IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Make sure u request the extension BEFORE the deadline!!!! I messed this up last year thinking I could file the extension a few days late and got hit with late fees even tho my final return was filed in september. The extension itself has to be filed by tax day or ur screwed

0 coins

Yes! This! So many people don't realize the extension request itself has a deadline. File Form 4868 electronically and you'll get confirmation right away. Much safer than mailing it.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Just wanted to add something important that I learned the hard way - when you're estimating your tax liability for the extension payment, make sure you account for self-employment tax if your K-1 shows you're actively involved in the business. Since you mentioned you're listed as a General Partner/LLC Member Manager, you might owe SE tax on your share of the profits, not just regular income tax. The SE tax is 15.3% on top of your regular income tax, so it can add up even on that $2,200. Last year I forgot about this part when estimating my extension payment and ended up owing penalties because I underpaid. Better to overestimate and get a refund than deal with underpayment penalties and interest! Also, definitely file that Form 4868 electronically like others mentioned - you'll get instant confirmation and it's much more reliable than mail during busy season.

0 coins

This is such an important point about self-employment tax! I had no idea that being listed as a General Partner/LLC Member Manager could trigger SE tax obligations. Is there a way to tell from the K-1 form itself whether you're considered "actively involved" enough to owe SE tax? I'm in a similar situation where I invested in a friend's business but I'm really just a passive investor - I don't do any actual work for the company.

0 coins

Understanding tax implications of earnings during Recharacterization and backdoor Roth conversion process?

I think I've made a mess of my Roth IRA situation and need some help figuring out the tax implications. Here's what happened: In April 2023, I contributed $6,500 to my Roth IRA for the 2023 tax year. In January 2024, I made a $7,000 backdoor Roth conversion for my 2024 contribution (using the new limit). Just last week, I discovered my MAGI for 2023 was higher than expected and I was only eligible to directly contribute $1,500 to my Roth IRA for 2023, not the full $6,500 I put in. So I quickly opened a Traditional IRA account and requested to recharacterize $5,000 of my 2023 Roth contribution. The brokerage told me I also had to recharacterize about $450 in earnings associated with that contribution. So a total of $5,450 moved from my Roth to my Traditional IRA. I then turned around and did a backdoor Roth conversion, moving that $5,450 back to my Roth IRA. I understand that my total valid Roth contribution for 2023 is still $6,500 ($1,500 direct + $5,000 backdoor), but I'm confused about how those $450 in earnings will be taxed for 2024. Will these earnings: a) Be treated as an excess Roth contribution subject to the 6% penalty until I remove it? b) Get hit with the 10% early withdrawal penalty as if it were an early IRA distribution? c) Just be treated as regular income and taxed accordingly? How should I handle this when I receive my 1099-Rs for both the recharacterization and backdoor conversion? Which form will show the $450 earnings and how do I report it correctly? I've searched everywhere and can't find a clear explanation for this situation. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Lucas Turner

•

Can someone explain in simple terms why we have to do all this backdoor Roth stuff anyway? It seems unnecessarily complicated. Why doesn't the government just let people contribute to Roth IRAs regardless of income? The annual limits are already pretty low.

0 coins

Kai Rivera

•

It's because Roth IRAs were originally designed as a retirement vehicle for middle-income people. The tax benefits are pretty significant since all growth is tax-free, so Congress limited them based on income. The backdoor method exists because there's no income limit on Traditional IRA contributions (though there are limits on deductibility), and there's no income limit on conversions from Traditional to Roth. This loophole has been known for years but Congress has never closed it, essentially making it an approved method. It's definitely more paperwork, but for high-income earners, getting money into a Roth is usually worth the extra steps.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

Thanks for explaining, that makes sense. It's just frustrating how everything in the tax code seems designed to create extra hurdles. I get limiting the tax advantages, but this seems like it just creates work for no reason since the backdoor option exists anyway.

0 coins

I had a very similar situation last year and can confirm what others have said - you handled this correctly! The key thing that helped me understand it was realizing that the recharacterization essentially "undoes" your original Roth contribution and treats it as if you had made a nondeductible Traditional IRA contribution all along. The $450 in earnings that got moved with the recharacterization will indeed be taxable income when you convert it back to Roth in 2024. But this is actually normal - any time you convert from Traditional to Roth, you pay taxes on the growth that happened in the Traditional account. One tip: when you get your 1099-R forms, double-check that the amounts match what you expect. Sometimes brokerages make errors on these forms, especially with more complex transactions like recharacterizations. I had to get mine corrected last year because they initially showed the wrong distribution code. Also, don't forget that your 2024 backdoor Roth conversion ($7,000) is completely separate from all this 2023 recharacterization business, so make sure you're tracking both properly for your 2024 taxes.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm actually dealing with a similar recharacterization situation right now and I'm nervous about getting the 1099-R forms wrong. When you say to double-check the amounts, what specifically should I be looking for? Are there particular box numbers or codes that are commonly messed up by brokerages? I want to make sure I catch any errors before I file my taxes.

0 coins

Great question! The main things to watch for on your 1099-R forms are: 1. **Box 1 (Gross Distribution)** - This should match the total amount that moved, including any earnings. For recharacterizations, make sure it shows the full amount that was moved to your Traditional IRA. 2. **Box 7 (Distribution Code)** - This is the big one that gets messed up. For recharacterizations, you should see code "R". For conversions back to Roth, it should be code "2". If these are wrong, it can really confuse your tax software. 3. **Box 2a (Taxable Amount)** - For the recharacterization itself, this might show as "not determined" or blank since the recharacterization isn't a taxable event. For the conversion, it should show the full conversion amount. 4. **Box 5 (Employee Contributions)** - This should reflect any basis/nondeductible contributions if applicable. I'd also recommend keeping your own detailed records of dates and amounts for each transaction, because sometimes the forms don't tell the whole story and you need to provide additional context on Form 8606. If you spot any errors, contact your brokerage right away - they can issue corrected forms, but it's much easier to fix before tax season gets busy!

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

One solution I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you might be able to claim a deduction for the income taxes paid on that phantom income through something called a "65-day election" for the following year. Talk to a good CPA who specializes in trusts. Sometimes trustees can make distributions within 65 days after the tax year ends (so by March 6th of the following year) and elect to treat them as if they were made in the previous tax year. This could potentially help align your actual cash distributions with the taxable income reported on your K-1. Also, keep track of your "basis" in the trust. The phantom income increases your basis, which means you might not be taxed again when you eventually receive that money in later distributions. Family trusts are complex and emotional - getting a professional involved who has no stake in family dynamics is usually worth the money.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

The 65-day election is made by the trust, not the beneficiary though. The trustee would have to agree to make that election, and it sounds like the trustee might not be cooperative in this case. Also important to note that the 65-day election only applies to complex trusts, not simple trusts.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

This is a frustrating situation, but unfortunately it's more common than you might think. Your uncle isn't necessarily doing anything shady - this is how trust taxation works. Here's what's likely happening: The trust earned $67,500 in income (interest, dividends, capital gains, etc.) and the trustee elected to "distribute" this income to you for tax purposes, even though only $27,000 was actually paid out in cash. This shifts the tax burden from the trust (which faces very high tax rates) to you as the beneficiary. A few things to consider: 1. Request a copy of the trust document - you have an absolute right to this as a beneficiary 2. Ask for a detailed accounting showing how the trust calculated your distributable share 3. The $40,500 difference likely remains in the trust but increases your "basis," meaning you may not be taxed on it again when eventually distributed Yes, you'll need to pay taxes on the full $67,500 even though you only received $27,000. I know it feels unfair, but this is legal and actually a common tax planning strategy for trusts. If you're concerned about your uncle's motivations, consider consulting with a trust attorney who can review the documents and ensure everything is being done properly according to the trust terms.

0 coins

Thank you for this clear explanation! As someone new to trust taxation, this helps me understand what might be happening in similar situations. One question - you mentioned that the $40,500 difference increases the beneficiary's "basis" in the trust. Can you explain how this basis calculation works in practice? Like, if Mateo receives a $50,000 distribution next year, would he potentially owe no taxes on $40,500 of it because of this increased basis from the phantom income? Also, when requesting the trust accounting, are there specific documents or calculations that beneficiaries should ask for beyond just the trust document itself?

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

As a newcomer to this community and someone currently facing this exact dilemma, I want to thank everyone for sharing such detailed and practical advice! I'm dealing with the same situation - amended my federal return last week and TurboTax is telling me to file a state amendment even though there's literally no change to my state numbers. Reading through all these experiences has been incredibly eye-opening. I had no idea that state and federal tax systems were so interconnected, or that filing a "zero change" amendment was actually important for maintaining consistent records. The insight from the tax prep professional about clients getting notices years later really drove the point home for me. I'm convinced now that filing the amended state return is the right move, even though it initially seemed pointless. The cost of a stamp and certified mail is definitely worth avoiding potential headaches down the road. I'll be following the advice here - mailing the amended state form with my 1040X copy attached, and using certified mail for tracking. This thread perfectly illustrates why community knowledge is so valuable - getting real experiences from people who've actually been through this process is way more helpful than trying to decipher vague official guidance. Thanks again to everyone who took the time to share their stories!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! As another newcomer who just went through this exact same confusion, I completely relate to your initial skepticism about filing a "zero change" amendment. Like you, I initially thought it seemed pointless and was tempted to just skip it. What really convinced me was seeing how many experienced community members emphasized the importance of maintaining that paper trail between federal and state systems. The fact that multiple people shared stories about getting notices years later when they didn't file really opened my eyes to how interconnected these systems actually are. I just mailed mine out yesterday using the certified mail approach everyone recommended, and it definitely feels good to have that peace of mind. The whole process was much more straightforward than I expected - just filled out the state form with identical numbers and attached the 1040X copy. Total time investment was maybe 45 minutes including the trip to the post office. Thanks for adding your perspective to this thread - it's really helpful to see other newcomers working through the same decision-making process and coming to similar conclusions based on the community's collective wisdom!

0 coins

As someone who just joined this community and is currently dealing with this exact situation, I'm incredibly grateful for all the detailed experiences shared here! I amended my federal return two weeks ago and have been stressing about whether to file the state amendment when nothing actually changed on my state taxes. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences has been so much more helpful than the confusing official guidance I've been trying to parse. The explanation about maintaining consistent records between federal and state systems finally made it click for me - it's not about the money, it's about the paper trail. What really convinced me was hearing from multiple people who either got notices years later or saw friends deal with automated system flags when records didn't match up. The tax prep professional's insight about seeing this happen to clients was particularly eye-opening. I'm definitely going to file the amended state return now, following the advice here - same numbers as my original return, 1040X copy attached, sent via certified mail for tracking. The small cost and time investment seems totally worth it to avoid potential complications down the road. This thread is a perfect example of why community knowledge is so valuable - getting practical advice from people who've actually navigated this process beats trying to decode vague official requirements any day. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and made this decision so much clearer for newcomers like me!

0 coins

Grace Lee

•

I completely agree with the advice to avoid claiming exempt in your situation. Having $1,200 in tax liability last year means you don't meet the qualification requirements, and at $48k you'll still have taxable income even with your new deductions. One thing I'd add - when you're filling out the new W-4, be conservative with your estimates on line 4(b). It's better to slightly over-withhold and get a small refund than to under-withhold and face penalties. You can always adjust your W-4 again later in the year if you find your withholding is still too high. Also, keep track of your deductions throughout the year. Things like mortgage interest and property taxes can vary, and you want to make sure your withholding adjustments are based on realistic numbers. The IRS withholding calculator (on their website) can help you run different scenarios as your situation changes. Remember, the goal is to get closer to breaking even at tax time, not necessarily to owe nothing. A small refund of a few hundred dollars is actually ideal - it means you got most of your money throughout the year but didn't underpay.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

This is really solid advice! I'm in a similar boat - switched jobs mid-year and was tempted to claim exempt to get more cash flow. Grace is spot on about being conservative with line 4(b) estimates. I learned the hard way that it's easy to overestimate deductions, especially with variable expenses like medical costs. One thing I'd add - if you're a first-time homeowner like the OP mentioned, make sure you understand which home expenses are actually deductible. Property taxes and mortgage interest yes, but things like PMI and home repairs generally aren't (unless it's a major improvement). I made that mistake my first year as a homeowner and had to scramble to adjust my withholding mid-year when I realized my deduction estimates were way off. The IRS calculator Grace mentioned is definitely worth using - I run it every few months now just to make sure I'm still on track, especially since my income can vary with overtime and bonuses.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

I'm glad to see everyone steering you away from claiming exempt - that would definitely be a mistake in your situation. With $1,200 in tax liability last year, you don't qualify for exempt status regardless of your income change. Here's a practical approach for your W-4 adjustment: Start by calculating your expected deductions above the standard deduction ($14,600 for 2025). Your mortgage interest, property taxes, and student loan interest could easily add up to several thousand dollars. Let's say they total $8,000 - you'd enter that amount on line 4(b). For line 4(c), you might want to reduce withholding by an additional $50-100 per paycheck to account for your lower income bracket, but be conservative here. You can always submit a new W-4 later if you're still getting too much withheld. The key is finding the balance between better cash flow and avoiding penalties. Given your tight budget, even a small underpayment penalty would hurt, so err on the side of caution. You might still get a refund, but it should be much smaller than the $3,800 you got last year. Consider keeping track of your year-to-date withholding on your pay stubs and run the IRS calculator every few months to make sure you're on track.

0 coins

This is excellent step-by-step guidance! I really appreciate how you broke down the actual dollar amounts for the W-4 lines. As someone who just bought their first home this year, I'm dealing with a similar situation and was also tempted by the exempt option after getting a huge refund last year. Your point about tracking year-to-date withholding on pay stubs is something I hadn't thought of - that's a great way to stay on top of things throughout the year instead of just hoping for the best come tax time. I'm definitely going to start doing quarterly check-ins with the IRS calculator like you suggested. One question though - when you mention being conservative with line 4(c) adjustments, how do you determine what's "too much" to reduce per paycheck? Is there a rule of thumb or should I just start small and adjust as needed?

0 coins

Prev1...995996997998999...5644Next