IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Philip Cowan

•

I dealt with this exact situation last year with my HSA through Bank of America. The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed spreadsheet tracking my contributions by date and the corresponding investment performance for each batch. What I did was go back through my HSA statements and identify exactly when I made the excess contribution (let's say it was my last $500 contribution in November). Then I tracked how my investments performed from that date forward until I discovered the issue. The pro-rata method others mentioned is correct, but I found it helpful to also document everything step-by-step in case the IRS ever questions it. I kept screenshots of my account balances, contribution dates, and the final calculation. One tip: when you call your HSA provider, specifically use the phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" - this is the exact terminology they need to hear to process it correctly for tax reporting purposes. Don't let them just process it as a regular distribution or you'll get hit with taxes and penalties you shouldn't owe. The whole process took about 3 weeks from calculation to getting the money back, but it was worth doing it right to avoid tax headaches later.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and hadn't thought about creating a detailed spreadsheet to track everything. The tip about using the specific phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" is gold - I bet that's why I keep getting transferred around when I call my provider. Quick question - did you have to provide Bank of America with your own calculations or did they do the pro-rata calculation themselves once you used the right terminology? I'm worried about getting the math wrong and then having issues down the road.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

Bank of America actually did the calculation themselves once I used that specific phrase! I provided my own calculations as backup documentation, but their HSA specialist walked through the pro-rata method with me on the phone to verify we got the same numbers. The key was getting to someone who actually understood HSA excess contribution rules. The first two reps I talked to had no clue what I was asking for, but once I got transferred to their HSA department and used that exact terminology, the specialist knew immediately what needed to be done. I'd still recommend doing your own calculation first so you can double-check their math, but having them do the official calculation gives you more confidence that it's being processed correctly for tax purposes. Plus they handle all the proper reporting codes automatically.

0 coins

I just went through this nightmare with my HSA provider a few months ago! The key is to be very persistent and document everything. Here's what worked for me: First, calculate the pro-rata earnings yourself using the method Paolo described above - it's actually not that complicated once you understand it. Write down your calculation with dates and amounts. Then when you call your HSA provider, don't accept "we can't help you" as an answer. Ask to speak to a supervisor or HSA specialist. I had to call three times before getting someone who actually knew how to process excess contribution returns properly. Most importantly, get everything in writing! Ask them to email you confirmation of the withdrawal amount and that it's being coded as a "return of excess contributions" rather than a regular distribution. This is crucial for tax reporting. One thing to watch out for - some providers will try to just process a regular withdrawal and tell you to "sort it out with taxes later." Don't accept this! It needs to be coded correctly from the start or you'll have major headaches come tax time. The whole process is frustrating but totally doable if you stay organized and persistent. Good luck!

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed advice I needed! I'm dealing with this situation right now and my HSA provider keeps giving me the runaround. The tip about getting everything in writing is especially important - I made the mistake of just accepting a verbal confirmation on my first attempt and then had to start all over again when nothing was processed correctly. One question - when you say "return of excess contributions" needs to be the specific coding, does that show up differently on your tax forms? I want to make sure I understand what to look for when I get my 1099 next year to verify they did it right. Also, did you end up having to file any additional forms with the IRS beyond your regular tax return, or does the proper coding from the HSA provider handle all the reporting automatically?

0 coins

Complex Tax Questions on PTP K-1s - Handling Sales, Repurchases, and UBTI Implications

I've been investing in several publicly traded partnerships (PTPs) and have received K-1s for them over the past few years. I'm trying to better understand how certain scenarios affect the reporting on these K-1s, particularly around the ordinary income on line 1 and unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) on line 20V. I have three specific scenarios I'm trying to figure out: 1. If I sell some or all shares of a PTP and don't repurchase within the same tax year, how does that impact the reporting on line 1 and line 20V for the final K-1 I receive? 2. What happens if I sell shares of a PTP but then rebuy within the same tax year? Does this affect the line 1 ordinary income and line 20V UBTI amounts differently than a complete exit? 3. How is the tax treatment handled if the PTP owner dies? Does it matter whether the PTPs are held in a taxable account versus an IRA? From my research and experience, I've noticed that when no trades are made to PTP holdings during a year, the ordinary income (K-1 line 1) and UBTI (K-1 line 20V) seem directly related to the capital account. On a per-share basis, both UBTI and income appear lower when the capital account is higher (or less negative). I've heard conflicting information about this, so I'd appreciate clarification. For context, I receive 1065 K-1s but have never been on the issuing side. Any insights on one or all of these questions would be tremendously helpful!

One often overlooked issue with PTPs is how suspended losses affect your situation when selling. If you've received K-1s with losses that were suspended due to passive activity or at-risk rules, those suspended losses become deductible when you completely dispose of your interest. But for your scenario #2 (sell and rebuy), you technically haven't fully disposed of your interest for tax purposes if you rebuy within the same year. This means those suspended losses remain suspended despite the sale transaction. For the UBTI reporting on line 20V, death transfers can be especially confusing. Technically, the UBTI character passes through to the heir, but the step-up in basis can reduce future UBTI by giving you a higher basis to offset against UBTI income.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

I thought suspended losses were released when you sell regardless of whether you rebuy later. Like each transaction stands on its own? My accountant told me this was one advantage of partnership interests over S-Corps.

0 coins

You're partially right, but it depends on the specific type of suspended losses. For passive activity losses, you generally do get to deduct them when you completely dispose of your entire interest in the activity. However, if you sell and then rebuy the same partnership within the same tax year, the IRS might view this as not being a complete disposition, especially if it appears to be part of a planned series of transactions. At-risk limitations work differently - those suspended losses are released when you dispose of your interest, but they're calculated based on your at-risk amount at the time of disposition. The timing of a rebuy within the same year could affect this calculation. Your accountant is right that partnership interests generally have more favorable suspended loss rules compared to S-Corp stock, but the sell/rebuy scenario creates some gray areas that aren't always clear-cut. The key is whether the IRS views your transactions as a genuine disposition or just a temporary restructuring of the same economic interest.

0 coins

Axel Far

•

The relationship between capital accounts and UBTI/income allocation you mentioned is spot-on, and there's actually a specific reason for this. Partnerships are required to allocate items in accordance with partners' interests in the partnership, which is primarily determined by capital account balances under Section 704(b) regulations. When your capital account becomes more negative (through distributions exceeding your basis), your economic interest in future partnership income decreases proportionally. This is why you see lower per-unit income and UBTI when capital accounts are more negative - you're essentially getting a smaller slice of the same pie. For your death scenario question, there's an important distinction many people miss: while the step-up in basis applies to the fair market value of the PTP units, it doesn't directly reset your capital account with the partnership. The partnership maintains its own records of your capital account, which continues to reflect the cumulative income, losses, and distributions. However, for tax purposes, your new stepped-up basis can significantly reduce or eliminate the taxable gain when the inherited PTPs are eventually sold. One practical tip: if you're actively trading PTPs, keep detailed records of your holding periods and corresponding K-1 amounts. The partnerships' quarterly ownership snapshots mean your K-1 might not perfectly match your actual trading activity, and you'll need to be able to support any adjustments on your return.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

This is really helpful context about the Section 704(b) regulations and how capital accounts drive the allocation mechanics. I'm curious though - when you mention that the step-up in basis doesn't reset the partnership's capital account records, does this create ongoing complications for heirs? For example, if someone inherits PTP units with a large negative capital account but gets stepped-up basis, would they still be subject to the same proportionally lower income/UBTI allocations going forward? Or does the partnership eventually adjust their capital account tracking to reflect the new economic reality after the step-up? I'm trying to understand if there's a disconnect between what the partnership shows on future K-1s versus the heir's actual tax basis for calculating gains/losses on eventual sale.

0 coins

Laila Fury

•

This has been such a comprehensive discussion! I'm really glad I found this community - as someone who's been doing taxes for years, I still learned some new things from reading everyone's experiences. I wanted to add one more tip that saved me recently: if you use mobile check deposit frequently, you can actually see your routing number displayed when you're depositing a check through your bank's app. Most apps show both the routing number from the check you're depositing AND your account's routing number for comparison. This gave me an easy way to double-check that I was using the right ACH routing number without having to dig through websites or call customer service. Also, for anyone who banks with multiple institutions, I keep a simple note in my phone with each bank's ACH routing number clearly labeled. Takes 5 minutes to set up but saves so much time and confusion during tax season. Just make sure to store it securely as others mentioned! The level of detail and real-world experience shared in this thread is amazing. It's clear this community really looks out for each other, especially during stressful times like tax season. Thanks everyone for making tax prep a little less intimidating!

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

This is such a great tip about using the mobile check deposit feature to verify routing numbers! I never would have thought of that but it's brilliant - you can literally see both routing numbers side by side for comparison. That's way easier than trying to navigate through bank websites or wait on hold with customer service. Your idea about keeping a secure note with all your banks' ACH routing numbers is really smart too, especially for people who have accounts at multiple institutions. I can see how that would be a huge time-saver during tax season when you're already dealing with so much paperwork and stress. I'm honestly blown away by how helpful everyone has been in this thread. When I first posted my question about which Chase routing number to use, I was expecting maybe one or two basic responses. Instead, I got this incredible wealth of knowledge from people with banking experience, tax professionals, and fellow community members who've been through the same confusion. This community really does look out for each other - it's made tax season so much less stressful knowing there are people here willing to share their expertise and experiences!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I just went through this same situation last week with my Navy Federal account. For anyone using Navy Federal or other military banks, they actually have a dedicated section on their website specifically for tax refund direct deposits that lists the correct ACH routing number. One thing I wanted to add that I learned the hard way - if you're military and have recently moved between states or overseas, make sure your address is updated with the IRS before filing. I had my routing and account numbers correct, but my refund got delayed because my address in the IRS system didn't match my current duty station. The IRS couldn't verify my identity for the direct deposit and had to mail a paper check to my old address. Also, for anyone who's filed jointly with a spouse, both names need to be on the bank account for direct deposit to work. We found this out when our refund got rejected because the account was only in my name but we filed jointly. Had to add my spouse to the account and then call the IRS to update the banking information. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this community has saved me so much stress during tax season!

0 coins

This is such valuable information about military banking and joint filing issues! I had no idea that both spouses need to be on the bank account for joint filing direct deposits - that seems like something that should be more widely known. Your experience with the address mismatch is really important too, especially for military families who move frequently. The tip about Navy Federal having a dedicated tax refund section on their website is great. It sounds like military-focused banks might actually be better at making this information clear and accessible compared to some civilian banks. I wonder if other military banks like USAA have similar dedicated sections? Your point about keeping addresses updated with the IRS is something I bet a lot of people overlook, not just military members. It's probably worth checking that your address matches across all your tax documents before filing, regardless of whether you've moved recently or not. Thanks for sharing these specific scenarios - they're exactly the kind of real-world complications that can trip people up during tax season. This thread really has become a comprehensive guide to avoiding direct deposit issues!

0 coins

This is such a common mistake - you're definitely not alone! I made the exact same error during my first year on F1 status. Filed with regular 1040 when I should have used 1040NR. The good news is that the IRS generally doesn't penalize voluntary corrections for residency status errors, especially since these rules are genuinely confusing for international students. You absolutely should file an amended return though - don't wait and hope they won't notice. A few things to keep in mind: - You'll need Form 1040X to amend, plus the correct 1040NR - Check if your home country has a tax treaty with the US - you might actually be entitled to benefits that could reduce your tax liability - As a nonresident, some credits you may have claimed (like education credits) might not be available, but treaty benefits could offset this - The process typically takes 8-12 weeks to resolve I ended up owing about $150 more after my amendment, but it was much better than the stress of wondering if the IRS would catch it later. The key is being proactive about fixing it yourself rather than waiting for them to find the error. If you need help navigating the forms, consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in international student taxes - it's worth the peace of mind to get it done correctly!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been losing sleep over this for weeks thinking I was going to get in huge trouble with the IRS. The fact that so many people have gone through this same situation and it worked out fine is really reassuring. I'm definitely going to file the amendment ASAP. The 8-12 week timeline you mentioned is helpful to know - I was worried this might drag on forever. And you're right about being proactive rather than waiting for them to catch it. One follow-up question - when you say you owed $150 more, was that because you had to give back credits you weren't eligible for as a nonresident? I'm trying to figure out if I should expect to owe money or if there's a chance I might actually get more back with treaty benefits. I'm from Canada if that makes a difference. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience - it really helps to know I'm not the first person to make this mistake!

0 coins

Sasha Reese

•

I'm going through this exact same situation right now and it's so reassuring to read everyone's experiences! I filed as a resident on my F1 visa when I've only been in the US for 14 months, so I definitely should have used 1040NR. Reading through all these responses, it sounds like the key points are: 1. File the amendment voluntarily before the IRS catches it (no penalties for proactive corrections) 2. Use Form 1040X along with the correct 1040NR 3. Check for tax treaty benefits that might actually work in your favor 4. Include a clear explanation letter with the amendment 5. Send it certified mail for proof of delivery The timeline of 8-12 weeks that several people mentioned is really helpful to know. I was dreading this process thinking it would be a nightmare, but it sounds much more manageable than I feared. For those asking about specific countries - I'd definitely recommend looking up your home country's tax treaty with the US. I'm from Germany and just discovered we have some provisions for students that I had no idea about. The treaty benefits might offset having to give back credits that nonresidents can't claim. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these confusing tax situations!

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same situation! Filed my Michigan state return in early April and I'm currently at 7 weeks stuck in review with absolutely no communication from them. Like so many others here, my federal refund came through in under 3 weeks with no problems, but Michigan just shows that same frustrating "under review" message every time I check. What's really getting to me is the complete lack of transparency - no explanation of what's being reviewed, no timeline estimates, nothing. I've been religiously checking my mail thinking I might have missed a notice, but there's been total silence from Michigan Treasury. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been both eye-opening and honestly pretty depressing. It's clear that 8-12+ weeks has unfortunately become the "new normal" this year, which is completely unacceptable. We shouldn't have to wait months for our own money while they provide zero accountability! I'm definitely going to try the secure messaging through Michigan Treasury Online that so many people have recommended since the phone system sounds like a complete waste of time. It's ridiculous that we have to become detective-researchers just to figure out how to get our own refunds from the state. Thanks Emma for starting this thread - it's both comforting and infuriating to see how many of us are dealing with Michigan's broken system. At least we know we're not alone in this mess, even though none of us should have to endure it. Hoping we all get our money soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

I'm going through the exact same thing! Filed my Michigan state return in late April and I'm currently at 5 weeks in review status with zero explanation. Like everyone else here, my federal refund came through quickly but Michigan just keeps showing that generic "under review" message. What's really frustrating is the complete lack of communication - no letter, no timeline, nothing. I've been checking my mail constantly but haven't received anything requesting additional documentation. After reading through all these experiences, it seems like 8-12+ weeks has become the unfortunate norm this year, which is absolutely ridiculous. We shouldn't have to wait months for our own money! I'm definitely going to try the secure messaging through Michigan Treasury Online that so many people have mentioned since calling seems pointless. It's crazy that we have to crowdsource solutions just to get our own refunds. Thanks for posting this Emma - it's both reassuring and maddening to see how many of us are stuck in Michigan's broken system. Hopefully we all get our money soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Prev1...386387388389390...5644Next