IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Carmen Diaz

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you respond to the LT38 by the deadline even if you're still sorting out the details! Those notices have strict deadlines and if you miss it, you could lose certain appeal rights. If you need more time, call the number on the notice and request an extension while you gather documentation. They'll usually give you an additional 30-60 days if you have a legitimate reason. Also, if you do end up owing money, look into a payment plan. The IRS offers reasonable monthly payment options, and once you're on a plan, they'll stop sending threatening notices.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

That's really helpful - I was so focused on figuring out the correct amount that I hadn't thought about the deadline. The notice says I have 30 days to respond. If I request more time, does that stop any collection actions they might take?

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Requesting more time usually pauses collection actions while your case is being reviewed, but it's not guaranteed. Make sure you get confirmation (ask for a transaction ID or confirmation number) when you request the extension. The safest approach is to send a written response by certified mail before the deadline stating that you're disputing the amount and gathering documentation to support your position. This officially stops the collections process while your case is reviewed. Then follow up with your complete documentation once you have everything organized.

0 coins

Has anyone had success getting interest charges removed in situations like this? I had a somewhat similar issue where the IRS made an error processing my return, and by the time they figured it out, they had added over $800 in interest to my balance.

0 coins

If the error was the IRS's fault, you can request interest abatement using Form 843. I did this last year after they misapplied a payment, and they approved it and removed all the interest charges. Make sure you clearly explain how the error was caused by the IRS and not by anything you did.

0 coins

Check your W4 form with your employer. If you had it set to 0 allowances (on the old system) or didn't adjust it on the new W4 system, a tiny refund is actually GOOD. Means you kept more of your $ during the year instead of giving IRS interest-free loan. People getting huge refunds just had too much withheld.

0 coins

How do you check if you're withholding the right amount? I always get really small refunds too and I'm never sure if that's good or bad.

0 coins

The IRS has a tax withholding estimator on their website that's actually pretty accurate. You input your income, filing status, and other tax situations, and it tells you if you're on track. You can adjust your W-4 anytime with your employer if you want a bigger refund (more withholding) or more money in each paycheck (less withholding). Small refunds are technically better financially because you've had access to more of your money throughout the year instead of waiting for a refund. But some people prefer larger refunds as a form of forced savings.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Not to be a downer but $102k with ONLY $380 back sounds like something might be off? I made $100k last year, single no kids, and got back $1,450. Maybe check if he claimed all your standard deduction? Or if your state taxes were done right?

0 coins

It really depends entirely on how much was withheld from each paycheck though. You probably just had more withheld throughout the year.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

True, withholding makes all the difference. My job tends to withhold a bit more than necessary. I also contribute to a traditional 401k which lowers my taxable income pretty significantly, forgot to mention that. That probably explains the difference between our refund amounts. Might be worth checking if you have any retirement contributions or other pre-tax deductions that could have been missed.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

You might want to keep records of the exact mechanism of how you're earning that interest. There's a difference between: 1) Interest from lending your crypto to a centralized platform 2) Interest from DeFi lending protocols 3) Staking rewards 4) Liquidity providing rewards Each might be treated differently if wash-sale rules get applied to crypto. The IRS might view some passive earnings differently than others depending on how much control/action you have in the process.

0 coins

That's a really good point I hadn't considered. My Bitcoin interest is coming from a centralized exchange (just a basic interest account), but I also have some ETH in DeFi protocols. Do you think the source matters that much for potential wash-sale considerations?

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

The source could definitely matter. Centralized exchange interest accounts are pretty straightforward - they're clearly interest, similar to a bank account. DeFi gets murkier because sometimes you're technically swapping your asset for a derivative token (like depositing ETH but receiving aETH or similar). In traditional finance, if you exchange one security for another that's considered "substantially identical," it can still trigger wash-sale rules. So if crypto wash-sale rules get implemented, there might be questions about whether your original ETH and the derivative token you receive are "substantially identical" for tax purposes.

0 coins

There's also the consideration of how new rules would be implemented. Most tax changes aren't retroactive. The Build Back Better Act had proposed crypto wash-sale rules, but it didn't pass. New legislation would likely have an effective date from passage forward, not back to Jan 2022.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

Actually, the Infrastructure Bill from last November did include some retroactive tax reporting requirements for crypto. So it's not impossible for them to do retroactive changes, especially for "clarifications" of existing rules rather than completely new taxes.

0 coins

One option you haven't considered is the "last-month rule" (also called the "full-contribution rule"). If you had HDHP coverage on December 1st, 2023, you can actually contribute the FULL annual limit, BUT you must remain HDHP-eligible for the entire following year (through Dec 31, 2024). This is called the "testing period." If you don't maintain eligibility throughout 2024, the excess contributions will be subject to income tax AND an additional 10% tax penalty. So it's a bit risky if you're not sure about your 2024 health coverage. This would allow you to keep your full $3850 contribution and claim the full deduction, but you need to be confident you'll have HDHP coverage all through 2024.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

I had no idea about this rule! So if I stay on my HDHP through all of 2024, I can keep the full $3850 contribution for 2023, even though I only had coverage starting in May 2023? Do I need to indicate this somehow on my 2023 Form 8889?

0 coins

Yes, exactly! If you had HDHP coverage on December 1, 2023, you qualify for the "last-month rule" and can contribute the full $3,850 for 2023 - as long as you maintain HDHP coverage for all of 2024. On Form 8889, you'll need to check the box on line 3 that says "If you, and your spouse if filing jointly, had an HDHP for the entire year, check the box..." This indicates you're using the last-month rule. You would then enter the full-year contribution limit on line 3. Just remember this comes with that testing period requirement - if you don't maintain HDHP coverage through December 31, 2024, you'll have to include the "excess" portion in your income for 2024 plus pay that additional 10% tax.

0 coins

Diez Ellis

•

Quick question about HSAs - I contributed through my employer's payroll deduction throughout 2023. Do I still need to file Form 8889? My tax software isn't prompting me for it even though I have an HSA.

0 coins

Yes, you absolutely need to file Form 8889, even with employer payroll deductions. Your tax software might not be prompting you because it doesn't know you have an HSA. You need to specifically tell it that you contributed to an HSA. Look for the section in your tax software about HSAs, health accounts, or tax deductions/credits. Once you indicate you have an HSA, it should generate Form 8889. The form is required for ALL HSA contributions and distributions, regardless of how they were made. Your W-2 should show HSA contributions in box 12 with code W if they were made through payroll.

0 coins

For your S-corp, have you looked into retroactive retirement plans? Solo 401k plans can be established up until the tax filing deadline INCLUDING EXTENSIONS (so potentially Oct 15), and could allow significantly higher contributions than a SEP IRA depending on your specific situation. You'd need to establish the plan before April 15 though, even if you file an extension. Another option: check if you qualify for the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction, which could give you up to 20% off your pass-through business income. Review your health insurance setup too - if structured correctly, S-corp shareholders can deduct premiums.

0 coins

I thought Solo 401ks were only for self-employed individuals without employees. Doesn't an S-Corp usually have at least the owner as an employee? Would this still work if the owner is the only employee?

0 coins

You're right to question this - I should have been more specific. A Solo 401k can work for an S-Corp if the only employees are the owner (and potentially their spouse). If the S-Corp has any other W-2 employees who work more than 1,000 hours per year, then you'd need a regular 401k plan with non-discrimination testing. If OP only has themselves (and possibly their spouse) as employees, then the Solo 401k is still an option and could allow for higher contribution limits than a SEP IRA in many cases, especially when you consider both the employer and employee contribution components.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

Maybe this is a dumb question but have you claimed the home office deduction? I have an S-Corp and my accountant says many business owners miss this. If you use a space exclusively for business, you can deduct a portion of your rent/mortgage, utilities, internet, etc. Could save you a decent amount!

0 coins

Not a dumb question at all, but with an S-Corp, the home office deduction works differently than for sole proprietors. The corporation should reimburse you for the home office expenses rather than taking them directly on your personal return. The S-Corp can deduct the reimbursement and it's not taxable income to you if done correctly.

0 coins

Prev1...42154216421742184219...5645Next