living outside the US. They're actively working for the company but don't have US work authorization, so regular payroll isn't possible. I'm trying to figure out the most tax-efficient way to get money to the owner. Dividends seem problematic due to double taxation (21% corporate income tax plus withholding tax on dividends to foreign shareholders). I'm wondering if the C corp can pay the foreign owner as an independent contractor? My main concern is whether this would violate transfer pricing rules if most of the corporate profits end up going to the foreign owner as contractor payments for their services. Has anyone dealt with this situation before? What are the best options for compensating a foreign owner without work authorization? Any insights would be super helpful!
18 comments


Charlie Yang
This is actually a common issue for foreign-owned US corporations. You're right to be concerned about transfer pricing rules - the IRS looks closely at these arrangements to ensure they reflect arm's length pricing. Paying your owner as a contractor is possible, but you need documentation showing the compensation is reasonable for the services provided. The key is to ensure payments reflect market rates for similar work. If all profits are being transferred as "contractor payments," that will definitely raise red flags. Consider a hybrid approach - reasonable contractor payments plus occasional dividends. You could also explore a management service agreement between your C Corp and a foreign entity controlled by the owner. This needs proper structuring with clear deliverables and market-based compensation. Whatever route you take, document everything thoroughly and consider getting an advance pricing agreement from the IRS to avoid future disputes.
0 coins
Grace Patel
•Thanks for your response. For the management service agreement option, would that still run into transfer pricing issues? And are there any specific documentation requirements to satisfy the IRS that the arrangement is legitimate?
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•A management service agreement still needs to comply with transfer pricing rules, but it gives you a more structured framework. The key is having clear deliverables and documented market rates for similar services. For documentation, you'll want contracts specifying services provided, benchmarking studies showing comparable compensation for similar services, invoices detailing work performed, and evidence the services were actually necessary and provided. Keep minutes of board meetings showing approval of the arrangement and periodic reviews of its effectiveness.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
After struggling with almost this exact situation last year, I found this amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me navigate this complicated international tax situation. I was trying to figure out how to structure payments to my UK-based business partner who owns 70% of our Delaware C corp. The tool analyzed our specific situation and provided a detailed plan that combined reasonable contractor payments with a properly structured management agreement. It took all the documentation we already had and showed us exactly what we were missing to stay compliant with both US and UK tax laws.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
•How exactly does this tool work? Does it just give general advice or does it actually help with the specific documentation needed?
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. Did it actually account for the transfer pricing regulations specifically? Those are incredibly complex and even most tax professionals struggle with them.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
•The tool works by analyzing your specific situation and documents, not just giving generic advice. You upload your corporate info, ownership structure, and any existing agreements, and it identifies gaps in your documentation and compliance strategy. It absolutely addresses transfer pricing regulations. It helped me identify comparable market rates for similar services, created documentation templates specifically designed for our situation, and even provided language for board resolutions. What impressed me was how it flagged specific IRS regulations I wasn't even aware of that could have caused problems down the road.
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
I was really skeptical about taxr.ai when I first saw it mentioned here, but I finally tried it while dealing with my own international business structure (I own a C Corp with partners in Singapore). It was actually legit and incredibly helpful. The tool immediately identified that our existing contractor agreement had several red flags that could trigger transfer pricing scrutiny. It provided specific language to fix the issues and helped us create a proper intercompany service agreement with market-based rates that would stand up to IRS review. Most impressively, it gave us a roadmap for documentation showing our pricing was reasonable. I showed everything to our accountant who was actually impressed with the quality of the guidance. Saved us thousands in consulting fees!
0 coins
Aria Washington
If you're dealing with this complex situation, I'd strongly recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to get direct guidance from the IRS. I tried calling the IRS international tax department for weeks about a similar foreign ownership issue and couldn't get through. With Claimyr, I had a callback from an actual IRS international tax specialist within hours. They answered my specific questions about contractor payments to foreign owners and documentation requirements. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c It was a total game changer compared to the frustration of trying to navigate the IRS phone system on my own.
0 coins
Liam O'Reilly
•Wait, this actually works? I thought the IRS was basically unreachable these days. How much did it cost to use this service?
0 coins
Chloe Delgado
•I don't believe for a second that this service could get you through to a specialist in the international tax department. The IRS barely answers general questions, let alone connecting you to specific departments. Sounds like marketing BS to me.
0 coins
Aria Washington
•Yes, it absolutely works! The service uses a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line. When an agent becomes available, it calls you and connects you immediately. Regarding connecting to specific departments - you're right that the initial connection is to a general agent, but once I explained my international tax issue, they transferred me to the appropriate department. The key is that I didn't have to waste hours waiting on hold - Claimyr did that part for me.
0 coins
Chloe Delgado
I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I've been trying to reach the IRS for weeks about my own foreign corporation issues. It actually worked exactly as described. I got a callback within about 90 minutes, explained my situation to the first agent who answered, and got transferred to someone who specifically deals with international business taxation. The agent walked me through the exact documentation requirements for payments to foreign owners and explained the safe harbor provisions for certain management service agreements. The information I got was incredibly specific and helpful - way beyond what I found searching online for hours. Really saved me a ton of time and frustration.
0 coins
Ava Harris
One option you haven't considered is having your foreign owner form a separate foreign company that enters into a licensing agreement with your US C Corp. The US corporation pays royalties or licensing fees to the foreign company for intellectual property, trademark usage, etc. There's still withholding tax on royalty payments (usually 30% unless reduced by treaty), but it's potentially more efficient than dividends. You'd need to ensure the licensing agreement reflects market rates and real value, not just a way to shift profits.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•That's an interesting approach I hadn't thought of. Would we need to establish actual IP value first? Our business is primarily service-based consulting, so I'm not sure what IP we'd be licensing.
0 coins
Ava Harris
•Yes, you'd need to establish real IP value - it can't just be a paper arrangement. For a service-based consulting business, the IP could potentially be methodologies, frameworks, training materials, proprietary processes, or software tools used in the consulting. If your business truly doesn't have distinct intellectual property, this approach wouldn't work well. The IRS would see through an arrangement where fees are paid for nominal or non-existent IP. That's why proper valuation and documentation of the actual IP assets is critical.
0 coins
Jacob Lee
Has anyone considered using a foreign subsidiary? The US C Corp could establish a subsidiary in the foreign country where the owner lives, then have a legitimate service agreement between the companies. The foreign owner could then be directly employed by the foreign subsidiary. This adds complexity but potentially solves several issues at once.
0 coins
Emily Thompson
•This is actually what we did for our UK-based owner. The US entity pays the UK subsidiary for actual services, and our owner is a proper employee of the UK entity. Works well but you need proper substance in the foreign entity - can't just be a shell company.
0 coins