


Ask the community...
You might wanna double check what kind of insurance you have exactly. The 1095-C just shows that your employer OFFERED you coverage, not necessarily that you TOOK the coverage. If you declined their insurance and got marketplace coverage with premium tax credits instead, then you'd need to amend using your 1095-A form. But if you just had regular employer insurance all year like most people, and correctly said so on your tax return, you're fine. Keep the 1095-C with your records, but you don't file it with your return.
Thank you for pointing this out! I did take my employer's insurance and have been covered all year through them. I definitely checked the box on my return saying I had coverage for all 12 months. So it sounds like I'm ok from what everyone is saying?
Yes, you're fine then! If you had employer coverage all year and indicated that on your return, the 1095-C is just documentation for your records. You don't need to amend your return or do anything else. The IRS already gets this information reported to them directly from your employer. Just keep the form with your tax records in case there are ever any questions, but you're all set!
Has anyone noticed that the 1095 forms ALWAYS come late? Like, every single year they're the last to arrive, usually after most people have already filed. Seems like the IRS should adjust the deadlines so these forms arrive before the filing season even starts. Makes no sense to get tax forms after you've already filed!
100% agree. My 1095-B comes late EVERY year. I think employers have until March to send them out, but W-2s have to be out by January 31. The deadlines don't make any sense when tax filing starts in late January!
Quick question about timing - I'm in the same boat (sophomore, made about $7k last year). Is there any benefit to filing early vs waiting until April? I've heard mixed things from friends.
File early!!! Especially if you're expecting a refund. The sooner you file, the sooner you get your money back. Also, identity theft is a real problem - if someone gets your SSN they can file a fake return in your name and steal your refund. Filing early prevents this. Filing early also gives you more time to correct any mistakes if something goes wrong. Last year I waited till the last minute and realized I was missing a form, had to file an extension and it was a whole mess.
If you're nervous about filing yourself, most colleges offer free tax help through the VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) program. Check your school's financial aid office or accounting department. The volunteers are usually accounting students supervised by professors or tax professionals, and they're certified by the IRS. I used it last year and they were super helpful and explained everything as they went along. Plus it's completely free!
This is what I did! Our business school had accounting students doing this as part of their practical experience. They were super thorough and even found a credit I didn't know about. Definitely worth checking if your school offers this!
As a partnership tax specialist, I'd like to add another perspective. The ERTC advance payment is essentially a reduction of a previously deducted expense (wages), not income. Here's how I've been handling it for multiple clients: 1. Report the credit on Form 5884-A, which flows to Schedule K, line 15 2. Reduce wage expense by the amount of the credit 3. Make an M-1 adjustment for "expenses recorded on books but not deducted on this return" (this reconciles your book treatment vs. tax treatment) The key is understanding that the ERTC is fundamentally a credit against payroll taxes that were previously paid. When you get an advance payment, you're just getting those funds earlier, but the tax treatment remains the same.
With the M-1 adjustment, should you include the full amount of the credit or only the portion received as an advance payment? One of my clients received part as an advance and claimed the rest on their quarterly 941s.
You should only include the amount that creates a book-tax difference on your M-1. If your books show the full wage expense but your tax return reflects the reduced wage expense (after applying the credit), then your M-1 adjustment would be for the full amount of the credit that affected wages in that tax year. If part was received as an advance and part was claimed on 941s, but the total impact on wage expense is the same, then the full amount would go on the M-1. The key is reconciling what's on your books versus what's on your tax return, regardless of how or when the credit was received.
Has anyone considered the timing difference when the advance payment is received in a different tax year than when it's reported on Form 5884-A? One of my partnerships received the advance in December 2021 but we're claiming the credit on the 2022 return (based on 2022 qualified wages).
Everyone here is focused on the hobby vs business question, but there's another angle to consider. If you're mainly selling model horses that you previously purchased for your collection (rather than making/modifying them yourself), you might be able to treat these as capital assets. When you sell a capital asset, you report the sale price minus what you paid for it (your basis). So if you bought a model horse for $100 and sold it for $150, you'd only pay tax on the $50 profit. This might be a better approach than hobby income if you're primarily just buying and reselling without substantial modification.
This is interesting! Would you use Schedule D for this instead of reporting as hobby income? And do you need to keep receipts for everything to prove what you originally paid?
Just to add another perspective... If you customize or restore the model horses before selling them, that effort might strengthen your case as a business rather than just collecting. You're adding value through your labor and expertise, not just buying and selling. I make and sell handcrafted jewelry and was in a similar position a few years ago. Once I documented my design process, tracked my time spent making pieces, and marketed my work more consistently, my tax preparer was comfortable treating it as a business on Schedule C, even though I wasn't profitable every year.
I do customize some of them! I repaint about 30% of the models I sell, and sometimes do minor repairs on vintage pieces. I just wasn't sure if that was enough to count as a "real business" since it's still mostly just for fun. But it sounds like that could help my case?
That definitely strengthens your case! The customization and repairs show you're adding value through your skills and labor, which is a big factor in the business vs. hobby determination. Make sure you document your work process - take before and after photos of your customizations, track the time you spend on each project, and keep receipts for all supplies. Also, consider creating a separate Instagram or Facebook page showcasing your work, even if it's just casual. Having a business presence online is another factor that supports business treatment. You might also want to look into selling at model horse shows or conventions if you don't already - participating in trade shows is another indicator the IRS looks for when determining if something is a business. The key is to show that you're making decisions with the intent to eventually be profitable, even if you're not there yet.
Paolo Longo
One thing nobody's mentioned is that some professionals are both CPAs AND tax attorneys. They've completed both sets of qualifications. They're less common and more expensive, but for really complex situations, they can be worth it. I use one for my business taxes because we have operations in multiple states with different tax treatments.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
ā¢That's really interesting - I had no idea some people had both qualifications. Would that be overkill for my situation though? I'm trying to be cost-conscious here.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
ā¢For your situation with unreported business income and inheritance questions, a dual-qualified professional would likely be overkill. They typically charge $400-600 per hour because they bring both legal and accounting expertise to the table. I'd recommend starting with a regular CPA who has small business experience. They'll be more affordable (likely $200-300/hour) and can handle everything you've described. If they discover something that requires legal expertise, then they can refer you to a tax attorney for just that portion of the work. This approach gives you the right level of expertise while keeping costs manageable.
0 coins
Amina Bah
Everyone talks about CPAs and tax attorneys, but don't sleep on Enrolled Agents (EAs)! They're specifically licensed by the IRS to handle tax matters and often charge less than CPAs while still being able to represent you in audits. I've used one for years for my small business.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
ā¢I second this! My EA charges about 30% less than CPAs in my area but knows the tax code inside and out. They focus exclusively on taxes while many CPAs do broader accounting work.
0 coins