IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Anna Xian

•

You might also want to check your state's tax laws. Some states have lower reporting thresholds than the federal government. In my state, the threshold is only $600 for reporting marketplace sales, even though the federal threshold is much higher.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

I hadn't even thought about state taxes! Do you know if states typically use the same forms (Schedule D and 8949) for reporting this kind of income?

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Most states use forms that correspond to the federal forms, but they may have different names. Usually your state tax return will ask for information from your federal return, including your Schedule D amounts, and then make adjustments based on state-specific rules. For example, in my state (California), we use Schedule D for capital gains just like the federal return, but some states have their own forms with different names. The good news is that most tax software will automatically handle this for you once you input the information on the federal forms.

0 coins

I'm curious - did you sell the tickets at significantly higher prices than what you paid? Might be worth checking if your city or state has any anti-scalping laws. Some places have restrictions on how much above face value you can sell tickets for.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Anti-scalping laws vary widely by location and are rarely enforced for individual resellers. Most target large-scale operations. The tax obligation remains regardless of any potential scalping issues.

0 coins

Incorporated Independent Contractors vs. Staffing Agencies - Employee Classification Issues in 2025 [USA]

I run a small consulting business where I'm the only employee of my S-corp. Recently I've noticed something frustrating - I seem to be getting shut out of contract opportunities because companies are exclusively going through staffing agencies instead of hiring incorporated independent contractors like me directly. From what I understand, there shouldn't be much difference in terms of worker classification risks between hiring someone through a staffing agency versus hiring an incorporated independent contractor (C-corp or S-corp). In both cases, the company is contracting with a business entity, not an individual. But lately I've lost out on three potential contracts where the client initially seemed interested but then said, "Sorry, company policy - we only work through our approved staffing vendors now." When I tried explaining that my S-corp status essentially provides the same classification protection as going through a staffing agency, they didn't seem to understand. I'm wondering if there's just a knowledge gap here. Since there are way more independent contractors operating as sole proprietors and LLCs rather than incorporated entities, do companies just assume all independent contractors come with the same classification risks? Are they missing the distinction between incorporated vs. unincorporated contractors? Has anyone else faced this issue or found effective ways to overcome this hurdle when marketing your incorporated consulting business?

Jason Brewer

•

Something no one has mentioned yet is that this issue varies HUGELY by industry. I work in healthcare IT consulting and have found that hospitals and healthcare systems are extremely rigid about only using staffing agencies because of compliance requirements. Meanwhile, my friend who does similar work for retail companies has much better luck contracting directly through his S-corp. What industry are you in, OP? That might be a factor in how difficult this battle is going to be.

0 coins

Financial services is another super rigid industry. After Dodd-Frank, most banks won't touch independent contractors directly regardless of how they're incorporated. I had to either go W-2 or work through their approved staffing partners, no exceptions.

0 coins

I'm in software development, specifically backend systems. It's interesting you mention the industry differences - that makes a lot of sense. I've noticed that smaller tech companies are much more open to direct contracts with my S-corp, while enterprise-level organizations tend to be completely locked into their staffing agency relationships. I wonder if creating some kind of industry-specific approach might be more effective than a one-size-fits-all solution. The documentation from taxr.ai that someone mentioned above sounds promising, but perhaps tailoring it to address the specific compliance concerns in my industry would be even more effective.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

One thing I learned after 15 years as an incorporated contractor - this whole landscape changes every few years. Back in 2018-2020 companies were much more open to direct contracts with S-corps. Then AB5 happened in California, and similar legislation started popping up elsewhere, and suddenly everyone got super conservative. So just because it's difficult now doesn't mean it will stay that way. Companies tend to overreact initially and then gradually develop more nuanced policies. I suspect by 2026-2027 we'll see more companies creating specific carve-outs for incorporated contractors vs. sole proprietors.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

This is so true! I remember when the Microsoft permatemp lawsuit happened way back, and suddenly EVERYONE freaked out about contractors. Then things gradually relaxed until the next big case. It's like a pendulum swinging back and forth.

0 coins

Just wanted to share what my financial advisor told me about this situation - there's a specific IRS ruling (I think it was 2005-36) that deals with successor beneficiaries of inherited IRAs. If the original beneficiary was already taking RMDs based on the stretch provision (pre-2020), then any successor beneficiary continues that same schedule. The key thing to remember is that nothing "resets" - not the schedule, not the starting date, nothing. Your aunt basically just picks up where your uncle left off.

0 coins

Does this apply only to the second beneficiary or would it continue if there was a third beneficiary down the line? Like if the aunt also passes away and leaves it to her child?

0 coins

The same principle applies to any subsequent beneficiaries down the line. If your aunt passes away and names a third beneficiary, that person would continue with the same distribution schedule that was established when your uncle first inherited the IRA. This creates what's sometimes called a "cascading beneficiary" situation, where each new beneficiary must follow the original schedule. No one gets to reset the clock or use their own life expectancy. This is why proper planning for these pre-2020 inherited IRAs is so important - the distribution schedule follows the assets regardless of how many times they change hands.

0 coins

Make sure you get the original beneficiary paperwork from when your uncle first inherited the IRA! I went through something similar and the IRA custodian tried to tell me I had to take all the money within 5 years, which was totally wrong. But I couldn't prove the correct distribution schedule until I found the original paperwork showing when distributions started.

0 coins

This is really good advice. I work at a financial institution, and you wouldn't believe how often we have missing or incomplete beneficiary documentation, especially for accounts that have transferred between custodians multiple times.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation last month. Here's what I found: The EITC is calculated based on your EARNED income, not your AGI. Traditional IRA contributions reduce your AGI but not your earned income. The reason most calculators ask for AGI is because it's also used as part of the qualification process. Your AGI needs to be below the threshold to qualify, but the actual calculation is based on earned income. I thought the same thing and was trying to max my IRA to get more EITC, but it doesn't work that way. HOWEVER, depending on your income level, maxing your IRA might qualify you for the Saver's Credit, which is totally different but can be worth up to $1,000 if you contribute $2,000 to retirement accounts.

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

What's the income limit for the Saver's Credit? I'm trying to figure out if I qualify for that since the EITC won't be affected by my IRA contributions.

0 coins

For the 2024 tax year (filing in 2025), the Saver's Credit income limits are: - 50% credit: AGI up to $21,750 for single filers - 20% credit: AGI between $21,751-$23,750 for single filers - 10% credit: AGI between $23,751-$36,500 for single filers The credit is based on your first $2,000 of contributions to retirement accounts (IRA, 401k, etc.). So if you qualify for the 50% rate and contribute $2,000, you'd get a $1,000 tax credit. It's definitely worth looking into if you're already planning to make retirement contributions!

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

One thing nobody mentioned yet - does your state have a state EITC too? Many states have their own version that piggybacks on the federal one, and sometimes those calculations ARE affected by AGI. I'm in California and our CalEITC is calculated differently than the federal EITC. My tax preparer told me that in some cases, IRA contributions can affect state EITCs even if they don't change the federal amount.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

This is a really good point. I'm in Maryland and our state EITC is just a percentage of the federal one, so if the federal one doesn't change, neither does the state one. But I know some states calculate theirs differently.

0 coins

Something important to consider is that the EITC has different income phaseouts depending on your filing status and number of qualifying children. With two kids and head of household status, your 1099 income of around $65K might be near the upper phaseout range, meaning you might qualify for some EITC but not the maximum amount. For 2024 (filing in 2025), I believe the EITC completely phases out around $59,000-$63,000 for head of household with two children. Your $65K might put you just above that limit, but deductions from your consulting business could bring your income down to qualifying range. Things like home office, business supplies, professional development, and even part of your health insurance might be deductible.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

Thanks for this info! When you say deductions could bring my income down to the qualifying range, does that mean I should look at my net 1099 income after expenses? I definitely have business expenses like office supplies, software subscriptions, and professional insurance that lower my actual net from that $65K.

0 coins

Yes, it's your net self-employment income that counts toward EITC calculations after you've taken all eligible business deductions. So your Schedule C will show your 1099 gross income of $65K, but after legitimate business expenses, your net might be significantly lower. For example, if you had $15K in deductible business expenses, your net self-employment income would be $50K, which would put you well within the EITC phaseout range rather than above it. Make sure you're tracking all possible business deductions - mileage for business travel, portion of home internet if used for business, professional subscriptions, business insurance, retirement contributions, etc.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Don't forget that your K-1 might include DIFFERENT types of income and losses, not just investment income! Some K-1 income could actually be considered earned income if it's from a partnership where you materially participated. The tax code treats different boxes on the K-1 differently. For example, Box 1 (ordinary business income) from an S-corporation or partnership where you materially participate could count as earned income for EITC purposes. But passive investment income like interest, dividends, or capital gains on your K-1 wouldn't count as earned income, only toward the investment income limit.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

This is such an important point that people miss! My accountant caught this exact issue last year. Part of my K-1 was from active participation in a business (counted as earned income) and part was passive investment (counted toward investment income limit). Made a huge difference in my EITC calculation.

0 coins

Prev1...34063407340834093410...5643Next