


Ask the community...
I'm a tax accountant and honestly, the idea of a "complete deduction finder" app is the holy grail of tax software that everyone wants to build, but it's incredibly difficult because of how personalized deductions can be. For example - two people with identical incomes and jobs could have completely different deduction profiles based on: where they live, if they have kids, medical expenses, if they own rental properties, if they have student loans, if they donate to charity, if they're paying for education, etc. The best bet is to either use a top-tier tax software AND read the questions carefully, or just hire a tax professional who specializes in your situation (self-employed, investor, rental property owner, etc).
So what you're saying is it's basically impossible for an app to do this right? That's pretty depressing considering how advanced AI is getting these days. Shouldn't a good AI be able to parse the tax code?
It's not impossible, but it's a massive undertaking that would require substantial resources. Current AI systems are getting better at parsing complex documents like the tax code, but the challenge isn't just understanding the code - it's applying it correctly to individual circumstances. The real complexity comes from how the different parts of the tax code interact with each other. Some deductions phase out based on income levels, some can't be combined with others, some require specific documentation or timing. AI systems are making progress in this area, but we're not yet at the point where they can replace the judgment of a tax professional who understands all these nuances.
Has anyone tried the IRS's own Free File Fillable Forms? It's not exactly what OP is asking for but it's free and at least gives you access to all possible forms and schedules. I've been using it for years and while it doesn't prompt you for deductions, it does have all the official forms with their instructions.
Don't forget about quarterly estimated tax payments if you're getting 1099 income! This was a huge mistake I made my first year as a contractor. If you're setting aside money but not actually sending in quarterly payments, you might get hit with underpayment penalties. The IRS expects you to pay taxes throughout the year, not just at filing time. For your deduction question - definitely track mileage for any work-related driving, business insurance premiums, professional subscriptions, and even certain software you use for work. But don't go crazy buying things just for tax purposes. A $1000 deduction doesn't save you $1000 in taxes - it just reduces your taxable income by that amount.
How do you calculate what to pay quarterly? I've been getting 1099 income for 6 months now and haven't made any quarterly payments yet. Am I already in trouble?
You'll want to estimate your annual income, calculate the approximate tax (including self-employment tax), and divide by four for your quarterly payments. The IRS Form 1040-ES has worksheets to help with this. You can also use the IRS withholding estimator tool online, which helps figure out your estimated tax burden. Don't panic about the six months you've missed. The safe harbor rule means you generally won't face penalties if you pay 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your income is over a certain threshold) through timely quarterly payments. Since you're only recently receiving 1099 income, you might have flexibility for this first year. Just start making the payments going forward, and you might want to increase the remaining payments to cover some of what you missed. The most important thing is to start the quarterly payment habit now!
Hey! CPA here who works with lots of freelancers. Something nobody's mentioned yet - look into opening a SEP IRA or Solo 401(k)! As a 1099 contractor, you're considered self-employed, which means you can make much larger retirement contributions than normal employees. This is one of the BEST tax deductions because: 1) You're saving for retirement (which you should be doing anyway) 2) You get to deduct those contributions from your taxable income For example, with a Solo 401(k), you could potentially contribute up to $22,500 as an "employee" contribution, PLUS an additional "employer" contribution of up to 25% of your net self-employment income. This could dramatically reduce your taxable income while building your retirement savings.
This is really interesting! I hadn't even thought about retirement accounts as a way to reduce my tax burden. Do these accounts need to be set up before the end of the tax year to qualify for deductions? And is one better than the other for someone at my income level?
For SEP IRAs, you actually have until your tax filing deadline (including extensions) to both set up the account AND make contributions for the previous tax year. So you could potentially set one up in April 2026 and still make a deduction for the 2025 tax year! For Solo 401(k)s, you need to establish the plan by December 31st of the tax year, but you can still make "employer" contributions until your tax filing deadline. At your income level ($42k), a SEP IRA might be simpler to set up and maintain. The contribution limit would be about 20% of your net self-employment income after deducting self-employment tax. The Solo 401(k) has more paperwork but potentially allows higher contributions if you can afford them. If you're just starting with retirement savings, the SEP IRA is probably the way to go for simplicity. As your income grows, you might want to graduate to a Solo 401(k) for the higher contribution limits.
My wife is also retired clergy and we've used TurboTax to e-file with the clergy housing exclusion for the past 3 years. You can absolutely e-file and include the statement! In TurboTax, after entering the 1099-R information, there's a section where you can indicate the amount that's excludable from income. Then look for "Forms" or "Other tax situations" and find where you can add an explanation or documentation. You'll want to include all the details about code 107, the three-part test, etc. just like you've been doing. E-filing made a huge difference for us - refunds in weeks instead of months!
Thanks for this! I've been using H&R Block online but might switch to TurboTax if they handle this better. Do you know if you have to use a specific version? And does it specifically have clergy options or do you have to find a general "add explanation" function?
You'll need at least TurboTax Deluxe to handle this situation properly. There isn't a specific clergy module that I've found, but the "Form 1099-R Not Taxable" section works well when you indicate the amount is for housing allowance. For the explanation, I use the general "Miscellaneous Forms" section and select "Statement" where you can type in a detailed explanation. I basically copy the same statement I used to mail in, with the reference to Section 107, the three values compared (amount received, actual housing expenses, and fair rental value), and which one is lowest/being excluded.
I just wanted to add that I'm a tax preparer and we see clients with clergy housing allowances fairly regularly. The supporting statement is actually quite important - when we've e-filed without it, about half get flagged for review which delays refunds. One important note: make sure your documentation clearly distinguishes between active vs. retired clergy housing allowances, as they're treated differently. For retired clergy receiving pension distributions designated as housing allowance, specifically cite Revenue Ruling 75-22 along with Code Section 107.
Have you considered offering a payment plan as a service with a small fee? I'm a tax preparer too and I started charging a 10% convenience fee for split payments. Most clients either decide to pay in full or they accept the additional fee. It turns the conversation from "No, I don't accept split payments" to "Yes, I can offer that service for a small additional fee." Psychologically, it works better because you're not rejecting their request outright. I also make it clear that I don't file or release any completed returns until payment is received in full. That policy is stated on my intake forms that clients sign before I start work.
I like this approach - it flips the script from rejection to accommodation with conditions. That might work much better with my client base. Do you have clients sign anything specific for the split payment arrangement? And have you had any issues with people not paying the second portion?
I have a simple one-page addendum they sign that outlines the payment schedule and the consequences of non-payment (which include me not filing their return and potentially taking them to small claims court for unpaid services if necessary). I've only had one person not pay their second installment in three years of offering this. I called them, reminded them firmly but professionally about our agreement, and they paid within 48 hours. Having the signed document is key - it turns a verbal agreement into a legal contract they've committed to.
Maybe I'm old school, but I think you're overthinking this. Just say "I'm sorry, but I require payment in full at the time of service." End of story. You don't need to explain or justify your business policies. If a client doesn't like it, they can find another preparer. There are plenty of clients out there who will respect your boundaries and pay properly. I've been doing taxes for 15 years and have never had an issue with being direct about my payment requirements.
Exactly this. Why is everyone making this so complicated? It's YOUR business. YOU set the terms. If clients don't like it, they can go to H&R Block or do their taxes themselves on TurboTax. Stand your ground or people will walk all over you forever.
I appreciate the straightforward approach, but I'm also conscious about maintaining relationships with long-term clients during tough economic times. Some of these people have been with me for years, so I'm trying to find a balance between good business practices and accommodating loyal customers. That said, you're right that clear boundaries are important. I think I need to be more direct and confident when explaining my policies instead of feeling apologetic about it.
Everett Tutum
One recommendation based on my experience with a similar situation - when you submit your documentation for the duplicate income, create a VERY clear cover letter that explains exactly what happened. Use bold headings and maybe even highlight the key parts. I made the mistake of sending in a detailed explanation but it was all in paragraph form. The IRS agent later told me they get so many responses that they sometimes miss important details if they're buried in text. When I resubmitted with a clear "DUPLICATE INCOME REPORTING" heading and bullet points, it got resolved within weeks. Also, send everything certified mail with return receipt so you have proof they received it! That timestamp can be critical if they try to claim you missed a deadline.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
ā¢Thanks for this advice! I'm working on my response letter now and will definitely format it with clear headings. Did you also include a table or some kind of visual that showed the duplicate income side by side? I'm trying to make it as obvious as possible.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
ā¢Yes! A simple table was incredibly helpful. I created a three-column table: first column had the income source, second column showed where it appeared the first time (W-2 or 1099), and third column showed where it appeared the second time. I also included the exact dollar amounts and highlighted that they were identical. Another tip - make copies of EVERYTHING before you send it. I had to reference my submission during a follow-up call, and having copies of exactly what I sent made the conversation go much more smoothly. The IRS representative appreciated that I could tell them precisely what page to look at.
0 coins
Sunny Wang
I'm a retired IRS employee and want to add something important that others haven't mentioned. With a CP3219A notice, you need to know that the IRS is required to use a specific process to document your dispute resolution. Request that they document your case in the AUR (Automated Underreporter) system with a specific transaction code 599 with action code 3. This code indicates "taxpayer disagreement" and forces them to manually review your documentation rather than just processing it through automated systems. When you speak with an agent, use these exact terms and ask them to confirm they've entered this code. It creates a different workflow for your case that typically results in more thorough review.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
ā¢This is gold! Thank you for sharing this insider info. I'm dealing with a similar notice and would never have known to ask for this specific code. Does this work for regular CP2000 notices too or just the CP3219A?
0 coins