


Ask the community...
I went through this exact scenario with two different clients in the past year, so I completely understand your stress! Here's what I learned from those experiences: First, the rejection of your e-filed extension is actually normal when there's a disconnect between your filed return and the IRS's system records. This doesn't necessarily mean your S election was denied - it's more likely that their systems just haven't synced up yet. For immediate protection, definitely mail Form 7004 via certified mail and mark it as an S corporation extension. Include a brief cover letter explaining that you have a pending S election under review. This creates documentation of your good faith effort to comply. Regarding your short tax year dates (9/1/22-12/31/22), those were absolutely correct if that's when business operations actually began. Don't second-guess yourself on this - the IRS expects the first tax year to reflect actual business activity dates. One thing I'd recommend is getting a Power of Attorney (Form 2848) on file if you don't already have one. This will make it much easier when you call the IRS to check on the election status, as they can speak directly with you about your client's account. The good news is that even if there are delays, you can usually get retroactive relief if you can demonstrate reasonable cause for the late filing. Keep detailed records of all your submission attempts and communications with the IRS.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm definitely feeling less panicked after reading everyone's responses. One quick question - when you mention getting a Power of Attorney on file, do I need to wait for the S election to be resolved first, or can I submit Form 2848 even while the entity status is uncertain? I want to make sure I don't create any additional complications while things are already in limbo. Also, has anyone had experience with how long these system sync issues typically take to resolve? I'm trying to manage my client's expectations about when we might be able to e-file normally again.
You can absolutely submit Form 2848 while the S election is pending - in fact, it's better to get it filed sooner rather than later. The Power of Attorney form doesn't depend on entity classification, it just authorizes you to speak on behalf of the taxpayer using their EIN. This will save you significant time when calling to check on the election status. Regarding system sync timelines, in my experience it can vary wildly. I've seen it resolve in as little as 2-3 weeks after the election is actually approved, but I've also had cases where it took 2-3 months. The IRS has been dealing with significant processing backlogs, so patience is unfortunately required. One tip: once you do get through to someone and confirm the election status, ask them specifically about when the e-filing system might be updated. Sometimes they can provide a more specific timeline or even expedite the sync if there's a compelling reason (like upcoming deadlines). Keep your client informed that this is a common issue and not indicative of any problems with their business or tax situation - it's purely an administrative processing delay.
I've been through this exact situation multiple times with clients, and I want to reassure you that this is more common than you think, especially with the IRS processing delays we've seen lately. Here's my step-by-step recommendation based on what's worked for my clients: 1. **Immediate action**: Mail Form 7004 via certified mail TODAY if you haven't already. Check the S-corp box and include a brief statement that the S election is pending IRS processing. This protects your client from penalties. 2. **Verify election status**: Call the Business & Specialty Tax Line at 800-829-4933 first thing in the morning. Navigate to the Form 2553 department specifically. Have your client's EIN, business name, and the date you submitted the election ready. 3. **Don't panic about the dates**: Your 9/1/22-12/31/22 short year was absolutely correct since that's when operations began. This won't cause approval issues. 4. **System disconnect is normal**: The e-filing rejection usually means their systems haven't synced, not that your election was denied. I've had clients where the election was approved weeks before the e-filing system recognized it. The key is getting confirmation of your election status first, then you'll know exactly how to proceed. Most of these situations resolve favorably - it's just the waiting and uncertainty that's stressful. Keep detailed records of all your calls and submissions for your files. You've got this! Let us know what you find out when you call.
This is exactly the kind of clear, actionable advice I needed to see! I'm dealing with my first late S election situation and was honestly feeling overwhelmed by all the conflicting information I've been finding online. Your step-by-step approach makes this feel much more manageable. I especially appreciate the tip about calling first thing in the morning and having all the documentation ready before calling. I've been dreading that phone call but knowing exactly what to ask for and what information to have prepared gives me confidence. One follow-up question - if the IRS confirms the election is still processing (not approved yet), should I still file the paper extension as an S-corp, or would it be safer to file under the previous entity classification until I get definitive approval? Thanks for the reassurance that this is common. Sometimes it's easy to feel like you're the only one dealing with these issues!
This is such a valuable resource! I'm getting married in September and have been struggling to understand how our taxes will be affected. My partner and I are both in marketing - I make $85k and they make $95k, so we're in that middle-income range where it's hard to predict the impact. What really caught my attention in this thread is how many different factors can influence the calculation beyond just salary. We both have some freelance income on the side (probably $8-10k each annually) and I'm wondering how that irregular 1099 income might complicate things compared to just W-2 wages. The timing discussion has been eye-opening too - I never realized that getting married in December vs January could make such a difference. We were leaning toward a December wedding for family reasons, but now I'm wondering if we should crunch the numbers first. Brady, your simulator sounds exactly like what we need. The visual graphs would be so helpful for explaining the impact to my partner, who isn't as comfortable with tax concepts. Really hoping you make it publicly available soon - would love to run our specific scenario through it before we finalize our wedding date! Thanks for starting this discussion and for all the detailed responses from everyone. This community is incredibly helpful for navigating these complex financial decisions.
Welcome to the community! Your situation with the freelance income adds another interesting layer to consider. That $8-10k each in 1099 income means you're both dealing with self-employment taxes on top of regular income taxes, which can definitely complicate the marriage penalty calculations. The irregular nature of freelance income also means your effective tax rate might vary quite a bit year to year, making it harder to predict the marriage impact. If you can control the timing of when you invoice clients or complete projects, that might give you some flexibility to optimize around your wedding date. At your combined income level ($85k + $95k + freelance), you're probably looking at a relatively small penalty or might even break even, but the December vs January timing could definitely matter. The freelance income timing might be especially important since you have some control over when you recognize that income. For the 1099 work, also consider whether marriage will affect your ability to deduct home office expenses, business equipment, or other freelance-related deductions. Sometimes the filing status change can impact these smaller deductions in unexpected ways. Really hoping @Brady Clean s'simulator includes 1099/self-employment scenarios - that would make it incredibly valuable for the growing number of people with side hustles or mixed income sources. The visual component would definitely help explain these complex interactions to partners who aren t'as tax-focused!
This is exactly what I needed to see! My partner and I are both attorneys making around $175k each, and we've been dreading the marriage penalty calculations. Reading through everyone's real-world examples has been incredibly helpful - especially seeing the actual dollar amounts people are facing. What's particularly interesting to me is how many specialized situations aren't covered by standard calculators. We both have partnership track positions that include profit-sharing bonuses that can vary wildly year to year (anywhere from $15k to $50k each), plus we're both paying back significant law school loans. The student loan interest deduction phase-out that several people mentioned is going to hit us hard - we're definitely going to lose most of that $5,000 combined benefit once we're married. Combined with what sounds like a substantial penalty on our base salaries, I'm starting to think we might need to seriously consider the December vs January wedding timing strategy. Brady, I'd love to beta test your simulator if you're still looking for users with complex scenarios. Our situation with variable partnership bonuses and professional school debt might help identify some edge cases. The legal profession has some unique compensation structures that would be great to stress-test against. Thanks for creating this tool and starting such an informative discussion. This thread alone has probably saved me hours of research and given me a much better framework for planning our wedding timeline!
Welcome to the community! Your situation as attorneys with variable partnership bonuses is really fascinating and definitely adds complexity that most standard calculators won't handle well. The profit-sharing variability ($15k-50k each) could create huge swings in your marriage penalty from year to year, which makes planning incredibly difficult. The combination of high base salaries plus unpredictable bonuses is particularly tricky because you might not know until late in the year whether you'll be in "moderate penalty" or "severe penalty" territory. This is where having a sophisticated simulator that can model different bonus scenarios would be invaluable. Your point about the student loan interest deduction is spot-on - at $350k+ combined base income, you're definitely going to lose that benefit entirely once married. That's potentially a $1,250 tax increase just from losing the deduction, on top of whatever marriage penalty you face on the income side. For law firm partnerships specifically, you might want to look into whether you have any control over when bonuses are paid out or recognized. Some firms have flexibility around December vs January bonus timing, which could be crucial for your wedding date decision. The December vs January timing strategy could be especially valuable in your case given the income levels involved. Even a few months difference in filing status could save thousands given your combined earning power. Really hoping @Brady Clean s'tool can handle these kinds of variable compensation scenarios - would be incredibly useful for professionals in law, consulting, finance, and other fields with unpredictable bonus structures!
Just to add another perspective - I work as a tax preparer and deal with signature issues all the time. The IRS has actually gotten much more flexible about electronic signatures since COVID, especially for individual returns (Form 1040). What matters most is that it's YOUR authentic signature, regardless of how it's created. A stylus signature on your Surface that gets printed is generally acceptable for most personal tax forms. The key is making sure the signature looks consistent with other documents you've signed. That said, if you're really worried about it, here's a middle-ground solution: sign a blank piece of paper with a pen, scan or photo it with your phone, then digitally paste that signature onto your tax forms before printing. This gives you a "wet signature" appearance while avoiding the transport issues. But honestly, for a standard 1040 return, your stylus signature should be fine. The IRS processes millions of returns and they're more concerned with tax compliance than signature methodology. Just make sure it's clearly your name and looks like an actual signature attempt, not just typed text.
Thanks for the professional insight! The blank paper scan method is really clever - gives you the best of both worlds. I'm curious though, have you seen any returns get rejected specifically because of electronic signatures, or is it more of a theoretical concern? Also, does the same flexibility apply to state returns or is that a whole different set of rules?
In my experience, I've never seen a federal return rejected solely for electronic signature issues on Form 1040s. The IRS's systems are primarily checking for mathematical errors, missing forms, and compliance issues. As long as there's a clear signature attempt in the signature box, you're usually fine. State returns are indeed a different beast though - each state has its own rules. Some states like California are very flexible with electronic signatures, while others like New York can be pickier. If you're filing state returns, I'd recommend checking that specific state's tax website for their signature requirements, or calling their helpline. The blank paper scan method I mentioned has worked great for clients who want that extra peace of mind. Just make sure when you paste the signature image that it's sized appropriately and positioned clearly in the signature box. And keep a copy of that signed blank paper for your records - some people like having a "master signature" file for future use.
As someone who's dealt with this exact situation, I'd say go with the stylus signature! I've been using my iPad to sign tax documents for the past two years without any issues. The IRS really has become much more flexible about electronic signatures, especially since so many people are doing everything digitally now. Your Surface stylus signature will be totally fine for a standard 1040 return. Just make sure it actually looks like your signature and not just scribbles. The IRS cares way more about whether you're reporting your income correctly than how you physically signed the paper. That said, definitely look into the Free File program for next year like others mentioned - no point paying TurboTax's fees if you don't have to! But for this year, sign it digitally, print it out, and mail it in. You'll save yourself the Uber money and the headache.
This is really reassuring to hear from someone who's actually done it! I was getting worried about potential issues down the road, but it sounds like the IRS has adapted to how people actually handle documents these days. Did you ever get any follow-up questions from the IRS about your electronically signed returns, or did they just process them normally? Also, do you do anything special to make sure your iPad signature looks consistent each time, or do you just sign naturally?
I've been using FreeTaxUSA for 3 years and never had this problem until this year. I think they're just overwhelmed with new users. If you keep getting errors, try this workaround that worked for me: 1. Clear browser cache/cookies 2. Use incognito/private browsing mode 3. Try the direct login URL: https://www.freetaxusa.com/login.jsp instead of going through the homepage The third step was what finally worked for me when nothing else did. Good luck!
I've been dealing with the same FreeTaxUSA login issues for the past week! What's frustrating is that I already started my return there and now I can't get back in to finish it. For anyone still struggling, I found that using a VPN sometimes helps - I think their servers might be geographically overloaded in certain regions. I switched my VPN to a different state and was able to get in during peak hours when it normally would have failed. Also, if you're like me and already have a partially completed return stuck in there, don't panic - your data is saved and you won't lose your progress once you can log back in. I called their support line (surprisingly short wait time compared to the IRS!) and they confirmed this. The direct login URL that Diego mentioned actually worked for me too, but only in combination with clearing cookies first. It's definitely worth trying all these suggestions before giving up and switching to a different service entirely.
The VPN trick is genius! I never would have thought of that. I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get back into my partially completed return. Going to try switching to a different region tonight and see if that helps. Did you use a free VPN or do you have a paid subscription? Just want to make sure I'm not making things worse by using some sketchy free service.
Keisha Robinson
I went through this exact same situation with my mother's IRA last year and completely understand your frustration! The key issue is that tax software often treats "inherited IRA" as if you're maintaining an inherited IRA account, but you actually took a full cash distribution. Here's what worked for me in TurboTax: Answer "Yes" to inheriting the IRA, but when it asks about the type of distribution, specifically look for an option like "I took a complete/total distribution" or "lump sum distribution." This should bypass the basis questions that are causing the software to calculate incorrectly. The reason you're seeing that massive refund is because the software is likely applying inheritance rules meant for people who are stretching distributions over time or who inherited Roth IRAs where distributions might be tax-free. Since your brother-in-law likely had a traditional IRA with pre-tax contributions (most common), the entire distribution should be taxable income. Make sure the distribution code in Box 7 of your 1099-R is correct - it should indicate death/inheritance (usually code 4). If everything is entered properly, you should pay ordinary income tax on the full amount with no early withdrawal penalty. Don't feel bad about being confused - this is one of the most poorly designed parts of tax software!
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
β’This is exactly the guidance I needed! Thank you so much for breaking this down step by step. I've been going in circles with the software for days. I'll look for that "complete distribution" option in TurboTax - I think I may have missed it because I was getting overwhelmed by all the questions about basis and Form 8606. Just to confirm I understand correctly: since we took the entire IRA as cash rather than rolling it into an inherited account, we should pay regular income tax on the full amount (which we're completely fine with), but there shouldn't be any 10% early withdrawal penalty even though my husband is under 59.5, right? The 1099-R does have code 4 in Box 7, so it sounds like we're on the right track. I really appreciate everyone's help on this thread - inheritance situations are stressful enough without having to become a tax expert overnight!
0 coins
Reina Salazar
You're absolutely correct on both points! Since you took the entire IRA as a lump sum cash distribution (rather than rolling it over), you'll pay ordinary income tax on the full amount, but there should be NO 10% early withdrawal penalty regardless of your husband's age. The fact that your 1099-R shows code 4 in Box 7 confirms this is properly coded as a death distribution, which exempts it from the early withdrawal penalty. When you find that "complete distribution" or "lump sum distribution" option in TurboTax, it should clear up all the confusion and stop the software from trying to apply Form 8606 or giving you that incorrect refund calculation. The software gets tripped up because it's trying to apply rules for people who are keeping the inherited IRA open and taking distributions over time, but that's not your situation. One tip: if you're still having trouble finding the right option, try looking for language like "I liquidated the entire inherited IRA" or "I closed the inherited IRA account" - different versions of tax software phrase this differently, but they all have some way to indicate you took everything out at once. You're handling this exactly right by wanting to pay the appropriate taxes on what is essentially new income. Once you get past this software glitch, your return should calculate normally with the inherited IRA amount added to your other income for the year.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
β’This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I inherited my grandfather's 401k and rolled it into an IRA, then took a full distribution. The tax software kept asking about basis and I had no idea what my grandfather's contribution history looked like. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like I should look for that "complete distribution" option too. One quick question - does it matter that mine went from 401k to IRA first before the distribution? Or should the tax treatment be the same as long as I took everything out as cash? The 1099-R I received also has code 4, so I'm hoping it follows the same rules about no early withdrawal penalty.
0 coins