


Ask the community...
This happened to me a couple years ago. Check if your employer correctly adjusted your tax withholding after your raise. Mine didn't, and I got hit with a huge bill. The higher your income goes, the more you need to pay attention to withholding. I'd recommend filling out a new W-4 form and submitting it to your HR department ASAP so this doesn't happen again next year. You might even want to add a little extra withholding to cover the difference.
Is there some calculator you can use to figure out the right withholding amount? I always struggle with this and either get a huge refund or end up owing.
Yes, the IRS has a Tax Withholding Estimator on their website that's pretty accurate. Just google "IRS withholding calculator" and it should be the first result. You'll need your most recent pay stub and tax return handy when you use it. The calculator will tell you exactly how to fill out your W-4 based on your specific situation. It even lets you adjust whether you want a bigger refund or more money in each paycheck. I use it every time I get a raise or my life circumstances change, and it's kept my tax bill/refund pretty balanced.
Have you looked at the actual tax brackets for both years? With $202k income for married filing jointly, part of your income is definitely getting taxed at 24% now. The difference between 22% and 24% brackets might not seem like much, but applied to thousands of dollars it adds up fast. Also check your pay stubs to see if your employer is withholding at the correct rate. Sometimes payroll systems don't automatically adjust withholding when you get promoted.
Exactly this. I work in payroll and see this all the time. Payroll systems calculate withholding based on the assumption that each check is what you'll make all year. So if you get a raise midyear, the system doesn't know about your previous lower income months and doesn't withhold enough.
That's a great point about midyear raises. The payroll system treats each check as if you've been making that amount all year, which can lead to significant underwithholding. This is especially true for bonuses or people who get promoted partway through the tax year.
Something nobody's mentioned yet - watch out for the self-rental rules if your LLC owns any property that's being used by the business. When you create this parent-subsidiary relationship, it can trigger some complicated tax implications for rental payments between your entities. Had this bite me last year and ended up having to amend returns.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. My first LLC does own the building where we operate. Would the self-rental rules apply even after the restructuring since I'd still be the ultimate owner through the second LLC?
Yes, the self-rental rules would still apply even after restructuring. The IRS looks at the ultimate ownership when determining whether these rules kick in. Since you'd still be the ultimate owner of both entities (you own the second LLC which owns the first LLC), any rental payments between them would be subject to scrutiny. The main thing to be aware of is that rental income in this situation is typically treated as non-passive, regardless of your level of participation. This means you can't use these rental losses to offset other passive income. It can significantly impact your tax planning if you were counting on those losses.
I actually did this exact restructuring last year. Made my first LLC (manufacturing business) owned by my second LLC (holding company). The key thing I learned: you MUST pay yourself reasonable compensation if you put yourself on payroll! I tried to be cute with a low salary and high distributions and got a nasty letter from the IRS.
What ratio did you end up using between salary and distributions that the IRS was ok with? I've heard everything from 50/50 to 70/30 but never from someone who actually went through an IRS review.
Has anyone considered a Transfer on Death (TOD) arrangement instead? It's similar to naming a beneficiary but specifically designed for brokerage accounts. I set this up for my grandkids last year and my financial advisor said it accomplishes the same step up basis benefit while being slightly more straightforward for brokerage accounts specifically.
How difficult was it to set up the TOD? Does it offer any advantages over just naming them as regular beneficiaries? I'm trying to keep things as simple as possible while still maximizing the tax benefits.
Setting up the TOD was extremely simple - just a form from my brokerage firm that took maybe 10 minutes to complete. The main advantage is that it's specifically designed for investment accounts and creates a cleaner transfer process. The TOD designation accomplishes essentially the same thing as a regular beneficiary designation, but it can sometimes process more quickly after death and avoids probate. Both methods will give your grandkids the full step up basis benefit. One thing to note - if you have multiple grandchildren and want to specify different percentages or specific assets going to specific grandchildren, the TOD forms typically allow for that level of detail.
Whatever you do, DON'T set up an UTMA/UGMA account like I did before understanding the tax implications. When my grandkids turned 18, they got full control of the money (one bought a car, the other took a trip to Europe), AND the gains during all those years were taxed at my higher rate because of the kiddie tax. Complete disaster compared to the step up basis approach you're considering.
Yeah, the UTMA/UGMA accounts are terrible for tax efficiency compared to getting the step up basis. My brother went that route and regretted it. Did you consider a trust at all? I've heard revocable living trusts can provide the step up basis while also giving you more control over when/how the kids get the money.
18 Just to add another perspective - the support test is what matters here, not income. My daughter made almost $50k last year at 17 from her online business, but since she wasn't using that money for her own support (most went to college savings), we still claimed her as dependent. We documented everything carefully just in case of audit. Make sure your daughter's employer is withholding correctly. Child performers sometimes have special rules depending on your state, and some states require part of their earnings to go into a protected account (similar to the "Coogan Law" in California).
3 Did you have to fill out any special forms to document the support calculation? I've been trying to figure out if there's an official worksheet or something for this. My son made about $32k from gaming tournaments this year.
18 There's no specific IRS form for the support calculation, but I created a simple spreadsheet showing the total cost of my daughter's support (housing, food, education, medical, clothing, etc.) and what portion I paid versus what was paid from her earnings. I kept receipts for major expenses just in case. For your son's gaming tournaments, make sure you understand if they're considered prizes/awards (reported on Line 8 of Schedule 1) or self-employment income (Schedule C) - they're treated differently for tax purposes. In my daughter's case, her online business income required Schedule C and self-employment tax, which was a big surprise our first year dealing with it.
14 Has anyone dealt with the kiddie tax in this situation? I've heard if your child has unearned income (interest, dividends, etc.) over a certain amount, it gets taxed at the parent's rate. Is that something to worry about with high-earning child performers?
7 Good question! The kiddie tax only applies to unearned income (investment income, interest, dividends, capital gains) - not to earned income like modeling or acting wages. If your child performer is just earning wages, the kiddie tax doesn't apply at all. However, if they're earning enough that you're investing some of that money and generating significant investment income, then the kiddie tax could come into play. For 2024, the first $1,250 of unearned income is tax-free, the next $1,250 is taxed at the child's rate, and anything above $2,500 in unearned income would be taxed at the parent's rate.
Giovanni Rossi
One thing to consider - you might be able to deduct the mold inspection as a medical expense if you can document that you did it for health concerns. IRS Publication 502 covers medical expense deductions, and preventative care can sometimes qualify. You'd need to itemize on Schedule A, and only medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of your AGI are deductible. Since you're selling the property, another option is to add the cost of the mold inspection to your basis in the property, which would reduce any potential capital gains tax when you sell. Keep all documentation for this.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
ā¢Thanks for this perspective! Since I'm planning to sell soon, adding it to the basis makes the most sense for me. Do I need any special documentation beyond the receipt and my communication with the builder to prove this should be part of my basis?
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
ā¢You'll want to keep the inspection report, receipt, and any communication with the builder or HOA that shows the inspection was necessary due to building defects. Also document that other units had confirmed mold issues, as this strengthens your case that the inspection was a necessary expense related to your property. For your basis calculation, maintain a file with all improvement costs, including this inspection. When you sell, you'll use IRS Form 8949 and Schedule D to report the sale, where your adjusted basis will offset the sale proceeds to determine your gain or loss.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
If the builder is asking for a W9, I'm betting they're planning to issue a 1099-MISC in box 3 (Other Income). This is their standard procedure for paying non-employees. But here's the thing - the IRS actually has guidance on reimbursements vs income. If you want to avoid the tax impact entirely, try asking the builder if they'll pay the testing company directly instead of reimbursing you. Then no W9 is needed since you're not receiving any money.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
ā¢This is exactly what I did when I had water damage in my apartment! The landlord paid the testing company directly and it saved me from dealing with any tax headaches. Definitely the cleanest solution if the builder is willing to do it.
0 coins