IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been following this thread closely as someone who went through a similar US-Germany tax transition in 2022, and there's one important aspect I haven't seen mentioned yet: the potential impact of state tax treaty benefits. While the federal US-Germany tax treaty is comprehensive, some US states don't automatically honor federal treaty provisions. Since your rental property is in California, you'll definitely need to file a California non-resident return (Form 540NR), and California has its own rules about recognizing foreign tax credits. California generally doesn't provide the same treaty benefits that federal taxes do, so you might end up with some level of triple taxation (US federal, California state, and German) on your rental income that can't be fully eliminated through credits. The good news is that California's tax rates are typically lower than German rates, so your German foreign tax credits on your federal return should still provide substantial relief. Also, make sure you understand the difference between the Foreign Tax Credit and Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. For your rental income, you'll want the Foreign Tax Credit since rental income doesn't qualify for the exclusion. But for future German employment income, the exclusion might be more beneficial depending on your situation. One practical tip: consider keeping separate bank accounts for your rental property income and expenses. This makes record-keeping much easier when you're dealing with currency conversions and different tax year reporting requirements between the countries. The learning curve is steep initially, but once you establish good systems and find the right professionals, it becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

This is such valuable insight about California's state tax complications! I hadn't even considered that California might not honor federal treaty provisions - that's a really important distinction that could significantly impact my overall tax liability. The potential for triple taxation on my rental income is concerning, but your explanation about German rates typically being higher than California rates gives me some comfort that the foreign tax credits should still provide meaningful relief. I'll definitely need to run the numbers carefully to understand the full impact. Your point about the Foreign Tax Credit vs Foreign Earned Income Exclusion is well taken. For my current rental income situation, the FTC makes sense, but it's good to know about the exclusion option for future German employment income. I'll need to evaluate which approach is more beneficial as my income sources change. The separate bank account suggestion is brilliant! I've been mixing my rental income with other funds, which is making the currency conversion tracking much more complicated than it needs to be. Setting up a dedicated account for the rental property will make record-keeping so much cleaner for both tax systems. Thanks for sharing your experience with this transition. It's reassuring to hear from someone who successfully navigated these complexities. The initial learning curve feels overwhelming, but knowing it becomes more manageable with proper systems gives me confidence to push through this first challenging year.

0 coins

I went through a very similar situation when I moved from the US to Germany in 2020, and I can definitely relate to the sticker shock of those professional fees! Here are a few practical steps that helped me navigate this without breaking the bank: First, take advantage of the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service - they have specialists who can help explain treaty provisions over the phone for free. I found them incredibly helpful for understanding how Article 23 of the US-Germany treaty applies to specific situations like ours. For the German side, look into local Lohnsteuerhilfeverein offices - these are non-profit tax assistance organizations that charge much lower fees (typically €200-400) compared to private Steuerberater. Many have staff who understand basic US-Germany tax coordination. One thing that saved me significant time and stress: I created a simple spreadsheet tracking all my income sources, tax payments, and relevant dates in both USD and EUR. This made it much easier to complete forms like 1116 for foreign tax credits and helped me catch potential issues early. Also, don't forget to check if your employer offers any expat tax assistance as part of your benefits package. Some German companies provide this support for international employees, even if it's not explicitly advertised. The €4000 quote you received is definitely on the high end. With some preparation and the right resources, you should be able to handle this for well under €1500 total. The first year is always the most challenging, but it gets much easier once you understand the process!

0 coins

This is incredibly practical advice, thank you! I had no idea the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service could help with treaty provisions - that's exactly the kind of free resource I need to understand the specifics of Article 23 before paying for professional help. The Lohnsteuerhilfeverein suggestion is brilliant! I've been focused on finding expensive Steuerberater when these non-profit tax assistance organizations might be perfectly adequate for my relatively straightforward situation. €200-400 is so much more reasonable than the quotes I've been getting. Your spreadsheet idea makes perfect sense. Right now I have documents scattered across different folders and it's making everything more confusing than it needs to be. Having everything tracked in both currencies with relevant dates will definitely streamline the form completion process and help me spot any issues before they become problems. I hadn't thought to check with my German employer about expat tax assistance - that's a great tip that could potentially save me significant money if they offer this benefit. I'll reach out to HR to see what support might be available. It's so encouraging to hear that you successfully navigated this for under €1500 total. The €4000 quotes were making me consider just paying whatever it takes, but your experience shows there are much more affordable options available with a bit of research and preparation. Thanks for sharing such actionable advice!

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

I went through identity verification in January 2024 and can share my exact timeline to help ease your anxiety! Here's what happened: Jan 8: Received 5071C letter Jan 10: Called verification line (got through after 2 hours of redials) Jan 10: Completed phone verification (took about 20 minutes once connected) Jan 24: Transcript updated with refund date Jan 29: Refund deposited So 14 days from verification to transcript update, 19 days total to money in account. The verification itself was straightforward - they asked for my SSN, filing status, refund amount, and a few line items from my return. Since you mentioned urgent medical expenses, definitely emphasize this when you call. The IRS has expedited processing for financial hardship cases. Also, call first thing in the morning (7-8 AM) for shorter wait times. One thing that helped my peace of mind was checking my online account transcript every few days after verification. You'll see the 570 "additional account action pending" code clear, then 971 "notice issued" will appear, followed by 846 "refund issued" with your actual deposit date. The waiting is the hardest part, but most people get their refunds within 2-3 weeks of verification. You've got this!

0 coins

LongPeri

•

Thank you so much for sharing your detailed timeline! This is exactly what I needed to hear. I'm feeling much more optimistic now knowing that 2-3 weeks is realistic. Your tip about calling early morning is great - I was planning to call at 8 AM sharp tomorrow. I'll definitely mention the medical expenses when I speak with them. It's reassuring to know that others have gone through this successfully and that the verification process itself isn't as scary as I imagined. I really appreciate everyone in this community sharing their experiences!

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

I went through identity verification just last month and wanted to share my experience to help calm your nerves! Here's my timeline: Dec 15: Filed return electronically Dec 28: Received 5071C letter in mail Jan 2: Called verification number (took 3 attempts to get through - kept getting busy signal) Jan 2: Completed phone verification in about 25 minutes once connected Jan 18: Checked transcript and saw code 846 with refund date Jan 22: Direct deposit hit my account So exactly 16 days from verification to transcript update, and 20 days total to getting my money. The agent was actually very helpful and walked me through each step. A couple things that made the process smoother for me: - I had my prior year AGI written down (they always ask for this) - Made sure to call from the phone number that matched what was on my tax return - Had my ID, Social Security card, and tax return spread out in front of me Since you mentioned urgent medical expenses, definitely lead with that when you call. I've heard they can flag accounts for expedited processing in hardship situations. The verification process itself really isn't as intimidating as it sounds - they're just confirming basic info from your return and ID. You'll get through this and have your refund soon!

0 coins

This is such helpful information! I'm in a very similar situation - just received my 5071C letter yesterday and I'm really nervous about the whole process. Your detailed timeline gives me so much hope that this won't drag on forever. I especially appreciate the tip about having everything laid out before calling - I would have definitely been scrambling to find documents while on the phone. Did the agent give you any indication during the call that your verification was successful, or did you just have to wait and check your transcript later? I'm worried I won't know if I did something wrong until weeks later.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Has anyone used the "regular method" vs "simplified method" for calculating the home deduction for childcare? I'm watching 2 kids in my apartment and trying to figure out which one would give me a better deduction.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

I've done both. The regular method usually gives a bigger deduction but requires more record keeping. You have to track all home expenses (mortgage/rent, utilities, insurance, repairs, etc.) and calculate the percentage used for business based on square footage and time used. The simplified method is just $5 per square foot up to 300 sq ft. Much easier but usually results in a smaller deduction, especially if you live in a high-cost area. For childcare specifically, the regular method tends to be better because you can deduct based on time-space percentage.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

One thing to keep in mind is that you'll want to separate business and personal expenses very clearly. Since your wife is providing childcare in your family home, the IRS can be particular about what constitutes a legitimate business expense versus personal family expenses. For meals and snacks, you can only deduct the portions provided to the childcare child - not what your own kids eat during the same time. I recommend keeping a simple log of what you buy specifically for the childcare child versus family groceries. Also, don't forget that if your wife earns over $400 in self-employment income, she'll need to make quarterly estimated tax payments starting next year to avoid penalties. Since this is her first year, she won't owe penalties for 2024, but she should start planning for quarterly payments in 2025 if she continues providing childcare. The good news is that even though she has to pay self-employment tax (about 15.3% on the net profit), she's also earning Social Security and Medicare credits that will benefit her later in retirement. Many people don't realize that stay-at-home parents can build up their own Social Security benefits this way.

0 coins

Has anyone considered Section 179 deduction for some of the more expensive components? I found that for some of the higher-end networking equipment I keep on hand (like $500+ items), my accountant suggested using Section 179 instead of supplies or CoG since they have a longer useful life.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

Section 179 is definitely worth considering for more expensive items, but you need to be careful about the "placed in service" requirement. Items must actually be used in your business during the tax year to qualify for Section 179, not just sitting on a shelf as backup inventory.

0 coins

This has been such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my small tech consulting business. Based on all the discussion here, it seems like the key is whether your business is primarily service-based (which it sounds like yours is) and whether the parts are incidental to your services rather than merchandise for sale. From what I've gathered, since you're an MSP providing services and the components are a small percentage of revenue (5%) and often not separately billed, treating them as supplies expense on line 22 of Schedule C seems appropriate. The fact that you're under the gross receipts threshold mentioned earlier also helps with simplified accounting methods. One thing I'd add is to make sure you document your reasoning - keep records showing the percentage of revenue from parts vs services, and note when parts are included in service fees vs separately billed. This will help if you're ever questioned about your classification choice.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

Thanks for the great summary! You've really captured the key points from this discussion. I'm new to this community but dealing with the exact same issue with my small IT business. One question - when you mention documenting the reasoning, do you think it's worth creating a formal policy document for my business files, or is it enough to just keep good records in my accounting software showing the revenue percentages and billing practices?

0 coins

Great discussion here! Just wanted to add one more consideration that might be relevant to your situation. Since you mentioned you're in the 32-35% tax bracket, you should also think about whether you expect to be in a higher or lower tax bracket in retirement. The whole point of a Roth conversion is that you pay taxes now at your current rate to avoid paying taxes later at whatever rate applies when you withdraw. If you think tax rates might be higher in the future (either because of policy changes or because you'll have more retirement income than expected), then paying the 32-35% now could still make sense even without the capital loss offset. Also, don't forget about Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs). Traditional 401ks force you to start taking distributions at age 73, but Roth accounts don't have RMDs during your lifetime. This can be a huge advantage for estate planning if you don't need the money right away in retirement. Given your capital losses, this might indeed be the perfect storm of circumstances to do at least a partial conversion. Just make sure to run the numbers on how the conversion affects your overall tax picture for the year!

0 coins

This is such a helpful perspective on the long-term implications! I hadn't really thought deeply about the RMD aspect, but you're absolutely right that Roth accounts don't have those requirements. Given that I'm still relatively young and hopefully have decades until retirement, avoiding forced distributions could be a huge benefit. Your point about future tax rates is really interesting too. With all the government spending and debt levels, there's definitely a case to be made that tax rates might be higher in 30-40 years when I'm ready to retire. Paying 32-35% now might look like a bargain compared to what rates could be then. I think between the capital losses, the RMD avoidance, and the potential for higher future tax rates, this really might be the perfect time to at least do a partial conversion. Thanks for adding this long-term perspective - it's helping me see the bigger picture beyond just this year's tax situation!

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

Just wanted to share my experience from a similar situation last year. I had about $40k in a traditional 401k and roughly $50k in capital losses from some tech stock disasters (painful lesson learned!). After reading through all these excellent comments, I ended up doing a partial conversion strategy over two years. Year one, I converted $20k and used $3k of my capital losses against ordinary income. Year two, I'm planning to convert the remaining $20k and again use another $3k of losses. What I didn't expect was how much the tax software struggled with this scenario. I ended up having to manually override several calculations because the software wasn't properly accounting for the interaction between the conversion income and capital loss carryforwards. If you go this route, definitely consider getting professional tax help or using one of the specialized tools mentioned here. One other tip - I found it helpful to do the conversion early in the year (I did mine in February) so I had flexibility to adjust my tax withholdings throughout the year. Doing it late in the year can create estimated tax payment headaches. The peace of mind of having that money in Roth and not worrying about future RMDs has been worth the temporary tax hit. Good luck with your decision!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful to hear from someone who actually went through a similar situation! The timing advice about doing the conversion early in the year is something I hadn't considered - that flexibility to adjust withholdings throughout the year sounds really valuable. Your point about tax software struggling with this scenario is concerning but good to know ahead of time. I was planning to just use TurboTax like usual, but it sounds like this might be complex enough to warrant either professional help or one of those specialized tools that were mentioned earlier in the thread. The two-year approach makes so much sense too. Instead of taking a massive tax hit all at once, spreading it out lets you optimize the capital loss usage and probably keeps you from jumping into higher tax brackets. Did you find that the second year conversion was easier to handle from a cash flow perspective since you knew what to expect? Thanks for sharing the real-world experience - it's exactly what I needed to hear to feel more confident about moving forward with this strategy!

0 coins

Prev1...385386387388389...5643Next