IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Mikayla Brown

โ€ข

Does anyone know if there's a dollar limit for meal deductions? Last year I had a few expensive client dinners (around $300-400 each) that were definitely business related, but I'm worried they might look excessive to the IRS.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

โ€ข

There's no specific dollar limit for meal deductions, but they must be "reasonable" and not "lavish or extravagant" according to IRS guidelines. What's considered reasonable depends on the circumstances and your industry. A $300-400 meal might be perfectly reasonable if you're in high-end sales, financial services, or certain consulting fields where that's normal client entertainment. The key is whether the expense is ordinary and necessary for your business. Make sure your documentation clearly shows the business purpose and who attended.

0 coins

Noah Ali

โ€ข

Great discussion here! Just wanted to add one more important point about Schedule C Line 24b meal documentation. Beyond keeping receipts and noting business purpose, I've found it helpful to take photos of the business cards of people I meet with during meals. This creates an easy backup record of who attended and their business connection to you. Also, if you're using a business credit card for meals, make sure the statement description clearly shows it's a restaurant/meal expense. Some merchants code differently than you'd expect, and having clear records helps during tax prep. I learned this the hard way when my accountant questioned a "business meal" that showed up as a generic merchant code on my statement. For anyone still confused about the 50% limitation - you deduct 50% of the actual meal cost on your Schedule C. So if you spent $100 on a qualifying business meal, you can deduct $50 as a business expense.

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I never thought about taking photos of business cards - that's such a simple way to document who you met with. I've been struggling with keeping track of all the details for my meal deductions. Quick question about the 50% rule - when you say "deduct 50% of the actual meal cost," does that include tax and tip? Or just the food portion? I want to make sure I'm calculating this correctly on my Schedule C.

0 coins

Chloe Green

โ€ข

This thread has been such a lifesaver! I'm working part-time at a local gym and was completely freaking out about having $0 federal withholding on my paystubs. Making around $1,600 so far this year, I thought I had messed up my W-4 somehow. Reading through everyone's explanations about the standard deduction really cleared things up for me. It makes perfect sense that if you're earning well below $13,850, the withholding system would calculate zero federal income tax owed. I was overthinking it! What I found particularly helpful was learning the difference between federal income tax and FICA taxes. I was getting confused seeing some deductions but not others on my paystub. Now I understand that Social Security and Medicare taxes (7.65% total) are required from the first dollar earned, while federal income tax only kicks in once you exceed the standard deduction. I'm definitely going to start that spreadsheet tracking method that @Brooklyn Foley mentioned to keep tabs on my total earnings throughout the year. And knowing I might qualify for the Earned Income Credit when I file is actually exciting - who knew being a part-time worker could potentially mean getting money back at tax time! Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences and making this confusing topic so much clearer!

0 coins

Isabella Silva

โ€ข

@Chloe Green, I'm so glad this thread helped clear things up for you too! Your situation with $1,600 in earnings definitely puts you well within the safe zone under the standard deduction, so zero federal withholding is exactly what should be happening. It's really interesting how many of us part-time workers were having the exact same anxiety about this! I think it just goes to show how little tax education we get before entering the workforce. The distinction between federal income tax and FICA taxes was a huge lightbulb moment for me as well. The spreadsheet tracking idea is genius - I've started doing the same thing and it's so helpful to see your running total throughout the year. Plus, it'll make tax filing so much easier when you have everything organized from the start. And yes, the potential for getting money back through the Earned Income Credit is such a nice surprise! It's pretty cool that the tax system actually has provisions to help lower-income workers rather than just taking money away. Thanks for adding your experience to this discussion - it's been amazing to see how this thread has helped so many people understand their tax situations better!

0 coins

This has been such an incredibly helpful thread! I'm also working part-time at a small local business and was getting really anxious about the $0 federal withholding showing up on my paystubs. Making about $1,400 so far this year, I kept thinking I had filled out my W-4 incorrectly or that my employer was making some kind of mistake. Reading through all these explanations about how the withholding system accounts for the standard deduction has been such a relief. It's actually pretty clever that the system automatically calculates that we won't owe federal income tax when our annual earnings stay well below that $13,850 threshold. What really helped me was understanding that this is completely separate from FICA taxes - I was seeing Social Security and Medicare deductions on my paystub and getting confused about why some taxes were being taken out but not others. Now I know that the 7.65% FICA rate applies to every dollar earned regardless of income level, while federal income tax only applies once you exceed the standard deduction. I'm definitely going to implement some of the tracking strategies mentioned here, especially keeping better records of all my paystubs and maybe starting that spreadsheet to monitor my total earnings. And learning about the potential Earned Income Credit has me actually looking forward to filing my first tax return! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community has turned what felt like a scary tax situation into something I actually understand and feel confident about!

0 coins

Tyrone Hill

โ€ข

@Sofรญa Rodrรญguez, this thread has been absolutely amazing for all of us part-time workers! Your earnings of $1,400 definitely put you in that sweet spot where zero federal withholding is completely normal and correct. I love how this discussion has evolved from initial panic about $0 federal withholding to actually understanding that it shows the tax system is working properly for our income levels. It's such a relief to know we're not alone in this confusion! Your point about the FICA vs federal income tax distinction is so important - I think that's where most of the initial confusion comes from. Seeing those Social Security and Medicare deductions while federal shows zero can definitely be alarming until you understand they serve different purposes. The record-keeping tips everyone has shared are gold! I've already started implementing the spreadsheet idea and it's giving me so much peace of mind to track my progress toward that standard deduction threshold throughout the year. It's really incredible how this one thread has transformed so many people's understanding of their tax situation. From anxiety to confidence - exactly what this community should be about! Thanks for sharing your experience and contributing to such a helpful discussion for all us newcomers to the workforce.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

โ€ข

Former environmental attorney turned tax attorney here with 7 years total experience. I made almost the exact switch you're considering 4 years ago, so I can speak directly to your situation. The transition from environmental to tax law was challenging but absolutely doable. Environmental law actually gave me a great foundation - you're already used to complex regulatory frameworks, detailed compliance work, and staying current with evolving federal and state rules. The analytical skills translate well, even though the subject matter is completely different. I did take a New York Tax School course during evenings while still practicing environmental law to build foundational knowledge. Most firms will expect some basic tax education if you're switching fields, but they'll train you on the job for firm-specific work. Regarding work-life balance with kids: I have a 6-year-old and 3-year-old, and tax law has been significantly better than environmental litigation for family time. Environmental cases were completely unpredictable - emergency injunctions, last-minute regulatory deadlines, discovery disputes that would blow up weekends without warning. Tax work, even during busy season, is more plannable. I can tell my spouse in January "I'll be working late through April 15th" rather than constantly canceling dinner plans because of some regulatory emergency. The salary progression has been solid - started at $95k switching fields, now at $140k after 4 years in tax. Not the $250k figure you mentioned, but with the predictable schedule, I can actually enjoy spending that money on family activities rather than just surviving until the next crisis ends. One piece of advice: if you do make the switch, be prepared for the first year to be intellectually humbling. Tax law has its own language and logic that takes time to internalize. But if you survived environmental law's complexity, you can definitely master tax.

0 coins

Natasha Romanova

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful coming from someone who made the exact transition I'm considering! The comparison between environmental litigation's unpredictability and tax law's plannable busy seasons really puts things in perspective. Being able to tell my family "I'll be working late through April 15th" instead of constantly having weekend plans derailed by regulatory emergencies sounds like a huge improvement. I'm particularly interested in your mention of the New York Tax School course. Did you find that was sufficient preparation, or would you recommend any other specific coursework or certifications before making the switch? I want to make sure I'm as prepared as possible, especially since I'll likely be competing with candidates who have more direct tax experience. The salary progression you described ($95k to $140k over 4 years) seems very reasonable, especially considering the lifestyle benefits. And your point about being "intellectually humbling" the first year is good to hear - I'd rather go in expecting that learning curve than be caught off guard. One more question: when you were job searching for tax positions coming from environmental law, how did you frame that transition to potential employers? Did you focus on the transferable regulatory skills, or did you find other aspects of your background that resonated with tax firms?

0 coins

AstroAce

โ€ข

Current tax attorney with 9 years experience here, and I wanted to address something that might be particularly relevant given your situation with two young kids - the seasonal nature of tax work can actually be a hidden advantage for family life if you plan around it strategically. Yes, January through April is intense (I typically work 60-65 hours those months), but here's what I've learned: those predictable crunch periods allow you to be MORE present during the rest of the year, not less. I coach my daughter's soccer team from May through October because I know my schedule is reliable then. I take real vacations in summer without checking emails constantly because there genuinely aren't urgent deadlines. Compare this to my friends in other practice areas who might randomly get pulled into a deal or litigation that destroys their summer vacation plans with 48 hours notice. The seasonality that seems like a downside is actually what creates the predictability everyone talks about. Regarding that $250k salary expectation - it's achievable but usually requires either Big Law tax (with corresponding lifestyle sacrifices) or 10+ years building a solid client base. More realistic targets for good work-life balance are $120-180k depending on market and experience level. One practical tip: if you do make the switch, negotiate your start date to begin right after busy season (May/June) so you have months to learn before jumping into the fire. Most firms are happy to do this since they're usually exhausted and not actively hiring during busy season anyway.

0 coins

Ella Knight

โ€ข

This seasonal perspective is brilliant and something I hadn't considered! You're absolutely right that the predictability could actually be an advantage - being able to commit to coaching soccer or plan real vacations because you KNOW when you'll be available versus constantly being on edge about unexpected emergencies sounds amazing. The timing advice about starting after busy season is really smart too. I'm currently feeling burned out in environmental law partly because I'm always playing catch-up and never feel like I have solid footing. Starting in May/June would give me months to build foundational knowledge before the intensity hits. Your realistic salary range ($120-180k) is much more helpful than the inflated numbers I keep seeing online. Honestly, even at the lower end of that range, if I'm getting predictable schedules and actual work-life balance, it would be a significant quality of life improvement over my current situation where I'm making more money but never feel like I can truly disconnect. One question about the seasonal planning: do you find that your family has adapted well to this rhythm? I'm wondering if my kids (currently 4 and 7) would actually prefer knowing "dad will be really busy these specific months but completely present the rest of the year" versus the current unpredictable situation where I might miss events randomly throughout the year.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

โ€ข

Has anyone considered that Toyota might accept alternative documentation? When I worked with Nissan, they initially asked for a Form 6166, but when I explained the delay in getting one, they accepted a combination of: - Copy of my Social Security card - Passport copy - Notarized statement of US residency - Copy of most recent tax return (which in your brother's case might be the parents' return showing him as dependent) It's worth asking Toyota's contracting department if they have any alternative documentation options while the actual 6166 is being processed.

0 coins

Giovanni Rossi

โ€ข

This isn't likely to work for Toyota specifically. Japanese companies are extremely strict about tax documentation because of their own tax authority requirements. I work with several Japanese clients and they never make exceptions on tax residency certificates - it's a hard requirement driven by their own compliance needs.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

โ€ข

That's good information about Japanese companies - maybe my experience with Nissan was unusual or things have changed. In that case, focusing on getting the Form 6166 as quickly as possible through expedited processing is probably the best approach. One additional thought - sometimes these companies have relationships with tax service providers who can help facilitate the process. It might be worth asking Toyota if they have any recommended resources for contractors in this situation.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

โ€ข

I've been through this exact scenario with my nephew last year when he got his first job after college. The key thing to understand is that being claimed as a dependent doesn't disqualify you from getting a Form 6166 - it just changes how you fill out Form 8802. When your brother completes Part II of Form 8802, he should select the box indicating he hasn't filed a U.S. tax return and then clearly explain in the attached statement that he was claimed as a dependent on your parents' returns. Include the tax years and your parents' names/SSNs where he was listed. One thing I'd add to the other advice here - make sure he includes his Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) or Social Security Number consistently throughout all documentation. The IRS is very particular about matching identifiers. Also, given Toyota's timeline pressures, I'd strongly recommend paying for expedited processing upfront. It's worth the extra cost to avoid losing the contract opportunity. Japanese companies like Toyota are notoriously inflexible on documentation requirements, so having that Form 6166 in hand is really the only path forward.

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

โ€ข

Has anyone successfully requested a "retroactive" corrective distribution in the year after the overcontribution? I'm in almost the identical situation (overcontributed about $600) and wondering if I have options in the new year if my employer won't help now.

0 coins

Freya Collins

โ€ข

Yes! I did this last year. The key is to request it before April 15th of the year following the overcontribution. Even though my employer initially refused, I sent a formal letter citing IRS Publication 525 which states the correction can be made up until the tax filing deadline. Worked like a charm - they processed it in February after refusing in December.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

โ€ข

I went through this exact same situation last year - overcontributed by about $700 across two employers and hit the same wall with HR being unhelpful. Here's what I learned after sorting it all out: You're correct about the double taxation, but there are a couple of key details to get right. You'll need to file Form 5329 to report the excess contribution and pay the 6% excise tax. However, you can avoid the recurring 6% penalty in future years by reducing your 2025 contributions by the excess amount ($550). This essentially "applies" your 2024 excess to your 2025 limit. One thing I wish I had known earlier - if your current employer's plan administrator is different from HR, try contacting them directly with a formal written request. Sometimes the plan administrators are more knowledgeable about corrective distributions than the HR department. Include specific references to IRS regulations (like Revenue Procedure 2019-19) in your request. Also, double-check that you're actually over the limit when combining both employers. The 2024 limit was $23,000, and if there were any employer matching contributions, those don't count toward your personal contribution limit. If all else fails and you do end up paying the penalty, make sure to keep detailed records of the excess amount and the taxes paid. You'll need this documentation when you eventually withdraw those funds in retirement to avoid being double-taxed on the entire amount.

0 coins

Emma Garcia

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I hadn't thought about contacting the plan administrator directly - that's a great suggestion. I've been dealing exclusively with HR who clearly don't understand the regulations around corrective distributions. One quick clarification - when you mention reducing 2025 contributions by $550 to avoid the recurring penalty, do I need to document this anywhere specific on my tax forms? Or does the IRS automatically recognize the reduced contribution as correction for the prior year excess? I want to make sure I don't accidentally trigger penalties by not properly documenting the correction. Also, you mentioned Revenue Procedure 2019-19 - is that the main regulation I should cite when making a formal request to the plan administrator?

0 coins

Prev1...383384385386387...5643Next