


Ask the community...
Wait I'm confused... everyone's saying to repay the full amount including taxes, but isn't that basically paying taxes twice? Once when they originally withheld it and again when paying back money you never received?
You're not paying taxes twice because you get to claim the tax portion back on your tax return. You repay the gross amount to the employer, then the IRS essentially "refunds" the tax portion to you when you file your return and claim it properly. It feels like paying twice in the moment, but it all balances out when you complete your taxes. The system is set up this way because your employer already reported the full amount to the IRS, and they need their books to match what they reported.
This is such a stressful situation, but you're definitely not alone in dealing with this! I went through something similar when my previous employer discovered a payroll error from several months back. One thing that really helped me was creating a timeline of everything - when the overpayments occurred, when I was notified, when I made the repayment, etc. This documentation became crucial when I filed my taxes the following year. Also, don't feel bad about not catching this earlier while dealing with a family health crisis. That's completely understandable, and payroll errors happen more often than employers like to admit. The important thing is that you're handling it properly now. Just make sure to keep copies of everything - the school's demand letter, your repayment receipt, bank records showing the original deposits, etc. You'll need all of this when you file next year to prove your claim for getting that tax money back. The IRS wants to see a clear paper trail that shows you received money, paid taxes on it, then legitimately had to repay it.
This is a great breakdown of ESPP tax implications! I've been participating in my company's ESPP for about 6 months now and honestly had no idea about the difference between qualifying and disqualifying dispositions until reading this thread. I'm in a similar situation where our stock price has dropped about 15% since my offering date. Based on what everyone's explaining here, it sounds like there's really no point in me holding these shares for the full qualifying period since the tax benefit would be minimal and I'd be taking on unnecessary risk. One question though - when you calculate the "discount you received" for tax purposes, is that based on the actual percentage discount from the plan (like if it's a 15% discount plan) or is it the dollar amount difference between what you paid and the fair market value? My plan offers 15% off the lower of offering date or purchase date price, so I'm trying to figure out exactly how much would be taxable as ordinary income. Also wondering if anyone has experience with RSUs vs ESPP from a tax planning perspective? I have both and trying to figure out the best strategy for managing the tax impact when I eventually sell.
Great question about the discount calculation! For tax purposes, it's the actual dollar amount difference, not the percentage. So if your plan gives 15% off and you bought shares at $85 when the FMV was $100, your taxable discount is $15 per share, not necessarily 15% of the purchase price. Regarding RSUs vs ESPP - they're taxed very differently. RSUs are taxed as ordinary income when they vest (included in your W-2), then any gains/losses from there are capital gains when you sell. With ESPP, you get to control the timing of when the discount becomes taxable income by choosing when to sell. From a tax planning perspective, you might want to coordinate the timing. For example, if you have a big RSU vesting event pushing you into a higher bracket this year, it might make sense to delay ESPP sales until next year. Or conversely, if you're in a lower bracket year, it could be a good time for disqualifying dispositions. The tools others mentioned like taxr.ai could help you model different scenarios with both types of equity comp.
Your analysis is spot on! You're absolutely right that when stock price drops during the offering period, the tax advantages of qualifying dispositions become pretty minimal. I went through the exact same decision process with my ESPP shares last year. One thing that helped me decide was calculating the actual dollar amounts rather than just thinking about percentages. In your 24% bracket, if you're only saving 9% on capital gains treatment, you need to ask yourself: is that 9% savings worth the risk of the stock dropping further while you wait for qualifying disposition status? I ended up selling most of my shares from periods where the stock had declined, but kept a small portion from one purchase where there was a meaningful tax benefit to holding. The key is running the numbers for your specific situation rather than following a one-size-fits-all approach. Also worth noting - make sure you understand your company's specific ESPP terms. Some plans have a "lookback" feature that can affect the tax calculations, and the discount percentage might vary. Your plan documents should spell out exactly how the purchase price is determined, which will help you calculate the exact ordinary income portion for each lot of shares.
This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was looking for! Running the actual dollar amounts makes so much more sense than just looking at percentages. One follow-up question - when you mention the "lookback" feature, how does that typically work? I think my plan might have something like that but I haven't dug into the details. Does it change which price they use as the baseline for calculating the discount? Also, did you end up using any specific method to track which lots came from which purchase periods? With quarterly purchases, I'm worried I'll lose track of the tax implications for each batch of shares, especially if I do partial sales like you mentioned.
My father-in-law fell for this exact scam last year with his "accountant" and lost over $24,000 from his business account. The person seemed totally legitimate - office, website, everything. After getting his login info, they slowly transferred money out over several months while sending him fake bank statements showing the correct balances. By the time he discovered it during tax season, the bank refused to cover the losses because he had willingly shared his credentials, which violated their terms of service. Please tell your brother to run away from this accountant and find someone legitimate who uses proper accounting software and secure document sharing. This isn't just unusual - it's a common scam targeting small business owners.
That's terrifying! Did they ever catch the person? Did your father-in-law report them to the IRS or state board of accountancy? I'd be interested to know what happened afterward.
This is absolutely a red flag and your instincts are correct! As someone who works in financial fraud prevention, I can tell you that legitimate accountants NEVER need full login credentials to bank accounts. There are multiple secure alternatives like QuickBooks bank feeds, Xero connections, or simply providing monthly statements. The refusal to provide her SSN for read-only access is particularly suspicious - any legitimate tax professional is required to have a PTIN (Preparer Tax Identification Number) and routinely provides identification to financial institutions. This is standard practice, not something to avoid. Your brother should immediately: 1) Find a new CPA or EA with proper credentials, 2) Change all his banking passwords if he's shared them, 3) Monitor his accounts closely for any unauthorized activity, and 4) Consider reporting this person to your state's board of accountancy. Small business owners are frequent targets for this type of scam because they often feel overwhelmed by tax requirements and trust too easily. Don't let him brush this off as "normal practice" - protecting his business finances is worth more than the inconvenience of finding a new accountant.
Just wanted to add my experience - I was in a very similar situation with a CP21B after my divorce. The $60k amount you mentioned is substantial, so I'd strongly recommend getting everything in writing before splitting it. Even though your divorce decree specifies 50/50, I'd suggest both of you sign a simple agreement acknowledging the refund amount, the split, and who received the original check. This protects both parties if questions arise later, especially with an amount this large. Also, keep copies of the CP21B notice, your divorce decree section about tax refunds, and any bank records showing the transfer. The IRS might ask questions years later about large deposits, and having clear documentation makes everything much easier to explain. One more tip - if the check comes made out to both names with "AND" between them (not "OR"), you'll definitely need both signatures. Some banks are strict about this even for divorced couples.
I went through something very similar last year with a CP21B notice for about $45k after my divorce was finalized. A few things I learned that might help: First, the timing of when you separated matters more than you might think. Even though your divorce was finalized in 2020, if you separated earlier in 2019, that could affect how the refund should be split according to your decree. Some courts consider the separation date, not the divorce date, for financial matters. Second, make sure you understand what triggered the CP21B. In my case, it was missed business deductions from my ex's side business that we had forgotten to claim. This changed our negotiation since those deductions were directly related to her income, not our joint expenses. Third, consider opening a temporary joint account just for this transaction if the check comes in both names. It's cleaner than trying to get dual signatures at the bank, and you can close it immediately after splitting the funds. The person at work who mentioned taxation was definitely wrong - this is your money being returned to you, not new income. But definitely keep detailed records since $60k will likely trigger some banking reporting requirements. Good luck with the split - having it spelled out clearly in your decree should make this relatively straightforward!
This is really helpful advice, especially about the separation vs divorce date distinction! I hadn't thought about that aspect. We actually separated in late 2019 but didn't finalize until 2020, so I should probably review our decree language more carefully to see if that matters for this refund. The temporary joint account idea is brilliant - much simpler than trying to coordinate bank visits for dual signatures. Did you have any issues opening an account specifically for this purpose, or were banks pretty understanding about the situation? Also, you mentioned banking reporting requirements for the $60k - should I expect any 1099s or other tax forms to be generated from this, even though it's not taxable income?
Oscar Murphy
Pro tip: set up alerts on your banking app instead of manually checking. Your neck will thank you later š
0 coins
William Rivera
ā¢good idea fr thank u
0 coins
Clay blendedgen
Been there! The waiting game is brutal but totally normal. TurboTax advance usually hits within 1-2 business days after your return gets accepted. Since yours was accepted 1/22, you're probably looking at Thursday or Friday at the latest. I know it feels like forever when you need the money, but try to distract yourself - obsessively checking won't make it come faster! š
0 coins