IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diego Mendoza

•

Just wanted to add that when you do respond to the CP2000, make sure you respond to EVERY item they're questioning, even if you agree with some parts and disagree with others. I made the mistake of only addressing the items I disagreed with, and it caused more confusion and delays. Also, if you're requesting an extension, do it as early as possible! The closer you get to your deadline, the more stressful it becomes.

0 coins

This is really helpful! When I respond, should I send copies of all my documentation or just the specific records related to the discrepancies they found?

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

Only send copies of the specific documentation that directly addresses the discrepancies mentioned in your CP2000. Sending too many unrelated documents can actually confuse the review process and potentially delay resolution. Make sure each document you send clearly relates to a specific item they're questioning. I like to use a cover letter that lists each discrepancy and exactly which supporting documents address each one. This makes it easier for the IRS agent reviewing your case to connect your evidence to their questions.

0 coins

Has anyone here ever had their extension request denied? I'm in a similar situation with a CP2000 notice, and I'm worried about what happens if they say no to giving me more time.

0 coins

StellarSurfer

•

I've never heard of an extension request being denied if you ask before the deadline. The IRS is generally reasonable about giving people time to gather documentation. The problem comes when people ignore the notice entirely or wait until after the deadline to ask for more time.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

Pro tip from someone who handles RSUs regularly: Always keep documentation from each vesting event, especially the fair market value on vesting date. This is your cost basis, and you need it to avoid exactly this situation. I create a spreadsheet each year with columns for: - Vesting date - Number of shares - FMV at vesting - Total value (reported as income on W-2) - Sale date - Sale price - Gain/loss since vesting (this is what goes on Schedule D) This makes tax time so much easier and helps prevent these IRS notices.

0 coins

Libby Hassan

•

Is there any software that does this tracking automatically? Seems like a lot of manual work if you have monthly or quarterly vestings.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

There are several options for automatic tracking. Most of the major brokerages (Schwab, Fidelity, E*Trade) have reporting features that attempt to track this, but honestly they're often inaccurate for RSUs specifically. I've found that dedicated equity compensation tools like Carta, StockOpter, or even some features in tools like Personal Capital can help with tracking. There are also some newer fintech apps specifically for equity compensation, but I still recommend maintaining your own spreadsheet as a backup. Once you set it up initially, it only takes a few minutes to update each vesting period.

0 coins

Something else to consider - check if your employer offered a "sell-to-cover" option where they automatically sold some shares to cover the tax withholding at vesting. If so, your W-2 already includes the income from the RSUs, and you only need to report any additional gain or loss that occurred between vesting and when you sold the remaining shares. When I had my IRS notice for unreported stock sales, I found out my company had only withheld at 22% for federal taxes, but I was in the 32% bracket, which created additional confusion.

0 coins

Sofia Peña

•

This is such an important point! My company does withholding at vesting but only at 22%, and I got hit with a huge tax bill my first year with RSUs because I didn't realize I needed to make estimated tax payments on the difference. The whole RSU taxation system is unnecessarily complicated.

0 coins

Here's a simple way to think about it - when you select "0" allowances, you're basically telling your employer "take out extra tax just to be safe." Each allowance you claim reduces the amount withheld. Most single people with one job should claim at least 1 allowance to account for the standard deduction (which is $13,850 for 2023). If you claim 0, you're likely overwithholding. But honestly, it depends on your comfort level with tax time. Some people prefer the "forced savings" of overwithholding to get a big refund. Others want their money throughout the year.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

Would it be bad to change it to 1 halfway through the year? I've been at 0 since January.

0 coins

Not bad at all! You can change your withholding at any time during the year. If you switch from 0 to 1 allowance now, you'll just start having less tax withheld from your remaining paychecks this year. The withholding system is designed to adjust throughout the year. Your employer calculates the withholding for each individual paycheck based on your current W-4 information, not based on what you submitted in January. So making the change now just affects your future paychecks - it doesn't retroactively change anything.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

Are you getting paid a lot more at this new job compared to your campus jobs? Because tax withholding is based on your projected annual income. If you were making like $15/hr part-time before and now you're making $25/hr full-time, you're in a higher tax bracket so they take out more.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

This is the most likely answer. I remember the shock when I went from my $12/hr campus job to my first salaried position. Suddenly I was seeing hundreds in taxes instead of like $30-40 per check. Welcome to adult life lol

0 coins

Which withholding tax rate applies for dual-resident company (US/Netherlands) receiving dividends from India?

I'm a digital nomad splitting time between Amsterdam and the US. I have a C Corporation registered in Delaware but I'm operating entirely from my apartment in Amsterdam where I have a registered office. The company is managed from the Netherlands with zero physical presence in the US beyond incorporation paperwork. I'm about to establish a subsidiary in India to handle some client work there. I'm confused about which withholding tax rate applies to dividends that will be paid from the Indian subsidiary back to my parent company. I've been reading through the tax treaties and found that Article 10 of the USA-India treaty states: >Dividends may be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, and according to the laws of the State, but if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed: (a) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends But then Article 10 of the India-Netherlands treaty says: >Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of one of the States to a resident of the other State may be taxed in that other State. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the dividends, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends. Since my company technically "lives" in both places - incorporated in the US but managed/controlled from the Netherlands - which withholding rate would apply? The US 15% or the Dutch 10%? Does the fact that I pay Dutch corporate taxes on all profits (which are higher than US rates) impact this decision? Any insights would be greatly appreciated!

Malik Jackson

•

One thing nobody has mentioned is that you should check if the India-Netherlands treaty has a Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clause that might prevent treaty shopping. Some newer treaties have provisions that deny benefits if the main purpose of the structure is to get treaty benefits. Since your company is incorporated in the US but claiming Dutch treaty benefits, you'll want to make sure you have substantial business reasons for this structure beyond just the tax advantages. Otherwise, the Indian authorities might challenge your use of the Dutch treaty regardless of the tie-breaker rules.

0 coins

This is a really important point. I got burned by this exact issue with a Korean subsidiary. Even though my company qualified as a UK resident under management and control rules, Korea applied their LOB provision and denied the UK treaty rate because they determined my structure was primarily for tax advantages. Cost me thousands in unexpected withholding taxes.

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

That's exactly the scenario I was warning about. The trend in international tax enforcement is moving strongly against structures that appear designed primarily for treaty benefits. The key factors authorities look for include: having genuine economic substance in the jurisdiction claiming treaty benefits (employees, office, equipment), a clear business purpose for the structure beyond tax savings, and decision-making that actually happens in the claimed jurisdiction. Without these elements, there's significant risk of treaty denial regardless of technical residency status.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

Has anyone considered that you might actually benefit from making an election under the US check-the-box rules for the Indian subsidiary? If it's treated as a disregarded entity or partnership for US purposes, the withholding tax issue might be bypassed entirely for US purposes.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Check-the-box could create other problems though. If the Indian sub is disregarded for US purposes but remains a corporation for Dutch and Indian purposes, you might create a hybrid entity mismatch that could trigger anti-hybrid rules in the Netherlands. The Dutch implemented ATAD2 which specifically targets these arrangements.

0 coins

From a bookkeeping perspective, here's how I would record this in QuickBooks: 1. Create an Other Current Asset account called "Refundable Deposits" 2. Record the payment to this asset account (not to an expense) 3. When you get the money back, record the deposit against this same account This way your books will show that you have this asset, and your taxes won't show an expense that isn't really an expense. The key is that it doesn't impact your profit and loss statement at all - it's strictly a balance sheet item.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

Thanks for breaking it down like this! This makes a lot of sense. Do I need to do anything special at tax time to report this deposit? Does it show up anywhere on Schedule C?

0 coins

You don't need to do anything special with this deposit on your tax return. It won't appear on your Schedule C at all since it's not an income or expense item. Schedule C only reports items that affect profit or loss. This deposit will only be reflected on your balance sheet as an asset. Since the IRS doesn't require sole proprietors or single-member LLCs to file balance sheets with their tax returns, you won't need to report it anywhere on your tax forms. Just keep good records in your accounting system so you remember to properly handle it when it gets refunded.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

Just a quick note that if your state doesn't end up refunding the deposit (like if you mess up your sales tax filings or something), then it WOULD become an expense at that point. My brother had this happen with his construction business - they kept his $750 deposit because he filed late twice, and his accountant said to record it as a business expense in the year they officially told him it was forfeited.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Yeah, and make sure you get documentation if they don't refund it! My state tried to claim I never paid a deposit in the first place when it came time for my refund. Thankfully I had kept the original receipt and was able to get it back, but it was a hassle.

0 coins

Prev1...48014802480348044805...5645Next