IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sophia Long

•

if ur using a mac try safari. chrome keeps blocking it for me but safari works fine

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

Had this exact same issue last month! The problem is usually with the IRS site's PDF viewer compatibility. Here's what finally worked for me: 1) Disable any ad blockers temporarily 2) Make sure JavaScript is enabled 3) Try accessing during off-peak hours (early morning works best) 4) If all else fails, you can request transcripts by mail using Form 4506-T - takes 5-10 business days but it's a guaranteed backup option. The mail route saved my mortgage application when the website kept failing me!

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

I'm going through the same thing right now! Completed my ID.me verification on February 28th, so I'm about 8 days in. This thread has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea about checking the transcript for the TC 971 code. I just logged in and sure enough, I can see it there with Action Code 111, which gives me so much peace of mind knowing the verification actually went through. The WMR tool has been completely useless, just showing "still processing" with no updates. Based on everyone's timelines here, it sounds like I'm right on track and should hopefully see something in the next 1-2 weeks. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it really helps to know I'm not alone in this waiting game!

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

You're definitely in good company! I'm actually a few days behind you - just completed my verification on March 3rd, so I'm only about 4 days in. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a relief because the IRS website doesn't really give you much to go on. I had never heard of checking the transcript for those codes either until I saw it mentioned multiple times in this thread. Just checked mine and I can see the TC 971 with Action Code 111 too, which is reassuring! It's crazy how much more informative the transcript is compared to the WMR tool. Sounds like we're all in that typical 2-4 week window based on what everyone else has shared. Fingers crossed we all see some movement soon!

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

I just completed my ID.me verification yesterday (March 6th), so I'm really early in the process but this thread has been incredibly informative! It's reassuring to see so many recent success stories with people getting their refunds within 3-4 weeks. I had no idea about checking the transcript for the TC 971 code - I just logged in and can see it's there with Action Code 111, which gives me confidence that the verification actually worked. The WMR tool is showing the usual "still processing" message, but based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like that's pretty normal and the transcript is much more reliable. I'm trying to stay patient since I'm literally day 1, but it's so helpful to have realistic expectations from people who've actually been through this recently. Thanks to everyone for sharing your timelines and tips!

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

This is exactly the kind of confusion that trips up so many people! Based on everything you've described, it sounds like your employer is providing what's essentially a taxable health stipend but calling it an "HRA" - which is causing all the confusion. The fact that it's showing up in your regular paycheck and included in your W-2 taxable income is the dead giveaway. A legitimate HRA would be administered separately from payroll, require you to submit receipts for reimbursement, and wouldn't appear as taxable income on your W-2. Since you're remote and their regular plan doesn't work for your location, what they're doing makes sense from a practical standpoint - they're trying to help you out. But from a tax perspective, they've structured it as additional compensation rather than a qualified health benefit. I'd suggest having a conversation with HR to clarify whether they intended this to be a formal HRA (in which case they need to restructure it) or if they're comfortable with it being taxable supplemental pay to help with your healthcare costs. Either approach is fine, but the tax treatment should match the actual structure. Don't feel bad about being confused - the terminology around health benefits is genuinely confusing, and many employers use these terms loosely without understanding the specific legal requirements behind them.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

This is such a helpful breakdown, thank you! I really appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this. It's becoming clear that my employer is trying to do the right thing but just doesn't have the proper structure in place. I think my next step will be to approach HR with some of the specific points mentioned here - asking about formal plan documents, whether they've set up proper reimbursement procedures, etc. If they haven't, maybe I can suggest they look into setting up a legitimate HRA for next year, or at least be transparent that this is taxable supplemental income. It's actually reassuring to know that this isn't uncommon and that I'm not missing something obvious. The tax code around health benefits really is as confusing as it seemed!

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Great question and you're definitely not an idiot! This is one of the most misunderstood areas of employee benefits. What you're describing sounds like a taxable health stipend rather than a true HRA. The key red flags are: - Money comes through regular payroll - Shows up as taxable income on your W-2 - No requirement to submit receipts or documentation A compliant HRA requires your employer to establish a formal written plan document, have you submit qualified medical expense receipts, and reimburse you outside of payroll (with no W-2 inclusion). Many well-intentioned employers call their health stipends "HRAs" without realizing there are strict IRS requirements. Your employer is trying to help, but they've structured it as taxable compensation. I'd recommend asking HR for: 1. The formal HRA plan document 2. Claims submission procedures 3. Confirmation of how reimbursements are processed If they can't provide these, then you'll know it's actually taxable income (which is fine, just different from what they're calling it). You might want to suggest they either properly structure an HRA or simply call it what it is - a health insurance stipend to help with your remote work situation.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

This is really helpful! I think I need to have that conversation with HR soon. One quick follow-up - if they can't provide those documents you mentioned (the formal plan document, claims procedures, etc.), does that definitively mean I should just accept this as taxable income? Or is there any way to push back and say "hey, you called this an HRA so it should be tax-free"? I'm trying to figure out if I have any recourse here or if I just need to accept that it's structured as taxable compensation regardless of the label they use.

0 coins

Lena Kowalski

•

Does anyone know if there's a minimum business size where you don't have to worry about the inventory stuff? I heard somewhere that very small businesses can just use cash method and expense inventory when purchased...

0 coins

There actually is! The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expanded the small business exemption. If your average annual gross receipts for the past 3 years is under $26 million, you can use the cash method AND treat inventory as non-incidental materials and supplies, which means you can deduct when paid or incurred.

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

This is exactly the kind of inventory confusion that trips up so many small business owners! I went through the same thing when I first started my retail business. One thing that really helped me understand it was thinking about it this way: that $135,000 of ending inventory isn't an expense yet - it's still an asset sitting on your shelves that you'll sell next year. So you can't deduct it as a business expense this year because you haven't actually "used it up" to generate revenue yet. The COGS calculation essentially says "okay, you bought $675,000 worth of stuff, but $135,000 of it is still unsold, so you only actually 'consumed' $540,000 worth of inventory to generate this year's sales." I'd also recommend keeping really good records of your physical inventory counts at year-end. The IRS can get picky about this stuff during audits, and having solid documentation of what you actually had on hand makes everything much smoother. Good luck with tax season!

0 coins

This is such a helpful way to think about it! I'm new to running a business and the whole inventory thing has been stressing me out. The way you explained it as "stuff you haven't used up yet" really clicks for me. Quick question though - when you say keep good records of physical inventory counts, do you mean I need to literally count everything at the end of the year? That sounds like a nightmare for my business since I have hundreds of different products. Is there a simpler way to track this, or do I really need to do a full physical count? Also, @Oscar O'Neil, did you ever run into issues with the IRS questioning your inventory numbers? I'm paranoid about getting audited over this stuff since it seems like there's so much room for error.

0 coins

Could also be interest they paid you on your escrow account! My lender sent me a 1099 for $27.38 which was apparently the interest earned on my escrow funds. Totally forgot that was a thing, but if you live in a state that requires lenders to pay interest on escrow accounts, that might be it.

0 coins

This is a really good point. I'm in Connecticut and lenders are required to pay interest on escrow accounts here. Got a tiny 1099-INT for like $18 last year for this exact reason. Check if your state has this requirement!

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

I went through this exact same confusion last year! In my case, the 1099-MISC was for a lender credit I received at closing that reduced my closing costs by $800. I had completely forgotten about it until I dug through all my closing paperwork. The tricky part is that these lender incentives (whether they're cashback, closing cost credits, or promotional bonuses) are considered taxable income by the IRS, even though they feel like discounts to us as borrowers. Your 1098 form for mortgage interest is completely separate and unaffected by this. If you still can't figure out what the 1099-MISC amount corresponds to, I'd recommend checking your Closing Disclosure (CD) form from your purchase. Look for any credits, rebates, or incentives listed there. The amount on your 1099-MISC should match one of those items. Sometimes they break down larger credits into smaller components too, so don't be surprised if the math isn't immediately obvious. When you file your taxes, you'll report this as "Other Income" and yes, you'll owe taxes on it at your regular income tax rate. It's annoying to discover after the fact, but at least now you know for any future home purchases!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I'm a first-time homebuyer and had no idea that lender credits could be taxable income. I just closed on my house last month and received a $1200 lender credit to help with closing costs. Should I expect to get a 1099-MISC for that amount next year? I want to start preparing now so I'm not caught off guard like the original poster was. Also, do you know if there's a minimum threshold for when lenders have to issue these forms?

0 coins

Prev1...386387388389390...5643Next