


Ask the community...
5 Something else to consider - are you planning to do the S Corp election yourself or work with a tax professional? I tried doing it myself last year and messed up the form because I didn't realize my operating agreement needed specific language for S Corp compatibility. Ended up having to redo everything and missed the deadline. Also, remember you'll need to run payroll and pay yourself a "reasonable salary" once you elect S Corp status. That means additional payroll tax filings and compliance requirements starting from whatever date you make the election effective.
8 What's considered a "reasonable salary" exactly? I've heard different things - some say 50% of profits, others say market rate for your position. I'm also wondering about the payroll part, do you use a service for that or DIY?
5 The "reasonable salary" requirement is probably the trickiest part of S Corp compliance. There's no fixed percentage or formula - the IRS evaluates it case by case. The most defensible approach is researching what similar positions earn in your industry and location. BLS.gov has salary data that can help document your reasoning. I absolutely recommend using a payroll service rather than DIY. I tried handling it myself initially and it was a nightmare keeping up with all the filing requirements and deadlines. I now use Gusto which costs about $45/month but handles all the calculations, filings, and direct deposits automatically. The peace of mind is worth every penny, especially since penalties for incorrect payroll tax filings can be steep.
19 Sorry to jump in - but wanted to mention that making yourself an S Corp in the middle of the year creates a short tax year, which means filing two tax returns for one calendar year. You'll need to file: 1) Schedule C for your self-employment from Feb-May 2) Form 1120-S for your S Corp from May-Dec That can significantly increase your tax preparation costs. Plus, many accountants charge more for S Corp returns (typically $800-1200) compared to Schedule C preparation. If your projected tax savings are modest, it might make more sense to wait until Jan 1 for simplicity.
16 Interesting point about the short tax year filing. Would that mean two separate state filings as well? And what about quarterly estimated tax payments - would those need to be recalculated mid-year?
Just wanted to add a practical tip based on my experience: keep detailed records of your days in the US vs Canada. The substantial presence test is based on a formula: days in current year + 1/3 of days in previous year + 1/6 of days in year before that. When I moved to Canada, I thought brief trips back wouldn't count, but they do! Every day matters. I use an app to track my border crossings now because it got confusing fast. Also, the first year after moving is usually the most complicated tax year you'll have.
What app do you use to track your travel days? I've been using a spreadsheet but it's getting messy, especially with some quick weekend trips back to the US to visit family.
I use an app called "Travel Days Tracker" - it lets you log entries/exits by country and calculates your total days for tax purposes. Some people also use the Stride Tax app which has a location tracking feature that can automatically log when you cross borders. The spreadsheet works too, but I found having the app on my phone made it easier to log immediately when crossing borders. Whatever system you use, just be consistent. The IRS can request proof of your physical presence, and border crossing records can sometimes be incomplete.
Don't forget about state residency rules! They're totally separate from federal rules and can be even more complicated. Some states like California are super aggressive about claiming you're still a resident. When I moved to Canada, I had to file a partial year California return even though I was considered a US resident alien for the full year on my federal return. Had to provide proof I'd actually established domicile in Canada (driver's license, housing lease, utility bills).
This is a really good point. New York is just as bad as California. I moved to Toronto but kept an apartment in NYC that I use occasionally. NY claimed I was still a full-year resident even though I was physically in NY less than 90 days that year.
Have you tried reaching out to your congressional representative's office? Their constituent services department can sometimes get responses from federal agencies when individuals can't. I had a similar situation with comments I submitted about 1099-K thresholds, and my congressman's office was able to at least confirm my comments were received and included in the review process.
That's a great suggestion! I hadn't thought about involving my representative. Did you just call their local office? And how long did it take them to get back to you with information?
I called their district office, and they had me fill out a privacy release form so they could inquire on my behalf. The whole process took about 2 weeks before they got back to me with confirmation. Most congressional offices have staff dedicated to helping constituents navigate federal agencies. They won't necessarily get the IRS to change their mind on anything, but they can often get status updates and confirmations that regular citizens struggle to obtain directly.
I work in regulatory compliance (not for the IRS), and I can confirm what others have said - individual responses aren't provided for public comments. However, there is a "hack" to get more visibility: submit your comments through a relevant industry association if possible. Comments from recognized industry groups tend to get more directly addressed in the final rule publications. If you're a member of any professional organizations related to your business, check if they're submitting comments on the same proposed rules. Sometimes you can get your specific concerns included in their submission, which typically gets more detailed attention.
That's really helpful insider info! Do you know if most industry associations allow individual members to contribute to their formal comments? I'm part of the National Association of Tax Professionals but never thought to check if they were commenting on the same rules.
For trusts, understanding the throwback rules saved me multiple times. Also, the 65-day rule for distributions (ยง663(b)) is an extremely useful planning tool that many preparers miss. Remember that trusts have very compressed tax brackets compared to individuals, so distribution planning is critical. A distribution timing mistake can cost thousands in unnecessary taxes.
The most important thing I've learned in 10+ years of tax work is to step back and look at transactions in context. Tax doesn't happen in isolation - it's connected to business decisions, family situations, and long-term goals. When I get overwhelmed, I find it helps to sketch out the entity structures and money flows on paper. Literally drawing boxes for entities and arrows for transactions can make complex situations much clearer than trying to hold it all in your head. For partnerships specifically, I recommend reading through the IRS audit techniques guide for partnerships. It shows you exactly what the IRS looks for when examining returns, which helps you understand what's most important to get right.
This is such practical advice - thank you! I've never thought about using the IRS audit guides as learning tools. Do you think starting with those might help me identify my knowledge gaps more effectively than just trying to read the code?
Absolutely! The audit guides are written in much more accessible language than the code and regulations. They focus on practical application rather than technical language. Plus, they highlight the areas where mistakes commonly occur, which helps you prioritize what to learn. The partnership ATG specifically has great examples of what proper allocations, basis calculations, and distributions should look like. It also explains the economic substance doctrine in a way that's much clearer than most textbooks. Just remember that they're written from an enforcement perspective, so they emphasize areas of non-compliance rather than planning opportunities.
Lucas Lindsey
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that your father needs to be aware of recapture rules if he doesn't maintain 100% business use for the entire recovery period. If business use drops below 50% in future years, he could face significant recapture of the benefit. Also, there are phase-out schedules for both the bonus depreciation and the EV credit depending on the year of purchase. Bonus depreciation under 168(k) is scheduled to phase down 20% each year starting in 2023, and the EV credit has manufacturer sales caps and income limits. Make sure he's working with a tax professional who can help him understand all the implications before making such a large purchase.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
โขThanks for bringing up the recapture issue - that's something I wasn't aware of. What exactly is the "recovery period" and how long would he need to maintain business use? He plans to use it exclusively for business for at least 5 years. Also, do you know if there's an income limit that might prevent him from claiming the full EV credit? His 1099 income fluctuates year by year.
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
โขThe recovery period for vehicles is typically 5 years, so your father's plan to use it exclusively for business during that time would avoid recapture issues. If business use drops below 50% during those 5 years, he would need to recapture the excess depreciation taken and report it as ordinary income. Yes, there are income limits for the EV credit. For a single filer, the credit begins to phase out at $150,000 AGI and is eliminated at $160,000. For married filing jointly, those thresholds are $300,000 and $310,000 respectively. With fluctuating 1099 income, he should do some tax planning to see if he'll fall under these limits in the year of purchase. If he's close to the threshold, he might want to consider timing the purchase or implementing strategies to reduce his AGI for that year.
0 coins
Sophie Duck
Another consideration - make sure to check if the specific Tesla model is eligible for the full $7500 credit. Not all EVs qualify for the full amount anymore due to battery sourcing requirements. The IRS maintains a list of qualifying vehicles and their credit amounts. Also, don't forget about potential state incentives! Many states offer additional tax credits or rebates for EV purchases on top of the federal benefits.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
โขThis is an excellent point. The Inflation Reduction Act changed the requirements, and now the vehicle must meet North American final assembly requirements. Additionally, there are critical mineral and battery component requirements that affect the credit amount. Tesla has been adjusting their supply chain to qualify, but it varies by model and can change.
0 coins