How much reasonable salary should I pay myself from my C-Corp for tax purposes?
I'm looking for some rough guidance before I book a session with a tax professional. So here's my situation: I started a small tech company that's now making consistent revenue (around $20k monthly with minimal expenses). We got some angel funding early on, but we're not planning to seek additional investment. Both myself and my co-founder are transitioning to part-time roles with the business. We're planning to keep the operation running with a few contractors helping us manage things. I want to maintain our Delaware C-corp structure because I'm thinking we might steadily grow this side business and potentially have a modest exit at some point, which would help return money to our early investors who have SAFE agreements. The issue I'm running into is understanding how to properly pay ourselves from the profits. My understanding is that it gets complicated because: 1) Taking distributions could be seen as trying to avoid payroll taxes, and 2) A C-corp needs to pay owner-employees a "reasonable salary" before distributions. What's considered reasonable in a situation like this? Should we be focused more on dividends or salary? Any high-level advice before I sit down with a CPA?
18 comments


Carmella Popescu
You're right about the "reasonable compensation" requirement for C-corp owner-employees. The IRS wants to make sure you're not avoiding payroll taxes by taking all your money as distributions. What's considered "reasonable" depends on several factors: your qualifications, the time you dedicate to the business, what similar positions would pay in your market, the size of your company, and your company's performance. Since you mentioned you're moving to part-time, your reasonable salary would be proportionately less than a full-time position. For a small tech company generating around $240K annually with you working part-time, you might consider what a part-time CEO/founder in your area would make. Maybe 20-30% of what you'd make full-time, depending on your hours.
0 coins
Lorenzo McCormick
•Thanks for the helpful response! So if a full-time CEO of a similar sized company might make $150k in our area, then maybe $30-45k would be reasonable for part-time? Would the IRS scrutinize a low salary more for a profitable business? We're making decent profit margins.
0 coins
Carmella Popescu
•Yes, that salary range sounds reasonable for the situation you described. If a comparable full-time position would pay around $150k, then $30-45k for part-time work aligns with the proportionate reduction in hours and responsibilities. The IRS does tend to scrutinize situations where the business is profitable but the owner-employees take minimal salaries while taking larger distributions. They're specifically looking for situations where people might be trying to avoid payroll taxes. The more profitable your business, the more they'd expect reasonable compensation to reflect that success.
0 coins
Kai Santiago
After reading about your situation, I thought I'd share my experience. I was in a similar position with my small SaaS company last year. I was confused about how to handle the salary vs. distributions issue, especially since I went part-time. I found this service called https://taxr.ai that literally saved me thousands in potential tax issues. I uploaded my company docs and financials, and they analyzed my specific situation and gave me customized guidance about reasonable compensation. They even provided documentation I could keep on file in case of an audit showing how my salary determination was made.
0 coins
Lim Wong
•How does the analysis work exactly? I'm wondering if this would help with my S-Corp where I've been struggling with similar reasonable compensation questions.
0 coins
Dananyl Lear
•Sounds interesting but seems like it might just be a fancy calculator. Did it actually provide anything different than a regular CPA would give you? I'm skeptical about AI tax tools.
0 coins
Kai Santiago
•The analysis uses IRS guidelines, court cases, and data from your industry to calculate appropriate compensation. It looks at factors like your role, time commitment, company size, and local market rates - it works great for S-Corps too! It's definitely more than a calculator. My CPA was actually impressed with the detail in the report. It provided specific documentation explaining how they arrived at the figure, cited relevant tax court cases, and compared my situation to established precedents. That kind of backup documentation is exactly what you need if you ever get audited.
0 coins
Dananyl Lear
I wanted to follow up about that taxr.ai service I was skeptical about. I decided to try it anyway for my own C-corp situation, and I have to admit it was surprisingly helpful. The report they generated was much more comprehensive than I expected. They analyzed my specific industry, company size, and responsibilities to provide a reasonable compensation range with actual documentation backing it up. What I found most valuable was the detailed explanation of how they determined the range, citing specific tax court cases and IRS precedents that applied to my situation. My accountant was actually impressed and said it was exactly the kind of documentation that helps in case of an audit. It was pretty eye-opening to see how much legitimate variation there can be in "reasonable" compensation depending on your specific circumstances.
0 coins
Noah huntAce420
Dealing with the IRS directly on C-corp compensation issues can be a nightmare. Last year I spent WEEKS trying to get someone on the phone after receiving a notice questioning my salary vs distributions. Someone recommended https://claimyr.com to me and I was skeptical but desperate. They actually got me connected to a real IRS agent in under an hour when I'd been trying for days. You can see how it works in this demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Having that direct conversation with the IRS agent was crucial - they explained exactly what documentation they needed to see regarding my compensation decisions, which helped me resolve the issue much faster.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•Wait, how does this even work? The IRS phone system is infamous for keeping people on hold for hours. How could a third-party service possibly get you through faster?
0 coins
Fidel Carson
•This sounds like BS honestly. Nobody can magically get through IRS phone queues. They're probably just charging you to wait on hold themselves, and you're paying a premium for something you could do for free.
0 coins
Noah huntAce420
•It uses a system that monitors the IRS phone lines and automatically dials repeatedly until it gets through. Then when a spot opens, they call you and connect you directly to the agent. It's not magic - just smart automation that saves you from having to manually redial for hours. The service doesn't just charge you to wait on hold. They use technology to constantly redial and navigate the IRS phone tree until they secure a place in line. Then they call you when they're about to connect with an agent. I was skeptical too but it saved me literally days of frustration. It's the difference between spending your whole day hitting redial versus getting a call when an actual agent is ready to talk.
0 coins
Fidel Carson
I need to eat my words about that Claimyr service. After my skeptical comment, I found myself in a complete mess with the IRS about my own C-corp salary classification. After trying for THREE DAYS to reach someone at the IRS with no luck, I reluctantly tried Claimyr. It actually worked exactly as advertised. I got a call back in about 40 minutes saying they had an IRS agent on the line. The agent was able to clarify exactly what documentation I needed to justify my salary-to-distribution ratio and even put notes in my file about our conversation. Would have saved myself a ton of stress if I'd just tried it sooner instead of being stubbornly skeptical. Sometimes new solutions really do work better than the old way of doing things.
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
One aspect of C-corp compensation that hasn't been mentioned yet is the dividend strategy. If you're moving to part-time and the business is profitable, you could consider a combination of reasonable salary + dividend distributions to shareholders. The benefit is that while dividends are subject to double taxation, they don't incur payroll taxes. For a company with stable profits like yours, establishing a dividend policy might make sense if you're looking to provide regular returns to your investors as well. Just make sure your salary comes first and is defensibly "reasonable" before you start declaring dividends. Documentation is key!
0 coins
Xan Dae
•What about accumulated earnings tax though? If the C-corp retains too much profit without a business purpose, couldn't they get hit with that penalty?
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
•You're absolutely right to bring that up. C-corporations that accumulate earnings beyond the reasonable needs of the business ($250,000 is generally the threshold) can face the Accumulated Earnings Tax, which is a 20% penalty tax. However, if the company can demonstrate specific, definite, and feasible plans for the retained earnings - like future expansion, equipment purchases, paying down debt, or even building reserves for contingencies - these can justify keeping cash in the business. It's important to document these plans in your corporate minutes and have financial projections to support them.
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
Have you considered the option of electing S-Corp status instead? Since you mentioned that you're not planning to raise more capital and are running this as a smaller operation now, an S-Corp could potentially give you more tax flexibility. The main benefits would be avoiding double taxation and having more options for taking profits out of the business. You'd still need to pay yourself a reasonable salary, but the remaining profits could pass through without the additional layer of corporate tax.
0 coins
Lorenzo McCormick
•I've thought about S-Corp, but we have some complications - we have foreign investors from the angel round, and I believe S-Corps can't have non-US shareholders? Also, if we did ever want to raise more money in the future or pursue an acquisition by a larger company, my understanding is that C-Corp is more attractive to those types of buyers.
0 coins