IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Romeo Quest

•

To get back to the original question about the Cohan rule - I'm a bookkeeper and see clients try to abuse this all the time. They'll come in with almost no records and expect to claim thousands in deductions "because of the Cohan rule." The reality is much different. In practice, the IRS is very strict about applying this rule, especially for theft losses. They typically expect: 1. A timely filed police report 2. Insurance claim documentation 3. Original purchase documentation or other proof of value 4. Evidence that you've exhausted recovery options Even with all that, they often allow only a percentage of the claimed amount when the Cohan rule is involved. And they're much more likely to scrutinize these claims during an audit. The bottom line: Can you "get away" with claiming fake theft losses? Maybe in the short term, but it's fraud, and if you're audited, you'll face serious consequences including penalties, interest, and potential criminal charges for tax evasion.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

So what if you genuinely had something stolen but have very little documentation? Like I had some camera equipment stolen from my car last year (did file a police report) but don't have receipts for everything. Can I still claim anything?

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Yes, you can still claim something with limited documentation. Having the police report is already a good start. For the value, gather whatever evidence you can - credit card statements from when you purchased the items, photos of the equipment, insurance documentation, even screenshots of similar items with comparable age/condition showing current market value. The Cohan rule might help you establish the value based on your partial records, but you'll need to show you're making a good faith, reasonable estimate. Document your estimation method carefully. For example, "Camera body purchased approximately June 2023 for $X according to credit card statement, lens valued at $Y based on current market price of similar used equipment minus 30% for age/condition." The more detail and supporting evidence you provide, the stronger your position will be if questioned.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Small business owner here. I've been through two IRS audits in my 15 years of running my company. Here's my experience with the Cohan rule: The rule CAN be helpful when you have some documentation but not complete records. During my first audit, I had incomplete mileage logs but could prove my business travel through appointment calendars, receipts from destinations, etc. The auditor allowed a reasonable percentage of my claimed mileage using the Cohan principle. BUT - and this is a huge but - they will give you ZERO leeway on completely undocumented claims or things that seem fabricated. My second audit involved a contractor who gave me fake documentation for some work, and even though I genuinely paid for services, the IRS disallowed the entire deduction because they determined the documentation was not credible. Claiming fake theft losses would fall under fraud, not the Cohan rule. The rule helps honest taxpayers with imperfect records, not dishonest ones trying to create deductions.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your real experience. What would you recommend for someone who's terrible at keeping receipts? I'm always losing them and I'm worried about an audit someday.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Just a heads up for everyone amending 2020 returns - make sure you're using the CORRECT forms. The IRS changed some of the business expense categories on Schedule C for that year. I messed up my first attempt because I used a current year Schedule C as my reference instead of the 2020 version. Also, if your amendment results in a refund, be prepared to wait a WHILE. My amended return took about 16 weeks to process last year. The IRS says to expect 16 weeks but it can take even longer.

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

Do you remember what specifically changed on Schedule C? I'm working on mine now and want to make sure I get it right.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

The main differences weren't dramatic, but there were some COVID-related options that existed only for 2020 returns. For example, there were special provisions for the Employee Retention Credit and paid sick/family leave credits that appeared on that year's forms. The core expense categories stayed the same (advertising, car expenses, insurance, etc.), but some of the instructions and limitations were different due to pandemic relief provisions. Your best bet is to download the actual 2020 Schedule C form and instructions directly from the IRS website rather than using any current year references. That way you'll be working with the exact form as it existed then.

0 coins

You might want to calculate if this is worth your time first. While you can definitely still amend a 2020 return, remember that you'll need to: 1) Recalculate your entire return with the new expenses 2) File Form 1040-X plus a new Schedule C 3) Include any supporting documentation 4) Wait potentially months for processing For $7,800 in business expenses, assuming you're in the 22% tax bracket plus self-employment tax, you might get back approximately $2,500. Only you can decide if that's worth the effort!

0 coins

Not to mention the possibility of having to amend your state return too depending on where you live. Some states require you to file a state amendment if you change your federal return.

0 coins

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - if you file separately and want to take deductions like student loan interest, tuition and fees, or education credits, there are special rules. If you're married filing separately, you CANNOT claim the student loan interest deduction at all. And for some education credits, filing separately might make you ineligible too. Run the numbers both ways before deciding. In my experience, filing jointly almost always wins from a pure tax perspective. The financial aid question is separate and depends on your specific aid package.

0 coins

This is super helpful! I had no idea about those limitations on education credits when filing separately. I think we'll definitely need to calculate it both ways. Do you know if standard free tax sites can show both scenarios accurately or do we need to use something more specialized?

0 coins

Most of the free tax sites can show you both scenarios, but you might need to create two separate tax returns (just don't file both!). Start one return as married filing jointly, note the refund/amount owed, then start a new return as married filing separately and compare. The standard sites aren't great at explaining the financial aid implications though. For that, you might want to talk to your wife's school financial aid office directly. They can often run projections showing how different income levels would affect her specific aid package. Some schools even have financial counselors who specialize in these situations.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

I'm still confused about FAFSA. I thought they changed the rules recently? Something about using different years for the income verification?

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

Yes, FAFSA made significant changes recently! Starting with the 2024-2025 FAFSA, they're using what's called the Student Aid Index (SAI) instead of the Expected Family Contribution (EFC). There are also changes to whose income is considered in the formula.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - check if you're still within the timeframe for a "corrective distribution" for your 2022 overcontribution. If you took the distribution before your filing deadline (including extensions) for 2022, you can avoid the 6% excise tax completely, even if Vanguard coded it incorrectly on the 1099-R. For the earnings portion, you generally need to include those as income in the year you made the contribution (2022), not when you took the distribution (2023). If your 1099-R doesn't separately show the earnings, you might need to contact Vanguard to get that breakdown. The most critical form here is Form 5329 where you'll need to show you corrected the excess contribution. Even with an incorrect distribution code, you can still properly document this with an attached statement explaining the situation.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Thanks for this info! I did take the distribution in February 2023, which was before my filing deadline for 2022 taxes. But I'm confused about reporting the earnings - my 1099R doesn't break out what portion was earnings vs. principal. Does this mean I need to amend my 2022 return now to report those earnings? Or can I handle everything on my 2023 return?

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Since you took the distribution before your 2022 filing deadline, you should definitely avoid the 6% excise tax, which is good news. For the earnings portion, yes, technically those earnings should be reported on your 2022 tax return, which would mean filing an amendment if you've already filed for 2022. You'll need to contact Vanguard to get the breakdown of principal vs. earnings from that distribution. Ask specifically for the "net income attributable" or NIA related to the excess contribution amount. This might not be reflected correctly on your 1099-R if the distribution wasn't properly coded.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

Heads up - I went through this exact same mess with Fidelity last year. Make sure you also check if you qualify for the "self-certification" procedure under Revenue Procedure 2021-30. If your correction doesn't fully meet all the technical requirements for a proper return of excess contribution, you might still qualify for relief under this procedure. It essentially lets you "self-certify" that you intended to follow the rules for proper correction even if there were some procedural errors along the way. You'll need to file a specific statement with your return, but it could help avoid penalties even if Vanguard didn't process everything perfectly.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

I've never heard of this self-certification procedure. Does it apply to 401k contribution corrections too or just IRAs? I overcontributed to both last year and am trying to sort through the mess.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Does anyone know if the court ruling affects the penalties for non-compliance? I heard the penalties were supposed to be pretty severe - like $500/day and potential criminal charges for willful violations. If the courts eventually uphold the CTA, could they still enforce penalties for the time period when we thought we didn't have to file?

0 coins

Vanessa Chang

•

As I understand it, if the injunction is eventually overturned and the BOI requirements are upheld, FinCEN would likely establish new compliance deadlines rather than trying to enforce the original ones retroactively. It would be pretty unreasonable to penalize businesses for non-compliance during a period when a court order explicitly stated they didn't have to comply. The penalties are indeed significant - civil penalties of $500 per day for violations, plus potential criminal penalties including imprisonment for willful violations. But these would only apply to violations of whatever new deadlines might be established if the CTA is ultimately upheld.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

That makes sense, thanks for the clarification! I was worried we might get caught in some kind of legal trap if we don't file now but then the requirements come back later. I'll just keep our information ready but hold off on filing until there's more clarity.

0 coins

Madison King

•

My accountant told me to just go ahead and file the BOI reports anyway despite the injunction, saying "better safe than sorry." Does that make any sense to anyone? FinCEN is still accepting filings through their website, but I'm not sure if there's any benefit to filing when it's not currently required.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

I think your accountant is being overly cautious. While FinCEN's system remains operational and you technically *can* still file, there's no legal requirement to do so while the injunction is in effect. There's no penalty for not filing right now. Unless you have some very specific business reason for wanting your beneficial ownership information on file with the government during this period of uncertainty, I'd recommend waiting to see how the legal situation resolves. Just keep your information organized so you're ready if/when the requirement comes back.

0 coins

Prev1...40084009401040114012...5643Next