


Ask the community...
From a bookkeeping perspective, here's how I would record this in QuickBooks: 1. Create an Other Current Asset account called "Refundable Deposits" 2. Record the payment to this asset account (not to an expense) 3. When you get the money back, record the deposit against this same account This way your books will show that you have this asset, and your taxes won't show an expense that isn't really an expense. The key is that it doesn't impact your profit and loss statement at all - it's strictly a balance sheet item.
Thanks for breaking it down like this! This makes a lot of sense. Do I need to do anything special at tax time to report this deposit? Does it show up anywhere on Schedule C?
You don't need to do anything special with this deposit on your tax return. It won't appear on your Schedule C at all since it's not an income or expense item. Schedule C only reports items that affect profit or loss. This deposit will only be reflected on your balance sheet as an asset. Since the IRS doesn't require sole proprietors or single-member LLCs to file balance sheets with their tax returns, you won't need to report it anywhere on your tax forms. Just keep good records in your accounting system so you remember to properly handle it when it gets refunded.
Just a quick note that if your state doesn't end up refunding the deposit (like if you mess up your sales tax filings or something), then it WOULD become an expense at that point. My brother had this happen with his construction business - they kept his $750 deposit because he filed late twice, and his accountant said to record it as a business expense in the year they officially told him it was forfeited.
Yeah, and make sure you get documentation if they don't refund it! My state tried to claim I never paid a deposit in the first place when it came time for my refund. Thankfully I had kept the original receipt and was able to get it back, but it was a hassle.
Make sure you also check your Social Security statement to see if someone is reporting wages under your SSN! I had a similar 1099-K issue that turned out to be part of a larger identity theft. The thieves had also gotten jobs using my SSN. You can check this online by creating an account at ssa.gov. If you see any earnings you don't recognize, report it immediately!
How far back should you check your SSA records? Just the current year or should you go back several years to be safe?
You should definitely check at least the past three years. Identity thieves sometimes start small to see if you notice before ramping up their activity. In my case, they had actually used my information for almost two years before I caught it. Also, while you're on the SSA website, set up account notifications so you'll be alerted to any future changes or activity. This way you'll know immediately if someone tries to use your SSN for employment again.
Has anyone dealt with getting a 1099-K from PayPal where some of the transactions were legitimate but the total amount was way off? My situation is slightly different - I do have a PayPal account, but my 1099-K shows about $9k more than I actually received last year.
This happened to me! In my case, PayPal had counted some transactions twice. Also, they were counting the full amount of money that moved through my account, including stuff that wasn't income (like when friends reimbursed me for group purchases). You need to contact PayPal tax department specifically, not just regular customer service, and request a corrected form.
I'm confused about something else in the original post. If both you and your husband were over the income limit for Roth IRA contributions in 2021, why did you contribute directly to Roth IRAs in the first place? Wouldn't it have been simpler to just contribute to traditional IRAs and then convert? Was this intentional or did you realize you were over the limit after making the contributions?
Many people don't know exactly what their annual income will be until late in the year, especially if they get bonuses or have variable income. It's pretty common for people to contribute to Roth IRAs throughout the year and then discover at year-end that they've exceeded the income limits, requiring a recharacterization.
Exactly what the other commenter said - we contribute monthly to our IRAs throughout the year, and we didn't realize until December that a bonus and some unexpected consulting income had pushed us over the limit. By then we had already made full contributions to our Roth IRAs for the year. Honestly, we'd never had to do a backdoor Roth before, so the whole process was new to us. Next time we'll just contribute to Traditional and convert right away since our income will likely be over the limit again.
I'm a little late to this, but there's an important distinction no one has mentioned yet. There are actually two different penalties that could be at play here: 1. Failure-to-file penalty: 5% of unpaid taxes each month (max 25%) 2. Failure-to-pay penalty: 0.5% of unpaid taxes each month (max 25%) The extension prevented the big failure-to-file penalty, but you're still on the hook for the failure-to-pay penalty since the money was due April 18th. Plus interest, which compounds daily. Your accountant should have estimated what you owed and advised you to make a payment by the deadline even if the return wasn't ready. That's where they dropped the ball.
Thanks for breaking that down! So basically, even though the extension was filed, I should have made an estimated payment by April 18th to avoid the failure-to-pay penalty? Is there any recourse now, or am I just stuck with these fees?
Exactly right. The extension only gives more time for paperwork, not payment. For future reference, always make your best estimate payment by the deadline even if your return isn't ready. As for recourse now, your best option is to request a First Time Penalty Abatement if you've had a clean tax record for the past 3 years. You can call the IRS directly or use the number on your bill to request this. The interest typically can't be removed, but the failure-to-pay penalty often can be if it's your first infraction. Just explain the situation with your accountant's poor communication, and they're usually pretty reasonable.
Am I the only one stuck on the fact that the accountant added the wrong dependent information? That seems like a bigger issue than the extension! You should double-check everything else on the return because that's a pretty significant error. What tax software does your accountant use? Some of the professional ones are better than others at catching errors.
Not all tax software is created equal. I've used ProSeries and Lacerte professionally, and they have very different error checking capabilities. But honestly, good accountants should be manually reviewing returns anyway, not just relying on software to catch mistakes.
Malik Jackson
One thing nobody has mentioned is that you should check if the India-Netherlands treaty has a Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clause that might prevent treaty shopping. Some newer treaties have provisions that deny benefits if the main purpose of the structure is to get treaty benefits. Since your company is incorporated in the US but claiming Dutch treaty benefits, you'll want to make sure you have substantial business reasons for this structure beyond just the tax advantages. Otherwise, the Indian authorities might challenge your use of the Dutch treaty regardless of the tie-breaker rules.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
ā¢This is a really important point. I got burned by this exact issue with a Korean subsidiary. Even though my company qualified as a UK resident under management and control rules, Korea applied their LOB provision and denied the UK treaty rate because they determined my structure was primarily for tax advantages. Cost me thousands in unexpected withholding taxes.
0 coins
Malik Jackson
ā¢That's exactly the scenario I was warning about. The trend in international tax enforcement is moving strongly against structures that appear designed primarily for treaty benefits. The key factors authorities look for include: having genuine economic substance in the jurisdiction claiming treaty benefits (employees, office, equipment), a clear business purpose for the structure beyond tax savings, and decision-making that actually happens in the claimed jurisdiction. Without these elements, there's significant risk of treaty denial regardless of technical residency status.
0 coins
StarSurfer
Has anyone considered that you might actually benefit from making an election under the US check-the-box rules for the Indian subsidiary? If it's treated as a disregarded entity or partnership for US purposes, the withholding tax issue might be bypassed entirely for US purposes.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
ā¢Check-the-box could create other problems though. If the Indian sub is disregarded for US purposes but remains a corporation for Dutch and Indian purposes, you might create a hybrid entity mismatch that could trigger anti-hybrid rules in the Netherlands. The Dutch implemented ATAD2 which specifically targets these arrangements.
0 coins