


Ask the community...
Just wanted to add that if you do let the mother claim the child, make sure you have a written agreement about it. My buddy got screwed because he verbally agreed to let his ex claim their kid, but then she refused to split the refund like they'd agreed. Without anything in writing, he had no recourse.
Can you actually enforce something like that legally though? I thought tax benefits were separate from custody agreements?
You absolutely can include tax arrangements in your custody agreement, and the court can enforce it. Many parenting plans specifically address who claims the child in which years (alternating, always one parent, etc). If it's not in your custody order yet, you can still create a separate written agreement. While not as strong as a court order, it's still evidence of your agreement if there's a dispute later. Some parents even use a service like Our Family Wizard to document these agreements, which gives them more weight since the communication is timestamped and can't be altered later.
Im wondering how this affects state taxes too? Does letting the mother claim your kid on federal mean she also has to claim on state return? Or can you split it?
I've filed taxes for 15 years and here's what I've noticed with refund timing: - Simple returns (just W-2 income): Usually 7-14 days - Self-employment/1099 income: 14-21 days - Any amended returns: 8-12 WEEKS (not days!) - EITC/Child Tax Credit: Not before mid-February, then 14-21 days - Large refunds ($5000+): Sometimes 1-3 days longer but not significantly The biggest factor is filing early - my Jan 31 returns always process faster than when I wait until March.
Have you noticed any difference between tax prep software? Like does using TurboTax vs H&R Block vs FreeTaxUSA change how fast the IRS processes things?
I haven't noticed any consistent difference in processing speed between tax software options. I've used TurboTax, H&R Block, and FreeTaxUSA over the years, and the refund timing seemed to depend much more on when I filed and what was on my return rather than which software I used. All the major tax software providers use the same electronic filing system to submit to the IRS, so once your return is accepted, the processing time should be the same regardless of which program you used to prepare it. The IRS doesn't prioritize returns based on which software was used.
anyone else notice that the "Where's My Refund" tool is SUPER unhelpful? it's been saying "Your return is being processed" for 2 weeks now with no other details. like thanks IRS, i already knew that lol. wish it would at least tell you where in the process it is or if there's a problem.
I had the exact same situation when I was bartending at a nightclub. Owner paid us through Venmo, then suddenly wanted to 1099 us all at tax time. The key factors the IRS looks at are: 1. Behavioral control - Did they control WHEN and HOW you worked? Sounds like yes. 2. Financial control - Did they set your pay rate and schedule? Sounds like yes. 3. Relationship - Was there an expectation of continued work? Two years sounds like yes. Don't just accept the 1099. I made that mistake and got hit with a $3,200 self-employment tax bill that should have been partially paid by the employer.
What happened after you got hit with the tax bill? Did you ever try to get it corrected or did you just pay it? I'm in a similar situation but with a restaurant that closed down, so I'm not even sure if the owner is still around to issue a corrected form.
I ended up paying it the first year because I didn't know any better. The second year, I filed the SS-8 form proactively and got a determination letter from the IRS saying I was indeed an employee. I took that to the owner, who initially resisted but changed his tune when I mentioned the potential penalties for misclassification. He issued a corrected W-2 for that year. For the previous year, I filed an amended return with the determination letter and got about $1,600 back. Even if your restaurant closed, you can still file the SS-8 and possibly get a determination that helps with your taxes. The owner being gone doesn't prevent the IRS from making a ruling on your status.
Does anyone know if getting paid through Cash App makes any difference for tax purposes? My understanding is that now with the new $600 reporting threshold, Cash App will issue 1099-Ks anyway, so maybe it doesn't matter if the hookah place sends a 1099 or not? I'm confused about how this all works together.
Getting paid through Cash App doesn't determine your worker status - that's based on the nature of your working relationship. However, you're right about the reporting change. Cash App (and similar payment services) are required to issue 1099-Ks for accounts receiving over $600 in payments for goods and services. This is separate from whether your employer issues a 1099-NEC or W-2. The IRS may notice if you receive a 1099-K from Cash App but don't report that income, regardless of whether you also get a 1099 or W-2 from the employer. So the income definitely needs to be reported either way, but the classification as employee vs. contractor determines HOW you report it and how much tax you pay.
Thanks for explaining! So if I'm understanding right, I could potentially get both a 1099-K from Cash App AND either a 1099-NEC or W-2 from my employer for the same income? That seems like it would cause confusion with the IRS. How would I make sure I'm not double-reporting the same income?
To add to what others have said, I'd recommend creating a detailed transaction log showing: 1) Initial USD to BTC purchase (date, amount, exchange) 2) BTC transfer to forex broker (date, amount, BTC value) 3) Conversion to fiat for forex trading (date, amount) 4) Summary of forex trading results (can be daily/weekly totals instead of every trade) 5) Conversion back to BTC (date, amount, BTC value) 6) Transfer back to exchange (date, amount, BTC value) This is essentially creating a paper trail that shows why the exchange 1099s don't tell the whole story. You'll want to report the actual forex trading results on Schedule 1 as Section 988 income/loss. The key is documenting everything thoroughly so if you're audited, you can clearly explain the discrepancy between the exchange reports and your actual tax situation.
This is extremely helpful, thank you! One question - when creating this transaction log, should I calculate the USD value of the BTC at each transfer point? Or just focus on the final gain/loss numbers?
Yes, you should definitely record the USD value of the BTC at each transfer point. This is crucial because the IRS considers each crypto-to-fiat or crypto-to-crypto exchange a potentially taxable event, and those values establish your cost basis. When you transfer BTC to your forex broker and convert to fiat, you technically have a taxable event based on whether your BTC gained/lost value since purchase. Then your forex trading creates separate taxable events. Finally, when converting back to BTC, there's another taxable event. Recording the USD values at each step creates a clear audit trail that properly separates the crypto transactions from the forex transactions.
Anyone know if the wash sale rule applies to forex trading? I had some losing trades that I closed out in December 2024, then opened similar positions in January 2025. My tax software is flagging them as potential wash sales but I thought forex was exempt?
Forex trades under Section 988 (which is the default for most retail forex traders) are NOT subject to wash sale rules. They're treated as ordinary income/loss rather than capital gains/losses. However, if you elected to use Section 1256 treatment (which most retail traders don't), then different rules would apply. Make sure you're consistent in your treatment though. You can't cherry-pick which trades fall under which section to maximize tax benefits.
Thanks for clearing that up! I've definitely been treating everything as Section 988 since I'm doing short-term day trading, so I should be good. I'll override the flag in my tax software and make a note explaining that these are forex trades under Section 988 and therefore exempt from wash sale rules.
Lucas Parker
Another option is to contact the company you worked for in 2018. Their HR/payroll department should have records of your W-2 from that year. Even if they don't have the full tax return, having your W-2 would show your state withholding amounts, which seems to be what you need to disprove the state's claim. Most companies keep payroll records for 7-10 years (even though they're only required to keep them for 4), so there's a good chance they still have this information. Reaching out to them might be faster than waiting for the IRS.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
ā¢I actually tried this already but unfortunately the company I worked for in 2018 was bought out in 2020 and the new owner purged a lot of the old records. They told me they only kept the "legally required minimum" which apparently didn't include my 2018 W-2. Really frustrating since this would've been the easiest solution!
0 coins
Lucas Parker
ā¢That's definitely frustrating! In that case, your next best option is to request a Wage and Income Transcript from the IRS, which will show all reported W-2 information. This is different from the Tax Return Transcript you tried to access online. You can request this specific transcript using Form 4506-T (check box 8 on the form). Even though the online system only goes back to 2020, the IRS can provide Wage and Income Transcripts going back 10 years when requested via mail or fax using this form. This would show exactly what was reported to them on your W-2, including state withholding information.
0 coins
Donna Cline
Just FYI - I deal with state tax audits for a living, and you should know that the burden of proof is actually on THEM to show you didn't pay taxes, not on you to prove you did. Ask them what evidence they have that you paid $0 in state taxes that year. Also, double-check the statute of limitations in your state. Many states have a 3-year limitation on tax assessments unless they suspect fraud. A 2018 audit in 2025 is outside that window unless they're alleging fraud or non-filing.
0 coins
Harper Collins
ā¢This is not entirely accurate. While the burden of proof does shift in certain circumstances, the general rule is that taxpayers bear the burden of proving their income, deductions, and credits. If the state is claiming you had income but paid no tax, they usually have some evidence of the income (like W-2 reporting) but are claiming you never filed or paid. The statute of limitations point is valid though - worth checking your state's specific rules.
0 coins