IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just an FYI for anyone dealing with this - I'm a payroll specialist (not for Paycom) and this is unfortunately a common mistake. The confusion usually happens because both HSA contributions AND cafeteria plan premiums are pre-tax, but they're handled differently on the W2. For clarification: - Box 12 Code W: Only HSA contributions - Cafeteria plan premiums: No specific box, they simply reduce wages in Box 1 - FSA contributions: Box 14 (optional) or just reduce Box 1 - 401k contributions: Box 12 Code D If your payroll person insists they're right, ask them to check IRS Publication 969 and the W2 instructions specifically for Box 12 Code W.

0 coins

This is super helpful! Would it make a difference if some of the additional amount in Code W might be employer contributions to the HSA? My employer doesn't contribute to mine, but I'm wondering if that could explain why some companies might have a higher number there.

0 coins

Yes, that's a good question! If your employer makes contributions to your HSA, those amounts ARE included in Box 12 Code W along with your own contributions. So the total in Code W would be the combination of your contributions plus your employer's contributions. But in your case, since you said your employer doesn't contribute to your HSA, that's not the explanation. This is definitely an error where they're incorrectly including cafeteria plan premiums in Code W.

0 coins

Sorry if this is a dumb question but how urgently does this need to be fixed? I just checked my W2 and I think they made the same mistake. I've already filed my taxes though... am I going to get in trouble with the IRS?

0 coins

Don't worry, it's not a dumb question at all. If you've already filed, you should still try to get a corrected W2 from your employer. Once you receive it, you'd need to file an amended return (Form 1040-X). If the incorrect W2 makes it look like you over-contributed to your HSA, the IRS might send you a notice. In that case, you'd need to respond with an explanation and documentation showing your actual HSA contributions. It's better to be proactive, but you won't get in serious trouble - worst case would be having to pay a 6% excise tax on any "excess contributions" until the issue is resolved.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

22 Just a heads up - while it's true you don't need to file if your gifts are under the annual exclusion, make sure you're calculating everything correctly. Did you give any other gifts to these same people during the year? Cash, paying bills directly, or adding someone to property deeds all count. Also, if you're married, you and your spouse can split gifts (effectively doubling the exclusion amount) but you DO need to file Form 709 to elect gift splitting even if you don't owe any tax.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

1 Thanks for this additional info! The only gifts I gave were those three payments for my kids' down payments. I'm widowed, so no spouse to worry about for gift splitting. I definitely didn't exceed $17,000 per person - each payment was exactly $15,000 since that was the exclusion limit I remembered from a few years ago (before it increased).

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

22 You're all set then! The annual exclusion was $15,000 for 2018-2021, then increased to $16,000 for 2022, and $17,000 for 2023. Since your gifts were $15,000 each, you're well under the threshold even for 2022. And being widowed means you don't need to worry about the gift-splitting election. Just keep good records of these gifts for your own files - dates, amounts, and recipients. This can be helpful in case questions ever arise in the future, but you definitely don't need to file Form 709.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

5 Somewhat related question - if I did need to file Form 709 but had already filed an extension with Form 8892, when would the new deadline be? Is it October 15th like regular income tax extensions?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

19 Gift tax extensions work differently than income tax extensions. Form 8892 extends the deadline to October 15th, but only if you also filed an extension for your income tax return (Form 1040). If you didn't extend your 1040, the 709 extension only goes to April 15th plus 6 months, which would also be October 15th. So either way, October 15th would be your deadline.

0 coins

Former salon manager here. What your wife's employer is doing is unfortunately common practice in some salons, but it's definitely not right. Here's why they're doing it: when tips are properly reported, the business has to pay the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes on those tips. By telling employees to "handle it themselves," they're avoiding these costs. For credit card tips specifically, this is extremely sketchy because there's already a paper trail. The IRS can easily see that the business processed credit card tips but didn't report them properly on W-2s. Your wife should absolutely keep her own detailed records of ALL tips received, noting which were cash and which were credit card. This will protect her if there's ever an audit.

0 coins

Is there a way to report this kind of behavior anonymously? My salon does the same thing and I'm worried about taxes but don't want to lose my job for causing problems.

0 coins

Yes, you can report tax compliance issues anonymously using IRS Form 3949-A (Information Referral). You can submit this form without providing your personal information, and the IRS is prohibited from disclosing the source of their information during an investigation. That said, if you're the only employee suddenly concerned about tip reporting, it might be obvious who made the report. Some employees choose to first approach the situation by simply saying they need proper tip reporting for mortgage application purposes or similar financial reasons - this sometimes can change the employer's approach without creating conflict.

0 coins

Just want to add - check your state laws too! Some states have additional requirements for tip reporting and minimum wage calculations for tipped employees. In my state, employers who take a tip credit have to provide written notification to employees about tip reporting procedures. Also, if your wife is getting health insurance or other benefits through this job, unreported income could affect her qualification or subsidy amounts if she's getting coverage through the ACA marketplace. It really can create a cascade of problems beyond just the IRS issues others mentioned.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

This is a really good point! When I was reporting tips incorrectly, it messed up my income verification for an apartment rental application. The landlord wanted proof of income and my paystubs showed way less than I actually made. Created a huge headache and almost lost the apartment.

0 coins

Emma Garcia

•

One important thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - check whether your 2023 recharacterization was done before the tax filing deadline (plus extensions). If it was, you technically don't need to amend - you can just file the 8606 for 2023 as if you had made a traditional contribution originally. Recharacterizations done by the deadline are treated as if you made the contribution to the second account from the beginning. The 2024 conversion is still reported on your 2024 return, but the contribution basis is established on your 2023 return with Form 8606. I went through this exact scenario last year and confirmed this with my CPA.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

I'm pretty sure my recharacterization was completed before the deadline (did it in mid-April 2024 for the 2023 contribution), but I had already filed my 2023 taxes in February. Does that mean I still need to amend to include the Form 8606, or can I just file the form separately?

0 coins

Emma Garcia

•

You'll need to file an amended return (Form 1040-X) along with the Form 8606 for 2023. Since you already filed your original return without the 8606, you need to formally correct that with an amendment. If you hadn't filed yet when you did the recharacterization, you could have just included the 8606 with your original filing. But since you already filed without it, an amendment is necessary to establish your basis properly.

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

Has anyone used TurboTax to report backdoor Roth conversions? I'm in a similar situation but trying to DIY this since my accountant also seems confused by the process. Does the software walk you through the recharacterization and Form 8606 correctly?

0 coins

I used TurboTax last year for my backdoor Roth and had mixed results. It does have a section for Form 8606, but it doesn't specifically prompt you about recharacterizations. I had to know exactly what I was doing and override some of its suggestions.

0 coins

What would be the best tax system for simplifying complex taxation and addressing income inequality?

I've been thinking a lot about how much better society would function if we simplified our complex tax systems down to primarily income-based taxation. My country's current system (like many others) seems needlessly complicated and often unfair. What advantages might we see with a simplified income-only tax system? First, it would be much easier for legislators to regulate. Politicians could focus on adjusting a single tax rate rather than juggling dozens of different taxes, making it harder to inadvertently damage the economy or government revenue. Second, it would create more equality. One common complaint is how wealthy individuals can navigate complex tax systems to minimize their burden. A single, straightforward income tax would be harder to avoid unless you abandoned the country entirely. Third, it would be more fair across income levels. Currently, consumption taxes on necessities like food affect everyone equally regardless of income. Since income tax is percentage-based, those earning less would pay less, creating true progressivity. Fourth, it might reduce illegal market activity. Without heavy product taxes, legal businesses could potentially compete with criminal enterprises on price. Fifth, transparency would improve dramatically. Most citizens have no idea what percentage of their money goes to taxes overall. A single tax would make this immediately clear and easier to compare internationally. Sixth, it could reduce business bankruptcies. Companies that aren't profitable wouldn't pay taxes, allowing more businesses to survive economic downturns. However, there would definitely be challenges: - Enforcement would be difficult for non-traditional workers - Verifying true income for entrepreneurs and business owners - Wealthy people might relocate to lower-tax countries - "Digital nomads" could potentially avoid taxes altogether How might we address these issues? - Redirect tax enforcement resources from other taxes to focus on income verification - Require tax withholding on all official contracts - Implement stronger penalties for illegal tax avoidance What are your thoughts on simplifying to an income-only tax system? What problems do you see, or how could this idea be improved?

Adding to the discussion on income-only taxation - one major issue not considered is wealth inequality. Income tax only targets active earnings, but much of the wealth held by the ultra-rich isn't in regular income but in appreciating assets like stocks, real estate, etc. This is why many economists argue for some form of wealth taxation alongside income taxes. If we eliminated property taxes, capital gains taxes, etc., we'd basically be giving a permanent tax holiday to those who live primarily off assets rather than wages. Also, consumption taxes can actually be beneficial for economic stability because they provide a more consistent revenue stream during recessions when incomes might fall dramatically. No perfect system exists, but a balanced approach with simplified versions of different tax types probably makes more sense than going all-in on just income taxation.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Great point about wealth vs income! I never thought about how rich people often have low "income" on paper while their net worth grows by millions. How would you design a wealth tax that's actually effective without hurting regular people who might have a valuable house but not much cash?

0 coins

Designing an effective wealth tax requires careful thresholds to target only significant wealth. For example, setting the threshold at $10 million in net assets would exempt most homeowners completely. You can also create progressive rates that increase with wealth levels and offer deferred payment options for asset-rich but cash-poor situations. The key is exempting primary residences up to a reasonable value, retirement accounts up to certain limits, and small business assets under a threshold. This protects regular people while still addressing the enormous untaxed wealth accumulation at the very top. Annual reporting requirements and strong valuation methods would be essential to prevent avoidance strategies.

0 coins

Having lived in 6 different countries, I've experienced many tax systems firsthand. The simplest wasn't necessarily the best. In Singapore, they have very straightforward taxes, but it created other societal issues. In the Nordic countries, taxes are high but extremely transparent in how they're calculated and spent. The problem with income-only taxation is it misses huge parts of economic activity. For example, tourism: visitors consume resources but would pay zero under income-only systems. One approach I liked was in New Zealand, where they have a fairly simple GST (goods and services tax) applied broadly with very few exemptions, combined with a progressive income tax. The simplicity wasn't from having just one tax, but from having few exemptions and very clear rules.

0 coins

That's really interesting! Can you explain more about how New Zealand's system works? I'm really curious about what makes it clearer than other systems. Also, what did you see in Singapore that created societal issues?

0 coins

Prev1...44094410441144124413...5644Next