How to correctly report Form 1065 Line 14c gross nonfarm income for limited partners
I'm having an issue with my partnership tax reporting. I entered a gross nonfarm income amount of $12,845 on Schedule K line 14c, and I noticed the tax software is automatically flowing this amount through to all the K-1s, including those for limited partners. According to the Form 1065 instructions I was reading, line 14c shouldn't be populated for limited partners. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if this is actually correct. Does anyone have experience with partnership returns and know if limited partners should indeed have the gross nonfarm income amount showing on their K-1s? Our partnership has both general and limited partners, and I want to make sure I'm allocating everything properly before finalizing the return.
26 comments


Natasha Kuznetsova
The instructions are correct - limited partners typically shouldn't have amounts reported in Box 14, Code C (Gross nonfarm income) on their Schedule K-1s. This is because limited partners generally aren't subject to self-employment tax on their distributive share of partnership income. The software is likely applying the same amount to all partners by default. You'll need to manually override this in your tax software. Look for partnership allocation settings or K-1 modification options that allow you to zero out specific line items for particular partners. Each software handles this differently, but there's usually a way to differentiate between general and limited partners for self-employment tax purposes. Make sure to verify the partner classification is correct in your software too. Sometimes the issue is that all partners are classified as general partners by default.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Thanks for the explanation. I'm using ProSeries for our partnership return and can't find where to override this. Does anyone know specifically where in ProSeries I can adjust this? Our partnership has 3 general and 2 limited partners.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•In ProSeries, you'll need to go to each individual partner's K-1 and look for the "Self-Employment" section or tab. There should be a way to indicate whether each partner is a general or limited partner, which controls how the software handles self-employment income items. Once you've properly classified your partners, check each K-1 again. If the amounts are still flowing incorrectly, you might need to use the override function. Look for a button or right-click option that says "Override" when you're on the specific line item in the K-1. If you still can't find it, sometimes there's a separate allocation worksheet for items that need special allocation. Check under the partnership menu for special allocations or income allocations.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
I ran into this exact problem last tax season when preparing partnership returns. I spent hours trying to figure it out until I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). They have this great feature where you can upload your Form 1065 instructions and ask specific questions about how to handle special allocations and limited partner reporting. I uploaded my partnership docs and asked about this exact issue - how to handle gross nonfarm income for limited partners. They confirmed that limited partners shouldn't have Box 14C populated and showed me the exact section in the instructions. Even better, they walked me through how to correct it in my software with step-by-step screenshots. Saved me from filing incorrect K-1s!
0 coins
Malik Thompson
•Does taxr.ai work with all tax software? I'm using Drake and having similar issues with other allocations, not just the nonfarm income thing.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•I'm a bit skeptical about these AI tax tools. How accurate is it really? The IRS instructions are complicated and I'd worry about getting bad advice.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•It works with any tax software because it's more about understanding the rules correctly than integrating with specific software. I've used it with both UltraTax and Lacerte. The interface lets you ask follow-up questions about how to implement the correct treatment in your specific software. As for accuracy, I was skeptical too initially. What impressed me is that taxr.ai directly references the relevant IRS publications and Form 1065 instructions. It's not giving its own interpretation - it's showing you exactly what the official guidance says and then helping you apply it correctly. I've had my work reviewed by our firm's partnership specialist, and he confirmed everything was done correctly.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai that the previous commenter recommended. I uploaded our partnership docs and asked about the gross nonfarm income issue for limited partners. It immediately pointed me to page 39 of the Form 1065 instructions that specifically addresses this. It confirmed that limited partners should NOT have Box 14C populated and explained that this is because limited partners aren't subject to self-employment tax on their partnership income (with some exceptions for guaranteed payments). Then it showed me exactly where in Drake to fix this - there's a partner-by-partner override section I completely missed before. Fixed the issue in about 10 minutes!
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
If you're still having trouble with your partnership return and can't get through to the IRS for help, I'd recommend trying Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was completely stuck on a similar partnership allocation issue last month and couldn't get any IRS agent on the phone despite trying for days. I was ready to give up when someone recommended Claimyr. They have this service where they get you to the front of the IRS phone queue. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. I was super skeptical but desperate, so I tried it. Got connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes who was actually really helpful about partnership allocations and confirmed exactly how to handle the gross nonfarm income for limited partners.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone lines are notoriously impossible to get through. Are they somehow holding your place in line?
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
•Sounds fishy. Why would the IRS allow a third party to bypass their phone queue? I've had to wait hours or sometimes days to speak with someone.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
•They use an automated system that waits on hold for you. When an IRS agent picks up, their system calls you and connects you directly to the agent. You don't have to wait on hold yourself - their system does the waiting for you. It's not bypassing the queue - you're still in the same line as everyone else. The difference is you don't have to waste your time listening to the hold music for hours. You go about your day, and when an agent is available, you get a call. It's completely legitimate and doesn't involve any special access or relationship with the IRS.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
I feel like an idiot for doubting Claimyr now. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still struggling with my partnership return issues, so I decided to give it a shot anyway. Used the service yesterday and got connected to an IRS business tax specialist in about 20 minutes. She confirmed that gross nonfarm income should NOT flow through to limited partners' K-1s and explained exactly why - it's because limited partners aren't subject to self-employment tax on their distributive share. She also walked me through how to properly report guaranteed payments which DO get reported on a limited partner's K-1 (but in a different box). Saved me from making a major error on our partnership return!
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
Something else to check - if you have income that should be reported differently between general and limited partners, make sure you're using the correct partner designation codes on each K-1. In Box I of Schedule K-1, you need to have the correct code for each partner's type. General partners should be coded as "GP" while limited partners should be "LP" - some tax software uses these codes to determine how certain income flows. If all partners are incorrectly coded as general partners, that might explain why the nonfarm income is flowing to everyone.
0 coins
FireflyDreams
•Thank you for mentioning this! I just checked and realized I had accidentally coded one of our limited partners as "GP" instead of "LP" in Box I. When I fixed this, the software automatically stopped flowing the gross nonfarm income to that partner's K-1. So it seems like the partner code is what controls this in my software. Would there be any other boxes besides 14c that are affected by the partner designation? I want to make sure I'm getting everything right.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•Glad that fixed the issue! Yes, there are several other items that are affected by the partner designation. The main ones are: Box 14A (Net earnings from self-employment) and Box 14B (Gross farming or fishing income) are also typically not reported for limited partners, as these items relate to self-employment tax which limited partners are generally exempt from. Also check Box 14E (Health insurance premiums) and Box 13W (Section 179 deduction) which sometimes require special handling for limited partners. Limited partners might have different rules for suspended losses and at-risk limitations too. I'd recommend reviewing all these sections on your limited partners' K-1s now that you've fixed the designation code.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
Has anyone run into this situation where the partnership agreement specifies that limited partners ARE subject to self-employment tax? I have a client with an unusual partnership structure where the agreement specifically states all partners, including limited partners, are subject to SE tax. In that case, would you still zero out 14c?
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•The partnership agreement doesn't override tax law on this issue. Whether someone is subject to self-employment tax is determined by the tax code, not the partnership agreement. Limited partners are generally exempt from self-employment tax on their distributive share of income under IRC Section 1402(a)(13), regardless of what the partnership agreement says. However, guaranteed payments to limited partners for services are still subject to SE tax. If your client wants all partners to be subject to SE tax, they might need to restructure so that everyone is a general partner, or consider a different entity type altogether.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
For anyone using TaxAct Professional, here's how to fix this gross nonfarm income flowing issue: Go to each K-1, click on "Partner Information", and there's a dropdown where you can specify if the partner is a general or limited partner. Once you select "limited partner", it will automatically exclude Box 14c amounts for those partners. Took me forever to find this setting last year!
0 coins
Lauren Zeb
Just want to add another perspective here - I've been preparing partnership returns for over 15 years and this gross nonfarm income issue trips up a lot of people. The key thing to remember is that limited partners are generally passive investors who aren't actively participating in the business operations, which is why they're exempt from self-employment tax on their distributive share. However, there's one important exception that hasn't been mentioned yet: if your limited partners receive guaranteed payments for services rendered to the partnership, those guaranteed payments ARE subject to self-employment tax and should be reported in Box 4 of the K-1, not Box 14c. Also, make sure you're not confusing this with rental income from real estate partnerships - that's treated differently and has its own set of rules. The gross nonfarm income in Box 14c specifically relates to trade or business income that would be subject to SE tax for general partners. If you're still unsure about your specific situation, I'd recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in partnership taxation, as these allocations can get complex quickly.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•This is really helpful - thank you for clarifying the distinction between distributive share income and guaranteed payments. I think this confusion might be part of what's causing issues for people. Just to make sure I understand correctly: if a limited partner receives a guaranteed payment of $5,000 for bookkeeping services they provided to the partnership, that $5,000 would go in Box 4 of their K-1 and would be subject to self-employment tax, but their distributive share of the partnership's ordinary business income would not be subject to SE tax and should not appear in Box 14c. Is that right? Also, when you mention real estate partnerships being treated differently - are you referring to the material participation rules under Section 469, or is there something else specific to gross nonfarm income reporting for real estate partnerships?
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•Yes, you've got it exactly right! The $5,000 guaranteed payment for bookkeeping services would go in Box 4 and be subject to SE tax, while their distributive share stays out of Box 14c. For real estate partnerships, I was referring to both the material participation rules and the fact that rental income is generally not subject to self-employment tax regardless of whether you're a general or limited partner (unless you're a real estate professional). So even general partners in real estate partnerships typically wouldn't have rental income flowing to Box 14c - it would stay in Box 1 as ordinary income but not be subject to SE tax. The gross nonfarm income in Box 14c is really meant for active trade or business income where the partner would be subject to SE tax if they were a general partner. Real estate rental activities are usually passive by nature, so they don't fall into this category.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a newer tax preparer and just encountered this exact issue with a farming partnership that has both general and limited partners. The gross nonfarm income was flowing to all partners in my software and I couldn't figure out why. After reading through all the comments here, I checked the partner designation codes in Box I of each K-1 and found that was the issue - I had everyone coded as "GP" by default. Once I changed the limited partners to "LP", the software automatically stopped flowing the Box 14c amounts to them. One follow-up question though: our farming partnership also has some rental income from land they lease out to other farmers. Based on what Andre mentioned about rental income not being subject to SE tax, should that rental income also be excluded from Box 14c for the general partners, or does it depend on whether the rental activity is considered part of the farming business? Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - saved me from filing incorrect returns!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
•Great question about the rental income! For farming partnerships, the treatment of rental income in Box 14c depends on whether the rental activity is considered part of the active farming business or a separate passive rental activity. If the partnership is actively engaged in farming operations and the land rental is incidental to the farming business (like renting out excess land while still farming the majority of their property), then the rental income might be considered part of the farming business and subject to SE tax for general partners. However, if the land rental is truly a separate passive activity where they're just collecting rent without active farming involvement, then it would typically not be subject to SE tax even for general partners and shouldn't flow to Box 14c. The key factors are: 1) Is the rental activity integrated with the active farming operations? 2) Does the partnership provide substantial services to the tenant farmers? 3) Is the rental on a crop-share basis where they participate in farming decisions? I'd recommend reviewing the partnership's activities carefully and possibly consulting the Section 1402(a)(1) regulations for farming partnerships to make sure you're treating this correctly.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
This is such a common issue that catches a lot of people off guard! I ran into the exact same problem last year when preparing my first partnership return with mixed partner types. What really helped me was creating a simple checklist to verify the partner classifications are correct: 1. Check Box I on each K-1 - make sure "GP" is only used for general partners and "LP" for limited partners 2. Verify Box 14c (gross nonfarm income) only appears on general partners' K-1s 3. Double-check that any guaranteed payments for services are properly reported in Box 4, regardless of partner type 4. Review boxes 14a and 14b as well since these are also SE tax related Most tax software will handle the allocations correctly once you've got the partner designations set up properly. The tricky part is just knowing where to find those settings in your specific software. It sounds like you've already solved the main issue, but I'd definitely recommend spot-checking a few other SE tax related boxes just to be safe before you finalize everything.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•This checklist is exactly what I needed! As someone new to partnership taxation, I've been feeling overwhelmed by all the different allocation rules. Your step-by-step approach makes it much more manageable. I'm curious about step 3 - when you mention guaranteed payments in Box 4, does this apply even if the limited partner is providing minimal services? For example, if a limited partner receives $1,200 annually just for attending quarterly partnership meetings and reviewing financials, would that still need to go in Box 4 and be subject to SE tax, or is there a de minimis threshold? Also, are there any other common boxes that get misallocated between general and limited partners that should be on this checklist? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything obvious. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this learning curve!
0 coins