IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Owen Devar

•

I've been reading through this entire discussion as someone who's faced a similar crossroads with my own S-Corp, and the consensus is crystal clear - your accountant's 1099 suggestion is a compliance nightmare waiting to happen. What really sealed it for me were the firsthand audit experiences shared here, particularly Samantha Hall's story about the IRS having algorithms that specifically flag S-Corps with unusual 1099 patterns to shareholders. The fact that they look at the "totality of circumstances" rather than just how you characterize specific duties means the "outside scope of normal employment" argument your accountant mentioned simply won't hold up. I'm also concerned about your current compensation structure. At $72K salary on $850K revenue, you might already be at risk for reasonable compensation scrutiny even without the 1099 issue. Adding legitimate performance-based W-2 compensation could actually help demonstrate that your total compensation is reasonable for a 35% shareholder who's actively bringing in business. My recommendation: work with an S-Corp specialist (not your current accountant) to design a compliant commission structure processed through payroll as W-2 income. Document everything with proper board resolutions and business justification. Yes, you'll pay more in payroll taxes, but the audit protection and clean compliance record are worth far more than any short-term savings. The stories shared here about penalties, interest, and professional fees during audits make it clear that the true cost of non-compliance is exponentially higher than just doing it right from the start.

0 coins

This comprehensive summary really captures the key themes from this excellent discussion. Your point about the "totality of circumstances" test is crucial - it shows that the IRS looks at substance over form, which makes attempts to reclassify shareholder-employee services as independent contractor work essentially futile. I'm particularly struck by how many different angles reinforce the same conclusion: the audit risk stories, the legal precedents cited by Connor Byrne, the state compliance issues Sean Kelly raised, and the practical business relationship impacts Keisha Jackson described. It's rare to see such unanimous expert and experiential consensus on a tax issue. Your observation about the reasonable compensation problem potentially being solved by adding legitimate W-2 commissions is brilliant - it's essentially killing two birds with one stone. Instead of having two separate compliance risks (low reasonable compensation AND improper 1099 classification), restructuring everything as performance-based W-2 income addresses both issues simultaneously. For Nia (the original poster), the path forward seems clear: get a second opinion from an S-Corp specialist, implement a documented performance bonus system through payroll, and treat this as an investment in long-term compliance rather than a short-term tax optimization strategy. The peace of mind alone is worth the extra payroll tax costs, especially given the current IRS enforcement environment. Thank you to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this thread should be required reading for any S-Corp owner considering compensation structure changes!

0 coins

After reading through this extensive discussion, I'm convinced that your accountant's 1099 suggestion is exactly the wrong approach. The unanimous consensus from CPAs, tax attorneys, and people who've actually been audited is clear: shareholder-employees cannot receive 1099 income from their own S-Corporation, regardless of how the services are characterized. What really concerns me is that you're getting this advice in 2025 when the IRS has clearly ramped up enforcement in this area. The audit stories shared here, particularly about algorithmic flagging of unusual 1099 patterns to shareholders, suggest this isn't just risky - it's almost guaranteed to trigger scrutiny. Here's what I'd recommend: immediately seek a second opinion from a CPA who specializes in S-Corp compliance before implementing anything. Have them design a performance-based W-2 compensation structure that achieves your financial goals while keeping you compliant. Yes, you'll pay more in payroll taxes upfront, but based on the penalty and interest stories shared here, the true cost of non-compliance could be 40-50% higher than just doing it right from the start. Also consider that your current $72K salary on $850K revenue might already be putting you at reasonable compensation risk. Adding legitimate commission-based W-2 income could actually help demonstrate appropriate compensation levels while giving you the performance incentives you want. The peace of mind and audit protection are worth far more than any short-term payroll tax savings. Don't let your accountant put your business at unnecessary risk over what appears to be a fundamental misunderstanding of S-Corp employment tax rules.

0 coins

This entire thread has been incredibly educational - thank you to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise! As someone who's new to S-Corp structures, I had no idea how complex and risky these compensation arrangements could be. What strikes me most is how the "simple" 1099 solution the original poster's accountant suggested turns out to be anything but simple when you consider all the compliance risks, audit exposure, and potential penalties involved. The real-world audit experiences shared here are genuinely eye-opening about how aggressively the IRS targets these arrangements. I'm also fascinated by how this connects to the broader reasonable compensation issue. It seems like many S-Corp owners get into trouble by trying to minimize W-2 income across the board, when they should really be focusing on structuring everything properly as employment compensation from the start. The mortgage qualification and retirement planning benefits of W-2 income that were mentioned earlier just reinforce this approach. For anyone else reading this who might be considering similar arrangements, the consensus couldn't be clearer: work with an S-Corp specialist, structure everything as documented performance-based W-2 compensation, and treat the extra payroll taxes as insurance against much more expensive audit consequences. The peace of mind alone seems worth the investment. This discussion should definitely be bookmarked as a reference for anyone dealing with S-Corp compensation questions!

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

I went through this exact same situation last year! As an F1 student who had been in the US for 3 years, I was also confused about which form to use. After doing a lot of research and speaking with my university's international student services, I learned that the key is understanding your tax residency status. Since you've been filing Form 1040NR (nonresident tax returns) for the past four years, that confirms you're still considered a nonresident alien for tax purposes. This means you should be using Form W8BEN, not W9. The good news is that this is a very common mistake and employers are usually understanding about corrections. Here's what I did to fix it: I drafted a brief email to each employer explaining that as an F1 visa holder, I needed to correct my tax forms and attached a completed W8BEN form. Most employers responded within a few days and updated their records without any issues. Also, definitely check if your home country has a tax treaty with the US! I'm from Germany and was able to claim treaty benefits that significantly reduced my tax withholding. You can find the treaty information on the IRS website or ask your international student office - they usually have resources about this. Don't stress too much about this - you caught the error and you're fixing it proactively, which is exactly what you should do!

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

This is such helpful advice! I'm also an F1 student (just finished my second year) and I've been so confused about all this tax stuff. Your experience gives me hope that it's not as scary as it seems to fix these mistakes. Quick question - when you contacted your employers about switching from W9 to W8BEN, did any of them ask for additional documentation beyond just the new form? I'm worried they might want proof of my visa status or something. Also, did you have to do anything special with employers you'd already stopped working for, or just current ones? Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing!

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

@Tony Brooks Most employers didn t'ask for additional documentation beyond the W8BEN form itself, but a couple did request a copy of my I-20 to verify my student status. I d'recommend having a current copy ready just in case, but don t'worry if you don t'have it immediately - they usually give you time to provide it. For employers I was no longer working with, I still contacted them because they might still need to issue 1099 forms at the end of the tax year. It s'actually easier to fix this now than to deal with incorrect tax documents later! Most were very responsive via email, and a few even thanked me for being proactive about it. One tip: when you email them, mention that you re'an F1 student and that W8BEN is the correct form for your visa status. This shows you understand the requirements and aren t'just randomly switching forms. The international student office at your school might also have template letters you can use - mine did, and it made the process much smoother. You ve'got this! The fact that you re'asking these questions shows you re'being responsible about your tax obligations.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

Sofia, I completely understand your stress about this situation! I'm also an F1 visa holder and went through the exact same confusion last year. The fact that you've been filing Form 1040NR for the past four years is actually the key piece of information here - it confirms that you've been correctly classified as a nonresident alien for tax purposes, which means you should indeed be using Form W8BEN instead of W9. Don't panic about having sent W9 forms to multiple employers - this is honestly one of the most common mistakes international students make, and employers who work with contractors are usually very familiar with these corrections. The important thing is that you're addressing it now, before the end of the tax year when 1099 forms get issued. Here's what I'd recommend: Draft a simple email to each employer explaining that as an F1 visa holder, you need to correct your tax documentation from W9 to W8BEN. Attach a completed W8BEN form and briefly mention that this is the correct form for your nonresident alien status. Most employers will update their records without any issues. Also, definitely look into whether your home country has a tax treaty with the US - you might be eligible for treaty benefits that could reduce your tax withholding. Your university's international student office should have resources about this, or you can check the IRS website for treaty information. You haven't messed up your visa status at all by submitting the wrong form - this is purely a tax documentation issue that's easily fixable. You're being proactive about correcting it, which is exactly what you should do!

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

This is such great advice, Arjun! I'm also an F1 student and have been lurking on this thread because I'm dealing with a similar situation. Your point about this being a common mistake really helps ease my anxiety about it. Quick question - when you mention checking for tax treaty benefits, do you know roughly how much of a difference this typically makes? I'm from Canada and I've been paying what feels like a lot in taxes, but I have no idea if I'm missing out on treaty benefits. Also, did your university's international office actually help you figure out the treaty stuff, or did you have to research it yourself? Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this exact situation!

0 coins

Great question about CDL training deductions! I went through something similar when I got my CDL last year. The key thing to understand is that since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, most employee education expenses can't be deducted directly anymore, but you still have options. For your $5,100 CDL training, you'll likely want to look into the Lifetime Learning Credit since it sounds like you're working as an employee driver rather than being self-employed. This credit can give you up to $2,000 back (20% of the first $10,000 in qualified education expenses), and vocational training like CDL programs typically qualify. Make sure to keep all your receipts and documentation from the training program - you'll need Form 8863 to claim the credit. Also double-check the income limits for the credit based on your filing status. If you end up going the owner-operator route in the future, then you could potentially deduct similar training costs as business expenses on Schedule C. The mandatory nature of the ELDT requirement actually works in your favor here since it demonstrates the training was necessary for your profession. Definitely worth exploring the Lifetime Learning Credit route!

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

Thanks for this breakdown! I'm actually in a similar boat - just finished my CDL training last month and paid about $4,800 out of pocket. Quick question though: do you know if there are any restrictions on what type of CDL training qualifies for the Lifetime Learning Credit? My program included both classroom instruction and behind-the-wheel training, but I'm wondering if the IRS has specific requirements about the school being accredited or anything like that? Also, since you mentioned keeping receipts - did you just keep the tuition receipt or did you also document things like books, testing fees, and other materials? Want to make sure I'm not missing out on any qualifying expenses when I file.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

Great questions! For the Lifetime Learning Credit, your CDL training should qualify as long as the school was an eligible educational institution - which generally means they're accredited and authorized to participate in federal student aid programs. Since ELDT requires FMCSA-registered providers, most legitimate CDL schools meet these requirements, but you can verify on the Federal School Code Search tool on the Department of Education website. Regarding expenses, you can include more than just tuition! Qualifying expenses include tuition, required fees, books, supplies, and equipment needed for the course. So yes, keep receipts for your textbooks, testing fees (like permit and skills test fees), any required safety equipment, and even things like logbooks if they were required purchases. Just make sure these were required by the school, not optional. One tip: if you paid for your permit testing separately through the DMV, those fees typically don't qualify since they're licensing fees rather than educational expenses. But everything you paid directly to the training school or for required course materials should count toward that $10,000 limit for the credit calculation.

0 coins

This is such a timely question! I just went through this exact situation when I got my CDL through an ELDT program earlier this year. The mandatory nature of the training definitely makes it frustrating that we can't take a straight deduction anymore. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given here is to make sure you get Form 1098-T from your training school if they issue one. Not all CDL schools provide these forms, but if yours does, it makes claiming the Lifetime Learning Credit much smoother during tax filing. The form shows exactly what you paid for qualified tuition and fees. Also, if you're planning to work as an employee driver initially but might go owner-operator later, keep detailed records of everything. If you do transition to being self-employed within a reasonable timeframe, you might be able to argue that the training was a startup business expense, which could be more beneficial than the credit depending on your tax situation. The income limits for the Lifetime Learning Credit can be tricky too - they're based on your modified adjusted gross income, so if you're right on the border, it might be worth timing when you file or considering other income adjustments to stay within the qualifying range.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

This is really helpful info about the Form 1098-T! I didn't even think to ask my CDL school about that. Quick question - if the school doesn't automatically send one, can you request it from them? My training program was through a smaller local school and I'm not sure if they typically handle those forms. Also, regarding the startup business expense angle you mentioned - how long of a timeframe would be considered "reasonable" for transitioning to owner-operator? I'm currently employed but thinking about going independent in the next year or two. Would that still allow me to potentially treat the CDL training as a business startup cost instead of using the Lifetime Learning Credit?

0 coins

This has been such a valuable thread for understanding Treasury ETF taxation! I'm a newcomer to investing in VGSH and was completely thrown off by seeing "ordinary dividends" on my 1099 when I specifically chose this ETF for Treasury exposure. The collective wisdom here has made it clear that the key is getting that specific Treasury percentage from Vanguard - it sounds like calling directly and asking for the "federal obligation percentage" is the most reliable approach. I'm planning to do this in February before tax season gets too crazy. One thing I'm curious about - for those who have been through this process multiple times, do you find that Vanguard keeps historical records if you need to go back and get Treasury percentages for prior years? I'm wondering if they can help with amended returns or if you really need to get this information during the current tax year. Also, I noticed someone mentioned that different brokerages might report slightly different Treasury percentages for the same ETF. Has anyone experienced significant discrepancies, or are we typically talking about minor variations that don't materially impact the tax calculation? Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread should definitely be required reading for anyone investing in Treasury ETFs!

0 coins

Great questions! In my experience, Vanguard does keep historical records for several years, which is really helpful. I had to file an amended return two years ago and was able to get the Treasury percentage for VGSH from 2021 without any issues. They seem to maintain this data for at least 3-4 years, though I'd recommend getting it during the current tax year when possible since their tax specialists are most prepared to handle these requests during filing season. Regarding brokerage discrepancies, I've seen minor variations but nothing that would significantly change your tax outcome. Usually we're talking about differences of 1-2 percentage points (like 85% vs 87%), which might affect your exemption by a few dollars but isn't material for most people. The variations seem to come from slightly different calculation timing or methodologies, but the differences are typically small enough that you don't need to stress about which source to use. Your plan to call in February is perfect timing - that's when their tax team is fully staffed and most knowledgeable about these specific requests. Just make sure to ask specifically for the "federal obligation percentage for VGSH for tax year 2024" and you should get exactly what you need for your state tax exemption calculation.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

As someone who just went through this exact situation last year, I can't stress enough how important this thread is! I had the same confusion with my VGSH dividends showing up as "ordinary dividends" and initially just accepted that I'd pay full state taxes on them. What saved me was discovering (thanks to a helpful CPA) that I needed to dig deeper into the actual source of those dividends. The process everyone has outlined here is spot-on - you absolutely need to get that Treasury percentage breakdown from Vanguard or your brokerage. For anyone still hesitant about making the call, I found Vanguard's tax specialists to be incredibly knowledgeable and patient. When I called in March last year, they not only gave me the exact federal obligation percentage for VGSH (it was 84% for 2023) but also explained how Treasury ETFs work from a tax perspective. The representative even walked me through how to apply the exemption on my state return. The savings were definitely worthwhile - even with a modest $8,000 position, I saved about $35 on my state taxes. That might not sound like much, but it adds up over time, and more importantly, I now understand the process for any future Treasury ETF investments. My advice: don't let the complexity intimidate you. Make that call to Vanguard, keep good records, and claim the exemption you're entitled to. This thread has all the guidance you need to do it correctly!

0 coins

I switched from TaxAct to FreeTaxUSA this year after having similar login problems. Their interface is way more reliable and honestly easier to use. Plus it's cheaper for most filing situations. Might be worth looking into for next year if you keep having issues.

0 coins

I second this! FreeTaxUSA has been my go-to for the past three years. Only costs like $15 for state filing and federal is free. Never had any login issues or data loss problems like I did with TurboTax and TaxAct.

0 coins

I had the exact same issue with TaxAct last week! The login loop is so frustrating. What finally worked for me was completely logging out of all Google/Microsoft accounts in my browser first, then clearing all site data for TaxAct specifically (not just cookies), and then trying again. If you're still stuck, you can also try accessing TaxAct through their mobile app instead of the website - sometimes that bypasses whatever browser-specific issues they're having. The mobile app saved my progress when the website wouldn't let me back in. Really hoping they fix these server issues soon. It's ridiculous that we have to jump through so many hoops just to file our taxes!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing that detailed solution! I'm curious - when you say "clearing all site data for TaxAct specifically," how exactly do you do that? Is that different from just clearing cookies? I'm not super tech-savvy and want to make sure I'm doing it right if I run into this issue again. Also, did the mobile app have all the same features as the desktop version? I have some complex business deductions that I worry might be harder to navigate on a smaller screen.

0 coins

Prev1...825826827828829...5644Next