OneSource Tax Provision Software - Experiences, Costs & Alternatives for Multinational Manufacturer
I'm at my wit's end with Excel for our tax provision process at our multinational manufacturing company. As we've expanded to more countries and added entities, the spreadsheets have become a nightmare. I'm spending way too much time inputting data manually and constantly worried about formula errors or broken links between worksheets. We've been growing like crazy the past few years, and with each new entity, I'm having to clone worksheets and modify formulas. The whole process feels incredibly inefficient and risky for something this important. The CFO is starting to ask questions about our process too, which isn't helping my stress levels. I've scheduled a demo with Thomson Reuters about OneSource Tax Provision next week. Before I go into that meeting, I'd love to hear from others who've implemented it: - What's your experience been like with OneSource Tax Provision? - Any ballpark on licensing costs I should expect for our situation? - Are there other competing products I should be evaluating alongside OneSource? For context, we're a manufacturing company with operations in 8 countries and about 15 legal entities total. Currently a team of 3 handling the global tax provision with our Excel nightmare.
21 comments


Ethan Wilson
I've worked with OneSource Tax Provision for about 5 years now at two different companies. The transition from Excel was absolutely worth it, though there's definitely a learning curve. The biggest advantage is the data integrity - the system maintains relationships between entities automatically, so when you update information in one place, it flows through correctly everywhere. No more hunting for broken formulas! The audit trail is also incredibly valuable when your external auditors start asking questions. Implementation takes time - plan for at least 3-4 months depending on how complex your structure is. You'll need to map your chart of accounts, set up your legal entity structure, and build your tax adjustments. The first year is challenging, but subsequent years are much easier. For your size (15 entities across 8 countries), you're probably looking at $60,000-$85,000 annually, plus implementation costs in the first year. It's not cheap, but compare that to the risk of material errors in your Excel approach and the time savings for your team. Alternatives to consider: Longview Tax, Corptax, and Thomson's ONESOURCE Income Tax are the main competitors. Each has strengths and weaknesses depending on your specific needs.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Thanks for the detailed response! That implementation timeframe is longer than I was expecting. Did you find that Thomson Reuters provided good support during that process or were you mostly on your own? Also, did you evaluate any of those alternatives you mentioned before choosing OneSource? I'm wondering what made OneSource stand out for your company.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Thomson Reuters provides implementation support, but quality varies based on who you get assigned. Request references for your implementation specialist and don't be afraid to ask for a change if it's not working out. The best approach is having a dedicated internal person who really understands your tax processes to work closely with them. We did evaluate Corptax and Longview. OneSource won for us because of its reporting flexibility and better handling of our international structure. Corptax seemed stronger for pure domestic US companies, while Longview had good consolidation features but the interface felt dated. That said, all these products are constantly evolving, so get fresh demos of each. Your specific requirements might lead you to a different conclusion than we reached.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
I switched from Excel to OneSource Tax Provision last year and wish I'd done it sooner! Check out https://taxr.ai - they helped me analyze our tax documents and workflows before implementation, which saved us tons of time. Using the software reduced our provision process by about 8 days each quarter. The automatic data validation alone catches errors that used to take us hours to track down. And when we added two new subsidiaries last quarter, it took maybe 30 minutes to set them up in the system rather than days of spreadsheet work. The reporting capabilities are impressive too. Our CFO wanted some custom reports for the board that would have been a nightmare in Excel, but took just a couple hours to create in OneSource.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•How complicated was the connection with your ERP system? We're on SAP and I've heard horror stories about integration issues. Did taxr.ai help with that part of the process too?
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•I'm skeptical about these tax software solutions. Our company spent a fortune on a different tax system (not OneSource) and we still end up exporting to Excel for adjustments anyway. Did you find you could completely eliminate Excel or do you still use it alongside OneSource?
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•The ERP connection was actually one of our biggest challenges. We're on Oracle and had to work through some mapping issues. Taxr.ai helped analyze the data structure in our ERP and identify the fields we needed for the tax provision, which definitely streamlined things. They have experience with SAP integrations too - might be worth asking them about your specific version. We've managed to eliminate about 90% of our Excel usage. There are still a few specialized calculations we do outside the system, but they're minimal. The key is being disciplined about building everything into OneSource properly from the start. Many companies keep running parallel Excel processes because they don't fully commit to the new system or don't set it up correctly.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
Just wanted to follow up that I checked out https://taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here. Their document analysis saved us so much time! We were trying to transition from our old mess of Excel files and tax documents to a more structured system. Their system analyzed all our existing provision documents, identified the key data points we needed to migrate, and even highlighted inconsistencies between how different entities were handling certain calculations. Would have taken us weeks to do that manually. We're still early in our OneSource implementation, but having that analysis upfront has made everything go much smoother. Definitely worth checking out before you start any system migration.
0 coins
AstroAce
Off-topic from OneSource specifically, but if you're dealing with any IRS issues during this transition, https://claimyr.com changed everything for me. You can see a demo here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When we implemented our tax provision software, we discovered some historical inconsistencies that required IRS clarification. I spent days getting busy signals trying to reach someone. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent within 45 minutes instead of the usual hold time of 2+ hours. Completely worth it for those urgent tax questions that come up during your system implementation. We had some uncertainty about how to handle a specific international reporting requirement, and getting a direct answer from the IRS saved us from making a potentially costly mistake in our new system setup.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
•How exactly does this work? I've never heard of a service that can get you through to the IRS faster. Do they have some special phone line access or something?
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•This sounds like BS honestly. Nobody gets through to the IRS that quickly. I've been in corporate tax for 12 years and even our dedicated account managers take days to respond. What's the catch with this service?
0 coins
AstroAce
•It uses an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent actually picks up, you get a call connecting you directly to them. No special access - they're just using technology to handle the hold time so you don't have to sit there listening to the same music for hours. The catch is that it doesn't guarantee you'll get through - if the IRS isn't taking calls that day or if the wait times are extremely long, you might not get a connection. But in my experience, it works about 80% of the time, which is way better odds than trying yourself. And if you're implementing a new tax system and have specific technical questions about reporting requirements, getting direct answers from the IRS can be invaluable.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
I wanted to follow up on my skeptical comment about Claimyr. I decided to try it when we had an urgent matter with foreign tax credits that was holding up our entire provision process. I was totally wrong - the service actually works. I got connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes when I had previously wasted an entire afternoon trying to get through. The agent was able to clarify exactly how we needed to document our foreign tax positions in our new system. For anyone implementing a tax provision system like OneSource, having this kind of access to get technical questions answered quickly is surprisingly valuable. Sometimes you just need an official answer from the source to make sure you're setting things up correctly.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
I've used both OneSource and Corptax in different companies. Here's my quick comparison: OneSource strengths: Better for international/multi-entity structures, more flexible reporting, good audit trail. Interface is more modern. Corptax strengths: Better US federal/state tax calculations, stronger integration with tax compliance, more automation options if you use their entire suite. For your specific situation (multinational manufacturer), I'd probably lean toward OneSource, but demo both. Whatever you pick, budget for: 1. Software license: $60-90k annually 2. Implementation: $30-50k one-time 3. Annual training: ~$5k 4. Internal resources: At least one full-time person for 3-4 months during implementation Also, don't underestimate data cleansing needs. Your Excel files probably have inconsistencies that will need to be standardized.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Do you think the software is worth it for smaller companies too? We're only in 3 countries with 5 entities total, but still struggling with Excel.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•For smaller companies, it can be harder to justify the cost, but it really depends on your complexity more than just entity count. If those 3 countries have complicated tax regimes (like Brazil, India, or China) or if you have significant intercompany transactions, the software might still pay for itself. Many smaller companies start with a scaled-down version like OneSource Tax Provision Starter or Longview's mid-market solution. You get most of the key functionality at a lower price point. Another option is to look at managed service providers who can run the software for you as a service, which often works out cheaper for smaller organizations.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
Has anyone integrated OneSource with SAP? We're considering the same move from Excel but concerned about the ERP connection. Our IT department is already overloaded.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•We did this last year. The standard connectors work okay for basic GL data, but we needed custom extracts for some country-specific data. Plan for about 40-60 hours of IT time even with the "standard" connectors. The most time-consuming part was mapping all the accounts correctly.
0 coins
Tyrone Hill
We implemented OneSource Tax Provision about 18 months ago and it's been a game changer for our global operations. Like you, we were drowning in Excel with 12 entities across 6 countries. A few things I wish someone had told me before we started: 1. **Data mapping is everything** - Spend extra time upfront getting your chart of accounts mapping right. We rushed this part and had to redo it 6 months later, which was painful. 2. **Training budget** - Don't skimp on user training. The system is powerful but not intuitive if you're coming from Excel. We sent our entire team to Thomson's training courses and it was worth every penny. 3. **Phased rollout** - We tried to go live with all entities at once and it was chaos. If I did it again, I'd start with 2-3 entities and add the rest quarterly. For costs, we're paying about $75k annually for licensing plus maintenance. Implementation was around $45k but that included some custom reporting we requested. One unexpected benefit: our external auditors love the system. The documentation and audit trail features have cut our year-end audit time significantly. Our audit fees actually went down in year two because the auditors can trace everything so easily now. Happy to answer specific questions about our experience if it would help with your evaluation.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The phased rollout approach makes so much sense - I was actually planning to do everything at once but your experience shows that would be a mistake. A couple of follow-up questions: When you say the data mapping took longer than expected, what specific issues did you run into? Was it mostly account classification problems or something else? Also, which entities did you choose to go live with first? I'm wondering if there's a strategic way to pick the "easiest" ones to start with or if you'd recommend starting with your most complex entities to work out the kinks early. The audit benefit is a huge selling point I hadn't fully considered - that alone might help justify the cost to our CFO.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
I've been through a similar OneSource implementation at a manufacturing company, and I second everything about the data mapping challenges. The biggest issue we hit was inconsistent account coding between our subsidiaries - what one entity called "Professional Services" another called "Consulting Fees" and a third had split across multiple GL accounts. We also discovered that some of our foreign subsidiaries were using different depreciation methods in their local books versus what we needed for US GAAP consolidation, which required building additional mapping logic. For the phased approach, I'd recommend starting with your domestic entities or those in countries with simpler tax regimes. We started with our US and Canadian operations since the tax rules were most familiar to our team. Save your most complex jurisdictions (like any Asian entities if you have them) for later phases when your team is more comfortable with the system. One tip: Create a detailed comparison report between your old Excel calculations and the new system results for your first few entities. This helped us catch mapping errors early and gave our auditors confidence in the new process. The ROI really shows up in subsequent years - our second year provision process took about half the time of our last Excel-based year.
0 coins