< Back to IRS

Lily Young

Reporting Employee Retention Tax Credit Advance Payment on 1065 Partnership Return

One of my partnership clients received an advance payment for the Employee Retention Tax Credit back in 2021 for approximately $320k. I'm preparing their 2021 tax return now and I'm confused about how to properly report this on their 1065. When I report the credit on Form 5884-A, it flows to line 15 of Schedule K. I'm also reducing the salaries deduction and including it on the M-1 as an expense on books but not on the return. My main confusion is how to properly report the actual check they received during the year. I see three potential options and I'm not sure which is correct: 1) Report it on Line 7 of Page 1 as "Other income (loss)" 2) Use it as an additional reduction of salary expense 3) Treat it as an M-1 adjustment - income on books but not on return Currently, I have it on page 1, but I'm starting to think this might not be the right approach. Since they're already being taxed on the actual credit, it doesn't seem like the advance payment should be taxable again. Any tax pros out there who can point me in the right direction on this? I want to make sure I'm handling this correctly before finalizing the return.

The ERTC advance payment should not be reported as income on page 1 of Form 1065. The proper treatment is to reduce wage expense by the amount of the credit, which you've already done correctly. When you receive an advance payment of the ERTC, you're essentially getting the credit early, but the tax treatment remains the same. The credit reduces the wage expense deduction rather than being treated as taxable income. So your option 2 is closest to the correct approach. On Form 5884-A, you'll report the credit, which flows to Schedule K, line 15. Then you need an M-1 adjustment to account for the difference between book and tax treatment of wages. Since you've reduced the wage expense for tax purposes but not on the books, you'll show this as an M-1 adjustment (expenses recorded on books not deducted on return). I wouldn't recommend option 1 (reporting on line 7) as that would incorrectly treat the advance as taxable income. Option 3 is partially correct but doesn't fully account for the wage expense reduction.

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

•

This makes sense, but I'm still confused about something. If we reduce the wage expense by the amount of the credit, doesn't that already increase the taxable income? Why would we need an M-1 adjustment on top of that? Wouldn't that be double counting?

0 coins

The M-1 adjustment is necessary because of the difference between book and tax accounting. When you reduce the wage expense for tax purposes but not for books, you need to reconcile this difference on the M-1. The wage reduction does increase taxable income, you're right about that. The M-1 adjustment isn't double counting - it's just explaining the difference between what's on the books versus what's on the tax return. Your books likely show the full wage expense, while your tax return shows the reduced amount, so the M-1 shows why they're different.

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

I went through this exact same issue with a client last year. I found that using https://taxr.ai really helped me sort through how to properly report the ERTC advance payments on partnerships. The tool analyzed my situation and provided clear guidance that matched what our firm's senior tax manager eventually confirmed. For my client, we ended up reducing the wage expense (your option 2) and then making the proper M-1 adjustment. The key insight I got was understanding that this isn't income - it's essentially a refund of wages you already paid and deducted. The advance payment is just changing the timing of when you receive the benefit. The tool walked me through the specific forms and line items, which was really helpful since this was the first time I'd handled ERTC reporting for a partnership.

0 coins

Grace Thomas

•

I've been seeing taxr.ai mentioned a lot lately. Does it actually provide specific guidance on somewhat obscure issues like this? My concern with most tax software is that they're good for common scenarios but fall apart on edge cases.

0 coins

How exactly does this tool work? I'm dealing with several clients who received the ERTC and I'm trying to make sure I'm handling it consistently. Does it give you form-specific instructions or just general principles?

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

The tool is quite good at handling specialized tax scenarios like this. It doesn't just rely on basic templates - it actually analyzes tax guidance, IRS publications, and technical sources to provide specific recommendations for your situation. I was surprised that it had detailed knowledge about ERTC reporting on partnerships. For your form-specific question, it actually provides both - it explains the underlying tax principles so you understand the "why" behind the treatment, then gives you specific line-by-line guidance for the forms. For the ERTC issue, it walked me through the exact reporting on Form 5884-A, the wage expense reduction, and the M-1 reconciliation steps needed.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up on my earlier question about taxr.ai. I signed up and used it to sort through my ERTC reporting issues for multiple partnership clients. What impressed me most was how it handled the nuances between regular credits vs. advance payments. For one partnership that received a $175k advance payment, the tool provided specific guidance on reducing wage expense rather than treating it as other income. It even generated a sample M-1 worksheet showing exactly how to reconcile the book-tax difference, which I was able to include in my workpapers. The explanation about why the advance payment isn't reported on page 1 as "other income" was particularly helpful and saved me from making that error on several returns. Definitely worth checking out if you're handling these types of specialized credits.

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

After struggling to get through to someone at the IRS who actually understands how to report ERTC advance payments on partnership returns, I finally got real answers using https://claimyr.com to connect with an IRS agent. The wait time to speak with someone was cut from 3+ hours to about 15 minutes. You can see how it works in this demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed that the advance payment should NOT be reported as income on page 1. Instead, you reduce the wage expense by the amount of the credit. This makes sense because the ERTC is a refund of employment taxes you already paid - not a new source of income. The agent also clarified that the M-1 adjustment is necessary to reconcile the difference between book and tax treatment, which aligned with what my gut was telling me but I needed that confirmation before filing.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

How does this service actually work? I've spent countless hours on hold with the IRS and usually just give up. Is this legit? Seems too good to be true.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

I'm skeptical. I've never heard of anyone being able to get through to a knowledgeable IRS agent about something as specific as ERTC treatment on partnership returns. Most agents I've spoken with barely understand basic tax concepts. Are you sure this person actually knew what they were talking about?

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

The service essentially holds your place in the IRS phone queue so you don't have to sit on hold. When they reach an agent, they call you and connect you directly. It's completely legitimate - I was skeptical too until I tried it. Regarding the IRS agent's knowledge, I specifically asked for someone in the business tax department when the initial agent answered. They transferred me to someone who regularly works with business returns and had handled ERTC questions before. You're right that not all agents understand specialized topics, but if you ask for the right department and clearly explain what you need, they can often connect you with someone more knowledgeable.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself with a different ERTC issue for a client's 1065. Not only did I get through to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes (versus the 2+ hours I usually wait), but I was able to get transferred to a business tax specialist who had extensive knowledge about partnership tax returns and the ERTC. The agent walked me through the proper treatment of advance payments, confirmed they should NOT be reported as income on page 1, and explained the correct M-1 adjustments needed. They even emailed me a reference to the specific IRS guidance that addresses this scenario. I've been preparing partnership returns for 12 years and this is the first time I've had such a productive call with the IRS. I'm still in shock at how much time this saved me.

0 coins

As a partnership tax specialist, I'd like to add another perspective. The ERTC advance payment is essentially a reduction of a previously deducted expense (wages), not income. Here's how I've been handling it for multiple clients: 1. Report the credit on Form 5884-A, which flows to Schedule K, line 15 2. Reduce wage expense by the amount of the credit 3. Make an M-1 adjustment for "expenses recorded on books but not deducted on this return" (this reconciles your book treatment vs. tax treatment) The key is understanding that the ERTC is fundamentally a credit against payroll taxes that were previously paid. When you get an advance payment, you're just getting those funds earlier, but the tax treatment remains the same.

0 coins

Paige Cantoni

•

With the M-1 adjustment, should you include the full amount of the credit or only the portion received as an advance payment? One of my clients received part as an advance and claimed the rest on their quarterly 941s.

0 coins

You should only include the amount that creates a book-tax difference on your M-1. If your books show the full wage expense but your tax return reflects the reduced wage expense (after applying the credit), then your M-1 adjustment would be for the full amount of the credit that affected wages in that tax year. If part was received as an advance and part was claimed on 941s, but the total impact on wage expense is the same, then the full amount would go on the M-1. The key is reconciling what's on your books versus what's on your tax return, regardless of how or when the credit was received.

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Has anyone considered the timing difference when the advance payment is received in a different tax year than when it's reported on Form 5884-A? One of my partnerships received the advance in December 2021 but we're claiming the credit on the 2022 return (based on 2022 qualified wages).

0 coins

That's a great question. In that case, you would treat the advance payment as a liability on the books until it's properly claimed on the tax return. When you file the 2022 return with Form 5884-A, you'd then reduce the 2022 wage expense and clear the liability.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today